Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: UK Microwaves
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Stephen Cole
Jul 11, 2019, 3:48:30 AM7/11/19
to
Jim GM4DHJ ... <jim.g...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> On 11/07/2019 08:38, Spike wrote:
>> On 10/07/2019 15:34, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>> On 10/07/2019 07:02, Brian Howie wrote:
>>
>>>> Interesting thread here.
>>
>>>> https://groups.io/g/UKMicrowaves/message/50824
>>
>>>> RSGBTech seem to have lost it.
>>
>>>> Brian
>>
>>> "I got bounced for trying to say how the track system was actually
>>> supplied, Not first time I've found moderation a little heavy handed"
>>
>>> "Please everyone quit that group - it is led by a control freak who's
>>> actions have done more damage to amateur radio than anyone realises"
>>
>>> "I too have been rudely treated by other group "owners" seeking to
>>> control its members"
>>> "I have found the moderation on the other group a bit excessive sometimes"
>>
>>> "I have greal deal of sympathy with Andy. I'm not a subscriber to the
>>> 'RSGB Tech' Group, as I believe that the over-moderation of discussion
>>> groups is unhealthy, and leads to stagnation"
>>
>>> "I got kicked off for explaining about compliance testing of smart meters
>>> Andy, you couldn’t make it up. When I complained I was told by the head
>>> honcho that I was not the sort of person they wanted on the group..."
>>
>> Interesting article here, suggesting a Pontius Pilate approach to the
>> problems caused by RSGBTech's bizarre modus:
>>
>> https://www.essexham.co.uk/rsgbtech-information
>>
>> ...which includes this, among others:
>>
>> "The unfair banning, or blacklisting, of Pete & Sarah is the tip of the
>> iceberg. There are several others who have been arbitrarily banned from
>> joining the group, or even being allowed to read the archives of this
>> “Technical Resource”, purportedly open to all Radio Amateur’s. Their
>> crime was to disagree with one of the “moderators” concerned, or to take
>> exception to his contemptible statements, such as calling anyone and
>> everyone challenging his pronouncements “Usual Rejects”, “Failures”,
>> “Lacking Qualifications” and more recently “Scum”. If you don’t agree
>> with him and many don’t – you are banned and the subject for extra
>> further abuse, including venomous abuse, from him".
>>
>>
> who cares...
Looks like Burt does, Jim. Thanks, Jim.
--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur
> On 11/07/2019 08:38, Spike wrote:
>> On 10/07/2019 15:34, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>> On 10/07/2019 07:02, Brian Howie wrote:
>>
>>>> Interesting thread here.
>>
>>>> https://groups.io/g/UKMicrowaves/message/50824
>>
>>>> RSGBTech seem to have lost it.
>>
>>>> Brian
>>
>>> "I got bounced for trying to say how the track system was actually
>>> supplied, Not first time I've found moderation a little heavy handed"
>>
>>> "Please everyone quit that group - it is led by a control freak who's
>>> actions have done more damage to amateur radio than anyone realises"
>>
>>> "I too have been rudely treated by other group "owners" seeking to
>>> control its members"
>>> "I have found the moderation on the other group a bit excessive sometimes"
>>
>>> "I have greal deal of sympathy with Andy. I'm not a subscriber to the
>>> 'RSGB Tech' Group, as I believe that the over-moderation of discussion
>>> groups is unhealthy, and leads to stagnation"
>>
>>> "I got kicked off for explaining about compliance testing of smart meters
>>> Andy, you couldn’t make it up. When I complained I was told by the head
>>> honcho that I was not the sort of person they wanted on the group..."
>>
>> Interesting article here, suggesting a Pontius Pilate approach to the
>> problems caused by RSGBTech's bizarre modus:
>>
>> https://www.essexham.co.uk/rsgbtech-information
>>
>> ...which includes this, among others:
>>
>> "The unfair banning, or blacklisting, of Pete & Sarah is the tip of the
>> iceberg. There are several others who have been arbitrarily banned from
>> joining the group, or even being allowed to read the archives of this
>> “Technical Resource”, purportedly open to all Radio Amateur’s. Their
>> crime was to disagree with one of the “moderators” concerned, or to take
>> exception to his contemptible statements, such as calling anyone and
>> everyone challenging his pronouncements “Usual Rejects”, “Failures”,
>> “Lacking Qualifications” and more recently “Scum”. If you don’t agree
>> with him and many don’t – you are banned and the subject for extra
>> further abuse, including venomous abuse, from him".
>>
>>
> who cares...
Looks like Burt does, Jim. Thanks, Jim.
--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur
Brian Reay
Jul 11, 2019, 4:32:08 AM7/11/19
to
--
Corbyn & the EU, the Nazi’s next step: "Our aim was Europe a nation. Our
faith European Socialism" Mosley "My Life" autobiography 1957.
Stephen Cole
Jul 11, 2019, 10:26:48 AM7/11/19
to
> "A. non Eyemouse" <some...@work.invalid> wrote in message
> news:goncca...@mid.individual.net...
>> On 10/07/2019 13:13, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> love this one.....Mike G0MJW obviously has reay sussed out...tee hee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> But we do..don't we chaps........
>>
>> Timbuuuuuuuuuuuuuur!
>>
> from a tall oak to a tiny acorn....tee hee
RSGBTech On Facebook(TM), on the other hand, is going strong, and all radio
amateurs are welcome (except Brian).
> news:goncca...@mid.individual.net...
>> On 10/07/2019 13:13, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> love this one.....Mike G0MJW obviously has reay sussed out...tee hee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "it is led by a control freak who's actions have done more damage to
>>>> amateur radio than anyone realises."
>>>>
>>>> "it is led by a control freak who's actions have done more damage to
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> But we do..don't we chaps........
>>
>> Timbuuuuuuuuuuuuuur!
>>
> from a tall oak to a tiny acorn....tee hee
RSGBTech On Facebook(TM), on the other hand, is going strong, and all radio
amateurs are welcome (except Brian).
0 new messages