Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
-- [UPDATE] GENERAL TEMPLATE AS DEMAND FOR ANYONE TO DISCLOSE NAME AND ADDRESS INFO
0 views
Skip to first unread message
dolf
Jul 18, 2016, 2:18:40 AM7/18/16
to
We have had a contempt shown by one party already, thus a power of
arrest exists for a continuation of the defined Criminal Offenses
nominated--after the expiration of 14 days, I will convey the matter to
the local Victoria Police for their consideration of action.
- dolf
SUBJECT: GENERAL TEMPLATE AS DEMAND FOR ANYONE TO DISCLOSE NAME AND
ADDRESS INFO
TO: [Insert Name]
[Insert Social Media Location]
ADMINISTRATOR
[Insert Administrator's Name]
DATE: Monday 18 July, 2016
SUBJECT:
A LAWFUL DEMAND FOR THE PROVISION OF A CORRECT NAME AND ADDRESS, AND A
REMORSEFUL STATEMENT AS A DETERMINED PROCESS OF RESTITUTION FOR DEFAMATION
AND CENSORSHIP.
ONLINE LINK:
- [Insert Link]
1) I know that the realisation, I can lawfully take this proposed action
against you may seem incredulous to you. But a failure to comply within
fourteen (14) days of it receipt by registered mail, will result within
your arrest for the Criminal Conduct specified below so as to ensure
good public order, and your conveyance to a Court having an appropriate
jurisdiction to determine the matters.
2) On 11 July 2016, I initially forwarded this lawful request now being
made directly of you, to the editor of the Sydney Star Observer as the
principle organ within the GLBTI community. Which acts to inform by
news and opinion, shape our collective community consciousness and
assist in directing us towards a common and complimentary purpose as
collective action.
3) I undertook such remedial action out of consideration for fair,
merciful and equitable justice, as I was empathetic to the situation,
that the lack of any remorseful action as conscious intent to remedy the
public defamatory conduct, despite being requested to do so, was most
probably due to such party, being: "born in 1989 within rural Victoria,
spending the first 15 years of her life pretty much illiterate due to a
disability of severe dyslexia so reading writing is pretty much an
impossible task."
4) Accordingly, I approached the Sydney Star Observer to act as an
Independent Party (on behalf of the GLBTI Community Interest) in the
circumstance, where the alleged criminal conduct has been committed by a
person with a reduced intellectual capability due to a physical
disability of dyslexia.
5) But that consequence as life circumstance, in no wise diminishes
their legal culpability. Or if they are by such disability rendered so
stupidly incapable, that it was any other party's legal culpability as
equally a moral accountability to respond accordingly to this obligation
to respond accordingly, which is being undertaken by this forceful and
lawful demand.
6) Furthermore, as a further consideration for the well being of others,
and so as to accord all parties involved within such public defamatory
activity, with an equitable and fair undertaking of justice. I
therefore further requested that the Sydney Star Observer newspaper
undertake such Community Guardianship on behalf of all parties which I
had nominated.
7) Specifically I requested that the Independent Party on behalf of
persons with diminished capability, contact each respective nominated
party and convey to them by a suitable explanation, such that they fully
understood the following legal demand which is placed upon them.
8) Accordingly, any accompanying documents as substantive grounds for
such an indictment as legal prosecution which is intended to be brought
against them should they fail to act with due diligence and fully
respond to this lawful demand.
9) Such demand which is placed upon them, by the exercise of a lawful
authority which I have as the determined, prudent, peaceful but forceful
means to bring a remedial effect as resolution to a matter over which I
am sorely aggrieved and for which they have shown a continuing
neglectful contempt towards.
10) I requested that the nominated Independent Party, immediately advise
me by a return email, of their willingness to undertake the legal
responsibility of an "Independent Party In Order to Effectively and
Compassionately Resolve a GLBTI Legal Issue in relation to the
prerogative adoption of Same Sex Marriage."
11) And advised them to be cautious within their reply, such as to not
to make any statement as a contemptuous disrespect shown towards this
request as a lawful action, by a presumptive ignorance--such ungracious
conduct would, I conveyed, then subject themselves to an imputed
accountability for which an equivalent legal redress would be sought.
12) In the understanding, that a failure to undertake this action of a
nominated Independent party as an empathy towards their humanity, I
cautioned that it will then necessitate, my simply electronically
messaging each party with appropriate URL references to any supporting
documents without any regard for the distress and duress which is
lawfully brought against them.
AUTHORITY TO REQUEST A NAME AND ADDRESS
13) The following are the legal issues involving an individual's
responsibilities and rights, in disclosing or restating as confirmation
of identity their name and address when requested to do so, by police is
discussed in the following excerpt, which is obtained from the Victorian
Government Legal Aid www-site. (A link is provided below)
14) The police do not have the right to demand your name or address
without a reason. Generally, a police officer can only ask you to give
your name and address if they believe you:
- Have committed an offence
- Are about to commit an offence.
For example, a police officer can ask you for your name and address if
they believe you bought alcohol and you are under 18.
15) Other times the police can ask for your name and address are:
- If you are driving a vehicle or boat and a police officer signals for
you to stop. You must stop and show the police officer your licence or
permit;
- If you are on the tram, train, bus or on public transport property
(public transport inspectors and protective services officers can also
ask for your name and address);
- If you are in a hotel or licensed premises (staff can also ask your age);
- If they believe you have information that could help them investigate
an indictable offence.
16) They must tell you what offence they think you can help them
investigate.
The police must tell you why they want your details. If they don't give
you a reason, you should ask for it.
It is an offence to refuse to give police your name and address or to
give police a false name and address if they have a lawful reason to ask
you for your details.
-
https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/find-legal-answers/police-powers-and-your-rights/speaking-to-police
17) This power to request a 'name and address' is also conferred upon an
individual, but only within the extraordinary contextual circumstance of
"FINDS COMMITTING AND POWER OF ARREST PROVISIONS" which occurs when a
"person found committing offences may be arrested without warrant by any
person" under Section 458 of the Crimes Act of 1958:
SECTION 458(1) amended by No. 37/2014 s. 10 (Schedule item 36.13).
(1) Any person, whether a police officer or not, may at any time without
warrant apprehend and take before a bail justice or the Magistrates'
Court to be dealt with according to law or deliver to a police officer
to be so taken, any person—
(a) He finds committing any offence (whether an indictable offence or an
offence punishable on summary conviction) where he believes on
reasonable grounds that the apprehension of the person is necessary for
any one or more of the following reasons, namely—
SECTION 458(1)(a)(i) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97 (Schedule item 40.30).
(i) to ensure the attendance of the offender before a court of competent
jurisdiction;
(ii) to preserve public order;
(iii) to prevent the continuation or repetition of the offence or the
commission of a further offence; or
(iv) for the safety or welfare of members of the public or of the offender;
SECTION 458(1)(b) amended by No. 37/2014 s. 10 (Schedule item 36.13).
(b) when instructed so to do by any police officer having power under
this Act to apprehend that person; or
SECTION 458(1)(c) amended by No. 117/1986 s. 6 (Schedule 1 item 1(8)(a)).
(c) he believes on reasonable grounds is escaping from legal custody or
aiding or abetting another person to escape from legal custody or
avoiding apprehension by some person having authority to apprehend that
person in the circumstances of the case.
(2) For the purposes of paragraph (a) in subsection (1) "offence" means
offence at common law or a contravention of or failure to comply with a
provision of an Act of Parliament and unless otherwise by Act of
Parliament expressly provided does not include a contravention of or
failure to comply with a rule regulation by-law or other law made under
an Act of Parliament.
SECTION 458(3) amended by Nos 9008 s. 2(1)(Schedule item 2(k)), 68/2009
s. 97 (Schedule item 40.31).
(3) A person who has been apprehended without warrant pursuant to the
provisions of paragraph (a) in subsection (1) in respect of any offence
punishable on summary conviction (not being an indictable offence that
may be heard and determined summarily) and taken into custody shall be
held in the custody of the person apprehending him only so long as any
reason referred to in the said paragraph for his apprehension continues
and where, before that person is charged with an offence, it appears to
the person arresting that person that the reason no longer continues the
person arresting that other person shall, without any further or other
authority than this subsection, release that person from custody without
bail or cause him to be so released and whether or not a summons has
been issued against him or a notice to appear has been served on him
with respect to the offence alleged.
SECTION 458(4) inserted by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Schedule item 40.32).
(4) In subsection (3), "notice to appear" has the same meaning as in the
Criminal Procedure Act 2009 .
SECTION 459 (Heading) inserted by No. 43/2011 s. 17(1), amended by No.
37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 36.14).
SECTION 459 substituted by No. 8247 s. 2, amended by No. 43/2011 s.
17(2)(3) (ILA s. 39B(1)).
PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINT:
18. The statements and actions (ie. that are summarily detailed within
the forwarded message section below) against which I specially raise my
complaint concerning their absence of any rational, reasoned explanation
beyond defamatory and untruthful characterizations as pejoratives. The
only accountability and justification for such membership actions of
others and in which you also engaged and incited was a remedial action
of censorship. They speak of the great abysmal depth of depravity and
perversity which is entirely another's claim to a faux-piety--as the
granting to themselves of an improper, disproportionate and egotistical
sense of entitlement, to then make their unfounded claims.
19. Such Internet based conduct in which it is alleged, you (ie. BY
INDISCRIMINATE ACT OF CENSORSHIP AND DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS OF YOURS OR
OTHERS) have engaged in, occurred on the (ie. [INSERT GROUP NAME])
www-page (xxx members) over which you have improperly exercised a
discretionary right of administration, and comprises various modes and
phases of action, namely:
- [INSERT URL LINK FOR SPECIFIC SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORK]
a) vitriolic characterisations as mocking by unreasoned, irrational,
illogical and unfathomable rebuke as contempt, defamation and slander by
making knowingly false statements by others on groups to which you are
associated;
b) censorship or threat of censorship as excoriation;
c) an impetus for social exclusion;
d) continuing reluctance to rectify any improper conduct.
It therefore by such continuance as impunity against which I am sorely
troubled and grieved, meets the criteria of a person found committing
offences who may be arrested without warrant by any person under Section
458 of the Crimes Act of 1958.
20. And by it's compliance with multiple meta-elements (ie. but not all
of the following) which comprises my understanding of a conceptual and
practical definition of 'fascist' as category of understanding:
a) xenophobic, racial or disease prejudice (eg. Africans have a higher
incidence of HIV disease infection)
b) psycho-sexualism ,
c) vehement anti-religiosity except your own belief, non-belief or disbelief
d) fascist characterizations (eg. this can be as simplistic as an
improper orthography of my name, by its depiction as Adolf)
e) deification of narcissistic ignorance (eg. this can be as simplistic
as an improper orthography of my name, by its depiction as dolt)
21. That this quintessential characteristic of racialism,
psycho-sexualism and implied hymenealism (ie. marriage as an
institutionalized values based religious belief, disbelief or
non-belief), it is alleged is then the cause of an utmost contempt for
the autonomy of self identity of others, sovereign authority, law and
order as justice.
MY JUSTIFIABLE DEFENSE AGAINST ANY SUCH IMPUNITY
22. In order to negate the slanderous characterisation that my public
comments and present actions are the product of an "unsound mind through
drug dependancy as use and addiction use", at 1030 hours on 28 June,
2016 I attended a consultation with my Doctor as a Special General
Practitioner, and voluntarily by my own authority sought a "urine drug
screen/unsupervised."
This sample was collected [UR NO: G14172961; DR REF: 21480] at 0916
hours on 29 June 2016 at an accredited Pathology Lab Number:
16-40978661, and the result printed at 0959 hours on 11 June, 2016 is as
follows:
OPIATES: Not Detected
AMPEH-TYPE SUBS: Not Detected
BENZODIAZEPINES: DETECTED
CANNABINOIDS: Not Detected
COCAINE METAB.: Not Detected
METHADONE METAB.: Not Detected
CREATININE: 3.3 mmol/L
POSITIVE RESULTS without GC/MS confirmation are presumptive only.
23. The positive result for the detection benzodiazepines can be
justified as a lawful use of an otherwise prohibited Schedule 4 class
drug, in that a non-repeat prescription for 25 x Temazepam (10 mg)
Tablets was obtained from my General Practitioner on the day prior (with
one taken that night) on the grounds, that I had unusually twice
presented at such medical appointment consultations in a fatigued state.
Which was caused by "frequent nightly awakenings, disrupted normal
sleeping and insomnia" as a result of engaging within a high level of
conceptual metaphysical and metempirical thought content, data
throughput and threshold limits of neural linguistic stimuli and
associated categories of understanding through the consequential effect
of steeping.
24. A medical as pharmaceutical temporary, short-term and occasional
insomnia intervention was sought by me so as to impose periods of rest,
during the final executory phase of anti-terrorism initiative. And as
the recipients of this document will no doubt attest, Temazapam's
anxiolytic (anti-anxiety), anti-convulsant, and skeletal muscle relaxant
properties are worth-while considerations.
25. The development of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is my claim to an
Intellectual Property as being compliant with a Natural Law, Common Law
and egalitarian right, in that it establishes the prima facie claim,
that my past conduct has integrity, and with regard to an expression of
an Autonomy of Will.
26. And is entirely the rational, reasoned impetus and determined
paradigmatic nature of my own covert internet religious based GLBTI
Community activism and advocacy activity as a focused anti-terrorism
initiative, which has sought:
a) To effect a denial of any claimed "divine imperative" by the Islamic
terrorist group Al-Qaeda associated to the EVENT of 11 September, 2001
as terror attacks against the United States of America and any
subsequent justification for War (see: 'Atheist Dilemma' and 'Here is a
little story for you' as email of 13 July 2016 made to the 'American
Consulate in Sydney' and the 'senior Library Technician at Victoria
Police Library');
b) A PLAN to undermine the foundations of Islamic extremist religious
belief; and
c) Give an auxiliary (ie. providing supplementary or additional help and
support) and prerogative (ie. a privileged right of the sovereign that
is theoretically subject to no restriction) SUPPORT to any Gay and
Lesbian Community's initiatives towards the adoption of same sex
marriage legislation.
d) To invalidate the original Letters Patent by Queen Victoria as
enabling the Constitution as Commonwealth of Australia of 1 January,
1901 and undertaking such action without any impunity (see: LAWYER
BRIEFING - Q&A MUSINGS ON BREXIT) directed to its formulation as an
instrument of British Empire Governance;
e) To provide the metempirical (ie. the branch of philosophy that deals
with things existing beyond the realm of experience) philosophical and
theological basis as the intellectual means to provide briefing matters
as the impetus for an indictment of Treason brought against Cardinal
George Pell in his contempt, as an absolute rejection on hymenal
(marriage) grounds for the refusal of Communion on Pentecost Sundays of
31 May, 1998 and 21 June, 2000 to any persons wearing the GLBTI
Community's symbol represented as a rainbow sash. (see: PUSY THIN DICK)
27. Accordingly, your perverse and adversarial public Internet conduct
has been an unbridled and unrestrained attempt to impede the successful
completion of the above stated goals (which I have concluded), to murder
my reputation and human dignity without any conscious acceptance of the
merit to the aforementioned action against religious extremism as
anti-humanity, anti-society, anti-civilization and anti-religion activity.
28. And to put it simply, to annihilate my reputation, impugn my
wellbeing and welfare by diminishing my life opportunity through a death
wish as willful conduct, neglect or self harm.
29. That the consequential effect of such "unreasonable public as
willful Internet originating and social consequential continuing
conduct" as to what amounts to be criminal conduct by such named persons
is that they might themselves "suffer from a public notoriety and
disgrace" in addition to any determination by a court of competent
jurisdiction for which they are to be brought before and their arrest is
sought.
30. This technology of mine, is an alternative HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
being a theoretical and metaphysical noumenon, conception of the
Godhead/DIVINE and a determined contrivance associated with attributed
time (COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis), autonomous sovereignty as
empire governance, language, rationality and the reasoned mind of
religious belief:
Telos (6,000) = Arch (0) + c² : arch kai telos oida {1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10}
Where the c² is equivalent to a constant dependent on n, calculated by
the formula:
M = [n(n² + 1)] / 2
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of Progression
of individual phenomena (Wan Wu)}
= Tetragrammaton hierarchy value as HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. Organization of the myriad or *number* of
things}
31. It is not a claim that the earth and universe is only 6,000 years
old, but rather a proposition of relativity within billions of years and
a noumenal focal point as a development by which rationality transpires,
reason springs forth and that is characteristic to being human:
HOMO ('man') / HOMOIOS (*same*, *equal* *in* *force*, *a* *match* *for*
*one*, *all* *one* *to* *us*, of *numbers*, *square*, *the* *product*
*of* *two* *equal* *factors*), SAPIENS ('thinker') / SAPIENT ('being a
wise/wisdom thinker') [Deuteronomy 4:32; Genesis 1:26]
32. The great benefit about this Intellectual Property of MINE as a
legal argument: (DIEU ET MON DROIT) is that this technology for
"Judging, Weighing and Integrity of Words" is not only embedded within
the Bible as Scriptures and given assent to through an *oath*, swearing
by Almighty God, but is compatible with the regime of numbered and
natural jurisprudence (ie. the Categories of Understanding as #729
appraisals within the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as a theoretical and
metaphysical conception of the Godhead/Divine Nature as Mind, in being a
reasonable consideration, then ought to equate with the numbered
paragraphs) as being a mandatory prerequisite for the presenting of any
legal case before a court of law.
OFFENCE - DEFAMATORY CONDUCT AS UNLAWFUL USE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CARRIAGE SERVICE FOR HARASSMENT
33. It is immaterial that any such statements and censorship has been
made under the cloak of anonymity, since the determination is that they
are knowingly undertaken on the basis on unreasonable prejudice against
religious belief. In that you had a duty as onus to inform yourself
otherwise by the availability of publicly accessible information.
34. The material substance of such knowledge, then being of such a
distinctive character, immediately conveying an integrity of purpose and
coherence as an intrinsic unity of apperception. Possessed of a high
probability, as the potential for an auspicious outcome. Which now
undeniably has come to fruition.
35. Such act of censorship which were allegedly made by you constitutes
defamatory conduct and an unlawful use of telecommunications carriage
service for the incitement of harassment which is contrary to law:
OFFENCES RELATING TO THE USE OF A CARRIAGE SERVICE (SECTIONS 474.15 AND
474.17)
A 'CARRIAGE SERVICE' MEANS A SERVICE FOR CARRYING COMMUNICATIONS BY
MEANS OF GUIDED AND/OR UNGUIDED ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (SECTION 7
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1997 (COMMONWEALTH).
EXAMPLES INCLUDE:
- TELEPHONE SERVICES
- INTERNET ACCESS SERVICES
- VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VOIP) SERVICES (EG, SKYPE)
USING A CARRIAGE SERVICE TO MENACE, HARASS OR CAUSE OFFENCE (SECTION 474.17)
IT IS AN OFFENCE FOR A PERSON TO USE A CARRIAGE SERVICE IN A WAY THAT
REASONABLE PERSONS WOULD REGARD AS BEING MENACING, HARASSING OR OFFENSIVE.
MAXIMUM PENALTY: *IMPRISONMENT* *FOR* *3* *YEARS*.
FOR EXAMPLE: SENDING A PERSON A LARGE VOLUME OF OFFENSIVE TEXT MESSAGES,
EMAILS OR INSTANT MESSAGES OR A TELEPHONE OR VIDEOCONFERENCE CALLS
36. Furthermore, my complaint is that the unrestrained and
indiscriminate action of censorship, which are made on the basis of
prejudiced and irrational belief is unlawful, as a breach of human
dignity and the autonomous sovereign meta-principles being the natural
law, common and egalitarian right of a person to live their life without
such incessant, deranged and delusional impunity being an attempt to
validate their ego as self identity as otherwise anal-sadistic depraved
and perverse religious belief, non-belief or disbelief which has been
socially perpetuated as a voiced licentious mania ever since a
homosexual male was first diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in 1981.
OFFENCE - TREASON
37. Given my voluntary Internet conduct as "autonomous sovereign
meta-principles being the natural law, common and egalitarian right"
initiative which are clearly conveyed by the accompanying documents, the
additional claim is, that such unlawful conduct constitutes TREASON that
is defined under Section 9A(1) of the Victorian Crimes Act 1958, which
prohibits:
(1) A PERSON WHO--
(D) ASSISTS BY ANY MEANS WHATEVER, WITH INTENT TO ASSIST, AN ENEMY AT
WAR WITH THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, WHETHER OR NOT THE EXISTENCE OF
A STATE OF WAR HAS BEEN DECLARED;
(F) FORMS AN INTENTION TO DO ANY ACT REFERRED TO IN A PRECEDING
PARAGRAPH OF THIS SUBSECTION AND MANIFESTS THAT INTENTION BY AN OVERT ACT—
SHALL BE GUILTY OF AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE, CALLED TREASON, AND LIABLE TO--
(G) LEVEL 1 IMPRISONMENT (LIFE); OR
(H) IMPRISONMENT FOR SUCH OTHER TERM AS IS FIXED BY THE COURT—
AS THE COURT DETERMINES.
(3) ON THE TRIAL OF A PERSON CHARGED WITH TREASON ON THE GROUND THAT HE
FORMED AN INTENTION TO DO AN ACT REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH (A), (B), (C),
(D) OR (E) OF SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION AND MANIFESTED THAT
INTENTION BY AN OVERT ACT, EVIDENCE OF THE OVERT ACT SHALL NOT BE
ADMITTED UNLESS THE OVERT ACT WAS ALLEGED IN THE INDICTMENT.
38. Under the law of the United Kingdom, high treason is the crime of
disloyalty [or a disrespect] to the Crown [or the principles of the
Crown]. Offences constituting high treason include plotting the murder
of the sovereign; committing adultery with the sovereign's consort, with
the sovereign's eldest unmarried daughter, or with the wife of the heir
to the throne; levying war against the sovereign and adhering to the
sovereign's enemies, giving them aid or comfort; and attempting to
undermine the lawfully established line of succession. Several other
crimes have historically been categorised as high treason, including
counterfeiting money and being a Catholic priest. [Jesuits, etc. Act 1584]
39. That accordingly, I can unambiguously characterize those false and
uncaring statements and censorship as being "unreasonable public as
willful Internet originating and social consequential continuing
conduct" engaged on your Group's Page, as an INTENTION POSSESSED BY AN
UNREASONED AND UNBRIDLED HATRED, that they have DELIBERATELY ENGAGED IN
as reprehensible conduct conveying a sufficient degree of seriousness or
"moral culpability" as to be a matter of public concern.
40. Which is not directed against the information and reasoned
argumentation as that I have patiently provided as courtesy, but against
my person, dignity, virtuous conduct and well-being, and is the
UNFORTUNATE AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE AS AN UNCONSCIOUS "intent to
assist, an enemy at war with both the United States of America and
Commonwealth of Australia". As a grievous wrong perpetuated against the
"public interest" and thereby under our Legislation constitutes a
TREASONABLE ACT.
41. It is a requirement for me to provide the reasoning upon which I
will rely in such criminal indictment of TREASON within legal
proceedings which are conveyed by the accompanying Google Drive document
URL references below.
REQUIREMENTS SOUGHT FROM YOU
42. Accordingly, you are required by law to:
a) Immediately provide, by return email to the address given below a
declaration or otherwise restatement as a clear and factually accurate
statement of your full name, date of birth, phone number and address;
b) Within 14 days you are required to provide a statement of:
- declaring and understanding the nature of any alleged improper conduct,
- contrition for the wrongs perpetuated,
- acknowledgement of the justification and rightfulness of my
statements, conduct and actions
43. Which is to be previously agreed to by me and displayed within 28
days upon your respective social media sites and forums as required, for
a duration as determined necessary to make an effectual restitution for
your egregious and immoral, vexatious and vitriolic conduct.
44. However, you ought to be cautious in reply, such as to not to make
any further statement or such actions as censorship of this notice or by
means of blocking as a further disrespect shown towards this request as
a lawful action, by a presumptive ignorance. Such ungracious conduct
will then subject yourself to a further accountability for which a legal
redress would be sought.
45. A failure to acquiesce and unreservedly comply to this reasonable
and lawful request, will result in your immediate arrest by a member of
the police force.
- dolf
Email: dolf...@hotmail.com
dolf...@gmail.com
Mobile: 0474 237 617
-------- Forwarded Message --------
DEFAMATORY AS INDISCRIMINATE CENSORSHIP FROM: "[INSERT SOCIAL MEDIA
NETWORK HERE]", [SPECIFY DATE]
-------- END OF CONTENT --------
ENCLOSURES:
"PUSY THIN DICK" of 13 - 17 July, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indN3BOOXZ2OVdSUm8
EMAIL OF 'HERE IS A LITTLE STORY FOR YOU'" of 13 July 2016 made to
American Consulate (Sydney) and 'Senior Library Technician at Victoria
Police Library'
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indbm04eUVtS3FWWmM
"IF IT'S GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE GOOSE (ie. [informal] a *foolish* person)
IT'S GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE GANDER (ie. *look* or glance at something) as
NADEGDA'S *MENTAL* *DEFICIENCY* AND DELUSION" of 8-12 July, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indcG9PemlzclFNVm8
"KARL BARTH ON KNOWLEDGE OF GOD" of 4 - 12 July, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indc1B0WjhzNUM2RGM
"I WARNED THEM OF AN IMPENDING CURSE OVER UNREMORSEFUL CATHOLIC
ANTI-SEMITISM: IT'S TIME THE IMPUDENT, IMPOTENT & LYING POPE FRANCIS
TOOK ACTION" of 28 Jun - 5 July 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indX3p5bzVxWER6VFE
- "FERTILITY CONTROL CLINIC SUPPORT" of 25 - 26 June, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indUFhreFh4aTZ5NWM
"LAWYER BRIEFING - Q&A MUSINGS ON BREXIT" of 25 - 26 June, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indYnQxbzhiMzZlQlE
"ATHEIST DILEMMA" of 4 - 8 May, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indZEZ2amJyR2tubkE
arrest exists for a continuation of the defined Criminal Offenses
nominated--after the expiration of 14 days, I will convey the matter to
the local Victoria Police for their consideration of action.
- dolf
SUBJECT: GENERAL TEMPLATE AS DEMAND FOR ANYONE TO DISCLOSE NAME AND
ADDRESS INFO
TO: [Insert Name]
[Insert Social Media Location]
ADMINISTRATOR
[Insert Administrator's Name]
DATE: Monday 18 July, 2016
SUBJECT:
A LAWFUL DEMAND FOR THE PROVISION OF A CORRECT NAME AND ADDRESS, AND A
REMORSEFUL STATEMENT AS A DETERMINED PROCESS OF RESTITUTION FOR DEFAMATION
AND CENSORSHIP.
ONLINE LINK:
- [Insert Link]
1) I know that the realisation, I can lawfully take this proposed action
against you may seem incredulous to you. But a failure to comply within
fourteen (14) days of it receipt by registered mail, will result within
your arrest for the Criminal Conduct specified below so as to ensure
good public order, and your conveyance to a Court having an appropriate
jurisdiction to determine the matters.
2) On 11 July 2016, I initially forwarded this lawful request now being
made directly of you, to the editor of the Sydney Star Observer as the
principle organ within the GLBTI community. Which acts to inform by
news and opinion, shape our collective community consciousness and
assist in directing us towards a common and complimentary purpose as
collective action.
3) I undertook such remedial action out of consideration for fair,
merciful and equitable justice, as I was empathetic to the situation,
that the lack of any remorseful action as conscious intent to remedy the
public defamatory conduct, despite being requested to do so, was most
probably due to such party, being: "born in 1989 within rural Victoria,
spending the first 15 years of her life pretty much illiterate due to a
disability of severe dyslexia so reading writing is pretty much an
impossible task."
4) Accordingly, I approached the Sydney Star Observer to act as an
Independent Party (on behalf of the GLBTI Community Interest) in the
circumstance, where the alleged criminal conduct has been committed by a
person with a reduced intellectual capability due to a physical
disability of dyslexia.
5) But that consequence as life circumstance, in no wise diminishes
their legal culpability. Or if they are by such disability rendered so
stupidly incapable, that it was any other party's legal culpability as
equally a moral accountability to respond accordingly to this obligation
to respond accordingly, which is being undertaken by this forceful and
lawful demand.
6) Furthermore, as a further consideration for the well being of others,
and so as to accord all parties involved within such public defamatory
activity, with an equitable and fair undertaking of justice. I
therefore further requested that the Sydney Star Observer newspaper
undertake such Community Guardianship on behalf of all parties which I
had nominated.
7) Specifically I requested that the Independent Party on behalf of
persons with diminished capability, contact each respective nominated
party and convey to them by a suitable explanation, such that they fully
understood the following legal demand which is placed upon them.
8) Accordingly, any accompanying documents as substantive grounds for
such an indictment as legal prosecution which is intended to be brought
against them should they fail to act with due diligence and fully
respond to this lawful demand.
9) Such demand which is placed upon them, by the exercise of a lawful
authority which I have as the determined, prudent, peaceful but forceful
means to bring a remedial effect as resolution to a matter over which I
am sorely aggrieved and for which they have shown a continuing
neglectful contempt towards.
10) I requested that the nominated Independent Party, immediately advise
me by a return email, of their willingness to undertake the legal
responsibility of an "Independent Party In Order to Effectively and
Compassionately Resolve a GLBTI Legal Issue in relation to the
prerogative adoption of Same Sex Marriage."
11) And advised them to be cautious within their reply, such as to not
to make any statement as a contemptuous disrespect shown towards this
request as a lawful action, by a presumptive ignorance--such ungracious
conduct would, I conveyed, then subject themselves to an imputed
accountability for which an equivalent legal redress would be sought.
12) In the understanding, that a failure to undertake this action of a
nominated Independent party as an empathy towards their humanity, I
cautioned that it will then necessitate, my simply electronically
messaging each party with appropriate URL references to any supporting
documents without any regard for the distress and duress which is
lawfully brought against them.
AUTHORITY TO REQUEST A NAME AND ADDRESS
13) The following are the legal issues involving an individual's
responsibilities and rights, in disclosing or restating as confirmation
of identity their name and address when requested to do so, by police is
discussed in the following excerpt, which is obtained from the Victorian
Government Legal Aid www-site. (A link is provided below)
14) The police do not have the right to demand your name or address
without a reason. Generally, a police officer can only ask you to give
your name and address if they believe you:
- Have committed an offence
- Are about to commit an offence.
For example, a police officer can ask you for your name and address if
they believe you bought alcohol and you are under 18.
15) Other times the police can ask for your name and address are:
- If you are driving a vehicle or boat and a police officer signals for
you to stop. You must stop and show the police officer your licence or
permit;
- If you are on the tram, train, bus or on public transport property
(public transport inspectors and protective services officers can also
ask for your name and address);
- If you are in a hotel or licensed premises (staff can also ask your age);
- If they believe you have information that could help them investigate
an indictable offence.
16) They must tell you what offence they think you can help them
investigate.
The police must tell you why they want your details. If they don't give
you a reason, you should ask for it.
It is an offence to refuse to give police your name and address or to
give police a false name and address if they have a lawful reason to ask
you for your details.
-
https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/find-legal-answers/police-powers-and-your-rights/speaking-to-police
17) This power to request a 'name and address' is also conferred upon an
individual, but only within the extraordinary contextual circumstance of
"FINDS COMMITTING AND POWER OF ARREST PROVISIONS" which occurs when a
"person found committing offences may be arrested without warrant by any
person" under Section 458 of the Crimes Act of 1958:
SECTION 458(1) amended by No. 37/2014 s. 10 (Schedule item 36.13).
(1) Any person, whether a police officer or not, may at any time without
warrant apprehend and take before a bail justice or the Magistrates'
Court to be dealt with according to law or deliver to a police officer
to be so taken, any person—
(a) He finds committing any offence (whether an indictable offence or an
offence punishable on summary conviction) where he believes on
reasonable grounds that the apprehension of the person is necessary for
any one or more of the following reasons, namely—
SECTION 458(1)(a)(i) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97 (Schedule item 40.30).
(i) to ensure the attendance of the offender before a court of competent
jurisdiction;
(ii) to preserve public order;
(iii) to prevent the continuation or repetition of the offence or the
commission of a further offence; or
(iv) for the safety or welfare of members of the public or of the offender;
SECTION 458(1)(b) amended by No. 37/2014 s. 10 (Schedule item 36.13).
(b) when instructed so to do by any police officer having power under
this Act to apprehend that person; or
SECTION 458(1)(c) amended by No. 117/1986 s. 6 (Schedule 1 item 1(8)(a)).
(c) he believes on reasonable grounds is escaping from legal custody or
aiding or abetting another person to escape from legal custody or
avoiding apprehension by some person having authority to apprehend that
person in the circumstances of the case.
(2) For the purposes of paragraph (a) in subsection (1) "offence" means
offence at common law or a contravention of or failure to comply with a
provision of an Act of Parliament and unless otherwise by Act of
Parliament expressly provided does not include a contravention of or
failure to comply with a rule regulation by-law or other law made under
an Act of Parliament.
SECTION 458(3) amended by Nos 9008 s. 2(1)(Schedule item 2(k)), 68/2009
s. 97 (Schedule item 40.31).
(3) A person who has been apprehended without warrant pursuant to the
provisions of paragraph (a) in subsection (1) in respect of any offence
punishable on summary conviction (not being an indictable offence that
may be heard and determined summarily) and taken into custody shall be
held in the custody of the person apprehending him only so long as any
reason referred to in the said paragraph for his apprehension continues
and where, before that person is charged with an offence, it appears to
the person arresting that person that the reason no longer continues the
person arresting that other person shall, without any further or other
authority than this subsection, release that person from custody without
bail or cause him to be so released and whether or not a summons has
been issued against him or a notice to appear has been served on him
with respect to the offence alleged.
SECTION 458(4) inserted by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Schedule item 40.32).
(4) In subsection (3), "notice to appear" has the same meaning as in the
Criminal Procedure Act 2009 .
SECTION 459 (Heading) inserted by No. 43/2011 s. 17(1), amended by No.
37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 36.14).
SECTION 459 substituted by No. 8247 s. 2, amended by No. 43/2011 s.
17(2)(3) (ILA s. 39B(1)).
PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINT:
18. The statements and actions (ie. that are summarily detailed within
the forwarded message section below) against which I specially raise my
complaint concerning their absence of any rational, reasoned explanation
beyond defamatory and untruthful characterizations as pejoratives. The
only accountability and justification for such membership actions of
others and in which you also engaged and incited was a remedial action
of censorship. They speak of the great abysmal depth of depravity and
perversity which is entirely another's claim to a faux-piety--as the
granting to themselves of an improper, disproportionate and egotistical
sense of entitlement, to then make their unfounded claims.
19. Such Internet based conduct in which it is alleged, you (ie. BY
INDISCRIMINATE ACT OF CENSORSHIP AND DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS OF YOURS OR
OTHERS) have engaged in, occurred on the (ie. [INSERT GROUP NAME])
www-page (xxx members) over which you have improperly exercised a
discretionary right of administration, and comprises various modes and
phases of action, namely:
- [INSERT URL LINK FOR SPECIFIC SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORK]
a) vitriolic characterisations as mocking by unreasoned, irrational,
illogical and unfathomable rebuke as contempt, defamation and slander by
making knowingly false statements by others on groups to which you are
associated;
b) censorship or threat of censorship as excoriation;
c) an impetus for social exclusion;
d) continuing reluctance to rectify any improper conduct.
It therefore by such continuance as impunity against which I am sorely
troubled and grieved, meets the criteria of a person found committing
offences who may be arrested without warrant by any person under Section
458 of the Crimes Act of 1958.
20. And by it's compliance with multiple meta-elements (ie. but not all
of the following) which comprises my understanding of a conceptual and
practical definition of 'fascist' as category of understanding:
a) xenophobic, racial or disease prejudice (eg. Africans have a higher
incidence of HIV disease infection)
b) psycho-sexualism ,
c) vehement anti-religiosity except your own belief, non-belief or disbelief
d) fascist characterizations (eg. this can be as simplistic as an
improper orthography of my name, by its depiction as Adolf)
e) deification of narcissistic ignorance (eg. this can be as simplistic
as an improper orthography of my name, by its depiction as dolt)
21. That this quintessential characteristic of racialism,
psycho-sexualism and implied hymenealism (ie. marriage as an
institutionalized values based religious belief, disbelief or
non-belief), it is alleged is then the cause of an utmost contempt for
the autonomy of self identity of others, sovereign authority, law and
order as justice.
MY JUSTIFIABLE DEFENSE AGAINST ANY SUCH IMPUNITY
22. In order to negate the slanderous characterisation that my public
comments and present actions are the product of an "unsound mind through
drug dependancy as use and addiction use", at 1030 hours on 28 June,
2016 I attended a consultation with my Doctor as a Special General
Practitioner, and voluntarily by my own authority sought a "urine drug
screen/unsupervised."
This sample was collected [UR NO: G14172961; DR REF: 21480] at 0916
hours on 29 June 2016 at an accredited Pathology Lab Number:
16-40978661, and the result printed at 0959 hours on 11 June, 2016 is as
follows:
OPIATES: Not Detected
AMPEH-TYPE SUBS: Not Detected
BENZODIAZEPINES: DETECTED
CANNABINOIDS: Not Detected
COCAINE METAB.: Not Detected
METHADONE METAB.: Not Detected
CREATININE: 3.3 mmol/L
POSITIVE RESULTS without GC/MS confirmation are presumptive only.
23. The positive result for the detection benzodiazepines can be
justified as a lawful use of an otherwise prohibited Schedule 4 class
drug, in that a non-repeat prescription for 25 x Temazepam (10 mg)
Tablets was obtained from my General Practitioner on the day prior (with
one taken that night) on the grounds, that I had unusually twice
presented at such medical appointment consultations in a fatigued state.
Which was caused by "frequent nightly awakenings, disrupted normal
sleeping and insomnia" as a result of engaging within a high level of
conceptual metaphysical and metempirical thought content, data
throughput and threshold limits of neural linguistic stimuli and
associated categories of understanding through the consequential effect
of steeping.
24. A medical as pharmaceutical temporary, short-term and occasional
insomnia intervention was sought by me so as to impose periods of rest,
during the final executory phase of anti-terrorism initiative. And as
the recipients of this document will no doubt attest, Temazapam's
anxiolytic (anti-anxiety), anti-convulsant, and skeletal muscle relaxant
properties are worth-while considerations.
25. The development of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is my claim to an
Intellectual Property as being compliant with a Natural Law, Common Law
and egalitarian right, in that it establishes the prima facie claim,
that my past conduct has integrity, and with regard to an expression of
an Autonomy of Will.
26. And is entirely the rational, reasoned impetus and determined
paradigmatic nature of my own covert internet religious based GLBTI
Community activism and advocacy activity as a focused anti-terrorism
initiative, which has sought:
a) To effect a denial of any claimed "divine imperative" by the Islamic
terrorist group Al-Qaeda associated to the EVENT of 11 September, 2001
as terror attacks against the United States of America and any
subsequent justification for War (see: 'Atheist Dilemma' and 'Here is a
little story for you' as email of 13 July 2016 made to the 'American
Consulate in Sydney' and the 'senior Library Technician at Victoria
Police Library');
b) A PLAN to undermine the foundations of Islamic extremist religious
belief; and
c) Give an auxiliary (ie. providing supplementary or additional help and
support) and prerogative (ie. a privileged right of the sovereign that
is theoretically subject to no restriction) SUPPORT to any Gay and
Lesbian Community's initiatives towards the adoption of same sex
marriage legislation.
d) To invalidate the original Letters Patent by Queen Victoria as
enabling the Constitution as Commonwealth of Australia of 1 January,
1901 and undertaking such action without any impunity (see: LAWYER
BRIEFING - Q&A MUSINGS ON BREXIT) directed to its formulation as an
instrument of British Empire Governance;
e) To provide the metempirical (ie. the branch of philosophy that deals
with things existing beyond the realm of experience) philosophical and
theological basis as the intellectual means to provide briefing matters
as the impetus for an indictment of Treason brought against Cardinal
George Pell in his contempt, as an absolute rejection on hymenal
(marriage) grounds for the refusal of Communion on Pentecost Sundays of
31 May, 1998 and 21 June, 2000 to any persons wearing the GLBTI
Community's symbol represented as a rainbow sash. (see: PUSY THIN DICK)
27. Accordingly, your perverse and adversarial public Internet conduct
has been an unbridled and unrestrained attempt to impede the successful
completion of the above stated goals (which I have concluded), to murder
my reputation and human dignity without any conscious acceptance of the
merit to the aforementioned action against religious extremism as
anti-humanity, anti-society, anti-civilization and anti-religion activity.
28. And to put it simply, to annihilate my reputation, impugn my
wellbeing and welfare by diminishing my life opportunity through a death
wish as willful conduct, neglect or self harm.
29. That the consequential effect of such "unreasonable public as
willful Internet originating and social consequential continuing
conduct" as to what amounts to be criminal conduct by such named persons
is that they might themselves "suffer from a public notoriety and
disgrace" in addition to any determination by a court of competent
jurisdiction for which they are to be brought before and their arrest is
sought.
30. This technology of mine, is an alternative HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
being a theoretical and metaphysical noumenon, conception of the
Godhead/DIVINE and a determined contrivance associated with attributed
time (COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis), autonomous sovereignty as
empire governance, language, rationality and the reasoned mind of
religious belief:
Telos (6,000) = Arch (0) + c² : arch kai telos oida {1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10}
Where the c² is equivalent to a constant dependent on n, calculated by
the formula:
M = [n(n² + 1)] / 2
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of Progression
of individual phenomena (Wan Wu)}
= Tetragrammaton hierarchy value as HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. Organization of the myriad or *number* of
things}
31. It is not a claim that the earth and universe is only 6,000 years
old, but rather a proposition of relativity within billions of years and
a noumenal focal point as a development by which rationality transpires,
reason springs forth and that is characteristic to being human:
HOMO ('man') / HOMOIOS (*same*, *equal* *in* *force*, *a* *match* *for*
*one*, *all* *one* *to* *us*, of *numbers*, *square*, *the* *product*
*of* *two* *equal* *factors*), SAPIENS ('thinker') / SAPIENT ('being a
wise/wisdom thinker') [Deuteronomy 4:32; Genesis 1:26]
32. The great benefit about this Intellectual Property of MINE as a
legal argument: (DIEU ET MON DROIT) is that this technology for
"Judging, Weighing and Integrity of Words" is not only embedded within
the Bible as Scriptures and given assent to through an *oath*, swearing
by Almighty God, but is compatible with the regime of numbered and
natural jurisprudence (ie. the Categories of Understanding as #729
appraisals within the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as a theoretical and
metaphysical conception of the Godhead/Divine Nature as Mind, in being a
reasonable consideration, then ought to equate with the numbered
paragraphs) as being a mandatory prerequisite for the presenting of any
legal case before a court of law.
OFFENCE - DEFAMATORY CONDUCT AS UNLAWFUL USE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CARRIAGE SERVICE FOR HARASSMENT
33. It is immaterial that any such statements and censorship has been
made under the cloak of anonymity, since the determination is that they
are knowingly undertaken on the basis on unreasonable prejudice against
religious belief. In that you had a duty as onus to inform yourself
otherwise by the availability of publicly accessible information.
34. The material substance of such knowledge, then being of such a
distinctive character, immediately conveying an integrity of purpose and
coherence as an intrinsic unity of apperception. Possessed of a high
probability, as the potential for an auspicious outcome. Which now
undeniably has come to fruition.
35. Such act of censorship which were allegedly made by you constitutes
defamatory conduct and an unlawful use of telecommunications carriage
service for the incitement of harassment which is contrary to law:
OFFENCES RELATING TO THE USE OF A CARRIAGE SERVICE (SECTIONS 474.15 AND
474.17)
A 'CARRIAGE SERVICE' MEANS A SERVICE FOR CARRYING COMMUNICATIONS BY
MEANS OF GUIDED AND/OR UNGUIDED ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (SECTION 7
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1997 (COMMONWEALTH).
EXAMPLES INCLUDE:
- TELEPHONE SERVICES
- INTERNET ACCESS SERVICES
- VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VOIP) SERVICES (EG, SKYPE)
USING A CARRIAGE SERVICE TO MENACE, HARASS OR CAUSE OFFENCE (SECTION 474.17)
IT IS AN OFFENCE FOR A PERSON TO USE A CARRIAGE SERVICE IN A WAY THAT
REASONABLE PERSONS WOULD REGARD AS BEING MENACING, HARASSING OR OFFENSIVE.
MAXIMUM PENALTY: *IMPRISONMENT* *FOR* *3* *YEARS*.
FOR EXAMPLE: SENDING A PERSON A LARGE VOLUME OF OFFENSIVE TEXT MESSAGES,
EMAILS OR INSTANT MESSAGES OR A TELEPHONE OR VIDEOCONFERENCE CALLS
36. Furthermore, my complaint is that the unrestrained and
indiscriminate action of censorship, which are made on the basis of
prejudiced and irrational belief is unlawful, as a breach of human
dignity and the autonomous sovereign meta-principles being the natural
law, common and egalitarian right of a person to live their life without
such incessant, deranged and delusional impunity being an attempt to
validate their ego as self identity as otherwise anal-sadistic depraved
and perverse religious belief, non-belief or disbelief which has been
socially perpetuated as a voiced licentious mania ever since a
homosexual male was first diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in 1981.
OFFENCE - TREASON
37. Given my voluntary Internet conduct as "autonomous sovereign
meta-principles being the natural law, common and egalitarian right"
initiative which are clearly conveyed by the accompanying documents, the
additional claim is, that such unlawful conduct constitutes TREASON that
is defined under Section 9A(1) of the Victorian Crimes Act 1958, which
prohibits:
(1) A PERSON WHO--
(D) ASSISTS BY ANY MEANS WHATEVER, WITH INTENT TO ASSIST, AN ENEMY AT
WAR WITH THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, WHETHER OR NOT THE EXISTENCE OF
A STATE OF WAR HAS BEEN DECLARED;
(F) FORMS AN INTENTION TO DO ANY ACT REFERRED TO IN A PRECEDING
PARAGRAPH OF THIS SUBSECTION AND MANIFESTS THAT INTENTION BY AN OVERT ACT—
SHALL BE GUILTY OF AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE, CALLED TREASON, AND LIABLE TO--
(G) LEVEL 1 IMPRISONMENT (LIFE); OR
(H) IMPRISONMENT FOR SUCH OTHER TERM AS IS FIXED BY THE COURT—
AS THE COURT DETERMINES.
(3) ON THE TRIAL OF A PERSON CHARGED WITH TREASON ON THE GROUND THAT HE
FORMED AN INTENTION TO DO AN ACT REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH (A), (B), (C),
(D) OR (E) OF SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION AND MANIFESTED THAT
INTENTION BY AN OVERT ACT, EVIDENCE OF THE OVERT ACT SHALL NOT BE
ADMITTED UNLESS THE OVERT ACT WAS ALLEGED IN THE INDICTMENT.
38. Under the law of the United Kingdom, high treason is the crime of
disloyalty [or a disrespect] to the Crown [or the principles of the
Crown]. Offences constituting high treason include plotting the murder
of the sovereign; committing adultery with the sovereign's consort, with
the sovereign's eldest unmarried daughter, or with the wife of the heir
to the throne; levying war against the sovereign and adhering to the
sovereign's enemies, giving them aid or comfort; and attempting to
undermine the lawfully established line of succession. Several other
crimes have historically been categorised as high treason, including
counterfeiting money and being a Catholic priest. [Jesuits, etc. Act 1584]
39. That accordingly, I can unambiguously characterize those false and
uncaring statements and censorship as being "unreasonable public as
willful Internet originating and social consequential continuing
conduct" engaged on your Group's Page, as an INTENTION POSSESSED BY AN
UNREASONED AND UNBRIDLED HATRED, that they have DELIBERATELY ENGAGED IN
as reprehensible conduct conveying a sufficient degree of seriousness or
"moral culpability" as to be a matter of public concern.
40. Which is not directed against the information and reasoned
argumentation as that I have patiently provided as courtesy, but against
my person, dignity, virtuous conduct and well-being, and is the
UNFORTUNATE AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE AS AN UNCONSCIOUS "intent to
assist, an enemy at war with both the United States of America and
Commonwealth of Australia". As a grievous wrong perpetuated against the
"public interest" and thereby under our Legislation constitutes a
TREASONABLE ACT.
41. It is a requirement for me to provide the reasoning upon which I
will rely in such criminal indictment of TREASON within legal
proceedings which are conveyed by the accompanying Google Drive document
URL references below.
REQUIREMENTS SOUGHT FROM YOU
42. Accordingly, you are required by law to:
a) Immediately provide, by return email to the address given below a
declaration or otherwise restatement as a clear and factually accurate
statement of your full name, date of birth, phone number and address;
b) Within 14 days you are required to provide a statement of:
- declaring and understanding the nature of any alleged improper conduct,
- contrition for the wrongs perpetuated,
- acknowledgement of the justification and rightfulness of my
statements, conduct and actions
43. Which is to be previously agreed to by me and displayed within 28
days upon your respective social media sites and forums as required, for
a duration as determined necessary to make an effectual restitution for
your egregious and immoral, vexatious and vitriolic conduct.
44. However, you ought to be cautious in reply, such as to not to make
any further statement or such actions as censorship of this notice or by
means of blocking as a further disrespect shown towards this request as
a lawful action, by a presumptive ignorance. Such ungracious conduct
will then subject yourself to a further accountability for which a legal
redress would be sought.
45. A failure to acquiesce and unreservedly comply to this reasonable
and lawful request, will result in your immediate arrest by a member of
the police force.
- dolf
Email: dolf...@hotmail.com
dolf...@gmail.com
Mobile: 0474 237 617
-------- Forwarded Message --------
DEFAMATORY AS INDISCRIMINATE CENSORSHIP FROM: "[INSERT SOCIAL MEDIA
NETWORK HERE]", [SPECIFY DATE]
-------- END OF CONTENT --------
ENCLOSURES:
"PUSY THIN DICK" of 13 - 17 July, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indN3BOOXZ2OVdSUm8
EMAIL OF 'HERE IS A LITTLE STORY FOR YOU'" of 13 July 2016 made to
American Consulate (Sydney) and 'Senior Library Technician at Victoria
Police Library'
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indbm04eUVtS3FWWmM
"IF IT'S GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE GOOSE (ie. [informal] a *foolish* person)
IT'S GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE GANDER (ie. *look* or glance at something) as
NADEGDA'S *MENTAL* *DEFICIENCY* AND DELUSION" of 8-12 July, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indcG9PemlzclFNVm8
"KARL BARTH ON KNOWLEDGE OF GOD" of 4 - 12 July, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indc1B0WjhzNUM2RGM
"I WARNED THEM OF AN IMPENDING CURSE OVER UNREMORSEFUL CATHOLIC
ANTI-SEMITISM: IT'S TIME THE IMPUDENT, IMPOTENT & LYING POPE FRANCIS
TOOK ACTION" of 28 Jun - 5 July 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indX3p5bzVxWER6VFE
- "FERTILITY CONTROL CLINIC SUPPORT" of 25 - 26 June, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indUFhreFh4aTZ5NWM
"LAWYER BRIEFING - Q&A MUSINGS ON BREXIT" of 25 - 26 June, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indYnQxbzhiMzZlQlE
"ATHEIST DILEMMA" of 4 - 8 May, 2016
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indZEZ2amJyR2tubkE
dolf
Jul 18, 2016, 3:45:35 AM7/18/16
to
We have had a contempt shown by one party already, thus a power of
arrest exists for a continuation of the defined Criminal Offenses
nominated--after the expiration of 14 days, I will convey the matter to
the local Victoria Police for their consideration of action.
I said, to my lunch friend of last week:
arrest exists for a continuation of the defined Criminal Offenses
nominated--after the expiration of 14 days, I will convey the matter to
the local Victoria Police for their consideration of action.
'The hand that rocks the cradle...
It marches off to war.
I sat there at the lunch table.
Quoting odes of awe.'
By SMS (amended) today, "There has been a contempt shown by a party
(they fell for my trap) after acknowledging the electronic transmission
of my demand--she is particularly whom I wanted to prosecute.
They have this stupid belief that because the cost of prosecution is
odious, that they can get away with such conduct.
I'm an ex-copper and it is well within my intellectual means to
transform it into a wilful criminal act--which has now occurred.
I will convey it to the police after the elapse of 14 days and she'll
get (if the police undertake the complaint) anywhere from 3 years to
life imprisonment and I'll get the establishment to recognize my
intellectual accomplishment without any cost or further effort by me.
I told you that I would do it--that is what I have worked towards for
the last 20 years.
You don't need to call me back buddy as I know you are busy.
But I just wanted to convey to you, that I wasn't bullshitting to you
and have today done exactly what I told you what I was planning to do.
Cheers"
HE REPLIED: "I will call you after 6pm.
Well done."
0 new messages