Peter Sutcliffe's underpants
noel ogara
discloses that on the night of his arrest Sutcliffe was wearing a
sweater with long sleeves pulled up over his legs and his genitals
exposed at the V in the neck of the sweater. Ml Bilton called it a
murder suit but I would say it was the underpants of a mentally insane
man.
Anyway I have sent a letter to the editor of the Times and I hope he
publishes it. This is the letter for those interested.
MORE UNDISCLOSED FACTS ABOUT THE YORKSHIRE RIPPER
Dear Sir,
I wish to refer to Michael Bilton's book which has been serialised in
the latest three editions of your newspaper.
The main thrust of this book is the hitherto hidden fact that when
arrested, Peter Sutcliffe was wearing a long sleeved V neck
sweater in place of underpants with the V allowing his genitals to be
exposed. Michael Bilton says that this bizarre attire, which he
labelled a murder suit, was not logged in the police reports.
When the Attorney General Sir Michael Havers' initial plea bargain
deal was rejected by Judge Boreham, the subsequent trial was
convened to determine whether Sutcliffe was in fact mad as the
prosecutor and psychiatrists claimed and therefore the plea of
manslaughter ought to be accepted, or conversly, he was sane and
criminally responsible for murders rather than manslaughter. In
effect the Judge wasnt convinced that Sutcliffe was mad and wanted a
jury to decide on this issue.If the latter was found to be the
case the reasoning goes, he should then face a trial for murder and
face the consequences of life in prison rather than the agreed
mental home with a promise of parole within 10 years. The prosecution,
led by Sir Michael Havers, who was then also the Attorney
General, was unaware of Sutcliffe's strange attire on the night of his
arrest. It is more than 20 years since this arrest and the
revelation of this fact now is only one in a litany of undisclosed
facts.
Sir Michael was only told what he needed to be told by the police who
wished to close this case to hide many embarrassing
failures in their investigation, failures which cost the lives of
other innocent victims and put at risk the lives of countless others.
Detectives who knew the inside story directed Sutcliffe's
"confessions" which were volunteered on the basis that he would be
going to a secure mental home as agreed by his legal adviser with the
police.
The prostitute who was with Sutcliffe when he was arrested stated that
he was unable to get an erection
Well might the police have forgotten the strange underpants worn by
this deranged Ripper suspect on the night of his arrest and far
from being a murder suit as Michael Bilton suggests, it is clearly the
attire of an insane man.
Some other more damning facts which these police forgot to mention
were that Sutcliffe had been eliminated 12 times previously
because he didnt share the rare B blood group or irregular teeth
pattern that the Ripper was known to have from semen and bite
marks on some victims breasts.
Crucially the prior acceptance by police that there was a copy cat
killer somehow involved in the Ripper count was also forgotten
and with it the possibility that Sutcliffe may be that copy cat
killer. His confessions were going to close the file.
In the sanity trial ordered by Judge Boreham, Sir Michael Havers was
later prosecuting Sutcliffe in Court making his own earlier
pleas look like he himself had been trying to pull the wool over the
Judges eyes. Some of the facts about the Ripper murders were
highlighted by him and showed that the Ripper was anything but a
mental case who had no sexual motive. The psychiatrists were
made to look very foolish indeed. They were unaware of the full facts
and would have been strengthened in their diagnoses had
they known about Sutcliffe's underpants and been briefed about the
nature of the injuries to all the Ripper victims and the forensic
evidence gathered. They didnt know that Sutcliffe had been eliminated
and were shown only his "confessions".
While Sutcliffe, the copy cat killer was clearly mad, the unmasked
Ripper was clearly calculating and controlled but he was now
being written out of the records.
They were not told that 2 of the Yorkshire Ripper's victims may be the
work of a copy cat killer nor that all of the assaulted victims
which Sutcliffe was charged with were not included in the Ripper frame
at the time of the arrest.
The truth is that Peter Sutcliffe was that deranged copy cat killer
and not the Ripper. The truth is that the real Ripper remained
free.
The whole embarrassing investigation was closed with the confessions
of a mentally disturbed man who believed he was the Ripper
because two of his killings were included in the Ripper frame.
In fact the police knew the identity of the real Ripper at that time
but for logistical reasons they could not arrest him readily and
Sutcliffe's untimely arrest in Sheffield pre empted their plans and
resulted in the charade outlined by Michael Bilton.
If anyone wishes to see the many other relevant pieces of evidence
that were ignored by the police after Sutcliffe's arrest they may
be seen on the web site www.yorkshireripper.co.uk
Signed Noel O'Gara
Ballinahowen Court,
Athlone,
Co Westmeath,
Ireland.
phone 00353 902 30107
Ærchie
<shor...@tampabay.rr.com> :
>heehee
I had to download 147 lines which I had previously downloaded for
this? SIX FUCKING LETTERS OF PRE-MENARCHAL WISDOM????
Ærchie
--
"I am a deeply superficial person."
Andy Warhol
suzann...@ntlworld.com
"Ærchie" <ha...@it.allthetime> wrote in message
news:igv93v0ctbug6ig2n...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 09:02:00 GMT, "Lady Libra"
> <shor...@tampabay.rr.com> :
>
> >heehee
>
> I had to download 147 lines which I had previously downloaded for
> this? SIX FUCKING LETTERS OF PRE-MENARCHAL WISDOM????
PMSL
Paul C. Dickie
<noel...@yahoo.com> writes
>The Sunday Times has been serialising a book by Michael Bilton which
>discloses that on the night of his arrest Sutcliffe was wearing a
>sweater with long sleeves pulled up over his legs and his genitals
>exposed at the V in the neck of the sweater. Ml Bilton called it a
>murder suit but I would say it was the underpants of a mentally insane
>man.
But did he also have his knickers on his head and pencils up his nose?
Did he answer every question put to him by saying "Wibble!"?
If he didn't, then he couldn't possibly have been mad -- could he?
>Anyway I have sent a letter to the editor of the Times
Written in green ink?
>and I hope he publishes it.
He might, but only if they've nothing better to print.
--
< Paul >
Lady Libra
"Ærchie" <ha...@it.allthetime> wrote in message
news:igv93v0ctbug6ig2n...@4ax.com...
Steve Walker
> In article <68f89ee3.03012...@posting.google.com>, noel ogara
> <noel...@yahoo.com> writes
>> The Sunday Times has been serialising a book by Michael Bilton which
>> discloses that on the night of his arrest Sutcliffe was wearing a
>> sweater with long sleeves pulled up over his legs and his genitals
>> exposed at the V in the neck of the sweater. Ml Bilton called it a
>> murder suit but I would say it was the underpants of a mentally insane
>> man.
>
> But did he also have his knickers on his head and pencils up his nose?
> Did he answer every question put to him by saying "Wibble!"?
Probably not, he was only mentally insane. You're confusing this with the
much more serious nasally insane, where pencil/wibble symptoms are
well-reported.
Ærchie
<shor...@tampabay.rr.com> :
>Well, why don't you cry about it?
>
Why? You really aint worth that much effort.
Ærchie
--
I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me, send money.
Lady Libra
"Ærchie" <ha...@it.allthetime> wrote in message
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:17:06 GMT, "Lady Libra"
> <shor...@tampabay.rr.com> :
>
> >Well, why don't you cry about it?
> >
>
> Why? You really aint worth that much effort.
>