Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

David Blaine / Lindsey Dawn Mackenzie

112 views
Skip to first unread message

Cuzman

unread,
Oct 12, 2003, 5:27:58 PM10/12/03
to
Just watching the repeats of his shows on Channel 4. Was it a complete
coincidence that Lindsey Dawn Mackenzie was one of the girls in that
glass-shattering *trick*? Or does the phrase *hired-help* spring to mind?


Dom Robinson

unread,
Oct 12, 2003, 5:54:01 PM10/12/03
to
In article <bmch0u$l9nb0$1...@ID-66441.news.uni-berlin.de>, cuzN...@supanet.com
says...

> Just watching the repeats of his shows on Channel 4. Was it a complete
> coincidence that Lindsey Dawn Mackenzie was one of the girls in that
> glass-shattering *trick*? Or does the phrase *hired-help* spring to mind?
>
I'd hire her to help :)
--

Dom Robinson Gamertag: DVDfever email: dom at dvdfever dot co dot uk
/* http://DVDfever.co.uk (editor)
/* 952 DVDs, 261 games, 33 videos, 68 cinema films, 69 CDs, laserdiscs & news
/* igby goes down, finding nemo, futurama, doctor who, old school, ghost recon
"Everyone's a winner!" - Newsgroup troll 'Time To Burn' on the lack of choice
foistered upon viewers by broadcasters who don't watch their own output

Doug Ellison

unread,
Oct 13, 2003, 6:50:30 AM10/13/03
to

"Cuzman" <cuzN...@supanet.com> wrote in message
news:bmch0u$l9nb0$1...@ID-66441.news.uni-berlin.de...

> Just watching the repeats of his shows on Channel 4. Was it a complete
> coincidence that Lindsey Dawn Mackenzie was one of the girls in that
> glass-shattering *trick*? Or does the phrase *hired-help* spring to mind?
>
>

Not a difficuly trick to pull off anyway.

Doug


Damot

unread,
Oct 13, 2003, 1:58:31 PM10/13/03
to
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:27:58 +0100, "Cuzman" <cuzN...@supanet.com>
wrote:

>Just watching the repeats of his shows on Channel 4. Was it a complete
>coincidence that Lindsey Dawn Mackenzie was one of the girls in that
>glass-shattering *trick*? Or does the phrase *hired-help* spring to mind?
>

The problem with Blaine is he cheats a lot. By cheat I mean he doesn't
show complete sections of film that clearly give away the technique.

For example, asking someone to write something down and then he sets
fire to it and reveals the name etched on his body.

I won't explain it here, but if you've watched any of those "masked
magician" type programs, they clearly show how it is done.

A good magician doesn't need to go to those lengths, cutting complete
scenes out is the same as camera tricks in my book.

Geoff Lane

unread,
Oct 13, 2003, 5:30:56 PM10/13/03
to
Damot <no...@none.com> wrote:
> The problem with Blaine is he cheats a lot.

Watchout, the Blainetologists will get you!

--
Geoff Lane

0 new messages