CANCER SHOULD'VE BEEN DEAD DECADES AGO
Good Gawd!
CANCER.
<
The most despicable word in the English language.
<
Worse, by far, than the seven "dirty" words that George
Carlin was ordered not to say on TV -- but said anyway.
<
CANCER, a truly ugly word, represents sheer horror, pain,
agony, torture, painful medical treatments, embarrassment
and, most often, death even when a person is too young to die.
<
It is misery, tears and heartbreak for loved ones.
>
WOULDN'T IT BE A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY IF THERE
"IS" A CURE FOR ALL TYPES OF CANCERS BUT IT IS "NOT"
AVAILABLE?
<
AND ISN'T IT A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY -- IN THE SLIM
CHANCE THAT A CURE HAS "NOT" YET BEEN FOUND (WHICH
I STRONGLY DOUBT) -- THAT CANCER RESEARCHERS
ARE "NOT" TRYING TO FIND A SOLUTION?
<
Everything -- and I mean EVERYTHING -- indicates that cancer
researchers have been spinning their wheels for decades, doing
virtually nothing to discover a cure.
<
Sadly, researchers UNDOUBTEDLY have vested interests in the
pharmaceutical industry's astronomical, mind-boggling profits
resulting from the FAILURE TO FIND A CURE and it either keeps
them silent or has them spewing bullshit about how close they are
to finding one.
<
I imagine you would, too, to protect your vested interests.
<
But, in four words, this is how a very wise man once explained
why a cure has been so unreachable.
<
http://www.greatplacesinc.com/blog/userfiles/image/pharmaceutical%20cover.jpg
<
After all, how totally incompetent can these cancer researchers be?
They and their predecessors have been either doing something terribly
wrong for many, many decades -- and undoubtedly doing it deliberately
so a cure is NEVER found (or, at least, unavailable for the poor souls
who have been afflicted -- or rest in a cemetary.
<
This comes despite the horrific consequences -- agony and death --
that the medical profession's involvement in collusion, conspiracy,
deceit and deception has had on their fellow man, along with
heartbreak for the victims' loved ones.
<
A despicable record in any other research field over so many years
would find these cancer researchers selling apples on the corner.
But, rather amazingly, there are still no reprisals and years pass
with no real cure in sight.
<
Quite frankly, cancer researchers should be embarrassed
to tell strangers what they do for a living since it is quite obvious
they do very little or nothing. And the ringleaders in the medical
and pharmaceutical industries should be tarred and feathered and run
out of town (if not forced to have a seat in an electric chair).
<
It's high time for cancer researchers, the American Cancer
Society AND highest officials of the medical and pharmaceutical
industries to put an end to this folly and finally prove they have
both a heart and a conscience.
<
======================================
<
CANCER CURE CONSPIRACY
<
http://www.greatplacesinc.com/Blog/EntryDisplay.aspx?EntryID=673
http://tinyurl.com/ybwozaw
<
PROFITS OF TOP 20 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES
http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache%3AH88SCYOoCLwJ%3Awww.calnurses.org%2Fresearch%2Fpdfs%2FProfits-of-Pharma-Corp.pdf+PHARMACEUTICAL+CORPORATIONS&hl=en&gl=us&sig=AFQjCNHSffpE3-wGarYP-YiXHp8D7pQ4AA&pli=1<
MONEY DOES INDEED GROW ON TREES
<
PFZIER
http://www.pfizer.com/about/?CMP=KNC-Google0409&gclid=CMigrPizn50CFQ2...
<
MERCK
http://www.merck.com/
<
LIST OF ALL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pharmaceutical_companies
<
Ed Conrad
http://www.edconrad.com
<
U.S. CANCER ORGANIZATIONS
American Cancer Society
1-800 ACS-2345
www.cancer.org
<
Candlelighters Childhood Cancer Foundation (CCCF)
1-800 366-CCCF
www.candlelighters.org
<
Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
1-800 955-4572
www.leukemia.org
<
Lymphoma Research Foundation of America
www.lymphoma.org
<
National Alliance of Breast Cancer Organizations (NABCO)
www.nabco.org
<
National Brain Tumor Foundation
1-800 934-CURE
www.braintumor.org
<
National Cancer Institutes
Cancer Information Service 1-800 4CANCER
www.cancer.gov
<
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
1-888-644-6226
nccam.nih.gov
<
National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance (NCCRA)
1-800-872-3000
www.nccra.org
<
OncoLink by University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
www.oncolink.com/
<
Skin Cancer Foundation
1-800 SKIN490
<
CANADIAN CANCER ORGANIZATIONS
<
Canadian Cancer Society
1-888-939-3333
www.cancer.ca
<
Breast Cancer Society of Canada
1.800.567.8767
www.bcsc.ca
<
Candlelighters Childhood Cancer Foundation Canada
1-800-363-1062
www.candlelighters.ca
<
Lymphoma Foundation of Canada
www.lymphoma.ca
<
Toronto's WellSpring Cancer Support Center www.wellspring.ca
<
Canadian Prostate Cancer Research Foundation
1-888-255-0333
www.prostatecancer.on.ca
<
CANCER LINKS
Oncolink: University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
Health Canada: Cancer
National Cancer Institute
Foundation for Children Oncology Group
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
<
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama.shtml
<
===========================
<
Tom
wrote:
> <
> Everything -- and I mean EVERYTHING -- indicates that cancer
> researchers have been spinning their wheels for decades, doing
> virtually nothing to discover a cure.
Except, of course that according to every competent study done for the
past decade or two, death by cancer has been decreasing steadily since
1990. In 2000, there were 12.7% fewer deaths than expected, including
declines in death rates for lung cancer, colon cancer, prostate
cancer, and breast cancer. These declines are attributeable to
improved prevention, screening and early detection, treatement, and
post treatment care. all of which have increased effectiveness because
of research.
It's too bad we haven't made more progress in the treatment of
paranoia, though. Clearly you're in need of some.
dvus
news:a5a55988-3b22-40ed...@f10g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 4, 5:26 pm, "Good Gawd!" <conspiracies.101.102....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> <
> Everything -- and I mean EVERYTHING -- indicates that cancer
> researchers have been spinning their wheels for decades, doing
> virtually nothing to discover a cure.
Except, of course that according to every competent study done for the
past decade or two, death by cancer has been decreasing steadily since
1990. In 2000, there were 12.7% fewer deaths than expected, including
declines in death rates for lung cancer, colon cancer, prostate
cancer, and breast cancer. These declines are attributeable to
improved prevention, screening and early detection, treatement, and
post treatment care. all of which have increased effectiveness because
of research.
He didn't say there wasn't progress in treatment, just little in the
eradication of the disease.
It's too bad we haven't made more progress in the treatment of
paranoia, though. Clearly you're in need of some.
Maybe. Do you work in the cancer prevention field?
--
dvus
Tom
> "Tom" <danto...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:a5a55988-3b22-40ed...@f10g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 4, 5:26 pm, "Good Gawd!" <conspiracies.101.102....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > <
> > Everything -- and I mean EVERYTHING -- indicates that cancer
> > researchers have been spinning their wheels for decades, doing
> > virtually nothing to discover a cure.
>
> Except, of course that according to every competent study done for the
> past decade or two, death by cancer has been decreasing steadily since
> 1990. In 2000, there were 12.7% fewer deaths than expected, including
> declines in death rates for lung cancer, colon cancer, prostate
> cancer, and breast cancer. These declines are attributeable to
> improved prevention, screening and early detection, treatement, and
> post treatment care. all of which have increased effectiveness because
> of research.
>
> He didn't say there wasn't progress in treatment, just little in the
> eradication of the disease.
Apparently, you don't know how to read very well. He says "they have
done virtually nothing to discover a cure", which is pure bullshit, as
shown by the figures I mentioned. Beyond that, this paranoid loon
seems to think that science has already found a single sure-fire cure
for cancer and are covering it up. Do you believe that, too? If so,
you're as fucking batshit crazy as he is.
> It's too bad we haven't made more progress in the treatment of
> paranoia, though. Clearly you're in need of some.
>
> Maybe.
No "maybe" about it.
> Do you work in the cancer prevention field?
I have a brain that has a working rational function and an ability to
read with comprehension, which you and that other paranoid dipshit
seem to be lacking.
Ato_Zee
On 5-Oct-2009, Tom <dant...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Beyond that, this paranoid loon
> seems to think that science has already found a single sure-fire cure
> for cancer and are covering it up.
Follow the money, in some cases long term treatment
is more profitable than a quick cure.
dvus
> On Oct 5, 5:42 am, "dvus" <d...@dvenator.com.invalid> wrote:
>> Do you work in the cancer prevention field?
> I have a brain that has a working rational function and an ability to
...debate others by calling them a "paranoid dipshit". Yes, that's quite the
mature and rational brain you have there.
> read with comprehension, which you and that other paranoid dipshit
> seem to be lacking.
Your "working rational" brain has jumped to irrational conclusions. My point
was that there's a possibility that some working in the cancer field may be
motivated by the huge grants available for research that would be curtailed by
the discovery of a cure.
You also failed to answer the simple question put to you.
--
dvus
Odysseus
<a5a55988-3b22-40ed...@f10g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,
Tom <dant...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Oct 4, 5:26�pm, "Good Gawd!" <conspiracies.101.102....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > <
> > Everything -- and I mean EVERYTHING -- indicates that cancer
> > researchers have been spinning their wheels for decades, doing
> > virtually nothing to discover a cure.
>
<snip>
>
> It's too bad we haven't made more progress in the treatment of
> paranoia, though. Clearly you're in need of some.
IIANM your correspondent is a sock-puppet for the notoriously prolific
screed-spammer Ed Conrad of "Man Is As Old As Coal" fame, but on a
different hobbyhorse. (IIRC the first one I saw this nick riding, before
it joined the others in my filter list earlier this autumn, was an
expos� of NASA's attempt to cover up the fossils on Mars.)
--
Odysseus
Tom
> "Tom" <danto...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:02e2d669-7a14-478b...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Oct 5, 5:42 am, "dvus" <d...@dvenator.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> Do you work in the cancer prevention field?
> > I have a brain that has a working rational function and an ability to
>
> ...debate others by calling them a "paranoid dipshit". Yes, that's quite the
> mature and rational brain you have there.
One doesn't "debate" paranoid dipshits. One simply points out their
paranoid dipshittiness.
Tom
> In article
> <a5a55988-3b22-40ed-b79b-2de0ea493...@f10g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
> Tom <danto...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > On Oct 4, 5:26 pm, "Good Gawd!" <conspiracies.101.102....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > <
> > > Everything -- and I mean EVERYTHING -- indicates that cancer
> > > researchers have been spinning their wheels for decades, doing
> > > virtually nothing to discover a cure.
>
> <snip>
>
> > It's too bad we haven't made more progress in the treatment of
> > paranoia, though. Clearly you're in need of some.
>
> IIANM your correspondent is a sock-puppet for the notoriously prolific
> screed-spammer Ed Conrad of "Man Is As Old As Coal" fame, but on a
> different hobbyhorse.
And clearly in need of treatment for his rampant paranoia, as I said.
HG
"Lady, trying to have a conversation with you would be like arguing with
a dining room table."
-U.S. Congressman Barney Frank, addressing a nutjob who accused
a Jewish congressman and a black president of being Nazis.
"You're fighting zombies now. It's headshot or nothing."
(I remember reading this in alt.magick years ago, but Google
doesn't find it.)
HG
dvus
Well then, Formosa's rule should have been applied. Why are you picking on me
since you've determined I'm "special"?
--
dvus
dvus
> And clearly in need of treatment for his rampant paranoia, as I said.
Hah! The Voices *told* me you would all say that! You will all PAY...
--
dvus
ah
>
> NASA's attempt to cover up the fossils on Mars.
It's true, I tell you!
--
ah
Marc Hodgson
I've noticed that a few people on this board like to play the
"paranoid" card which is essentially designed to discredit the
speaker. It is also a true indication that the person playing that
card is one of two things:
1) ignorant.
2)An N.W.O. operative.
Cancer has not been cured for several reasons:
1) The pain it causes feeds dis-incarnate entities.
2) It makes a pyramid of people wealthy and sustains an industry that
employs hundreds-of-thousands..
3) The disease is a genetic filtering process. The strong get stronger
and the weak die.
4) It is one of the many test-runs of the N.W.O. on population control
and planetary depopulation programs.
The writer of this original post is hitting the nail right on the
head. Cancer is just the beginning of a conspiracy that touches every
facet of human life... the few that remain, that is.
Nate
Nate
dvus
> 4) It is one of the many test-runs of the N.W.O. on population control
> and planetary depopulation programs.
Why does the National Wrestling Organization want to control the population?
--
dvus
Tom
> "Marc Hodgson" <marcjame...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 4) It is one of the many test-runs of the N.W.O. on population control
> > and planetary depopulation programs.
>
> Why does the National Wrestling Organization want to control the population?
They don't want to have to rent bigger arenas.