"Mike Swift" <
mike....@yeton.co.uk> wrote in message
news:f0cZiJAa...@ntlworld.com...
>
> What a pointless jumbled badly acted piece of crap this was, at least for
> the first 15 minutes before I switched of.
>
> I could have been brilliant, a historic story that the BBC made so well in
> the past, well acted and informative.
>
> Instead it was incoherent and filled with unnecessary effing and blinding,
> I'm no prude but there was much more than was needed.
>
> The Yorkshire accents were a joke straight from Monty Python's Three
> Yorkshiremen sketch.
>
> I see from comments elsewhere, non complementary, that the "author" lets
> the "actors" choose their own words, this was evident in the
> unintelligible 15 minutes I foolishly watched.
I've not watched it yet, but I've seen the end-credits sequence as I was
transcribing the cast for the entry on IMDB. And it looked like the creative
result of a very bad acid trip. The reviews are mixed: the Independent
loathed it
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/the-gallows-pole-review-shane-meadows-b2348985.html
but the Guardian loved it
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2023/may/31/the-gallows-pole-review-shane-meadowss-period-drama-is-an-absolute-must-see
I suppose I could have guessed that it was going to be an "arty" adaptation
from the number of "Supporting Artist" cast who had no previous credits,
especially children of the starring actors.
I was brought up on the Cragg Vale Coiners story from Phyllis Bentley's
novel for children Gold Pieces in which a fictional weaver's son gets to
know David Hartley's son and gets drawn into the coin-clipping conspiracy.
It was a while before I learned that the coiners were real and not something
that Bentley invented for her novel. The BBC would have done well to adapt
that novel instead...