> Who *can't* do Frank Spencer? Come on, own up.
<waves>
ooh betty.
See? Just not convincing, is it?
Just wait until you realise that your comedy knob painting is still
faintly visible to your visiting relatives.
--
Nobody tells me anything either
but I like it that way. (Snoopy)
steve at otolith dot demon dot co dot uk
Can you do a Rolf-a-roo?
Sun arise, she bring in the morning
Fluttering the birds all around...
> Who *can't* do Frank Spencer? Come on, own up.
*puts hand up*
Not skinny or weedy or high-pitched enough.
Mike
--
* Email address spam-trapped: replace YOOKAY with UK *
fluttering her skirts, actually.
I may have to go and listen to the album now, to check.
Hm. Rolf Harris or Bob Harris...
--
It's not the despair, I can stand the despair. It's the hope.
'Stroo. You are hereby elevated to the position of resident uk.misc Rolf
Harris expert.
I'm in awe...
But have you found him yet?
--
another little drink wouldn't do us any harm
>I did David Bowie this afternoon, just on a whim.
I thought he didn't do that kind of thing anymore?
> I did David Bowie this afternoon, just on a whim.
The different coloured eyes, or what?
> In article <h730htkb7mk2igsmj...@4ax.com>,
> li...@REMOVETHISlindsayendell.co.uk says...
> > On Sat, 26 May 2001 14:53:00 +0100, MikeB wrote:
> >
> > > Can you do a Rolf-a-roo?
> > >
> > > Sun arise, she bring in the morning
> > > Fluttering the birds all around...
> >
> > fluttering her skirts, actually.
> >
> > I may have to go and listen to the album now, to check.
>
> 'Stroo. You are hereby elevated to the position of resident uk.misc Rolf
> Harris expert.
I don't know that this is a good thing though.
> I'm in awe...
But I'll take awe whenever and wherever it's offered.
It could be a lot worse.
Not sure how, admittedly. I'll get back to you if I can think of
anything.
> > I'm in awe...
>
> But I'll take awe whenever and wherever it's offered.
You hoard it, I'll bet. I'm sure my granny hoarded it. She hoarded
*everything*.
Define 'do'.
And keep it clean, I scare easily.
Nooo, that's ploppies.
> >And keep it clean, I scare easily.
>
> I've liberally sprinkled this post with Domestos, just for you.
It's only killed 99% of all the known germs. Dammit.
> In article <mrg0ht4c8eni5lf1r...@4ax.com>,
> li...@REMOVETHISlindsayendell.co.uk says...
> > On Sat, 26 May 2001 21:21:29 +0100, MikeB wrote:
>
> > > I'm in awe...
> >
> > But I'll take awe whenever and wherever it's offered.
>
> You hoard it, I'll bet. I'm sure my granny hoarded it. She hoarded
> *everything*.
No, I haven't worked out how to hoard it so I bask in it.
> > You hoard it, I'll bet. I'm sure my granny
hoarded it. She hoarded
> > *everything*.
>
> No, I haven't worked out how to hoard it so I
bask in it.
I know what you mean but you can't bask in awe,
the awe is with the beholder. You can however bask
in the glory that is yours on uk.misc.
John
They never quite quantified exactly how many unknown germs there were,
nor what they meant my unknown. Maybe it wasz just 'not known by some
bod at Domestos', i.e. 99% of all germs known by proper scientists.
Best not to think about it...
This week, I have been mostly laying ethernet cable.
--
Colin Rosenthal
Astrophysics Institute
University of Oslo
> This week, I have been mostly laying ethernet cable.
Now, that's *gotta* hurt.
>
> Today, I shall be mostly painting the living room 'Mexican Straw',
> which is poncey for yellow. Think I might try a few Rolf Harris
> can-you-tell-what-it-is-yet? type impressions. Well, it passes the
> time dunnit?
I have just, finally, given the bedroom ceiling its first coat of
paint. In the process I tipped the roller tray down my front. I hate
painting ceilings.
In about 4 hours I shall hate it all over again when I do the second
coat. Then I shall move the furniture back in, so I can go to bed. And
eventually I shall get around to obtaining the paint for the walls.
But first I think I'll have another shower to try to remove the coat
of paint on my skin...
I can highly recommend one of those electric roller thingies as seen in
B&Q (or similar). True, you'll only use it once as the paint will
inevitably set like concrete in the feeder tube the first time you leave
it overnight, but as a time-saver, it's almost useful. OTOH, instead of
spilling a mere tray of paint, you get to spill the whole can.
> But first I think I'll have another shower to try to remove the coat
> of paint on my skin...
I'm sure they use the same stuff that sticks cathairs to clothes in
paint. It's just as difficult to remove...
--
Cheers,
Ade.
If at first you fail, cheat. Repeat until caught, then lie.
Hah. For the walls I think I'll revert using a brush. This spattering
business is a nightmare, and while the roller is happy to roll on the
walls, it doesn't want to roll on the tray, so I get a lot of paint
round one side of the roller and hardly any on the other. As for the
fact that the roller sleeve manages slowly to come off the spindle it's
all becoming more of a nightmare than it's worth.
> > But first I think I'll have another shower to try to remove the coat
> > of paint on my skin...
>
> I'm sure they use the same stuff that sticks cathairs to clothes in
> paint. It's just as difficult to remove...
And there's another thing. Brand new can of paint. So how come, when I
opened it, there was a feckin cat hair in it?
> > > But first I think I'll have another shower to try to remove the coat
> > > of paint on my skin...
> >
> > I'm sure they use the same stuff that sticks cathairs to clothes in
> > paint. It's just as difficult to remove...
>
> And there's another thing. Brand new can of paint. So how come, when I
> opened it, there was a feckin cat hair in it?
>
Y'see, proves my theory. Obviously paint factories are full of shaved
moggies (well, I couldn't really say pussies, could I?), and since the
first law of cathairs is they get everywhere, including where it's
physically impossible, etc.
> Linz <li...@REMOVETHISlindsayendell.co.uk> wrote:
> >But first I think I'll have another shower to try to remove the coat
> >of paint on my skin...
>
> Leave it. Make a torque out of bacofoil and tell people you've become
> a Celtic warrior queen.
I caught a glimpse of my elbow in the huge mirror by the loo at work
today (why? Who needs to watch while they wee?) and realised I hadn't
actually washed off all the paint yesterday...
> I caught a glimpse of my elbow in the huge mirror by the loo at work
> today (why? Who needs to watch while they wee?)
Is it true you have sofas and soft toilet paper?
I heard many a story and one or two posts about gals who couldn't be arsed
to queue for the ladies and popped into the gents instead.
Good Luck, matey!
I wish I had the guts to use the ladies. Perhaps one day I'll jump the queue
with a casual "I'm not pissing in *that* shithole!" then go and use one of
the sinks.
> "Linz" <li...@REMOVETHISlindsayendell.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:9cr7htknlpbvqej5f...@4ax.com...
>
> > I caught a glimpse of my elbow in the huge mirror by the loo at work
> > today (why? Who needs to watch while they wee?)
>
> Is it true you have sofas and soft toilet paper?
I have a leather armchair and recycled toilet paper. Oh! Hang on, you
don't mean me personally, do you. Yes, some ladies' loos have sofas,
soft toilet paper, soap and hand towels. But very few indeed have huge
mirrors in the actual cubicles.
> I heard many a story and one or two posts about gals who couldn't be arsed
> to queue for the ladies and popped into the gents instead.
>
> Good Luck, matey!
BTDT.
> I wish I had the guts to use the ladies. Perhaps one day I'll jump the queue
> with a casual "I'm not pissing in *that* shithole!" then go and use one of
> the sinks.
Hah. You wouldn't dare.
> "Linz" <li...@REMOVETHISlindsayendell.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:9cr7htknlpbvqej5f...@4ax.com...
>
>> I caught a glimpse of my elbow in the huge mirror by the loo at work
>> today (why? Who needs to watch while they wee?)
>
> Is it true you have sofas and soft toilet paper?
>
> I heard many a story and one or two posts about gals who couldn't be arsed
> to queue for the ladies and popped into the gents instead.
I've seen it happen plenty of times. Makes it interesting having girls in
the gents queueing for the single cubicle with no seat and no paper. If the
girls could find a way of using the urinals.....
mh.
--
This space intentionally blank.
They have, they just choose not to use it. I've seen them use the
cubicle in the gents, I've yet to see them squat over a urinal...
http://www.restrooms.org/standing.html
Why have I a horrible feeling that the site is instruction to some,
pornography to others?
Oh damn and I've been following this thread hoping that I wasn't too late.
> In article <Penguin.%.m2d78qczs0.fsf@news2.kororaa.c0m>, August West
> <aug...@kororaa.com> writes
> >Steve Walker <st...@spam.spam.spam> writes:
> >>
> >> They have, they just choose not to use it. I've seen them use the
> >> cubicle in the gents, I've yet to see them squat over a urinal...
> >
> >http://www.restrooms.org/standing.html
>
> Why have I a horrible feeling that the site is instruction to some,
> pornography to others?
Becasue you have a sick, twisted and deeply unplesantly perverted
mind?
Yeah, but I thought you might know something I didn't.
I hear tell that there are out there a number of websites dedicated to the
practice. Not that I've ever found any. Hmph.
--
SAm.
EchelonFodder: invade Semtex Fylingdales Mugabe ketamine assassinate
You should be ashamed to hijack August's best chat up lines, you
bounder.
Not far off, but I'm not a geordie.
--
anyone who can't record good rock'n'roll on sixteen tracks is a wimp
> Hah. For the walls I think I'll revert using a brush. This spattering
> business is a nightmare, and while the roller is happy to roll on the
> walls, it doesn't want to roll on the tray, so I get a lot of paint
ah. cheap tray. unridged, no doubt. you get what you pay for.
> round one side of the roller and hardly any on the other. As for the
> fact that the roller sleeve manages slowly to come off the spindle it's
ah. cheap roller. ygwypf.
--
It's a ridged tray. Why would it make any difference, the walls aren't
ridged. Well, not badly, anyway.
> > round one side of the roller and hardly any on the other.
> > As for the fact that the roller sleeve manages slowly to
> > come off the spindle it's
>
> ah. cheap roller. ygwypf.
Bah. There wasn't a choice. And I got a long handle for it, and they
don't fit together (well, they do, but they wobble a lot). But it's
not a problem now. Felix sprayed on it so it's gone.
--
Is it on't trolley?
True, but now I'm all ADSL'd up and can download cyberporn at 384kbs 24 hours
a day. Can anyone recommend a newsreader for Windoze2000?
And you join the select few who recognise what a good program it is...
--
Paul B
>True, but now I'm all ADSL'd up and can download cyberporn at 384kbs 24 hours
>a day. Can anyone recommend a newsreader for Windoze2000?
If it's binaries groups you're interested in, (Free)Agent is good for that.
--
Tim Emanuel http://cantona.org.uk
"Pah." - Kathryn.
>Turnpike is great. Works fine with W2k.
>
>And you join the select few who recognise what a good program it is...
Hmm. I had the audacity to suggest - in a different NG - that deleting
the *whole* post before replying is a pain for me [as a TP user] to
which the gist of this nonentity's reply was 'get a proper one
[newsreader]'.
The chap *still* doesn't realise that if he has completely stripped the
text to which he is replying, readers are now dependant on their ability
at recall. As my recall is poo, I am forced to review the previous
post.
I couldn't have explained well enough.
--
Liz Crewe
>The chap *still* doesn't realise that if he has completely stripped the
>text to which he is replying, readers are now dependant on their ability
>at recall. As my recall is poo, I am forced to review the previous
>post.
>
>I couldn't have explained well enough.
Eh?
Are you referring to me? Have we met in a different newsgroup, or in a
previous life, or in an alternate Universe?
Hope not... my post certainly didn't strip the text to which I was
replying.
I feel *so* unloved...
--
Paul B
> On 28 May 2001 12:26:20 +0100,
> August West <aug...@kororaa.com> wrote:
> >col...@toliman.uio.no (Colin Rosenthal) writes:
> >
> >> This week, I have been mostly laying ethernet cable.
> >
> >Now, that's *gotta* hurt.
>
> True, but now I'm all ADSL'd up and can download cyberporn at 384kbs 24 hours
> a day. Can anyone recommend a newsreader for Windoze2000?
No, but I can recommend an ointment for friction burns.
He tells me it is my problem that I don't know what he's talking about
because I use TP.
I say that I cannot recall the post to which he replies, and so, I am
forced to review the previous post.
Does that help?
And I am sure you are loved.
--
Liz Crewe
>I say that I cannot recall the post to which he replies, and so, I am
>forced to review the previous post.
>
I'd ignore the prat, if I were you.
>
>Does that help?
>
Lots.
>And I am sure you are loved.
>
<hopeful>
Offers?
--
Paul B
*Do* tell...
--
Paul B
slrn is out there as is gnus. The first is OK, the second is a pain in
it's doze incarnation.
I quite like Gravity, in fact I liked it so much I registered the copy
I use at work.
Iain
--
\/ Member of the UK Usenet Committee, also Control for uk.*
Full information on uk.* newsgroups at http://www.usenet.org.uk
Iain Bowen. in deepest B13. Also available at alaric(at)alaric.org.uk
West Midlands Election Site at http://www.harlech.demon.co.uk/election.html
Are you trying to start the top and bottom posting thing *again*?
Please note that I didn't mention anything about sigs 'cos OE can't do them
properly.
> >I say that I cannot recall the post to which he replies, and so, I am
> >forced to review the previous post.
> >
> I'd ignore the prat, if I were you.
She takes things to heart, I reckon. Poor, sweet, child that she must be.
> >Does that help?
> >
> Lots.
What are *you* after?
> >And I am sure you are loved.
> >
> <hopeful>
Ah, I see.
> Offers?
Get them in writing and have the signatures witnessed.
--
Paul Griffiths
I don't think she needs to be told this. She's using it because she likes
it. Someone else is trying to tell her it's crap and she should use a
better newsreader because she complained that posts no quoted text were
hard to understand through lack of context. That someone else is clearly
bonkers, but I dunno how one would convince them of this.
[cursor above quoted text is often actually better than below it, as it
encourages people to snip the bits they are not responding to instead of
just putting the whole reply at the bottom, which isn't any better than
just putting it at the top]
--
l...@lspace.org http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~eleanorb/
>>And I am sure you are loved.
>>
><hopeful>
>
>Offers?
Regularly. You?
--
Liz Crewe
I'm working on it. It's having to talk about sheep all the time which is
a bit off-putting...
--
Paul B
>>>Offers?
>>
>>Regularly. You?
>
>I'm working on it. It's having to talk about sheep all the time which is
>a bit off-putting...
Hmm. Yes, it might suggest that you have little experience that's true.
Perhaps if you leave out the word 'sheep' in your discussion/s.
--
Liz Crewe
Lots of experience with sheep, though.
> Perhaps if you leave out the word 'sheep' in your discussion/s.
Would anything worthwhile be left?
--
Paul Griffiths
>I feel *so* unloved...
Join the club, m8.....
http://www.steelbreeze.fsnet.co.uk
Remove 2001 to reply
"Caution!!! I can hardly speak English. This manual is irresponsible" - found in program manual
> I quite like Gravity, in fact I liked it so much I registered the copy
> I use at work.
Did you know they've released it as freeware now? Microplanet decided to
give up developing it so they removed the registration requirement as well.
mh.
--
"It's a 4000 in an X cup."
I like it, although it's butt-ugly. According to a local beta-tester, v6
has a new gui.
>I quite like Gravity, in fact I liked it so much I registered the copy
>I use at work.
Shit. Have you told The Register about this scoop? 'Man pays for
shareware, WinZip representative stamps his feet and mutters'.
Wouldn't I have to pay for Turnpike? It seems a bit daft when there
are so many free newsreaders around.
> [cursor above quoted text is often actually better than below it, as it
> encourages people to snip the bits they are not responding to instead of
> just putting the whole reply at the bottom, which isn't any better than
> just putting it at the top]
Cursor at top: encourages top-posting
Cursor at bottom: emcourages non-snipping
STICK THE FECKER IN THE MIDDLE
>Wouldn't I have to pay for Turnpike?
If I understand it correctly [?!] - yes after a month, unless you are a
Demon customer.
> It seems a bit daft when there
>are so many free newsreaders around.
I agree, but I suppose if you are that keen then the cost isn't
necessarily the crux.
Scrolling down endless posts in OE doesn't look comfortable to me as I
like TP popping the 'next unread' post into a full screen display.
Whether I would pay for the privilege nowadays however, hmm I dunno,
unlikely - being as poor as a church mouse at the moment. Cutting
cloth.
--
Liz Crewe
The new GUI is luvverly. An Explorer shell extension, like the recent
versions of WS-FTP. You lose the ability to throw things all over the
screen - which was kinda nice, since you could put all the important
stuff in the top left, the fun stuff in the top right or whatever - but
it's still luvverly.
(Currently running Beta 4, and I've been using it since the Alpha test.)
--
James Coupe PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D
"You reinstall Dial-Up Networking. The Elf screams and becomes EBD690ECD7A1F
an icon. *** CONGRATULATIONS! *** You completed the BT Internet B457CA213D7E6
Helpdesk training course in 15 out of a possible 9000 moves." 68C3695D623D5D
Yes.
> It seems a bit daft when there
>are so many free newsreaders around.
I can pick up many free newspapers, but people still pay for some.