Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

BBC News - Jacqui Smith in Bath Plug Shame

7 views
Skip to first unread message

alland...@live.co.uk

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 10:31:54 AM3/30/09
to

Jacqui Smith claimed 88p in expenses, a new bath plug for her second
home.

Richard Bird

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 10:53:42 AM3/30/09
to

<alland...@live.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8c212f74-c5a9-4148...@u39g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...

>
> Jacqui Smith claimed 88p in expenses, a new bath plug for her second
> home.

She will be getting oxfam food parcels, bus tokens and council tax rebate
next


abelard

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 11:25:35 AM3/30/09
to
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:31:54 -0700 (PDT), alland...@live.co.uk
wrote:

>
>Jacqui Smith claimed 88p in expenses, a new bath plug for her second
>home.

do they have some sort of expensive habit...beyond the usual
'new' labour profligacy with other people's money....

this stuff smells of desperation....or can it just be more greed...

--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Message has been deleted

FriarTuck

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 12:37:04 PM3/30/09
to
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:31:54 -0700, allandetracy wrote:

> Jacqui Smith claimed 88p in expenses, a new bath plug for her second
> home.

good job its not the dwp investigators on her tail then eh!

or even the penny pinching pains-in-the-arse at the typical engineering
companies expenses department.

Mr Scummy

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 2:24:17 PM3/30/09
to
alland...@live.co.uk wrote:
> Jacqui Smith claimed 88p in expenses, a new bath plug for her second
> home.

Amazing. I only earn a fraction of what Jacqui gets but I would be
embarrassed to spend my time doing an expenses claim for something as
trivial as a bath plug.

R. Mark Clayton

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 2:26:18 PM3/30/09
to

<alland...@live.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8c212f74-c5a9-4148...@u39g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...
>
> Jacqui Smith claimed 88p in expenses, a new bath plug for her second
> home.

Never mind the 88p, what about the £116,000 claimed for staying at her
sister's!

And then £40kpa hubby gets to run her office.

These trivial claims and genuine mistakes are a smoke screen to hide the
real issue.


Jades Not Dead

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 3:38:19 PM3/30/09
to
On 30 Mar, 19:24, Mr Scummy <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:

That's why she pays her husband to claim stuff like that for her,
which he does while jacking off to soft-core nonsense, also at the
taxpayers expense.

Onlyme

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 3:46:04 PM3/30/09
to

"Jades Not Dead" <pick...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:43594716-aad2-4949...@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...


One wonders if we also paid for the vaseline and tissues!


Turk182

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 5:48:38 PM3/30/09
to
On 30 Mar, 15:31, allandetr...@live.co.uk wrote:
> Jacqui Smith claimed 88p in expenses, a new bath plug for her second
> home.

She earns £140,000 pound a year before expenses perks and she pays her
husband another £40,000 on top of that - and she charges to the
country the cost of her bathroom plug!

As a woman who looks like she doesn't bathe as often as some, I would
say this shows the woman's sheer, unashamed, greed.

Turk182

John Bennett

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 7:17:28 PM3/30/09
to R. Mark Clayton
Wish I'd wrote that:-))

Onlyme

unread,
Mar 30, 2009, 7:23:12 PM3/30/09
to

"John Bennett" <bennett584...@bt.com> wrote in message
news:49D15308...@bt.com...


I was going to say it seems she claimed for everything but the kitchen sink.
But then I read that she has, in fact, claimed for a kitchen sink too!!!!
(A nice stone £550 jobbie by all accounts)


Turk182

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 5:40:22 AM3/31/09
to
On 31 Mar, 00:23, "Onlyme" <onlyme_sitt...@home.com> wrote:
> "John Bennett" <bennett584removet...@bt.com> wrote in message

>
> news:49D15308...@bt.com...> R. Mark Clayton wrote:
> > > <allandetr...@live.co.uk> wrote in message

>
> news:8c212f74-c5a9-4148...@u39g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...
>
> > >> Jacqui Smith claimed 88p in expenses, a new bath plug for her second
> > >> home.
>
> > > Never mind the 88p, what about the £116,000 claimed for staying at her
> > > sister's!
>
> > > And then £40kpa hubby gets to run her office.
>
> > > These trivial claims and genuine mistakes are a smoke screen to hide the
> > > real issue.
>
> > Wish I'd wrote that:-))
>
> I was going to say it seems she claimed for everything but the kitchen sink.
> But then I read that she has, in fact, claimed for a kitchen sink too!!!!
> (A nice stone £550 jobbie by all accounts)

So I think what we are looking at, is a woman, whose basic income of
£140,000 can just be paid straight into a ring fenced savings
account. Apart from the odd Maccy D's, this woman has got so much of
her life attributed to the taxpayer's tab, that she needn't ever touch
her earnings! It's a fact that whenever politicians, and
particularly Labour get into power, within seconds they have their
hands in the till; their snouts in the trough, and then they set about
making it harder and harder for the public in general to enjoy life's
little extra's.

All this, 'we need to watch what you're doing all the time' stuff, is
really a projection of their own guilt. They know that they're on the
fiddle, so they automatically accuse us of it too!

Turk182

R. Mark Clayton

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 6:10:32 AM3/31/09
to

"Onlyme" <onlyme_...@home.com> wrote in message
news:OYKdnfBK4Iz0yUzU...@bt.com...

My old sink lasted 23 years and was only replaced after it got burnt. The
new one has already done 8 should last at least as long, so why does JS not
contribute towards the cost. It cost around £90 from B&Q IIRC and an
equivalent 1.75 unit costs about £150 - £400 less than hers!

BTW those expensive low level "Belfast" sinks are a real pain in the back if
you actually [bend over to] do any washing up in them...


Message has been deleted

Onlyme

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 6:45:35 AM3/31/09
to

"Turk182" <digital...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:5ba71b80-5a2d-4a93...@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...

All this, 'we need to watch what you're doing all the time' stuff, is
really a projection of their own guilt. They know that they're on the
fiddle, so they automatically accuse us of it too!

Turk182

******************

You might just be onto something there Dr Freud!


Halmyre

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 6:48:08 AM3/31/09
to
On 31 Mar, 11:10, "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclay...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
> "Onlyme" <onlyme_sitt...@home.com> wrote in message
>
> news:OYKdnfBK4Iz0yUzU...@bt.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "John Bennett" <bennett584removet...@bt.com> wrote in message

> >news:49D15308...@bt.com...
> >> R. Mark Clayton wrote:
> >> > <allandetr...@live.co.uk> wrote in message

>
> >news:8c212f74-c5a9-4148...@u39g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...
> >> >> Jacqui Smith claimed 88p in expenses, a new bath plug for her second
> >> >> home.
>
> >> > Never mind the 88p, what about the £116,000 claimed for staying at her
> >> > sister's!
>
> >> > And then £40kpa hubby gets to run her office.
>
> >> > These trivial claims and genuine mistakes are a smoke screen to hide
> >> > the
> >> > real issue.
>
> >> Wish I'd wrote that:-))
>
> > I was going to say it seems she claimed for everything but the kitchen
> > sink.
> > But then I read that she has, in fact, claimed for a kitchen sink too!!!!
> > (A nice stone £550 jobbie by all accounts)
>
> My old sink lasted 23 years and was only replaced after it got burnt.  The
> new one has already done 8 should last at least as long, so why does JS not
> contribute towards the cost.  It cost around £90 from B&Q IIRC and an
> equivalent 1.75 unit costs about £150 - £400 less than hers!
>
> BTW those expensive low level "Belfast" sinks are a real pain in the back if
> you actually [bend over to] do any washing up in them...- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

That's because the Irish are too pissed or too lazy to do the dishes
standing up. Allegedly. Probably. Coat please!

--
Halmyre

Tronic

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 6:53:08 AM3/31/09
to
hubby looks like a thick twat
f*ck knows what he's up to
... but we all know don't we lol

Tronic

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 6:54:02 AM3/31/09
to
>On Mar 30, 8:38 pm, Jades Not Dead <pickp...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
holy moly a cult of jade it was only a matter of time

Onlyme

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 7:43:13 AM3/31/09
to

"Halmyre" <flashgord...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b8550716-cd5b-4a20...@q18g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...

--
Halmyre

*****************

LMAO

I've always facied a Belfast sink....for the farmhouse country kitched look.
However, my wife has always refused to have one, stating "I'll be the silly
bugger breaking her back over it".
I'm assuming the stone sink that Jackboots bought was a Belfast model.
Perhaps it was hubby's choice, he doesn't look very tall, and a low-level
sink would be ideal for ...erm...'washing up' in...after watching those
blueys!


Ian Jackson

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 7:55:30 AM3/31/09
to
In message <nfOdncmofq5OnE_U...@bt.com>, Onlyme
<onlyme_...@home.com> writes

>
>"Halmyre" <flashgord...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:b8550716-cd5b-4a20...@q18g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
>On 31 Mar, 11:10, "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclay...@btinternet.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>That's because the Irish are too pissed or too lazy to do the dishes
>standing up. Allegedly. Probably. Coat please!
>
>--
>Halmyre
>
>*****************
>
>LMAO
>
>I've always facied a Belfast sink....for the farmhouse country kitched look.
>However, my wife has always refused to have one, stating "I'll be the silly
>bugger breaking her back over it".
>I'm assuming the stone sink that Jackboots bought was a Belfast model.
>Perhaps it was hubby's choice, he doesn't look very tall, and a low-level
>sink would be ideal for ...erm...'washing up' in...after watching those
>blueys!
>
The sinks are mounted low down because Irish 'little people' need to use
them.
--
Ian

Alang

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 8:56:59 AM3/31/09
to
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:43:13 +0100, "Onlyme" <onlyme_...@home.com>
wrote:

You don't have to have a belfast sink low down. We had one in the
cottage we lived in 40 years ago. Quite comfortabl to use and big
enough to let the kids use it as a bath. At the time we didn't have a
bath, inside toilet or hot water supply.

alland...@live.co.uk

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 10:20:15 AM3/31/09
to
>
> BTW those expensive low level "Belfast" sinks are a real pain in the back if
> you actually [bend over to] do any washing up in them.
>

That’s because things like the height of sinks, vacuum cleaners and
ironing boards are determined by the average height of women, not men.

Therefore, most men cannot risk using the sink, the vacuum cleaner or
the ironing board because it’s uncomfortable and may damage their
backs.

It’s then a popular myth, that women like to propagate, that men’s
reluctance to do housework is for reasons of sexual inequality when,
in fact, it’s purely for reasons practical.

Onlyme

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 12:03:20 PM3/31/09
to

<alland...@live.co.uk> wrote in message
news:84ccabbd-fef7-4941...@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...

***************

I'll buy that.
(well, send the wife to buy it...but you know what I mean!)


Phil Stovell

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 3:09:05 PM3/31/09
to

Printed out and filed on the ironing board. Thanks.

Mike

unread,
Apr 1, 2009, 6:01:20 AM4/1/09
to

With a few (make that very few) exceptions, they are all crooks.

What many don't realise (as yet) is that the Tories are the worst
offenders, every one is as bent as nine bob note.


--

Turk182

unread,
Apr 1, 2009, 7:12:55 AM4/1/09
to
On 1 Apr, 11:01, Mike <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:48:38 -0700 (PDT), Turk182
>

The 'turns each' democracy trick that has been designed for Britain,
keeps parliament as a cover for a great british swindle. It's a
system designed by rogues, and you're right to point out they're all
at it. It's time for the public to spewll out to politicians that the
system must be changed. A difficult thing to do in view of the
addiction to fish and chips, Sky TV and beer taking priority over most
other decisions for the public.

Turk182

John Bennett

unread,
Apr 1, 2009, 12:04:01 PM4/1/09
to Turk182
Turk182 wrote:

A difficult thing to do in view of the
> addiction to fish and chips, Sky TV and beer taking priority over most
> other decisions for the public.

You heartless B-I-T-C-H, how could you ever forget The Queen of
Essex,HRH Jade?
The brain-dead will NEVER EVER forget our JADE.

YOU did,I'll never speak to you again you heartless hussie.

Going off now for a hissy fit:-))

Mike

unread,
Apr 1, 2009, 7:06:21 PM4/1/09
to

WTF is Jade?


--

0 new messages