-- I Don't Understand Much Mathematics Either But I Did on 1 June 2003 Have This Momentary Whimsical Inspiration

[dolf]

On 17/07/2016 02:54, Bill Jillians wrote:
> In message <nmdhbi$110$1...@dont-email.me>, Idlehands
> <hide...@nospamhush.com> writes
>> On 2016-07-16 12:03 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>>> In article <nmcg20$22r$1...@dont-email.me>, hide...@nospamhush.com
>>> says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <nmbkhr$e19$2...@dont-email.me>, nad31...@gmail.invalid
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4...@fx03.iad>, r0lli...@none.invalid
>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Durrbs <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> //
>>>>>>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK,
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms
>>>>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>>> any of us have known you under?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to
>>>>>>>>>> guess.
>>>>>>>>>> I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was
>>>>>>>>>> there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with
>>>>>>>>>> one of the original core awards...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK
>>>>>>>>> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand
>>>>>>>>> :->
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix
>>>>>>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of
>>>>>>>>> rhetoric.
>>>>>>>>> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien"
>>>>>>>>> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even
>>>>>>>>> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the
>>>>>>>>> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his
>>>>>>>>> "birth"..
>>>>>>>>> if you like :-/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I
>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to
>>>>>>>> setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone
>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some
>>>>>>>> unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more
>>>>>>>> substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if
>>>>>>>> anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is
>>>>>>>> flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so
>>>>>>>> badly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your*
>>>>>>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite
>>>>>>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW,
>>>>>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads
>>>>> makes
>>>>> four.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think
>>>> the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for knives
>>>> before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery.
>>>
>>> It still adds up to one, AFAIC.
>>>
>>
>> It does indeed, binky only does what the chicken fucker tells him and
>> the chicken fucker's only friend seems to be nads so it all adds up to 1.
>>
>>
>>
>
> I won't tell your ma you failed 2nd Grade Maths.
>

Could you explain it to me?

- https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzRmc7Bm7indNEZkMG1KeThTWUU

GRAPPLE - Epistemological Hermeneutic
An empirical-inductive & meta-physical deductive model

P (Shared Hemispheric View) = P (V1) * P (V2 | V1) or P (V2) * P (V1 | V2)