Corruption At The Top
Watcher
The Prime Minister
Mr Tony Blair
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA.
STATEMENT OF TRUTH.
The Statements that I the undersigned, Maurice Kellett, make herein
below are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
In 1986 in learned of crime that was being carried on at the then North
East UK National Coal Board Estates Department, at Spennymoor, Co
Durham. I was affected by it and pressed the matter with the management.
Facts suggested that at least one of them was involved with it. After I
would not drop the matter I was battered and then struck by a car that
was deliberately driven at me by a man named Robert Willis Gardner
Pringle. That same night Northumbria Police officers left me with no
choice but to crawl most of the five or so miles to my home in the
middle of the night during torrential rain. I was bleeding heavily from
my injuries and the police doctor had no bandages whatsoever to help
stem that. Police refused me hospital treatment. When I arrived home
that morning a doctor attended me and confirmed that I had required it.
He made a diagram of the injuries to my body that remains on my medical
notes.
The First Use Of Crime Carried Out Against Me By Houghton-le-Spring,
Tyne-Wear, Magistrates Court.
The matter detailed above went to Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear,
Magistrates Court, UK. One of the sitting magistrates, Mr. William
Moseley, in regular attendance at Hetton-le-Hole Masonic Hall, was a
very close acquaintance of Pringle and I too had been friendly with him
having obtained him work for his garage business. The case was dismissed
by the court. When I approached Mr Moseley at his home on that same
evening, he claimed that he had stood down from judgement in the Pringle
affair. That despite it now being known that magistrates generally get
several days prior warning of cases listed to be heard before them Much
later a police officer told me that the Houghton Magistrates Court
proceedings had been illegal. He said that that the remaining sitting
magistrate, who had sat with Moseley on the bench, had no
qualifications to act alone. The fact of that has of late again been
confirmed by a senior police officer. The manager of that court, a Mr
Bavidge and the Lord Chancellors Department were parties to ignoring and
attempting to cover up of the matter of those illegal Magistrates Court
Proceedings. I have continued to pursue it without success. Northumbria
Police have done their utmost to avoid investigating that matter
throughout the years since.
First Durham County Court Serious Crime Used Against me.
Deputy District Judge Baird, November 1993.
In November of 1993 I and on behalf of my wife, Joyce Kellett, appealed
at the Durham County Court in the matter of a judgement made by District
Judge Scott-Phillips. It related to damage to our property following a
vehicle collision with it. My appeal against District Judge Scott-
Phillips ruling was heard by Deputy District Judge Baird who refused
it. I learned that a Deputy District Judge is not permitted by law to
hear any appeal. Eventually the Durham County Court admitted that fact.
That admission came only after I had pressed the matter with the Court
and it had clearly attempted to cover up it up. When it was clear to the
Court that I would not let the matter go, the Court wrote that my appeal
had been heard by the wrong judge in error. That was a lame excuse. All
judges and indeed solicitors generally, are well aware that it is
illegal for a Deputy District Judge, as Baird was, to hear any Appeal.
It was eventually lawfully heard by a Circuit Judge who upheld it.
Deputy District Judge Baird had in the circumstances, carried out a
serious crime against me by unlawfully hearing my Appeal. It was clear
afterwards that in that matter, It had been heard before a man who had
carried out serious judicial criminal deception against me. It is also
considered that the crime of Misconduct in Public Office is also of
relevance. No action was taken on that matter by either the Durham
County Court or any of the relevant Authorities that I reported it to.
Those Included Durham Constabulary who were later to refuse to accept
any evidence concerning serious crime that had been carried out by Miss
Shirley Carr, Solicitor Alison Stott and the Durham District Land
Registry.
Newcastle County Court March 1994.
Deputy District Judge Baird.
In March of 1994 I was accused by my next door neighbour, Miss Shirley
Carr, of 16 the Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, who was employed as a
National Insurance Investigator, of being a trespasser on land which
both I and my father had been in possession of for over twenty seven
years. The original owner of it could not and never was traced. There
was no adverse claim made against us throughout that full period of our
occupation. In accordance with the Law we had in those circumstances
become the lawful owners of it. The first hearing of my alleged trespass
on that land was before Deputy District Judge Baird. I had of course
previously exposed him, as detailed above, for his previous use of
Criminal Deception which he had used against me. Unfortunately I had not
recognised or associated him at that time as being the same criminal
judge who had been primarily involved with my appeal at Durham County
Court a few months earlier. Though I was in need of her assistance in
the judges chambers, D.J. Baird refused my wife access to them. They
were situated at the Newcastle County Court. He allowed Carr two
representatives or advocates into his Chambers. One of them was
Professor Kenny, who was said to be a regular contributor to The Law
Society Journal. He would have been well aware that by speaking on the
case as Baird had invited him to do was to say the least very improper.
He had also paid Carr a visit at her home one Sunday afternoon which was
not within the normal working ours of his employment. Both were employed
at the University of Northumbria Law Clinic. Carr was in those
circumstances unlawfully allowed the use of two advocates. DDJ Baird
ignored my irrefutable evidence provided to him that I had not been a
trespasser and ruled in the favour of Carr. DDJ Baird had shown in
November 1992 that he was guilty of Criminal Deception. Having a second
crack of the whip to pay me back for exposing his crime would all appear
to fit in with his character.
Shirley Carr has never been able to substantiate what is shown to have
been her false allegation that I, or indeed my father in the
circumstances, were trespassers on the land in question. She simply had
no entitlement to the land whatsoever. Recorder John H Fryer Spedding
ruled that fact in October 1996. That despite his numerous acts, many of
which are evidenced by his own approved transcript of judgement, were
clearly meant to pervert the course of justice. A summary examination by
anyone with even slight legal expertise would be able to confirm that.
Despite that ruling, The Chief Registrar of the Durham District Land
Registry ignored that ruling and unlawfully allowed Carr to register our
land subject of Newcastle County Court case NE401650 into Carr's name.
Following my meeting with Mr Timothy late last year (2002) I am
satisfied that he too is a mason.
In March 1994 I took out a civil action against Carr at the Durham
County Court. That followed her refusal to name the people who had
carried out the re-roofing of her property in late 1993 (Durham County
Court case No: DH400898.) That work had been commenced on a Saturday
morning and had been completed by the following Sunday evening. What was
the reason that work was done on a weekend? They had caused damage to
our house during that work and had also refused to identify themselves
to us so that the normal course of law could be pursued. I also took out
an action for damage being caused to our property following steps having
been taken by Carr to ensure that our property received drainage coming
from her adjoining property (Durham County Court case DH400950). It had
no drainage facilities at the rear of it. It is clear that she had
purchased that property at a reduced price because it had no working
drains on it. My Durham County Court cases No. DH400950 and DH400898
along with Carr's Newcastle County case No. NE401650 continued. On June
1st 1994 Shirley Carr's application to the Durham County Court for
consolidation of the cases into her case NE401650 was heard before
District Judge Scott-Phillips. He refused her application and Ordered
that the above cases could not be subject of consolidation. His Order
was never subject of Appeal and stood at the time Recorder John H Fryer-
Spedding falsely alleged that the cases had been subject of
consolidation. Then he unlawfully tried them that way as a consolidated
case under Carr's case No: NE401650. My two prosecution cases DH400950,
and my defence case in NE401650 had been prepared under the Order made
on the 1st June 1994 refusing consolidation, mentioned above, of the
cases. In the event, my case notes were of little use. However, recorder
John H Fryer Spedding had warned me that my pointing out to him that
Carr had commenced to swear perjury will she was under my cross
examination, would do me no good. He also agreed that it was his
intention to deprive me of my rights. The latter statement is agreed in
his approved transcript of judgement. It is not difficult to see from
the available catalogue of events, details of which are all readily
available, that he had the prior intention that I would be his victim.
The authorities who were made aware of that criminal act by Spedding,
along with a catalogue of his other crimes used to defeat my cases,
ignored it. As a further example of recorder John H Fryer-Spedding's
perversion of the course of justice, he said that my right of way across
the garden purchased by Carr had come to an end because that right had
not been reserved in the conveyance of it to Carr. One of the most
commonly used sections of law used in the conveyance of property is
Section 62 of The Law of Property Act 1925 where included in it is all
rights, easements, appurtenances, privileges etc. etc. are deemed to
be conveyed with a property unless specifically revoked in it. That had
not happened. Indeed the opposite was true because the vendors of that
property had been my own parents. My father swore an affidavit agreeing
the fact that our right of way was not revoked. That was only one part
of the large amount of evidence that Spedding ignored. Recorder John H
Fryer-Spedding also falsely alleged that we had required a thirty year
term to obtain a title by adverse possession of the land subject of case
NE401650. That was only another of his many lies. Only the twelve year
period was in question and we had well exceeded that term anyway.
Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding was alleged to have been a judge with
Chancery experience. I cannot think that such experience which had
allowed him to make such untrue statements, had come from any Court of
Law that I know of. Spedding agreed these statement in his approved
transcript of judgement. Video evidence taken at the time our land
subject of case NE401650 was fenced from the garden owned by Carr was
shown to Spedding. His statements regarding what was shown in it bore
nothing whatsoever to the truth of what he was shown in it. Newcastle
County Court refused me access to the tape recordings made at the
kangaroo court held by Spedding there in October 1996. That served as
evidence of their part in the attempted cover up of Spedding's crime
used against me. People who ignored these facts and many others showing
Spedding's crimes included Lord Justices Auld and Pill, The Court
Service, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner and the
Attorney General. This has clearly been a situation where Establishment
crime was, and remains as being protected by yet more Establishment
crime. The fact that recorder John H Fryer-Spedding had consistently
lied and that is shown and proved by his own approved transcript of
judgement, there is no doubt. His reasons for having done that to me
remains in some doubt. However, I am sure that it had been his reward
for me having contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select
Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and judiciary (
Nolan Inquiry).
I obtained from Sunderland Local Authority substantial evidence that
Carr had sworn very material perjury in her court submissions in the
matter of case DH400950. Then she applied for an injunction clearly to
deter me from seeking and taking further evidence of her crime. The
injunction application was heard by District Judge Cuthbertson sitting
at the Durham County Court in September 1995. D.J. Cuthbertson agreed
that solicitor Alison Stott be allowed to prepare the draft of joint
undertakings agreed between Carr and I in general principle. He then
adjourned the proceedings without making it known when those proceedings
were to recommence. In January 1996 solicitor Alison Stott declared to
the Newcastle County Court chaired by recorder John H Fryer-Spedding
that up to that day she had not in fact been acting for Carr but had
only been assisting her. In those same circumstances alone, as Carr's
assistant, solicitor Stott was party to criminal deception by failing to
declare to the Durham County Court she was even at that time only Carr's
assistant and had not been her advocate. That was not the least of her
use of crimes against me. I will detail some of the others later in this
document. Stott's declaration to the Newcastle County Court in January
1996 mentioned above, was in fact an acknowledge of her serious use of
crime. That same very serious crime was reported to Durham Constabulary
and The Office For The Supervision of Solicitors who simply ignored it.
Two days after the injunction hearing before DJ Cuthbertson, my wife and
I, received a copy of an Order made by DJ Cuthbertson granting all that
Carr had applied for in her injunction application. I appealed against
that Order. My Appeal was again heard by D.J. Cuthbertson who refused
it. In the circumstances that Appeal too had been illegal. A judge is
not permitted by law to hear any appeal from his own judgement. I never
accepted the lawful validity of DJ Cuthbertson's Order. In June of 1996
I was accused of having been in breach of DJ Cuthbertson's injunction
Order. Part of his Order was that I was not allowed to speak to Carr.
After that Order had been granted Carr falsely claimed to the
Sunderland Public Health Department that our two dogs barked incessantly
which was only another of her many lies. Shortly after that while sat in
our garden, one of our dogs started to bark at noises coming from the
adjoining fence between Carr's property and our own. When it carried on,
I put some steps up against the fence and looked over it. There I saw
Carr with something in her hand and scratching it against the fence. In
her other hand was a microphone. It was clear even then what her
intention had been. I called her some appropriate names in my outrage.
She obviously tape recorded at least part of that. She had however
edited part of that recording to her advantage. Evidence provided by
Carr to the Courts, showed that she had secretly tape recorded a
conversation between my wife and I while we sat in the privacy of our
own kitchen. It had been done by her placing a microphone up to the open
window. In July of 1995 while my wife and I had been on holiday, Mr
Norman Pringle who lives with Carr, had gone into our property and
altered guttering on it to allow Carr's property drainage to flow more
freely onto ours. He agreed that he had done that in his affidavit. The
results of his work were video filmed when my wife and I returned from
holiday. In 1996 when my wife and I went on holiday we left a video
camera pointing down the boundary fence between our property and Carr's.
It had not been in use anyway as no equipment could record for the two
weeks unattended while we were away on holiday. It had been meant as a
deterrent to Pringle against trespassing and altering our property.
Circuit Judge Helen Paling would I feel sure have been aware of that
fact but still sentenced me to imprisonment. Later, which I will detail,
she was to prove to me her unfitness to be a judge.
An application was made in July 1996 by Carr for my imprisonment under
her allegation that I had breached the injunction as in the above
described circumstances, which District Judge had granted under what had
been illegal circumstances. I was found guilty of that allegation at
Newcastle Crown Court by Circuit Judge Helen Paling and then sentenced
to three months imprisonment at Durham. There I had a stroke and was
released on appeal. My sentence was then suspended.
At the outset of the cases and around late June 1994, a solicitor by the
name of Nancy Bone practising from Durham, made an application for Legal
Aid for us. It was refused on the grounds that insufficient information
had been given to the Legal aid Board by her. Bone then asked us for
over two thousand pounds for having made that application. I would not
pay it. In fact there had never been any mention whatsoever by Bone of
any costs for a Legal Aid application. Then she withheld all of my files
by lien. I made an application to the Durham County Court which was
heard before DJ Scott-Phillips, that I be allowed to visit the Offices
of Bone to take copies from my files to allow me to proceed. He granted
that Order. Bone breached it and was in those circumstances guilty of
Contempt of Court. She had locked me out of her offices. I contacted
the Durham County Court and was told that DJ Scott-Phillips had not
granted such Order. The Court manager. Mr I Cuthbertson said that DJ
Scott-Philips had told him that my visit to Bone's office had only been
by her agreement. That was a lie but I could not prove it then. Around
two years after the final hearing of the cases before recorder John H
Fryer-Spedding, Bone was struck from the Register of Solicitors for
crime/misconduct in other people's cases. Another solicitor returned my
files that Bone had withheld. They included copies of letters that she
had sent to the Durham County Court. In them she had referred to my
visit to her office as being by Order of the Court. That was proof that
the Court and/or DJ Scott-Phillips had lied about the matter and had
protected solicitor Bone from a probable Contempt of Court conviction.
On the 1st June 1994 District Judge Scott-Phillips at the Durham County
Court Ordered that the three cases mentioned above, DH400950, DH400898
and NE401650 between Carr and I could not be subject of consolidation
into one case. Solicitor Alison Stott had been going into court with
Carr from late June 1994. In 1995 she took on the work of preparing the
judges bundles ready for trial. She secretly passed on that work for
Carr to carry out herself. In October 1996 recorder John H Fryer-
Spedding falsely alleged that the cases had been subject of
consolidation. Despite my protests he went ahead and tried them as a
single action. After three days he ruled that I was to pay five sixth of
all costs. His approved transcript of Judgement still serves as
substantial evidence that it had been his prior intent to pervert the
course of justice. I have published it along with my replies to it in
Statement of Truth format. During the proceedings, he had warned me
against highlighting to him that Carr was swearing perjury during my
cross examination of her. Her contradictions of previous statements made
on oath proved that fact. He said it would do me no good. About a week
later I reported recorder John H Fryer-Spedding's crime to then Lord
Chancellor Mackay. Spedding then went into what was shown to been a
sudden decision to retire. When Carr had prepared the judges bundles,
without the knowledge or consent of the Durham County Court, she later
agreed that she had deliberately left out documents which she said as
not being important. One of them was the Order made on the 1st June 1994
refusing her application for consolidation of the three actions that
had, in the circumstances unlawfully, been heard before recorder
Spedding as a single action. In any event, he was required by Supreme
Court rules to have seen a copy of the alleged Order for consolidation
of the cases. There was none, only the Order refusing consolidation of
the cases. I had prepared my two prosecution cases and one defence case
as per the Order of the 1st June 1994 refusing consolidation of the
cases. At what was a kangaroo court presided over by recorder Spedding I
was thrown into complete disarray.
I sought leave to appeal recorder Spedding's judgement at the London
High Court. It was heard before Lord's Justices Auld and Pill. I
supplied them with a huge amount of evidence showing evidence of the
injustice that I was deliberately being subjected to. I also supplied
them with a copy of the Order made by District Judge Scott-Phillips at
Durham on 1st June 1994 refusing Carr's application for consolidation of
the three cases. That alone should have been sufficient for granting my
application for leave to appeal. They refused it. In 1996/97 I had
contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee
Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. It was common
knowledge I had done that. I was still at that time in correspondence
with Lord Nolan on matters concerning Freemasonry and that continued
until January of 1998. He wrote then telling me that he was returning to
being a Member of the Law Lords. Lord Justice Auld spent a large amount
of the time they had allocated for my application in an attempt to
persuade me the possibility of Masonic involvement in the injustice that
had been dealt out was unlikely. I wrote to LJ Auld and Pill
afterwards. I asked that Lord Justice Auld and Pill having spent so much
time on the matter of my concerns regarding Freemasonry would they in
those circumstances agree their having any membership of Freemasonry.
The letter I received from their secretary was that they did not enter
into correspondence with litigants who had been before them. In fact
their failure to make such denial or admission of Masonic membership was
a breach of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention.
Solicitor Alison Stott practising from Durham, had been attending the
Durham County Court from around late June 1994. In January 1996 she
declared to the Newcastle County Court chaired by recorder John H Fryer
Spedding that she had not been acting for Carr but had only been
assisting her. There were witnesses to her declaration and affidavits
sworn relative to it. Spedding replied to her that she was either acting
for Carr or she was not. Her reply was that, "well I am now sir". As
Carr's assistant Stott had no legal authority for work that she had been
given by the Court in the matter of the injunction application against
me in 1995 which had imprisoned me in 1996. Neither did she have any
authority to take on the work of preparing the judges bundle or indeed
its authority to pass that work on for Carr to carry out. Last year
2002, Durham County Court agreed following their search of the files,
there was no authority on record to allow solicitor Stott to prepare the
judges bundle. That of course had also been true of the situation
relative to Shirley Carr. That these two people had been guilty of
serious crime there is no doubt whatsoever. The mass of evidence showing
that still remains.
In March 1999 I was made bankrupt at the Durham County Court in the sum
of £15.800. Included in the bankruptcy costs were solicitor Stott's
costs throughout which included the time period that she was, as she had
declared in January 1996, was only Carr's assistant. My bankruptcy
costs, having been engineered on a bed of crime, some of which is
described here, included solicitor Stott's costs as if she had in fact
been acting as Carr's advocate rather than her assistant as she had
previously declared. That amounted to fraud under the Theft Act. That
still needs to be investigated. Durham Constabulary are aware of that
fraud but have refused to take any action on it. Those who have made
that decision are in those circumstances shown to be liable for
prosecution under the Regina-v-Dytham case, for Misconduct in Public
Office. They are also held to be liable for other action. Facts and
evidence showing that the final hearing of the cases before John H
Fryer-Spedding had been illegal by virtue of the 1st June 1994 Order
refusing consolidation of the cases. That too was also ignored by the
bankruptcy court as it had also been by Lords Justices Auld and Pill. My
appeal against that bankruptcy was refused by Mr Peter Leaver QC at the
London Appeal Court. He said that he had no interest in the evidence
that I had supplied to him which showed the sea of fraud used to
engineer my bankruptcy. Part of it included the 1st June 1994 Order by
the Durham County Court refusing consolidation of the cases. Mr Leaver
said that he had no interest in that evidence only whether the actual
bankruptcy proceedings had been legal. He added another two thousand
pounds costs on for my bankruptcy appeal. Attending that appeal was
Shirley Carr, solicitor Stott and barrister Mr Richard Merritt acting
for Carr. Merrit had been aware that the cases had unlawfully been heard
as a consolidated action before recorder John H Fryer-Spedding. He had
in fact corrected his defence and prosecution case submission reflecting
that fact when that point had been made to known to solicitor Stott by
my solicitor Mrs P. Tench a few weeks earlier. In those circumstances
solicitor Stott and barrister Mr Richard Merrit are further implicated
in the crime/misconduct used against me. It would appear at the very
least that their obligations to the duties of their profession and to
their duties as Officers of the Courts were ignored to the point that
was a criminal act.
In the matter of the land subject of my alleged trespass, solicitor
Stott was in receipt of evidence that another solicitor, Mr Paul Graney,
also since struck from the register of Solicitors for crime/misconduct
in other peoples cases, had sworn perjury in a Statutory Declaration
which had been used to lodge a caution on the land subject of the
trespass case at the Durham District Land Registry ( NE401650). She
failed, indeed refused to make that information known to the land
Registry. Northumbria and Durham Constabulary ignored those matters even
after solicitor Graney had sworn an affidavit agreeing that the
information he had sworn in his Statutory Declaration used to register a
caution at HM Land Registry had been untrue. Evidence by means of his
own letters which came to light had proved that fact anyway. That
evidence was shown to detective sergeant McGann and detective constable
Storey at Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, Police Station. They falsely
claimed that swearing perjury was not a police matter.
Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding ruled that Carr had no entitlement to a
possessory title to the land subject of my alleged trespass under case
NE401650. Despite that, Mr Patrick Timothy Chief registrar of the Durham
District Land Registry, who was provided with a copy of that ruling,
ignored it despite my protests. He unlawfully allowed the land subject
of that matter to registered into Carr's name. I, and my father (since
deceased) still have lawful title to that land despite it having been
stolen from me by none other than crime as a mass of evidence shows.
My father had taken an action at the Durham County Court to go back onto
possession of the land sunject of case NE401650. Recorder John H Fryer
Spedding had ruled, and that is included in his approved transcript of
judgement, that my father was the most likely person to have title to
it. His application was heard before District Judge Cuthbertson. D.J.
Cuthbertson ruled that my fathers application was an abuse of court time
and then dismissed it. My father appealed that ruling. I represented him
at the Sunderland County Court. The judge in that matter was Circuit
Judge Helen Paling. She was the judge who had previously sentenced me to
three months imprisonment at Durham for alleged Contempt of Court. At
the outset of the hearing she told me to be quiet and then dismissed my
father's appeal without my being able to present it on his behalf. My
father ran from the courtroom when I became subject of nothing short of
a verbal onslaught from CJ Helen Paling. The court usher had expressed
concern about his safety following that. I wrote to the Lord Chancellor
about that matter. CJ Paling made an excuse then which effectively said
that it had been a mistake. It could not have been a mistake and that
matter was never corrected by the Court. My fathers health went
downhill. He collapsed and died two days after my bankruptcy was
published front page on the local Press in April 1999. The publication
had also included that I was thereafter barred from being a Town
Councillor by virtue of that bankruptcy ruling. He had been very upset
at the whole affair and that was considered by a family member as being
a contributory factor in his death.
I had been accused by Carr of approaching her at the Sunderland County
Court and threatening harassment of her. Her accusation had been made
relative to the day my fathers appeal case should have been heard by CJ
Paling at the Sunderland County Court. That allegation and another she
had made against me had also been untrue. I was found guilty of Carr's
allegation at Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates court and received a huge
fine with costs. It was that same Court who had previously carried out
serious crime against me by its illegal proceedings in 1986 mentioned
above. That was a matter which I had never let go of. It was at that
time that I became sure that members of Freemasonry had been involved in
that. My appeal against that conviction was refused. Judge Moir and two
lay magistrates sitting at the Newcastle Combined Courts, had been
informed a week earlier that I would require that they declare any
membership of Freemasonry. After around a half hour adjournment, Judge
Moir said that they would not make that declaration. Following a ruling
in 2002, (Commissioners Case No: CSI/136/02) their judgement in that
matter as in the cases detailed here, is shown to have been a breach of
Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. While I had asked
that that the barrister then acting for me, Mr Neil Addison, require
that same declaration from the judges sitting at the London Appeal Court
in that matter, I am unsure now as to whether he had in fact made that
known to the judges. I have reason to believe that he had not done that
and that suggests what I know from my experience to be a general fear
of mentioning anything to do with Freemasonry in our Courts.
A few months after my Appeal against conviction for alleged harassment
of Carr, I collected a file from solicitors Harding, Swinburne, Jackson
& Co of Sunderland. They were the solicitors representing me in my
appeal. They had kept my files for a long time after my failed appeal
under their allegation that they still needed them. Eventually I went to
their offices and a clerk gave them to me apparently believing it had
been agreed that I could collect them. When I examined them at home,
there was a copy of a letter written by Mr Head, Senior Prosecutor of
the Washington, Tyne-Wear Crown Prosecution Service. He had written it
to my former solicitors, Jackson's of Hartlepool, Co. Cleveland. It read
that a security officer, a Mr Michael Golding, who was on duty in the
Sunderland County Court at the time of the allegation made against me by
Carr and had been spoken to by police. The letter said that Mr Golding
had told Northumbria Police that nothing of note had occurred in the
court at the time Carr had made that allegation of my threatening
harassment of her. That letter was never submitted in my defence
evidence in my prosecution or during my appeals against it afterwards.
Northumbria Police agreed that the evidence of that letter was material
to my defence and that it had been a criminal act to deliberately
withhold it from the courts. They agreed to investigate that and other
matters of crime used against me, including the matter of the illegal
Houghton Magistrates Court proceedings in 1986. They have never done
that. They had allegedly appointed an acting Inspector Steve Coxon to
deal with those matters. Weeks afterward it became very clear to me that
all in fact he had been doing was acting and nothing else.
I was a New Labour member of Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, Town Council. I
spoke out at Council meetings against four family members, all Easington
Lane Ward Councillors having failed to declare an interest in the matter
of land owned by one of them which was subject of Council discussion for
proposed housing. Instead of declaring an interest and not taking part
in that discussion, all were part of it and two of them spoke in favour
of that housing. When I spoke out against their failure to declare that
interest at a Hetton Council meeting, the Councillor who owned that land
stopped me from leaving the Council Chambers. Two of his Councillor
family members held me while I was being pushed back from the door. The
Councillor who owned that land subject of Council discussion, a member
of the Freemasons, then drew his arm back in a clear action to deliver a
blow to my head. That was prevented by Councillor Mr George Wandless who
took hold of that man and pulled him away from me. I continued to be
subject of threats from them. Immediately before that Council meeting, I
had been asked by that mason Councillor if I owned my own home. I
replied that I did. He implied that if I mentioned their failure to
declare an interest in the land mentioned above, I might end up not
owning it. That is exactly what has happened as a result of the serious
crime which I have reported to you as Prime Minister since you took
Office and before in 1997 when you were Leader of the Opposition. I made
complaint on that matter to Northumbria Police. Inspector Williamson was
appointed to investigate that matter. He never even approached me at
all. He declared a few days later that as he did not think the rest of
the Town Councillors would say what they had witnessed of the assault on
me and what amounted to my false imprisonment by the Councillors, he had
decided not to take any action on that matter. That Inspector retired
several months later. I have good reason to believe that he too was a
member of the Freemasons.
My wife, myself and our two daughters became subject of a death threat.
A man said that he would stab us. He went on to say that if we reported
that matter to Northumbria Police he would repeat that same threat made
against us to them as well. A Northumbria Police officer was called. He
went to see the man who did indeed repeat that same death threat made
against us to him as well. No action was taken on that matter either by
Northumbria Police. This Mr Prime Minister is the way criminal elements
of Freemasonry works and there are a large number of other people who
can bear witness to that. It is only one of the many reasons why all
those employed in the public service must be compelled to declare any
membership of Freemasonry. While I understand your government will not
do that because of possible violations of the European Human Rights
Convention under the Privacy Article, by using that same argument crime
rings too could make that same claim.
In 1999 after further false allegations made by Shirley Carr I was
arrested and taken to Washington, Tyne-Wear, Police Station. My request
for a doctor to attend me was ignored. I requested a solicitor but that
too was ignored. I asked that someone be informed as to where I was
being held. That request too was ignored. After around two hours I had
breathing difficulties. Only when I made a further request that a doctor
attend me did the custody sergeant telephone one. I was allowed to speak
with that doctor on the telephone and told him my symptoms and
medication that I was undergoing. He informed the custody sergeant that
I must be taken immediately to hospital. Following my admission there
and examination, It was confirmed that I had been seriously ill. The
Police Complaints Authority confirmed afterwards that I had been
unlawfully arrested and that my continued detainment by Northumbria
Police has also been unlawful. The PCA letter agreeing that was only
part of the huge amount of documents now missing following the seizure
of my home on 5th February 2003.
A man criminally assaulted both my wife and I at our home. He had just
previously caused criminal damage to our property. When Northumbria
Police were called to the scene, the man agreed that he had carried out
those acts. Nothing was heard again from Northumbria Police on that
matter as well.
Following having taken part in a radio discussion relative to
Freemasonry in November of 1997 a man called at our home the following
morning. In short he suggested that I would never be able to beat
Freemasonry for what it is known by many to be generally up to. He
warned that someone by the name I believe was Mr John Coates had been
like me and would not stop voicing his concerns about Freemasonry. He
went on to say that his deep freezer situated at South Shields, had
been burnt down as a result of that. His implication was that our home
could become subject of similar treatment. In January of 1998 my wife
and I heard evidence that the threat of having our home burnt down was
real because a deep freezer business had in fact been burnt down at
South Shields. I reported that matter to a Northumbria police officer
and that was also ignored by them. My wife had asked that we sell our
home and try to flee from the situation. That is never possible where
Freemasonry in concerned and the reasons for that are numerous.
This type of behaviour by Northumbria Police is all too common to me.
Its Chief Constable is reputed to be a member of Freemasonry. He had
never issued any denial of that when I requested he do that in my
letters sent to him. I am aware of a number of its senior officers also
being masons. That would follow given that masons are required to give
preference to their Masonic brothers in the well known oaths that they
all make. Freemasonry is also known as The Brotherhood which sets them
aside all other considerations when dealing with them.
In late 2002 a possession Order for my home was made at the Teesside
County Court in the favour of Carr. My bankruptcy engineered on nothing
short of a bed of crime, had allowed that situation. It had been my home
most of the time since 1947. I appealed against it on the 20th January
this year (2003) at the Teesside County Court. Durham County Court could
not hear that matter because I have made a damages claim against it for
its use of crime against me detailed above. They are continuing to
ignore it and had previously alleged the matter had been referred to the
London Court Service to deal with. When I contacted them weeks after the
Durham County Court allegation that it had been referred to them, they
told me that they had no record of that. I have heard nothing from any
of them since that time. Judge Mainwaring-Taylor refused my application
to set aside the possession Order for my home. He had wrongly ruled that
my concerns at possible Masonic influence in my cases was of no
relevance ( Commissioners Case No: CSI/136/02).
The Durham County Court quickly arranged my appeal hearing of his
ruling. It was heard at Teesside County Court on Thursday 30th January
this year. I had provided the judge, as yet unnamed to me, with a copy
of the Commissioners Case No: CSI/136/02 . It related to a litigant who
also had concerns at possible Masonic involvement in his case which a
tribunal had ignored. The Appeal ruling was that by failing to instil a
feeling of confidence in that litigant, it had been an automatic
violation to Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention and
the his appeal was upheld. When the judge at the Teesside County of the
30th January started to read that CSI/136/02 ruling he was clearly
shocked and asked if the solicitor for Carr had seen it. He indicated
that he had. I took ill very shortly afterwards and the judge
immediately adjourned the case. I was taken by ambulance to hospital and
spent some time in a cardiac care ward until late the following day. I
had provided the judge and Carr's solicitor with the necessary protocols
required for my application for Judicial Review in my cases. I had also
provided them with my skeleton argument which the Protocols required.
Nothing whatsoever was heard from the courts after that.
On Monday 2nd February this year (2003) a bailiff arrived at my home
accompanied by Northumbria Police officers. I saw him trying to force
entry to my home watched by police officers. I warned them that what he
was doing was illegal but the bailiff continued to try to force entry to
my home. It was then that I decided to stay my ground against what had
been nothing less than the massive use of crime that had brought about
that situation. I took an ornamental sword used as an ornament and
threatened to fall on it if the bailiff did not stop trying to force the
door to my home. He still continued with his attempt to force entry. I
took petrol from a can in my rear garden and poured some over me and
held an unlighted match close to me. I warned that if an entry was made
to my home, they would just have to take what they would find of me.
More police officers arrived. Two police negotiators started to talk to
me. My telephone and gas supply was turned off by the police. I had told
one of the police negotiators, a female officer named to me as Jo, that
I would hand some evidence of my allegations of the crime used to bring
about that situation to her through my kitchen window. It was then that
she warned me from going near that window and it was then made clear to
me that police marksmen had been stationed outside my home and were
looking for an opportunity to shoot me. Jo told me she would go and have
a word with them.
Later that Monday evening police cut off my electricity. The next day my
water supply off. I was able to drink a little that I presume had been
left in the pipes. I was very sick after drinking it. When I saw the
water the following morning it was heavily discoloured. On the third
night Northumbria Police Special Squad officers battered down the door
of my home. I stood at the top of the stairs of it and was trying to
pluck up courage to fall on the sword that I held. Two Special Squad
officers complete with riot shield, visors etc, quickly made their way
up the stairs and hand cuffed me while they were all yelling and
screaming presumably to distract me. Two Special Squad officers held my
shoulders but left my sword between my hands so I could not move it.
Then they proceeded to make noises that were very clearly meant to co-
ordinate their pressure on my shoulders while pushing my abdomen down
onto the sword. Another Special Squad Officer was near to the top of the
stairs. On seeing what his colleagues were attempting to do to me, he
grabbed the handcuffs and pulled the sword away then dragged me headlong
down the stairs away from his colleagues, the two would be murderers. I
suffered superficial wounds to my abdomen resulting from that murder
attempt.
I ended up at Sunderland Royal Hospital with a twenty four hour
continued throughout Northumbria Police guard. The next two days no one
was allowed to visit me at the hospital. Only when they were warned by
someone with legal knowledge that what they were continuing to do was
also illegal did they allow me visitors. However, I was not allowed them
without a police officer in attendance. One of them confirmed to me that
anything that passed in the conversation between my visitors and myself
was being noted for possible use. Essential medication that I needed and
which a police doctor had obtained especially for me was never sent to
hospital. That caused me problems when I ended up taking some wrong
medication.
Before the siege of my home started on 2nd February, and the just
previous Teesside County Court proceedings, I had received a letter from
your Mr Matt Dowding of 10 Downing Street, London. Last year I had
forwarded on a damages claim made against you for what I consider has
been a serious failure in what I consider to have been your duty as
prime Minister to set in motion the necessary mechanism to allow the UK
citizen access to independent and impartial tribunals or authorities
established by law for the resolution of our criminal and civil rights.
That as you will know is a requirement of Article 6(1) of the European
Human Rights Convention. Mr Dowding's letter of the 16th January 2003
related to that matter. It read that my letters and claim made against
you were being passed on to the Lord Chancellors Department to deal
with. I have not had any communication from that Department following
that. My claim against you is being revised in an upward direction
following the events which have taken place in my case over this past
year. Mr Fraser Kemp MP, sent had copy bundles of evidence of the
judicial and other crimes that had been used against me to, The Lord
Chancellors Department, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner
and the Attorney General. None of these authorities accepted any
responsibility to act on the matter of judicial crime or indeed the
evidence showing that. Letters that Mr Kemp MP had received from these
authorities confirmed that fact. I then asked in my letter to Mr Kemp MP
if he would raise these matters for and in the general public interest
in the House of Commons. He replied in his letter that he was not
permitted to raise issues in the House. That still requires an
explanation.
There is absolutely no doubt that had we had such independent
authorities for me to turn to as required under Article 6(1) of the
European Human Rights Convention in the matter of the Establishment
crime of which I am subject, the situation of the seizure of my home in
February would not have come about. Now it has also been effectively
confirmed via Mr Fraser Kemp MP that the Judiciary generally have become
a law to themselves. This is itself a very serious matter in addition to
the deprival of our rights of access to independent authorities ect, for
the resolution of our criminal and civil rights as required under the
European Human Rights Convention. The question that remains is who was
it who decided that my murder was a solution to the Establishment crime
problem? That decision had surely come from high authority?
Finally, my wife and I, since divorced after thirty years of marriage,
purchased a property at Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire, in the sum of
£65.000 cash in late April 1998. That purchase had been made with our
money and while we were still married and was registered at HM Land
Registry in my wife's name. I was made bankrupt in March 1999 in the sum
of £15.800. I had made the Official Receiver situated at Stockton-on-
Tees, aware of that purchase. According to the law, all financial
transactions leading up to a bankruptcy for a period of two years are
deemed to be taken into consideration for the purposes of it. That
section of law was ignored in my case. After that purchase my wife's own
hand written financial accounts which she had hidden from me, showed
that there was £27.600 remaining after that house purchase. In addition,
she had used forgery to obtain Land Registry registration of our marital
home into here sole name at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, which had
previously been registered in our joint names. Land which had been
registered at the Durham District Land Registry in my sole name, became
registered again by means of forgery, into my wife's sole name. Evidence
shows that she had then sold or whatever those assets which had been
mine to the Trustee in Bankruptcy. The value of those assets far
exceeds the amount claimed in my bankruptcy even had it been obtained
without the use of the mass crimes I have again reported to you.
North Yorkshire Police, in whose area my wife had purchased the property
at Dacre Banks is, refused to act on my allegations regarding that. I
threatened Mr Kenworthy, the North Yorkshire Chief Constable with
citizens arrest for failing to carry out his duty on that matter. Only
then did he send two detectives north to see me at my home at Hetton-le-
Hole, Tyne-Wear. They saw and took copies of the evidence of my wife's
hand written accounts and were made aware of the cash house purchase by
her at Dacre Banks. That purchase had been well within the period
relative to bankruptcy. They detectives told me that they had sufficient
evidence to act and returned to North Yorkshire. Around two weeks later
I received a letter from North Yorkshire Police saying that there was
insufficient evidence to act on my allegations. Even a simple check at
HM Land Registry would have provided sufficient evidence of that £65.000
cash purchase by my wife, let alone the rest of it. That was again a
clear indication that I was subject of a conspiracy which I attribute
that to the influence of Freemasonry.
The thread of their very obvious influence remained throughout and had
started with the illegal Houghton-le-Spring Magistrate Court proceedings
in 1986. The Magistrate, Mr William Moseley, who later claimed he had
stood down from judgement when I asked him to explain his presence on
the bench, was in regular attendance at Hetton-le-Hole, Masonic Hall.
Pringle, the man who had battered me and then struck me with his car
that he had deliberately driven at me, supplied the local Masonic Halls
with fruit and vegetables for use in their functions.
This is not a full account of what was carried out against me by what
has undoubtedly amounted to high level authority crime. It is however I
think the most substantive. I have been subject of other crime carried
out by a doctor and police officers where again there was evidence of a
thread of Freemasonry involved in that as well. Indications are that the
problem of Masonic membership within the medical profession is also a
problem. I had been an active supporter of Mr Chris Mullin MP's Private
Members, Secret Societies Declaration Bill which failed when it was
talked out of time in the House of Commons several years ago. Later he
wrote to me hinting at his concern of the number of MP's who were
masons. Now it is my understanding that Mr Mullin MP pays his
Constituency Office rent to the Durham Grand Lodge of Freemasonry. Just
over a year ago he was forefront in the obtaining of a £35.000 public
grant for the restoration of one of Sunderland's Masonic Halls.
The Court Service has advised that I employ a solicitor to act for me in
these matters. However, again from my past experience, I have found
solicitors generally to be involved with matters involving crime and
misconduct. It is now a well known fact by me following my experience
with them, and from the experience of many others that the Office For
The Supervision Of Solicitors is more often involved in covering up
legal profession crime and misconduct that in protecting the public from
it. I suggest that is an all too common problem coming from self
regulatory authorities. They have done that to me now several times. In
addition, solicitors, being Officers of the Courts, cannot reasonably be
claimed to be independent or impartial in matters concerning judicial
crime. I am also very aware of substantial membership of Freemasonry
within the legal profession generally and that too I know has been a
factor involved in my situation.
I have previously asked that you have a Public Inquiry into my case. My
request to you regarding that has not been granted. I am aware that if
such Inquiry was carried out by those authorities or tribunals as
required under Article 6(1) of the ECHR, which we simply don't have, it
would show that all UK citizens and not just myself, have a very serious
problem with the denial of our rights. Mr Fraser Kemp MP's letters and
evidence sent to the various authorities I have named show that the
judiciary is not accountable to the public or any authority.
A list of names is being drawn up of those involved in judicial crime
who, by use of their crimes, have rendered themselves liable to a lawful
citizens arrest. Such arrest is extended to all those who fail to carry
out their considered public duty to act on that crime or to those who
try to prevent such lawful arrests from taking place.
I again ask that you set in motion the necessary mechanism to set up an
Independent Inquiry into my case. It is clear from evidence that I have
at hand that none of what is considered as being the relevant
authorities will act on the matter of judicial crime. That same crime is
clearly being protected generally by the police in what appears to be an
unwritten law. It is therefore an illegal law being used by them.
My home and land was taken from me as a result of the crimes carried out
against me, some of which I have detailed here to you, which ensured
that situation. It is not my intention to beg for what is rightfully
mine and which has been stolen from me. The UK justice system is without
doubt now in a situation where it is more akin to an injustice system
and accountable to no one. I don't think that I need to write here what
I believe will eventually happen because of that. History is the best
indicator.
I copy a letter written to me by Mr Benny Stone of the Court Service
Unit dated 21st October 2003. You will see their absolute reluctance to
act on these matters. But that has made their authority to act
questionable in the process? This is of course the same Court Service
which the Durham County Court had alleged that they had passed on to my
damages claim made against it. To remind you of what I wrote earlier,
after many months had passed I contacted the Court Service who told me
that they had no record of my case having been passed to them by the
Durham Country Court.
I also copy a letter to you a letter which I received from Mr Andrew
Clark of The Home Office in what he has written is in response regarding
Freemasonry and the Police Service. It is dated 28th October 2003. You
will again see that the Home Office is denying any responsibility to act
on the matters I have reported to you.
Mr Fraser Kemp MP, Barroness Scotland of the Lord Chancellors
Department, The Attorney General and the Parliamentary Commissioner, and
indeed the Home Office were, according to Mr Fraser Kemp MP, all sent a
copy dossier of evidence showing evidence of my allegations against
those I have named here. I am sure that he too was surprised at their
response to him having supplied that evidence by their clear failure to
act on it. I am accusing the Establishment of being deeply involved in
trying to cover up its own crimes. I am also well aware now that there
are those who are capable of and consenting to my murder to achieve my
silence on these matters. I am not deterred by that.
I suffered a heart attack while looking for somewhere to live following
the seizure of my home. That had also followed the attempt to murder me
at the time police stormed my home. I realise now the possibility of a
further heart attack occurring and this more so because of the stress
which I remain subjected to by the failure of any authority whatsoever
to carry out their public duty to act on these matters. Those same
authorities who are well known by the many victims of judicial crime and
misconduct of playing a sort of game of frustration. These are just some
of my reasons not to remain silent or give in to what has become
tyrannical powers now at work in the UK. When judges are no longer
answerable to Parliament for their crime, as is the situation now, this
leads our country into a very dangerous stage of its history. My natural
instinct is to fight the Establishment crime I am subjected to rather
than give way to it. If I have to die in that cause then so be it. The
evil people I have named to you will ultimately be called to answer for
their crimes whether I am dead or alive. I do not request a Public
Inquiry into these matters. I think it appropriate in the circumstances
which I have detailed to you that I am right to demand one.
Perhaps from information given to me you should look more into the
Operation Ore list and see how many of them are members of the
Freemasons. Perhaps it would also be useful to find out how many judges
and police officers are included on that list and who amongst them are
still employed in the Public Service where no action against them has
been taken either. Thomas Hamilton the Dunblane child mass murderer was
also a known mason. There is little doubt that his involvement in that
matter is still cause for alarm to many over the one hundred year clamp
down on news of the matter of his massacre at Dunblane.
Signed by me Maurice Kellett
Of:
Address withheld for the purposes of this posting only
On this 11th day of November 2003.
C.C. All interested parties and publication to the general public.