Re: Training

[Mike Tomlinson]

En el artículo <kjoqbk$lpd$1...@dont-email.me>, gareth
<no....@thank.you.invalid> escribió:

>Mike "Potty Mouth" Tomlinson, perhaps?

Yawn.

The malicious email you sent to my employer falsely insinuating that I
am a paedophile is with Wiltshire Police, Evans. You'd do well to
remember what happened the last time you tried to pull this stunt.

Shall I remind you?

http://tinyurl.com/cqdfxlw

http://tinyurl.com/c5zwwmu

Love'n'kisses

Mike

--
(\_/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")

[Mike Tomlinson]

En el artículo <z2wfZ7ML...@jasper.org.uk>, Mike Tomlinson
<mi...@jasper.org.uk> escribió:

By the way Gareth, thank you for proving my point and so ably
demonstrating why we need the moderated group to protect people from the
likes of you.

M.

[gareth]

"Mike Tomlinson" <mi...@jasper.org.uk> wrote in message
news:z2wfZ7ML...@jasper.org.uk...

> En el artículo <kjoqbk$lpd$1...@dont-email.me>, gareth
> <no....@thank.you.invalid> escribió:
>
>>Mike "Potty Mouth" Tomlinson, perhaps?
>
> Yawn.
>
> The malicious email you sent to my employer falsely insinuating that I
> am a paedophile is with Wiltshire Police, Evans. You'd do well to
> remember what happened the last time you tried to pull this stunt.

I have no idea what you are talking about.

[gareth]

"Mike Tomlinson" <mi...@jasper.org.uk> wrote in message
news:z2wfZ7ML...@jasper.org.uk...

> En el artículo <kjoqbk$lpd$1...@dont-email.me>, gareth
> <no....@thank.you.invalid> escribió:
>>Mike "Potty Mouth" Tomlinson, perhaps?
> Yawn.
> The malicious email you sent to my employer falsely insinuating that I
> am a paedophile is with Wiltshire Police, Evans. You'd do well to
> remember what happened the last time you tried to pull this stunt.

No idea what that is about.

If it is something recent, then I suggest that you investigate those with a
history
of stalking me, M3OSN, G4KFK, G3VKI and G7KUJ.

Most probably G7KUJ or G3VKI who sent an undertaker round to pick up
my body, or who cancelled my licence.

Speaking out against the gangrenous degeneration of amatuer radio over the
years has certainly attracted a lot of unpleasantness, seemingly now from
you.

(Why is this crossposted?)

[gareth]

"Mike Tomlinson" <mi...@jasper.org.uk> wrote in message
news:z2wfZ7ML...@jasper.org.uk...

> http://tinyurl.com/cqdfxlw

An appeal on that matter is an advanced stage of preparation so I shall not
comment
on it.

> http://tinyurl.com/c5zwwmu

That arrest was a malicious action by Brian Reay M3OSN. Over an 18 month
period
he published 24 articles that were racially offensive and irrelevant to
amateur radio.

When he originated a grossly offensive article to intimate that my wife was
a sheep in
the bed next to me, I pressed him for an apology.

He complained that my pressing him for an apology was harassment and ran
sobbing and
screaming to seek that his fellow w*nkmasons in the ploddery should dry his
tears for him,
who immediately dropped the matter as soon as the litany of Reays
provocative and
offensive remarks were presented to them.

However, Reays inability to take in what he gives out set in motion a
sequence of
events that lead to the suicide of a Wiltshire plod, Richard Fuller W177.

Brian Reay's modus operandi, which continues to this day, is to goad people
as
part of a sick psyche seeking attention and then to run to the ploddery when
he
gets his result.

That reason alone is sufficient to confine him to a KF lest you get caught
up
in his web of mental derangement.

There are at least 4 recorded cases of Reay deliberately and maliciously
stirring
people up in uk.radio.amateur and then running sobbing and screaming to seek
that
the ploddery should dry his eyes for him.

[Mike Tomlinson]

En el artículo <kjpf25$kj0$1...@dont-email.me>, gareth
<no....@thank.you.invalid> escribió:

> No idea what that is about.

Yeah, sure, whatever.

I have the email with headers, as does my employer, as does Wiltshire
Police.

Neither is it the first time you have sent a malicious communication to
the employer of someone you have disagreed with. There are at least two
other verifiable instances that I know of.

May I remind you that following your conviction for sending same, you're
still operating within the terms of your 3 year conditional discharge,
and that a further conviction is likely to result in a custodial
sentence?

[gareth]

"Mike Tomlinson" <mi...@jasper.org.uk> wrote in message

news:kiGa8WAS...@jasper.org.uk...

> En el artículo <kjpf25$kj0$1...@dont-email.me>, gareth
> <no....@thank.you.invalid> escribió:
>> No idea what that is about.
> Yeah, sure, whatever.
> I have the email with headers, as does my employer, as does Wiltshire
> Police.

The "We'll Shite (All Over you) Conplodulary? I have commented
in the past, as I do now, that more social benefit would accrue to the
populace of Wittshire if all the plod pods were to be demolished to
make way for car parks.

> Neither is it the first time you have sent a malicious communication to
> the employer of someone you have disagreed with.

I have never done such a thing. I regularly and civilly disagree with
people. However, what I do not tolerate is people like you who originate
rude remarks.

Shame on you.

> There are at least two
> other verifiable instances that I know of.

Bollocks.

>
> May I remind you that following your conviction for sending same, you're
> still operating within the terms of your 3 year conditional discharge,
> and that a further conviction is likely to result in a custodial
> sentence?
>

An appeal is being prepared so I shall not comment on that.

However, I suggest that you stop harassing me lest you find yourself on the
wrong
side of the law.

Again, I have no idea what you are talking about. I do not know
who is your employer, and I have never sent a malicious
communication to any employer.

What I have done, is where I have a genuine grievance against
a public body because the computers of that public body are being
used to heap offensive remarks in my direction is to complain
to that public body under the Computer Misuse Act.

If you say that I have contacted your employer, and I have no
idea to what you refer, then what was your behaviour leading up
to that alleged communication?

Physician heal thyself

[gareth]

"gareth" <no....@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message
news:kjpj6i$i8t$1...@dont-email.me...

> "Mike Tomlinson" <mi...@jasper.org.uk> wrote in message
> news:kiGa8WAS...@jasper.org.uk...
>> En el artículo <kjpf25$kj0$1...@dont-email.me>, gareth
>> <no....@thank.you.invalid> escribió:
>>> No idea what that is about.
>> Yeah, sure, whatever.
>> I have the email with headers, as does my employer, as does Wiltshire
>> Police.
>
> The "We'll Shite (All Over you) Conplodulary? I have commented
> in the past, as I do now, that more social benefit would accrue to the
> populace of Wittshire if all the plod pods were to be demolished to
> make way for car parks.
>

I challenge you to publish that email complete with headers, now, in this NG
so that all may see what a blustering bully you are in truth.

[Mike Tomlinson]

En el artículo <kjpj6i$i8t$1...@dont-email.me>, gareth
<no....@thank.you.invalid> escribió:

>Again, I have no idea what you are talking about. I do not know
>who is your employer

Tsk. Grammar, Gareth. 'who your employer is'

You're a really bad liar, Gareth. Your assertion is provably false:

Message-ID: <igkiha$bqi$1...@news.eternal-september.org>

>What I have done, is where I have a genuine grievance against
>a public body because the computers of that public body are being
>used

Liar. I did not use my employer's computing facilities to make the
posting you complain of, as you know perfectly well. I made that
posting using my own personal ID of 'mi...@jasper.org.uk', using my home
PC, on my home broadband connection, in my own time. My employer was
not involved in any way, shape or form. You had no valid reason to
involve them.

You took it upon yourself to dig up dirt on me, discover who my employer
was, and attempted to cause me trouble by making a complaint to them.
Fortunately, your email was seen for what it was - a malicious
communication designed to harass me and cause me alarm and distress -
and this is also understood and has been logged by Wiltshire Police.

You have a history of making malicious complaints to the employers of
people to whom you have taken a dislike, Gareth, as is proven by your
conviction for same.

Go to bed and sleep the booze off, eh?

[Mike Tomlinson]

En el artículo <kjpje6$k84$1...@dont-email.me>, gareth
<no....@thank.you.invalid> escribió:

>I challenge you to publish that email complete with headers, now, in this NG
>so that all may see what a blustering bully you are in truth.

Rattled now, eh?

Don't worry, I have it, the full headers, and I also have the logs from
the mail server showing the IP address you used to send it which tallies
with the IP address you were using to post to usenet at the time.

Have a nice day.

[gareth]

"Mike Tomlinson" <mi...@jasper.org.uk> wrote in message

news:HT5CAFBt...@jasper.org.uk...

I am not at all rattled.

I am confident that you are a rude, unpleasant person who blusters his
way along, and in response to a challenge, you bluster even more.

[Lordgnome]

On 06/04/2013 16:45, gareth wrote:

Blah, blah....

Damn - I suppose I now need to set up a kill file for even THIS group.
What the hell has any of this tripe got to do with the pros & cons of
another news group?

Les.

[Spike]

On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 18:27:31 +0100, Lordgnome wrote:

> Damn - I suppose I now need to set up a kill file for even THIS group.
> What the hell has any of this tripe got to do with the pros & cons of
> another news group?
>
> Les.

Perhaps it needs moderating. RFD, anyone?

--
Spike

[gareth]

"Mike Tomlinson" <mi...@jasper.org.uk> wrote in message

news:bTzFgvAF...@jasper.org.uk...

> En el artículo <kjpj6i$i8t$1...@dont-email.me>, gareth
> <no....@thank.you.invalid> escribió:
>>Again, I have no idea what you are talking about. I do not know
>>who is your employer
>
> Tsk. Grammar, Gareth. 'who your employer is'

You really are a rude and unpleasant person

>
> You're a really bad liar, Gareth. Your assertion is provably false:

Yeah, right.

You are a rude and unpleasnt person who runs away when challenged.

> Message-ID: <igkiha$bqi$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
>
>>What I have done, is where I have a genuine grievance against
>>a public body because the computers of that public body are being
>>used
>
> Liar.

You really are a rude and unpleasant person.

> I did not use my employer's computing facilities to make the
> posting you complain of,

What posting was that? Care to give us the message header?

> as you know perfectly well.

I really have no idea. Post your evidence else be seen just to be
a rude unpleasant blusterer.

> I made that
> posting using my own personal ID of 'mi...@jasper.org.uk', using my home
> PC, on my home broadband connection, in my own time. My employer was
> not involved in any way, shape or form. You had no valid reason to
> involve them.
> You took it upon yourself to dig up dirt on me, discover who my employer
> was, and attempted to cause me trouble by making a complaint to them.

Your claim falls flat. If you posted from such an email address, how was it
possible to deduce who is your employer?

> Fortunately, your email was seen for what it was - a malicious
> communication designed to harass me and cause me alarm and distress -
> and this is also understood and has been logged by Wiltshire Police.

I have no idea what you are talking about, but if you reproduce the
posting that you say triggered the alleged behaviour, would it itself prove
to be "a malicious

communication designed to harass me and cause me alarm and distress"

You go remarkably silent and increasingly rude when you are challenged.

Shame on you.

Perhaps a moderated group might be needed to protect people from the
likes of you?

>
> You have a history of making malicious complaints to the employers of
> people to whom you have taken a dislike,

No true at all.

>Gareth, as is proven by your
> conviction for same.

An appeal is under preparation so I won't comment on that particular
infantile
remark.

>
> Go to bed and sleep the booze off, eh?

But I will comment upon THAT infantile remark. I have always been open
about being a member of AA, and have just celebrated my 26th birthday
in that organisation, a fact with which you are well aware in consideration
of your obvious stlaking of me.

You continue to be a really rude and unpleasant person.

[gareth]

"gareth" <no....@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message

news:kjpm9k$9ms$1...@dont-email.me...

> "Mike Tomlinson" <mi...@jasper.org.uk> wrote in message

>> I did not use my employer's computing facilities to make the
>> posting you complain of,
>
> What posting was that? Care to give us the message header?

Is there a double standard there? Mr.Tomlinson thinks it to be OK
to use the Internet to originate abusive material that is readable
by 3rd parties, but objects when an alleged right-of-reply response is also
made via the Internet that is also readable by 3rd parties?

[Mike Tomlinson]

En el artículo <2WY7t.268944$eU7....@fx24.fr7>, Lordgnome
<l...@nospam.null> escribió:

>Damn - I suppose I now need to set up a kill file for even THIS group.
>What the hell has any of this tripe got to do with the pros & cons of
>another news group?

Don't bother, Les. I'm done here, the intention was to demonstrate as a
warning to people reading the RFD here in uk.net.news.config the
vindictive and malicious nature of some of the regulars (aka 'usual
suspects') in uk.ra.

Looking forward to the CFV for uk.ram and, if it is passed, making a
positive contribution. I shan't respond to Gareth any more, except if
he makes a useful contribution to the moderated group*, in which case I
will respond in kind.

* oink, flap.

[MM3QRO/MM]

Spike wrote:

>
> Perhaps it needs moderating. RFD, anyone?

Careful!
Talking about moderating/moderators can get you onto the banned-list.

:-)

[Judith]

On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 19:21:32 +0100, Mike Tomlinson <mi...@jasper.org.uk> wrote:

>En el art�culo <2WY7t.268944$eU7....@fx24.fr7>, Lordgnome
><l...@nospam.null> escribi�:

>
>>Damn - I suppose I now need to set up a kill file for even THIS group.
>>What the hell has any of this tripe got to do with the pros & cons of
>>another news group?
>
>Don't bother, Les. I'm done here, the intention was to demonstrate as a
>warning to people reading the RFD here in uk.net.news.config the
>vindictive and malicious nature of some of the regulars

Yes - many thanks for showing your own true colours.

[FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI]

"gareth" <no....@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message

news:kjplol$5dr$1...@dont-email.me...

> I am confident that you are a rude, unpleasant person who blusters his
> way along, and in response to a challenge, you bluster even more.
>
>

Do you often talk to yourself?
--
;-)
.
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
.
http://turner-smith.co.uk

[G4KFK]

On 06/04/2013 16:21, Mike Tomlinson wrote:

> http://tinyurl.com/c5zwwmu

Some people would pay good money to be handcuffed and roughly treated by
somebody named Amanda....!

[FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI]

"gareth" <no....@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message

news:kjpm9k$9ms$1...@dont-email.me...

> "Mike Tomlinson" <mi...@jasper.org.uk> wrote in message
> news:bTzFgvAF...@jasper.org.uk...

>> Go to bed and sleep the booze off, eh?
>
> But I will comment upon THAT infantile remark. I have always been open
> about being a member of AA, and have just celebrated my 26th birthday
> in that organisation, a fact with which you are well aware in
> consideration
> of your obvious stlaking of me.
>

I'm not an Alcoholic, Alcoholics go to meetings, I go to the pub.

[MM3QRO/MM]

Huge wrote:


> Nothing, but they are doing a fine job of justifying the existence of
> a moderated group.

All that has been shown is that a filter-list in ones own computer is much
more agile and better at filtering what you want to read rather than what
someone thinks you should read.

next??? - will the the same people will be standing at the checkouts of
various shops and supermarkets checking the basket and deciding on what we
are allowed to eat????

What happens if all moderators miss a howler of a message and lots of
people start to complain about the moderators not doing a perfect job?

What happens with moderators who deliberately moderate one persons
messages more often that others messages?

[Stephen Thomas Cole]

"MM3QRO/MM" <mm3...@yjahoo.com> wrote:
> Huge wrote:
>
>
>> Nothing, but they are doing a fine job of justifying the existence of
>> a moderated group.
>
> All that has been shown is that a filter-list in ones own computer is much
> more agile and better at filtering what you want to read rather than what
> someone thinks you should read.
>
> next??? - will the the same people will be standing at the checkouts of
> various shops and supermarkets checking the basket and deciding on what we
> are allowed to eat????
>

Not a bad idea really, given the obesity epidemic that's costing the
country billions of pounds a year. Chocolate bars, fizzy pop, frozen
microwave meals all against the charter and rejected, Ryvita and fresh
fruit on-topic and authorised.

--
Stephen Thomas Cole - Sent from my iPhone so please forgive any spelling
mistakes or botched snipping.

[Pedt]

In message <xn0ii2kvo...@news.albasani.net>, at 08:53:11 on Wed,
15 May 2013, MM3QRO/MM <mm3...@yjahoo.com> sniffed the air and
proclaimed

>What happens if all moderators miss a howler of a message and lots of
>people start to complain about the moderators not doing a perfect job?
>

If the moderators are doing a good job normally, the occasional manually
moderated message that was accepted that mods acknowledge was an "oops"
will be accepted [pun unintended] as no-one expects that a good set of
moderators to be 100% perfect. If it was a whitelisted poster I'd expect
the mods to say the poster is not now whitelisted for a period and
they've adjusted their trigger word list if appropriate to do so.

>What happens with moderators who deliberately moderate one persons
>messages more often that others messages?

Care to tell everyone which moderation software is capable of assigning
a percentage to the amount of a poster's articles which should be
moderated other than 0% unless you hit triggers if whitelisted or 100%
if you are not whitelisted?

X-posted to unnm{oderation} and FU set as this is OT here.

--
Pedt
Cryptic Clues Round 5, Number #4
Cor! Cretin is plainly wrong. (9)

[Fritz Wuehler]

On Fri, 17 May 2013 00:54:06 +0100, Pedt <"\"@
@\""@operations.force9.net> wrote:

> In message <xn0ii2kvo...@news.albasani.net>, at 08:53:11 on
Wed,
> 15 May 2013, MM3QRO/MM <mm3...@yjahoo.com> sniffed the air and
> proclaimed

> >What happens if all moderators miss a howler of a message and lots
of
> >people start to complain about the moderators not doing a perfect
job?
> >

a) True Blue or Andrew Carter or Jumbo Pencil or Anne Cave or Radio
Four or Anne Hall or Mr Lamb or Norman Corner or Geoff Smith or Ronny
Scott or whoever complains about it unnm;

b) it doesn't matter, they are all the jtroll anyway.

[Judith]

Hello my little maggot, Wm - who lifted the stone?