In message
<spampoppy-6E502...@surfnet-nl.ipv4.ptr.145.109.x.invalid>,
EllTee <
spam...@thetames.me.uk> writes:
>I wonder if this story is heading towards flagging up the food bank
>scheme?
It occurs to me that the nice lady at the food bank might have suggested
Emma look into benefits. Of course, maybe she would have, but Susan's
arrival (and, I think, taking away of Emma and child) stopped that.
>
>Until I read the announcement on our village website I hadn't realise
>the aim of the foodbank is to provide short term help until other
>benefits become established and arrive. Our websites says three lots of
(I hadn't either.)
>food for three weeks. I think it is supportive not a whole week's
>shopping basket. Emma needs to go to the CAB (why would she do this I
>ask, as I doubt she would think they could get help, unless she thinks
>they may be due to some financial help), who are one of the agencies
>that may refer her. You can't just turn up yourself it seems.
You write sentences as complex as I do ... (-: Where can't you just turn
up - CAB? Benefits office? And who can refer you to whom - food bank to
CAB? to benefits office? CAB to benefits office?
>
>Isn't Ed's milk business his own? There are different benefits
>available to the self employed. Lower ones I think?
>
I think so, to avoid fraud.
>
>I think and hope there is more to come from this story. It won't be the
>first time they have started out with a line we think is wrong, only to
>use this as a form of dramatic irony device which becomes clarified as
>the story unfolds.
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
So, Heresy be damned (well, it would be, wouldn't it?).
Radio Times 24-30 July 2010 (page 24)