On May 21, 9:14 am, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 07:44:44 +0100, "Brian Watson"
>
>
>
>
>
> <
Br...@imagebus.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >"Martin" <m...@address.invalid> wrote in message
> >news:pkehr7prl38v58n2k...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 20 May 2012 09:12:24 +0000 (UTC), Dave Ewart
> >> <
da...@sungate.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>>On Sun, 20 May 2012 06:27:27 +0100, Basil Jet
> >>><
jo...@journeyflow.spamspam.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> "see the path of Sunday's annual solar eclipse"
>
> >>>>
http://www.pcworld.com/article/255858/nasa_google_map_shows_path_of_s...
>
> >>>Annual => annular, presumably?
>
> >> It is correct in the link provided
> >>
http://nasascience.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/15may_s...
>
> >> "It's an annular solar eclipse, in which the Moon will cover as much
> >> as 94% of the sun. Hundreds of millions of people will be able to
> >> witness the event."
>
> >That's annular fine mess you got me into.
>
> "Why is Uranus upside down?" title of a science book posted to a
> binaries newsgroup last week.
I thought Uranus was lying on its side? If we're talking about
direction of axis and direction of spin then Venus is upside-down,
IIRC.
--
Halmyre