> Hello all. I was wondering if anyone keeps an online museum of info on
> Hayman Guitars and even basses? I have been unlucky finding one. -
I think the nearest thing you will find will be at:
http://www.burnsguitarmuseum.com/
(bearing in mind that James O Burns designed the Hayman range)
JNugent wrote:I think the nearest thing you will find will be at:
>
> http://www.burnsguitarmuseum.com/
>
> (bearing in mind that James O Burns designed the Hayman range)
That was a great site and I will keep checking in as that was all I got
doing searches. It's obviously THE place to start compiling links. Very
cool. They seem to be looking for a Hayman 20 20 just as I might be. That's
all I know about Hayman is the 20 20 exists, but what else?. Such a well
made bass, the 40 40 I have I was hoping to mate it with a guitar. All the
Best - Justin
> JNugent wrote:
> >I think the nearest thing you will find will be at:
> > http://www.burnsguitarmuseum.com/
> > (bearing in mind that James O Burns designed the Hayman range)
> That was a great site and I will keep checking in as that was all I got
> doing searches. It's obviously THE place to start compiling links. Very
> cool. They seem to be looking for a Hayman 20 20 just as I might be.
That's
> all I know about Hayman is the 20 20 exists, but what else?
I think the 2020 was the one equipped with two Re-An humbucker pickups. If
it was, it sounded *very* dull (nothing like as bright as a humbucking
Gibson, for instance) unless you installed a DPDT switch to coiltap the
p/us. As you can guess, I once owned one (I only bought it because I wanted
a guitar to install a Bigsby Palm-Pedal on).
I think it cost me £75 s/h in 1980 in the old Unisound shop in Kilburn, and
I sold it (minus the Bigsby) in 1982 for £565.
> Such a well
> made bass, the 40 40 I have I was hoping to mate it with a guitar.
I think the single-coil Haymans are a better analogue of the basses.
> That's all I know about Hayman is the 20 20 exists, but what else?
> I think the 2020 was the one equipped with two Re-An humbucker pickups. If
> it was, it sounded *very* dull (nothing like as bright as a humbucking
> Gibson, for instance) unless you installed a DPDT switch to coiltap the
> p/us. As you can guess, I once owned one (I only bought it because I
wanted
> a guitar to install a Bigsby Palm-Pedal on).
> I think it cost me £75 s/h in 1980 in the old Unisound shop in Kilburn,
and
> I sold it (minus the Bigsby) in 1982 for £565.
Spot-The-Deliberate-Mistake-Time, folks!
(£65!)
Nick
[1]I wasn't with the company then but think he was a consultant rather
than an employee.
--
real e-mail is themusic dot workshop at ntlworld dot com
> <JNu...@AC30.spamFreeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >(bearing in mind that James O Burns designed the Hayman range)
> Not entirely. He was involved in some of the earlier work{1] but Bob
> Pearson did most of the design work over the ensuing years and I
> designed some of the circuitry.
> Nick
> [1]I wasn't with the company then but think he was a consultant rather
> than an employee.
The 1969-ish prototype for what became the Hayman range (recognisably
"Hayman" body shape, but with a Telecaster-style headstock) was actually
logo'd as an "Ormston" (same brand as the infamous electric double bass).
One was for sale for ages in Pan (Wardour Street), c.1971/72. I should have
bought it (about £45).
The "Hayman" connection came a bit later when Dallas-Arbiter wanted a range
of UK-made guitars (to complement their "George Hayman" drums, but you
already knew that!)
JNugent wrote:
I think it cost me £75 s/h in 1980 in the old Unisound shop in Kilburn, and
I sold it (minus the Bigsby) in 1982 for £565.
That's better than buying silver with the Hunt Brother at
that time. I imagine that the sound could have been improved upon.
I have enough pickup types to experiment but the one thing that is important
is the feel, how it sets up and stays in tune. Some wood though does not
seem to care what electronicsyou put into it. If you were willing
to sell it at roughly seven times over that means... what exacly?
- Cheers, Justin
nick odell wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:38:03 -0000, "JNugent"
<JNu...@AC30.spamFreeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
>(bearing in mind that James O Burns designed the Hayman range)
>
Not entirely. He was involved in some of the earlier work{1] but Bob
Pearson did most of the design work over the ensuing years and I
designed some of the circuitry.Nick
[1]I wasn't with the company then but think he was a consultant rather
than an employee.
Who's idea was it to put the clear plastic Hockey
Puck in the top centre of the headpeg, and the smoked plexi gaurds on the
bass? Nice touch. I have to say something for the bass in that the stock
pickups are great for me. For the time they were cutting edge. The
bridge is a good idea and shows much thought. Really progressive for the
time. It is an original work. And nobody stole it.
I can't imagine the guitar. The neck on the bass is really
well made and designed. I like the zero nut and the heavy A and D string
guides. Somebody gave alot of thought to downbearing pressure and its reaction
to transferring the vibrations to the neck. My 40 40 has the feel of an
older tele bass or mid 50s precision in the way that it feels. So, I am
wondering if they made better basses and I should give up the idea of a
guitar. ( ...the £700 is a bit steep - however - I have put down
more on stranger guitars.
By the way I do like the circuitry on the bass. The 3-way
switch is really positioned well and can be flipped slight of hand. I wish
the controls had been stacked knobs but the pole pieces all but make up
for it. They actaully make a big difference. - Best, Justin
> JNugent wrote:
> > I think it cost me £75 s/h in 1980 in the old Unisound shop in Kilburn,
> > and I sold it (minus the Bigsby) in 1982 for £565.
> That's better than buying silver with the Hunt Brother at that time.
"£565" was a typo (which I corrected in my next post). The sale price was
£65!
> I imagine that the sound could have been improved upon. I have enough
> pickup types to experiment but the one thing that is important is the
feel,
> how it sets up and stays in tune. Some wood though does not seem t
> care what electronicsyou put into it. If you were willing to sell it at
> roughly seven times over that means... what exacly?
> Cheers, Justin
Ah, I *would have* if only I *could have*, but I couldn't, so I didn't,
IYSWIM... :-)
> By the way I do like the circuitry on the bass. The 3-way switch is
really
> positioned well and can be flipped slight of hand. I wish the
controls
> had been stacked knobs but the pole pieces all but make up for it.
> They actaully make a big difference.
I have a 40/40 and used it ,IIRC, on the middle switch position on the
'Give and Take' track at mp3.com
http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/237/icarusi.html
Icarusi
--
remove the 00 to reply
I have a Hayman 1010 guitar since the 70's. I love it to bits.
I had a quick look at the Burns site but there seems to be more
interesting pictures on the shergold site.
My 1010 is filled from neck to bridge with big plastic humbuckers.
Also the pots are push pull type which makes it a really versatile
guitar.
P
Justin O'Callahan <fromthe...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3C4A0D12...@earthlink.net...
> Hello all. I was wondering if anyone keeps an online museum of info on
> Hayman Guitars and even basses? I have been unlucky finding one. -
> Justin O'Callahan <fromthe...@earthlink.net>
"icarusi" <icar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<ccB28.1115$ZO2.58115@stones>...
icarusi wrote:
> I have a 40/40 and used it ,IIRC, on the middle switch position on the
> 'Give and Take' track at mp3.com
>
> http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/237/icarusi.html
Sadly, I'm closer to having my performance portrait done by Picasso...
and while I can figure out how to do email and a website. MP3s are not my
cup. It is a combination of my computor and too many rehersals... I might
be willing to purchase your CD but not before I find a copy of "The
Burns Book" by Paul Day (out of print according to Amazon)
I will try again tommorrow to load the MP3. I have to try and download
the software and see how it works. Do me somew good to learn something
new.- Justin
As to why it failed - bear in mind I was only running the production
line (under Bob Pearson) but from where I stood the main reason why it
went under was the financial state of the company Dallas Music
Industries. Originally Dallas-Arbiter, there was a split between the
principals and DMI never recovered from it and went into liquidation.
Hayman was just a brand name within the company, not a company in its
own right.
As you probably know, Shergold were an outsource manufacturer for some
of the major components of the Hayman range and they decided to make
the range under their own badge. Bob joined them for a while, lost a
great deal of his own money, so he told me, and left them to it. There
was consequently nothing you could really describe as product
development after that.
Nick
> I will try again tommorrow to load the MP3. I have to try and
download
> the software and see how it works. Do me somew good to learn
something
> new.- Justin
There's always a Lo-Fi play version on mp3 which streams into Windows
Media Player (or other mp3 player Musicmatch Jukebox and Winamp being
probably the most popular) so you don't need to download the full
version, unless you like it. The same track's also on the UKMG mp3 CD,
all proceeds of which go to charity.
And there's a little in 'Pearls and crazy diamonds', the new book on
Burns and related makes.
George