Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Topical for Burt

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Stephen Cole

unread,
Jun 16, 2019, 4:23:14 AM6/16/19
to
Spike <Aero....@mail.invalid> wrote:
> On 15/06/2019 19:27, Roger Hayter wrote:
>> Stephen Thomas Cole <use...@stephenthomascole.com> wrote:
>>> Rambo <Ra...@thisaintreal.org> wrote:
>
>>>> Don't know what you are babbling on about.
>
>>> Well, Rich, what happened was Paul said that Burt had checked up on Paul,
>>> Rich, and that Burt had received some unspecified sanction for checking up
>>> on Paul. Burt, Rich, has always been pretty cagey about what happened to
>>> Burt when Burt, Rich, checked up on Paul, Rich, so we're all keen to get to
>>> the bottom of what happened to Burt,
>
>> No we're not.
>
>>> Rich, when he checked up on Paul,
>>> Rich. I figured, Rich, that where you've got extensive experience with
>>> telling lies, Rich, that you might be able to help identify which of Burt
>>> and Paul is lying, Rich, about what happened to Burt when he checked up on
>>> Paul, Rich. Thanks, Rich.
>
> Snowflake Stephen seems to need his imaginary friends, even though he's
> approaching 40.

Who’s lying Burt? You or Paul?

--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur
0 new messages