Complaint about Ice-cream van

[Judith]

An ice-cream van parks outside my house every night after 19:00 playing loud
distorted music/chimes. (My neighbour told me that it is a nuisance to her as
well as her young kids want an ice-cream when they've gone to bed !)

I phoned local environmental health to complain giving them Registration number
and the logo "Joe Bloggs Ices"

They have got back to me and said that they need to have the make of the
vehicle and its colour before they can investigate.

Do they really need that info to identify the owner via the DVLA: I would have
expected that they had privileged on-line access to the DVLA and they could
just put reg in and get the details. Is that not the case? The officer from
EH said that they need all info as they have to "send-off" a completed form to
the DVLA.

[mro...@btopenworld.com]

No They're probably as tired of hearing from you as we are!

[Brian G]

What did the vendor say when you told him he is upsetting you and your
neighbour?

[Nightjar .me.uk>]

On 23/01/2015 11:41, Judith wrote:
>
>

They can find out which vehicle is supposed to have that registration
number. The additional information allows them to check that it really
is the same vehicle and not one with cloned plates. The logo won't be on
their records.

--
Colin Bignell

[John]

"Judith" wrote

> I phoned local environmental health to complain giving them Registration
> number
> and the logo "Joe Bloggs Ices"
>
> They have got back to me and said that they need to have the make of the
> vehicle and its colour before they can investigate.

Probably just trying to make it awkward for you to formally complain.

Just out of interest what restrictions apply to outdoor business noise? As
the crow flies I live approximately six miles from the site of Hull Fair,
but when the wind is in the right (wrong) direction I can easily hear the
music being blared out. I'm sure if my business could be heard from that
distance I'd be prosecuted.

John.

[mro...@btopenworld.com]

I fancy that it is all tied up with the legal concept of nuisance. It is not an offence to make a noise, even a loud one at any time. In order to uphold a complain however, there has to be elements of persistence and annoyance present.

I do know that in order to get the environmental health department involved it is necessary to collect evidence by keeping a log over time of incidents and even making recordings of scientific measurements of the nuisance involved.

[John]

<mro...@btopenworld.com> wrote

> I fancy that it is all tied up with the legal concept of nuisance. It is
> not an offence to make a noise, even a loud one at any time. In order to
> uphold a complain however, there has to be elements of persistence and
> annoyance present.
>
> I do know that in order to get the environmental health department
> involved it is necessary to collect evidence by keeping a log over time of
> incidents and even making recordings of scientific measurements of the
> nuisance involved.

I guessed it would be something along those lines, and certainly didn't
expect any complaint against the fair being upheld - especially as the local
council provide the land and licence the event.

John.

[Caecilius]

On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:27:26 +0000, Brian G <bg7...@verizon.net>
wrote:

>What did the vendor say when you told him he is upsetting you and your
>neighbour?

A word with the person concerned seems to be the right thing to do in
the first instance. But if the person cuts up rough, they'll guess who
made the formal complaint if it gets to that stage.

[Ernie]

IME the last thing that ice cream wallahs want is trouble with the
authorities. They all have something to hide usually.

[Ernie]

When I was driving an ice cream van the law stated that the chimes
couldn't be used after 7pm and before (I thunk) 7am.

There are definitely laws banning their usage at certain times.

[White Spirit]

On 23/01/2015 14:44, mro...@btopenworld.com wrote:

> I do know that in order to get the environmental health department
> involved it is necessary to collect evidence by keeping a log over
> time of incidents and even making recordings of scientific
> measurements of the nuisance involved.

I can imagine you have done that a lot - every time your neighbour has a
barbecue, whenever someone plays reggae music, the times your neighbour
uses the vacuum cleaner past 7pm or uses their lawnmower on a Sunday.

The calls will have an extra level of self-righteousness if your
neighbours have done anything that identifies them as gay.

[GB]

On 23/01/2015 15:46, Jethro_uk wrote:
> I recently read a suggestion that "ice cream vans" are fronts for dodgy
> fags'n'booze sellers ... you pay the driver, get a ticket, and collect
> from somewhere else.
>
> Why else would one be doing the rounds in midwinter when almost everyone
> has a freezer nowdays ?
>

Freezers are far too cold for ice cream?

[GB]

I mean standard domestic freezers.

[Judith]

On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:44:53 -0800 (PST), mro...@btopenworld.com wrote:

<snip>

> It is not an offence to make a noise, even a loud one at any time.

Usual incorrect rubbish from you:

Code of Practice on Noise from Ice-Cream Van Chimes Etc. in England 2013

It is an offence under section 62 of the Control of Pollution Act 1974 (CoPA)
to use a loudspeaker in the street. There is a specific exception for the
operation of loudspeakers fixed to vehicles used to convey and sell perishable
commodities for human consumption to the public, such as ice-cream, provided
that they do not give reasonable cause for annoyance to persons in the
vicinity.

REMEMBER: It is an offence to sound your chimes before 12.00 noon or after 7.00
pm.

[Ophelia]

"Jethro_uk" <jeth...@hotmailbin.com> wrote in message
news:m9u05d$gd4$1...@dont-email.me...

> Depends on what you call ice-cream ;) The whippy-shit vans serve is (as
> my Dad observed) like soap.

Your Dad had a good name for it <g>

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

[peterwn]

People in Aberdeen allegedly install double glazing so the wee bairns cannot hear the ice cream van. Perhaps you could do the same - it would probably pay for itself with fuel cost savings.

[ARW]

"Judith" <jmsmi...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:gfc4ca52or9eggu4v...@4ax.com...

Well you know what colour it is. So just do the rest on line

http://ownvehicle.askmid.com/

--
Adam

[mro...@btopenworld.com]

So what? What the bloody hell has it to do with you that you find the need interfere. If your neighbour gets upset, let them deal with it. It's what life is for.

Tell her our kids never got out of bed to eat ice cream. That's just poor child rearing skills.

Then again you wouldn't know would you? Your kind don't have children!

[harryagain]

"White Spirit" <wsp...@homechoice.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cif9t6...@mid.individual.net...

Perverts you mean.
Gay is a hijacked word.

[Old Jinglebollocks]

It all revolves around the colour of the van driver's skin.

If he's brown or black, and you're white, officialdom will do all it can to discourage your complaint. Not only that - you are in danger of being jailed for hate crime of you insist on going further down this road.

For example, look at this story:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2919918/Neighbour-convicted-assault-throwing-WATER-woman-noisy-children-door-garden.html

While I don't recommend throwing water at children, unless they're your own and are asking for it...

...........just consider the stupidity of a white English woman making an official complaint against someone with the name Afshan Iqbal. After all these years, does that white woman not know how things are in this country?

[Judith]

On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:50:33 -0800 (PST), mro...@btopenworld.com wrote:

<snip>

>> REMEMBER: It is an offence to sound your chimes before 12.00 noon or after 7.00 pm.
>
>So what? What the bloody hell has it to do with you that you find the need interfere. If your neighbour gets upset, let them deal with it. It's what life is for.

I realise that your neighbours would not want to speak to you at all - and very
wise of them: but in some areas they do - sharing issues with each other.
Where is it you live now, as far as your neighbours are concerned? Coventry?

>Tell her our kids never got out of bed to eat ice cream. That's just poor child rearing skills.
>
>Then again you wouldn't know would you? Your kind don't have children!

Keep you hair on - if you have any left - you silly old sod.

Get over it - you were just plain wrong. (Again)

[Mr Pounder]

"Old Jinglebollocks" <old.jingl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4c10f9ba-d0bf-478d...@googlegroups.com...

"Speaking through an interpreter, Mrs Iqbal said"
.....................................
Mrs Iqbal was only taking the piss out of us. Fucking Muslims.

[Special Care]

On Friday, 23 January 2015 15:46:41 UTC, Jethro_uk wrote:
> I recently read a suggestion that "ice cream vans" are fronts for dodgy
> fags'n'booze sellers ... you pay the driver, get a ticket, and collect
> from somewhere else.
>
> Why else would one be doing the rounds in midwinter when almost everyone
> has a freezer nowdays ?

-----------------------------------

Well, I heard the ice cream man directly sells heroin and similar delights.
True, there's not much profit in ice cream in January.

[karene...@gmail.com]

I have an ice cream van and we are just trying to make a living like everyone else. We have our regular customers all through winter otherwise we wouldn't be wasting our diesel going round.
What would you rather we did , sat on our backsides and claim the benefits.
Get off our backs and support us , the joy we bring to both children and adults is I measurable. I say you need to get a life !
The job is long hours and hard , so please a little bit of slack and bad mouthing would be appreciated.

[melani...@gmail.com]

This is targeted at two audiences:
1. Ice cream sellers: why do you need to have your engines running outside your own home? And how long does this need to be for?

2. Has anyone else had problems living next to an cream van?

[FMurtz]

Jeff wrote:

> Outside on the road??  If so it is illegal to leave the vehicle
> unattended with the engine running.
>
> Jeff
To keep the ice cream from melting?
Until you put t5he ice cream in another fridge?
he engine may not be the van engine, but the refrigerator

[Woolly Jumper]

On 02/06/2018 08:23, melani...@gmail.com wrote:

You're the type of person that would complain about fire engines
sounding their sirens coming out of fire stations. Moaning about a ice
cream van: Get A Life !

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[Fredxx]

On 02/06/2018 10:46, Woolly Jumper wrote:
> On 02/06/2018 08:23, melani...@gmail.com wrote:
>> This is targeted at two audiences:
>> 1. Ice cream sellers: why do you need to have your engines running
>> outside your own home? And how long does this need to be for?
>>
>> 2. Has anyone else had problems living next to an cream van?
>>
>
> You're the type of person that would complain about fire engines
> sounding their sirens coming out of fire stations. Moaning about a ice
> cream van: Get A Life !

Perhaps they have children and are 'hassled' when the ice-cream van
visits perhaps once a day.

I used to have lollies in the freezer for such occasions.

[JNugent]

On 02/06/2018 10:46, Woolly Jumper wrote:

> On 02/06/2018 08:23, melani...@gmail.com wrote:

>> This is targeted at two audiences:
>> 1. Ice cream sellers: why do you need to have your engines running
>> outside your own home? And how long does this need to be for?
>>
>> 2. Has anyone else had problems living next to an cream van?
>>
>
> You're the type of person that would complain about fire engines
> sounding their sirens coming out of fire stations. Moaning about a ice
> cream van: Get A Life !

It sounds like very bad luck to "live next door to an ice cream van"
(which must mean living next door to an inconsiderate neighbour who
parks a commercial vehicle on his drive, or worse, on the road).

Why should anyone have to put up with it in what must be a residential
area? Would it be alright to park a skip lorry in the same way?

[BurfordTJustice]

fucking snowflake.



<melani...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c498a58e-4918-462e...@googlegroups.com...
: This is targeted at two audiences:

[BurfordTJustice]

Freedom is long gone from the UK



"Jeff" <je...@ukra.com> wrote in message news:petjjh$2fk$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

: On 02/06/2018 08:23, melani...@gmail.com wrote:

: > This is targeted at two audiences:

: > 1. Ice cream sellers: why do you need to have your engines running
outside your own home? And how long does this need to be for?
: >
: > 2. Has anyone else had problems living next to an cream van?

: >
:
: Outside on the road?? If so it is illegal to leave the vehicle

[tim...]

"Fredxx" <fre...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:petprm$l5a$1...@dont-email.me...

but how did you stop being hassled for lollies when there wasn't an ice
cream van outside?

tim

[GB]

On 02/06/2018 12:14, BurfordTJustice wrote:
> Freedom is long gone from the UK

In this case, do you mean the freedom to leave your engine running, or
the freedom not to be disturbed in your home by an engine left running
outside? The two freedoms conflict.

Likewise, in the USA, there's the freedom to gun people down
willy-nilly, and the freedom not to be gunned down.

[p-0''0-h the cat (coder)]

On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 07:14:21 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
<burford/asso...@uk.MI15> wrote:

>Freedom is long gone from the UK

I don't think it's ever been legal to permanently park signed vans in
residential roads. Speak to the local authority. Running businesses from
home which cause a nuisance is also a no no.

I knew someone doing just this with an ice cream van who got a letter
from the council telling them to stop.

Careful though. Some people in the ice cream business are heavy.

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

--
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme,
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook,
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag,
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

I mark any message from »Q« the troll as stinky

[BurfordTJustice]

Try to change the subjects to the yanks makes you a luzer.



"GB" <NOTso...@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:petv8e$men$1...@dont-email.me...

: >
: >
:

[GB]

On 02/06/2018 12:47, BurfordTJustice wrote:
> Try to change the subjects to the yanks makes you a luzer.

Not understanding the point makes you what?

[BurfordTJustice]

by being a "parent"





"tim..." <tims_n...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:petucq$h7n$1...@dont-email.me...
:
:
: "Fredxx" <fre...@nospam.com> wrote in message

:
:

[BurfordTJustice]

Freedom is long gone from the UK.

You will do only what you are told you may do, why?
Cause only pussified folk are left onthe island.

Thus the invaders are taking over.

"GB" <NOTso...@microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:peu0il$tm7$2...@dont-email.me...

: > : >
: > :
: >
: >
:

[johnny-knowall]

On 2 Jun 2018, p-0''0-h the cat (coder) wrote
(in article<tmv4hdp6e1o2of2g5...@4ax.com>):

> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 07:14:21 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
> <burford/asso...@uk.MI15> wrote:
>
> > Freedom is long gone from the UK
>
> I don't think it's ever been legal to permanently park signed vans in
> residential roads. Speak to the local authority. Running businesses from
> home which cause a nuisance is also a no no.
>
> I knew someone doing just this with an ice cream van who got a letter
> from the council telling them to stop.
>
> Careful though. Some people in the ice cream business are heavy.

Yes, ice cream van turf wars can get rather nasty; so I presume the vendors
are not unaccustomed to a bit of aggro towards anyone who affects their
business in a detrimental way.

I presume the engine is left running in order to supply power to the
chiller/freezer units in the back of the van; and prolong the life of the van
battery?

Leaving an engine running on a public street contravenes section 42 of the
1988 Road Traffic Act, although the clause in question does add
*un-neccessarily* to the engine running scenario. The ice cream vendor would
argue that it is necessary for his business to have the engine on.

The 1988 Act was more concerned with the extra pollution emitted by idling
vehicles, and this might be a more likely avenue to explore with the local
council.

[Shadow]

On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 12:36:41 +0100, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:

>On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 07:14:21 -0400, "Bouffant du Jour"
><burford/asso...@uk.MI15> leaned over, strained a bit, and squeaked:

>
>>Freedom is long gone from the UK
>
>I don't think it's ever been legal to permanently park signed vans in
>residential roads. Speak to the local authority. Running businesses from
>home which cause a nuisance is also a no no.

The working class does in the US. I believe it's the norm
there. Oh, I thought you meant calling signed parked vans "home" and
bothering businesses "a la Walmart". I'm on my first coffee...
The other way round would be illegal in a truly free country.
Your freedom ends where someone else's starts. A cat knows all about
boundaries, right ? Explain the concept to the Bouffant, I don't speak
his lingo.
TIA
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

[p-0''0-h the cat (coder)]

On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 07:56:59 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
<burford/asso...@uk.MI15> wrote:

>Freedom is long gone from the UK.

Won't be long now before Trump kills net neutrality. We'll laugh while
your 'freedom' slides down the shitter. How's the environment doing? I
hear bad things that'll keep your kids employed for eternity clearing
the shit up.

[johnny-knowall]

On 2 Jun 2018, p-0''0-h the cat (coder) wrote
(in article<aqi5hdtie04l5rrjh...@4ax.com>):

> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 07:56:59 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
> <burford/asso...@uk.MI15> wrote:
>
> > Freedom is long gone from the UK.
>
> Won't be long now before Trump kills net neutrality. We'll laugh while
> your 'freedom' slides down the shitter. How's the environment doing? I
> hear bad things that'll keep your kids employed for eternity clearing
> the shit up.

The US environment was buggered years ago when they let GM crossbred weeds
out into the wider countryside. Now even the strongest herbicides ever
invented will not kill them without killing every living thing within a 20
mile radius.

No one will be able to clear that shit up.

Of course no one cares because they have big national parks where the
surviving species are corralled and journalists are allowed to film.

You will not find quite so many Monarch butterflies in the USA as you would
have done 50 years ago.

Why? One word - Roundup.

Yanks chuck it around as if it was water - and what has happened in the last
thirty years?

Monarch butterfly numbers have fallen by 90%. Yes 90% - in 30 years.

And all because of the obsession with cheap junk food which is killing the
population but making a killing in profits for a few greedy billionaires.

[Norman Wells]

Coincidence is not the same as causation. Roundup is not toxic to
butterflies so is not directly to blame.

It is of course toxic to weeds, which is why it is used. It means crops
can grow free from massive weed competition and thus give reasonable
yields. If it weren't for Roundup, farmers would have to use another
herbicide, probably one that is far less safe to the environment.

The scientifically illiterate green lobby would love of course to see it
banned because they hate big business, especially big chemical business
(which they don't understand), and particularly the biggest ogre of all,
Monsanto. But they don't have any scientific justification, and their
concern is largely synthetic.

[johnny-knowall]

On 2 Jun 2018, Norman Wells wrote
(in article <fng63e...@mid.individual.net>):

Well that’s ok then.

Goodbye - nature.

Hello - nothing but profit.

Enjoy your miserable future in the featureless desert your ignorance and
greed has created.

[johnny-knowall]

On 2 Jun 2018, Norman Wells wrote
(in article <fng63e...@mid.individual.net>):

Wrong, wrong and wrong again.... As usual.

I’m afraid just parroting right wing ignorance will get you nowhere on
uk.p.m.

Read this and weep into your dinner -

http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/4/1416

[Norman Wells]

No, I think not.

> I’m afraid just parroting right wing ignorance will get you nowhere on
> uk.p.m.

It's got nothing to do with politics, right wing or otherwise. It's
science.

> Read this and weep into your dinner -
>
> http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/4/1416

Didn't you read what the editors say before the article?

"The editors of the journal have been alerted to concerns over potential
bias in opinions and bias in the choice of citation sources used in this
article. We note that the authors stand by the content as published.
Since the nature of the claims against the paper concern speculation and
opinion, and not fraud or academic misconduct, the editors would like to
issue an Expression of Concern to make readers aware that the approach
to collating literature citations for this article was likely not
systematic and may not reflect the spectrum of opinions on the issues
covered by the article."

What they're saying is 'take it with a huge pinch of salt'.

[Norman Wells]

Goodbye weeds in treated crops, sure.

> Hello - nothing but profit.

Hello, food in sufficient quantity to feed the world. For the time
being anyway.

> Enjoy your miserable future in the featureless desert your ignorance and
> greed has created.

You can hanker after a non-existent golden age that's passed if you
like. Someone sensible has to take the hard decisions, though, like how
to feed a world population that is increasing by 40% every 50 years from
a finite planet.

[GB]

On 02/06/2018 21:15, Norman Wells wrote:

> You can hanker after a non-existent golden age that's passed if you
> like.  Someone sensible has to take the hard decisions, though, like how
> to feed a world population that is increasing by 40% every 50 years from
> a finite planet.

The current population growth rate is estimated at 1.09% pa, which
equates to around 70% over 50 years. But, that is about half the growth
rate compared to the peak in 1962/63.

[Norman Wells]

On 03/06/2018 10:37, GB wrote:
> On 02/06/2018 21:15, Norman Wells wrote:
>
>> You can hanker after a non-existent golden age that's passed if you
>> like.  Someone sensible has to take the hard decisions, though, like
>> how to feed a world population that is increasing by 40% every 50
>> years from a finite planet.
>
> The current population growth rate is estimated at 1.09% pa, which
> equates to around 70% over 50 years.

And if that doesn't scare you, I don't know what will.

We have no control over it, and everyone turns a blind eye.

Nothing will be done until it's too late.

[BurfordTJustice]

You fail.

On April 23, 2018, the FCC's repealing of net neutrality rules went into
effect.

No one even nticed.

United Kingdom[edit]
In comparison to the United States, the debate concerning Net Neutrality is
one that has not received much attention in the United Kingdom. The
officials merely refer to such a concept as an open internet, as net
neutrality is a term used originally in American politics. While it does
seem to be a non-issue in the UK, there is indeed a defining characteristic
in the neutrality debate there, as the arguments are often shaped by
regulators. Also, these arguments are often influenced by the discourse of
other countries in Europe, so much of the discussions that the UK has about
open internet will be linked with those of other European countries listed
on this page.[77]

From the socialist bible

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality_by_country#United_Kingdom



In 2007, Plusnet was using deep packet inspection to implement limits and
differential charges for peer-to-peer, file transfer protocol, and online
game traffic.[78] However, their network management philosophy was made
clear for each package they sold, and was consistent between different
websites.[79]


"p-0''0-h the cat (coder)" <super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote in
message news:aqi5hdtie04l5rrjh...@4ax.com...
: On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 07:56:59 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"

:

[GB]

It is too late. When I was a student, 55 years ago, the population just
turned 3 bn. Now it is 7.6 bn.

There is built in growth, as so much of the population is under 16, and
they can hardly be expected not to have any kids.

The only bright point is that the growth rate is on a downward trend.

[BurfordTJustice]

"Norman Wells" <h...@unseen.ac.am> wrote in message
news:fng63e...@mid.individual.net...

[BurfordTJustice]

"GB" <NOTso...@microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:pf0ctc$tn1$1...@dont-email.me...

:

[BurfordTJustice]

yet the African nations are further behind than they were then.

The world could stop sending them food and the population will decrease.

"GB" <NOTso...@microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:pf0hmv$q3m$1...@dont-email.me...

[BurfordTJustice]

"Norman Wells" <h...@unseen.ac.am> wrote in message

news:fngbrs...@mid.individual.net...

[mal...@mail.com]

The LA have all the details of these annoying people. They need it all in order to issue them a licence.
There is absolutely no consideration for those who work night shift and just get off to sleep when they are blasted out of bed by chimes that are LOUDER than the sirens of emergency vehicles!
They should be banned altogether!

[mal...@mail.com]

I believe their licence applies to hours between noon and 7 pm.

[milijanamc...@gmail.com]

the ice cream. am doesn’t even stop near mine and since i come straight home at lunch i starve because the van doesn’t come near mine so i need to wait till 7pm till u can get some food!!!!!! SO SHUT UP COMPLAINING CAUSE YOUR LUCKY!!!!!!!!!!!

[GB]

On 13/12/2019 16:52, milijanamc...@gmail.com wrote:
> the ice cream. am doesn’t even stop near mine and since i come straight home at lunch i starve because the van doesn’t come near mine so i need to wait till 7pm till u can get some food!!!!!! SO SHUT UP COMPLAINING CAUSE YOUR LUCKY!!!!!!!!!!!
>

Is ice cream food?

[R. Mark Clayton]

Yes, but after four years it will have melted.

[https://twitter.com/Bitxcoin2/status/1198150189871]

The ice-cream was too running and made a mess of my hand. The ice-cream man didn't shave his face properly.

All four tyres where different makes.

That was out of order.