mm0fmf <
no...@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 04/05/2019 13:22, Rambo wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 May 2019 12:53:43 +0100, Brian Reay <
no...@m.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/05/19 12:49, Rambo wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 3 May 2019 22:05:34 +0100, Brian Reay <
no...@m.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 03/05/2019 20:57, Rambo wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 3 May 2019 20:13:23 +0100, Brian Reay <
no...@m.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 03/05/2019 17:57, Rambo wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 3 May 2019 07:14:32 +0000, Spike <Aero....@mail.invalid>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 03/05/2019 05:16, Brian Reay wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We’re yet to see an original explanation from him as to why he claimed to
>>>>>>>>>>> hold a full licence, though.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We’ve yet to see any explanation, leaving either it was a straight lie or
>>>>>>>>>> he’d taken the exam, hoped he’d passed, but had failed. He’s denied that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, either way, it was a lie.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course, there are the other, shall we say (to be generous)
>>>>>>>>>> ‘exaggerations’.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The usual rejects just can’t tell the truth, often as not they lie to
>>>>>>>>>> compensate for their under achievement.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who was it that recently claimed that they'd held a Full for forty years?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure whether that was self-aggrandisement, a bare-faced lie, or
>>>>>>>>> the results of advancing dementia.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's so repative, jusT lashes out without thinking when he is made to
>>>>>>>> look a pratt. Only to make himself look an even bigger pratt.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> Doe's posting that make you feel better about yourself?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's always a pleasure when you put a bullet through your foot. You
>>>>>> sock (s) must be like colanders.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You really don't like having the piss taken out of you do you?
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't bother me.... unlike you I don't get angry.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Really, it was one of your (many) angry posts that included the infamous
>>> upgraded claim.
>>>
>>> ;-)
>> I'm not the one documented elsewere as having anger issues...
>>
> But you are the one documented elsewhere telling lies about having a
> FULL licence. Why did you claim to have a FULL when you didn't?
>
Rich said he held a Full when he actually held a 2E0. Rich, why did you say
you held a Full when you actually held a 2E0? Thanks, Rich.