I am also considering changing my name by deed poll
Guy Fawkes
to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mission critical webspace on Cobalt Servers.
£25 per 25MB per year. 5GB per month free.
.co.uk/.org.uk £6.99 <> .com/org/net £8.99
http://www.surfbaud.co.uk/Web_Hosting/web_hosting.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hazel
I have been watching this group, lurking, for some time and it seems
to me that most contributors have made the same fundamental mistake.
Its a mistake that has distorted their thinking and its to the
detriment of their contributions.
The reason, according to my reading, is well understood but difficult
to remedy. It seems that too many growth and sex hormones have been
used in far too big a quantity in animal husbandry. Not only do the
people get it in their food as their drinking water is re-cycled half
a dozen times before consumption they get it in water as well. A
double whammy! Not to mention the added contribution from female
urine, the contraceptive pill! Mind you, it seems that intellectual
impairment was not the first pointer to be picked up by the experts it
was the physical changes in the sexes. The men, according to some army
physical training instructors and a number of GPs, were becoming
renowned for the size of their breasts, the shape of their hips and
their high pitched voices. Some of them were finding that shaving with
a razor had become so painful that they had resorted to using Imac
instead. According to the literature women had developed one male
characteristic big enough to choke a Clydesdale horse. It was after
these changes were noted that intellectual deterioration was spotted.
Myself I dont have any first hand knowledge of this, except for a
couple of newsgroups, that's why I am raising it here. Its possible
that some of the contributors to this group will be able to give first
hand information.
I at first thought that the contributors were producing mindless
rubbish purely because most of their time was spent with their head so
far up their arse that the only thing they were acquainted with was
the back of their own teeth. Little did I know that it was because
most of them only had two grey cells (brain cells) to speak of and
when they fired in co-ordination if the owners were men they had an
orgasm and if women an erection. That's probably why when they say
they have just had an idea what they mean is that they have shoved
their hand up the nearest constipated rectum, pulled out a lump of
natural fertiliser and remembering that their brains reside in their
own clay pit mistake the process for thinking. They probably feel so
proud of themselves, that's why it is passed around from newsgroup to
newsgroup for comment. This to my mind is THE fundamental mistake
which over 99.98% of contributors make. Mistaking shite for an idea
and manual evacuation of the rectum as thinking.
Now I am an open minded person and I am the first to admit that I may
well be off-mark on this one. This is where contributors to this
newsgroup living in the local area may be able to help clarify the
situation.
I look forward to your contribution. You may e-mail if you so wish.
Thanks for your attention.
Jason Copelan
\\\|///
\\~~ ~~//
(/ @ @ /)
+--oOOO----------(_)--------------+
| Caruthers Carstairs-McKracken |
| Wishes You and Yours |
| A very Merry & Happy Christmas |
|Watch out for Trolls & NetNannies|
+--------------------------oOOO---+
|___|___|
| | | |
oooO Oooo
Steve Yerbury
<guy.f...@noemail.com> writes
>
>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
I am a number, not a name.
--
Steve Yerbury
Has the bottom fallen out of your world?
Take a tin of Andrew's and make the world fall out of your bottom.
Guy Fawkes
<ste...@stevey.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <envj4t8s9o9d77tpj...@4ax.com>, Guy Fawkes
><guy.f...@noemail.com> writes
>>
>>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
>
>I am a number, not a name.
well, it's not a number, it (not that one which is just a example) is
a unique identifier that can get me from anywhere, absolutely
anywhere, yet absolutely prevents marketing types from data minimg
me....
so i am not a name or a number, I am me, but I can choose to be known
by my IP address.
Mark Lewis
one at Powder Springs, Georgia.
Changing to something like Nott-Guilty might work well in court. On the
other hand:
A shopkeeper who changed his name to Free Rob Cannabis was yesterday
found guilty of growing cannabis plants and possessing a range of drugs
including LSD and ecstasy.
Cannabis, 33, of Glastonbury, Somerset, denied possessing all the
substances, which were found by police in his shop and house.
Defending himself, Cannabis told Taunton Crown Court that he was a
shaman and had an allegiance to the Hindu god of cannabis Lord Shiva. He
said he had a right to grow and use cannabis under Article Nine of the
European Convention of European Rights, which gives people the right to
freedom of thought, conscience and religion. The convention has now been
incorporated into English law.
The jury found Cannabis guilty of one count of producing cannabis, one
count of possessing cannabis, and three counts of possessing the Class A
drugs ecstasy, LSD and DMT. He was also found guilty of one count of
possessing cannabis with intent to supply. He was found not guilty of
one count of possessing magic mushrooms, at the judge's direction.
Cannabis assumed his name to draw attention to his belief that it should
not be unlawful to cultivate and use cannabis.
He told the court: "I believe I have the birthright to cultivate and use
the cannabis plant for all its uses. I have used all the substances
listed, with the possible exception of the MDMA (ecstasy), in a shamanic
way."
He asserted that the Misuse of Drugs Act contravened his human rights.
Outside court he said: "I may well decide to appeal to a higher court
where human rights are regarded."
--
Mark W. Lewis, Bristol (UK)
Windy
<guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
>
>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
Trust you to go for a triple-barrelled one!
--
~*~*~*~* " W I N D Y" *~*~*~*~
The Ironic Bat
Guy Fawkes
wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:39:15 +0000, Guy Fawkes
><guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
>
>Trust you to go for a triple-barrelled one!
4 cylinder akshully.......
you bought a decent bike yet?
andy wood
"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
news:envj4t8s9o9d77tpj...@4ax.com...
>
> to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
should i pronounce the dots, as dot, fullstop or period and do i
have to include the last six characters on next years chrissy
card?
--
/""\
Andy
The Ancient Geek
the "standard" is "dot" - mind you I may go and reg a trademark for
the phrases "fullstop com" and "period com" just in case :-)
--
http://www.uklsw.org - temporarily offline
http://www.bedlam.u-net.com - the official uk.local.southwest website mirror
to reply by mail drop the dead donkey
andy wood
"The Ancient Geek" wrote in message
news:b02l4ts9r3778mv5h...@4ax.com...
> >> to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
> >
> >should i pronounce the dots, as dot, fullstop or period and do
i
> >have to include the last six characters on next years chrissy
> >card?
>
> the "standard" is "dot" - mind you I may go and reg a trademark
for
> the phrases "fullstop com" and "period com" just in case :-)
>
>
so is it two hundren and thirteen dot... or two one three dot...?
--
/""\
Andy
The Ancient Geek
the latter - HTH :-)
Paul Wilson
Paul Wilson
Guy Fawkes
<andy...@laid.xepip.moc> wrote:
>
>"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
>news:envj4t8s9o9d77tpj...@4ax.com...
>>
>> to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
>
>should i pronounce the dots, as dot, fullstop or period
DOT
"period" if you are female I guess.......
>and do i
>have to include the last six characters on next years chrissy
>card?
just append ":21"
Guy Fawkes
<ge...@the.dead.donkey.uklsw.org> wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 00:28:49 -0000, "andy wood"
>the "standard" is "dot" - mind you I may go and reg a trademark for
>the phrases "fullstop com" and "period com" just in case :-)
my mate has ditco.co.uk
Windy
<guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:58:12 +0000, Windy <wind...@TYwindfalls.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:39:15 +0000, Guy Fawkes
>><guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
>>
>>Trust you to go for a triple-barrelled one!
>
>4 cylinder akshully.......
As in, starts with a grunt?
>you bought a decent bike yet?
*Any* motorised cycle upon which I plant my ample backside is by
definition, a "decent one".
Steve Yerbury
<wind...@TYwindfalls.net> writes
Guy Fawkes
wrote:
>*Any* motorised cycle upon which I plant my ample backside is by
>definition, a "decent one".
oh dear, that's the motto of the gay christian motorcyclists
fellowship too...... (allegedly)
Nessuno
<guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
>
>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
Who gives a shit? Even if you change your name you're still a
fuckwitt.
------
NOKIA 3310 BUG
The Nokia 3310 (and any other Nokia with predictive texting) has a
very interesting bug that manifests itself when you do the following:
1. Take a Wavecom modem (or a Nokia Card Phone) with an Orange or Voda
SIM. (Haven't tried with Cellnet or o2o)
2. Type: AT+CSMS=0, you should get the following back from the modem:
AT+CSMS:1,1,1) If not this WILL NOT WORK!
3. Set Preferred Message Format to PDU block mode: AT+CMGF=0
4. AT+CMGS=+MOBILENUMBERHERE<001266019285000001xx>
5. Replace the xx with 66 for a Nokia 3310 or 21 for a Nokia 3210.
Once the above message has been received by the handset it will reset
itself, if you switch the phone back on it will ask for the PUK2 code.
I have noticed that some Nokia 3210s you need to remove the battery
for a few seconds. On the Nokia 3210 the handset phonebook and SIM
phonebook will be lost in the majority of cases. The ringtone/operator
logo will default back to the original Nokia one.
The bug exploits the way the Nokia text engine parses PDU messages.
****************************************************************************
Try Nessuno's Crypto Quiz! If you can decrypt the following message then you could win
$1,000,000!
YTF"SHX(PPA1Q/=N8L<A#QNG Y7P173@DU24>JD*
<R-C<0U#$"(RJS:IHZ#&X9JB0WY5V[/;S'TD(B@%
K#OT6T%Z30J'D:6CW,E7B!W=?)@FOC,675;U!*M
[159/L!UC.0H-2B>*:WW;ES8N6R+I+81F3M:GMIV
.?HJU4.PR<CY&V?9:8>,4=P32D9<2O4XVA3K@5EQ
==..NX*K%I)>L>;4IF$MZ$ -AB[!+G1S)NV09-RL
MKQ?7@'F5GLOE&G/YTF"SHX(PPA1Q/=N8L<A#QNG
Y7P173@DU24>JD*<R-C<0U#$"(RJS:IHZ#&X9JB
This weeks clue: 15 English words including spaces.
Full terms and conditions of entry available by writing:
Nessuno's Crypto Quiz
PO Box 912
Ourimbah, NSW 2258
Australia
****************************************************************************
Exclusive Nessuno Merchandise
"I wanna be like Nessuno" T-Shirt Sizes S-XXXL (XXXL only available to uk.telecom.mobile posters) ONLY $19.99 (100% cotton, available in black with red screen printing) & Shipping - FedEx 2 Day $7.99, surface mail $2.50
Call to order yours now! 1-800-NES-SUNO (Visa/MasterCard/Amex/Discover)
Guy Fawkes
>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:39:15 +0000, Guy Fawkes
><guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
>
>Who gives a shit? Even if you change your name you're still a
>fuckwitt.
I see fecal freddie is back again..... out with the killfile.
Harvey John
The personality type attracted to the post/function/role of *net nanny
is extremely well described in the professional literature to the
extent that even the untrained observer after a first reading is able
make recognition without much effort. It is better described than any
other aberrant personality type.
According to the literature they tend to be emotionally and sexually
immature. Personal relations are a nightmare for them, more so for
object of their attention. They just cannot cope with other people
especially those of their preferred sex. They are described as being
highly authoritarian and very seriously pedantic. Taking the highly
authoritarian aspect first, they defer to and are weak with the strong
(others who have some sort of control or hold on them). On the other
hand they "kick the shit" ot of those they regard as weaker or
inferior to them. They are the sort of people who when asked to kill
people only ask how many and how often. Pedantry, in this type of
personality, is a consuming and all pervading passion. In newsgroups
they tend to examine messages for spelling, punctuation, grammar,
query syntax, whether the message is on topic, and general netetiquet
before getting down to the message contained in the posting. If they
get down to the message they have nothing to contribute and bizarrely
may even congratulate you for being on topic etc. (There are many
examples around now). A word to the wise. They are very easily
offended because of their basic underlying pathology. Being rigid and
unable to make concessions or to admit they may be "mistaken" every
disagreement is taken as personal slight. Coupled with their inability
to correct misinformed notions and their lack of adaptability they
tend to have ill balanced aims way out of proportion to any perceived
slight. Responses to perceived slights are always over the top. War
can break out over the miss-spelling of a word, a miss-placed
punctuation mark, or minor difference of opinion. Cause indeed to have
you banned from the Net. They fall out at the drop of comma!
Newsgroups, especially the uk.local. ones are ideal for them partly
because face to face relationships are not just a nightmare for them,
but anyone within a 50 mile radius and partly because each group has a
"charter" which they can refer to. A weapon with which to keep us all
in line. A number of news groups are so badly infested that they
either become deserted or the domain of one small "clique", ruined for
everyone else. It is best to remember that inter-personal relations of
any kind always become a veritable nightmare for them.
This is not an exhaustive description but I hope it helps.
I don't normally subscribe to uk.local groups but an academic friend
of mine suggested that I might find considerable material here. Its
been very rewarding so far.
Regards,
Harvey.
Harvey John
Harvey John
Harvey John
Regards,
Harvey.
Harvey John
andy wood
"The Ancient Geek" wrote in message
> >
> >so is it two hundren and thirteen dot... or two one three
dot...?
>
> the latter - HTH :-)
>
ta very muchly...
--
/""\
Andy
Andrew Taylor
news:3b2653b8....@porcodio.it...
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:39:15 +0000, Guy Fawkes
> fuckwitt.
Fuckwit only has on 't', you should know that by default!
Nessuno
<guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:52:59 GMT, nes...@excite.com (Nessuno) wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:39:15 +0000, Guy Fawkes
>><guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
>>
>>Who gives a shit? Even if you change your name you're still a
>>fuckwitt.
>
>I see fecal freddie is back again..... out with the killfile.
Please stop spamming the newsgroup with your adverts, I believe there
is a special newsgroup for that.
mutley
<peri...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
>A search for Guy Fawkes at people.yahoo.com turns up several, including
>one at Powder Springs, Georgia.
>
>Changing to something like Nott-Guilty might work well in court. On the
>other hand:
>
>A shopkeeper who changed his name to Free Rob Cannabis was yesterday
>found guilty of growing cannabis plants and possessing a range of drugs
>including LSD and ecstasy.
It's a pity they didn't charge him with being boring.
What is it with a certain type of drug user that makes them feel they
have to constantly tell everyone else that they do drugs?
mutley
mutley
>On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 15:14:53 +0000, Guy Fawkes
><guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:52:59 GMT, nes...@excite.com (Nessuno) wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:39:15 +0000, Guy Fawkes
>>><guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
>>>
>>>Who gives a shit? Even if you change your name you're still a
>>>fuckwitt.
>>
>>I see fecal freddie is back again..... out with the killfile.
>
>Please stop spamming the newsgroup with your adverts, I believe there
>is a special newsgroup for that.
At least his sig separator isn't broken.
mutley
Mark Lewis
> What is it with a certain type of drug user that makes them feel they
> have to constantly tell everyone else that they do drugs?
I believe the police called on Rob, not Rob on the police.
Establishing that state interference with drug use in private is a
violation of privacy is part of the human rights argument.
The case is not limited to smoking cannabis. Rob grows cannabis
horticultural, and won the Glastonbury in Bloom competition in 1998 for
his fine high street display of the plant, as reported by the bbc:
An inquiry is under way after the winning display in a civic bloom
contest was alleged to contain cannabis plants.
Judges in Glastonbury, Somerset, had awarded hemp shop In Harmony With
Nature first prize in the first-time entry category for a selection of
tubs and hanging baskets on display outside the store in July.
But police swooped last month to remove 13 cannabis plants from the
display and arrested the shop's manager, Free Rob Cannabis, on suspicion
of cultivating an illegal drug.
Mr Cannabis, 31, who changed his name as part of his campaign to
legalise the drug, was released on bail while police forensic experts
analysed the plants.
Sowing the seeds
The hemp expert, who was presented with his award on Saturday, said: "I
did not sow the hemp seeds, I thought that would be a bit much as I was
going to enter the Glastonbury in Bloom competition.
"But other people do scatter the seeds around and cannabis plants are
often seen growing in the town's flower tubs.
"But watering the plants is seen as cultivating them, so I was
arrested."
'Private display'
He added: "The main issue here is that this is a plant that we have been
using in a variety of ways for thousands of years."
Mr Cannabis said he had only planted lavender, heather and roses.
Mendip district councillor Alan Gloak, the chairman of the Glastonbury
in Bloom competition, said: "We judged this display in July on what was
growing there then.
"People do scatter these seeds around Glastonbury quite often. Where we
see them in council displays we remove them, but these were in a private
display."
--
Mark W. Lewis, Bristol (UK)
Sue H
<madh...@madasafish.com> wrote...
>On Fri, 29 Dec 2000 09:22:49 GMT, nes...@excite.com (Nessuno) wrote:
>>On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 15:14:53 +0000, Guy Fawkes
>>
>>is a special newsgroup for that.
>
>At least his sig separator isn't broken.
It is broken - it's minus its space. (She bickered.)
--
Sue H
The Fourth Warrior
"Guy Fawkes" <guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote in message
news:q31l4t4p813d9mur8...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:58:12 +0000, Windy <wind...@TYwindfalls.net>
>
> >On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:39:15 +0000, Guy Fawkes
> ><guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
> >
>
> 4 cylinder akshully.......
>
But I thought a Godstar was ...........
The Fourth Warrior
"Windy" <wind...@TYwindfalls.net> wrote in message
news:j4hl4t0klapnlibrn...@4ax.com...
RU saying you've got a decent backside to go with it; is that what youre
sayin?
The Fourth Warrior
"Steve Yerbury" <ste...@stevey.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:BWCR8AAd...@stevey.demon.co.uk...
> In article <j4hl4t0klapnlibrn...@4ax.com>, Windy
> <wind...@TYwindfalls.net> writes
> >On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 00:13:53 +0000, Guy Fawkes
> ><guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:58:12 +0000, Windy <wind...@TYwindfalls.net>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:39:15 +0000, Guy Fawkes
> >>><guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
> >>>
> >>>Trust you to go for a triple-barrelled one!
> >>
> >>4 cylinder akshully.......
> >
> >As in, starts with a grunt?
> >
> >>you bought a decent bike yet?
> >
> >*Any* motorised cycle upon which I plant my ample backside is by
> >definition, a "decent one".
> >
> The bike, the backside, or both?
Precisely ... !
mutley
<peri...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
>> What is it with a certain type of drug user that makes them feel they
>> have to constantly tell everyone else that they do drugs?
>
>I believe the police called on Rob, not Rob on the police.
You've obviously not actually met the bloke then. Can't talk about
anything else and reminds me of parties where i've listened to prats
talk for hours on end about whether red leb was better than paki
black.
Wouldn't be so bad if it would have been possible to go to a gig at
the Black Swan or Skate and Ride this last year without having some
moron thrust a Rob Canabis is innocent flyer in my face. (despite the
fact he'll happily admit to everyone bar the establishment that he
planted plants for a laugh)(just not outside his own shop)
mutley
--
http://www.blackfire.demon.co.uk
http://www.hooliganrecords.co.uk Hooligans in Bristol!
Nessuno
Sorry about that.
Adrian Stapley
>
> to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
jer want yer ports probed ?
Guy Fawkes
ooooooooh, yes please........
(hint, I didn't post my real IP)
(second hint, I am secure anyway)
Stephen Carter
>news:envj4t8s9o9d77tpj...@4ax.com...
>>
>> to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
In that vein [127.0.0.1] would work better.
Back in the Good Auld Days of punch card systems I wanted to
get someone to change their name to one/any of
****
EOJ
EOB
QUIT
:-)
--
st...@stephencarterNOSPAM.net
Nothing is Beatle Proof!!
Adrian Stapley
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 18:05:53 -0000, "Adrian Stapley"
> <adr...@semleystation.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >
> >Guy Fawkes <guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote in message
> >news:envj4t8s9o9d77tpj...@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
> >> --
> >jer want yer ports probed ?
> >
>
> ooooooooh, yes please........
>
Guy Fawkes
wrote:
>On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 18:05:53 -0000, "Adrian Stapley"
>>Guy Fawkes <guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote in message
>>news:envj4t8s9o9d77tpj...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
>
>In that vein [127.0.0.1] would work better.
>
>Back in the Good Auld Days of punch card systems I wanted to
>get someone to change their name to one/any of
>
> ****
> EOJ
> EOB
> QUIT
>
>:-)
not ZZZZZ then?
Adrian Stapley
> On Mon, 01 Jan 2001 08:41:25 GMT, steve@[127.0.0.1] (Stephen Carter)
> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 18:05:53 -0000, "Adrian Stapley"
> >>Guy Fawkes <guy.f...@noemail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:envj4t8s9o9d77tpj...@4ax.com...
> >>>
> >>> to 213.38.74.169...... that'll fuck em up
> >
> >In that vein [127.0.0.1] would work better.
> >
> >Back in the Good Auld Days of punch card systems I wanted to
> >get someone to change their name to one/any of
> >
> > ****
> > EOJ
> > EOB
> > QUIT
> >
> >:-)
>
> not ZZZZZ then?
> --