Re: Cottaging - Anthony Charles Lynton Blair (Tony Blair, former PM of the UK)

[Tired]

Jacob Von Hogflume wrote:
:: 'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court
:: for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
:: sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet
:: was being watched by police. Blair was fined �500, and walked away
:: with nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to
:: cover who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends
:: in court got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.'
::
:: http://tinyurl.com/c4z68ne

but its not true, is it?

[Turk182]

On Nov 5, 11:06 pm, "Janitor of Lunacy" <z...@zonk.com> wrote:
> "Fredxx" <fre...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>
> news:k79es2$ahq$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
>
> > On 05/11/2012 21:32, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
>
> >> "Jacob Von Hogflume" <timefl...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> >>news:50982245$0$2087$7120d902@karibu...

> >> Amazing that you can get prison time for calling a black man a monkey on
> >> the internet, yet someone can get away with this.
>
> > It's not called political correctness for nothing!!
>
> and we don't yet know whether they will "get away with this". My feeling is
> that they will not.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Know nothing of the allegation, however, the former Prime Minister is
confused about life - and confusion shows itself in different ways in
younger people.

Young men sometimes go through crisis before they find out who they
are - and sometimes never get there!

It's unlikely to be true due to his brilliance with Teflonics.

Turk182

[Jacob Von Hogflume]

'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court
for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet was

being watched by police. Blair was fined Ł500, and walked away with

[True Blue]

On Nov 5, 8:32 pm, Jacob Von Hogflume <timefl...@btinternet.com>
wrote:

> 'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court
> for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
> sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet was

> being watched by police. Blair was fined 500, and walked away with

> nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover
> who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court
> got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.'
>
> http://tinyurl.com/c4z68ne

Good to see the internet being used to its <cough> full potential !!

[Andy Wainwright]

On 05/11/2012 20:32, Jacob Von Hogflume wrote:
>
> 'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court
> for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
> sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet was

> being watched by police. Blair was fined �500, and walked away with

> nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover
> who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court
> got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.'
>
> http://tinyurl.com/c4z68ne

I think they should have special bogs for this sort of thing, i.e.
ladies, gents, pervs.

I could certainly imagine Blair being bi though. Still, better that than
a fake straight like most of the far right are...

[Mentalguy2k8]

"Jacob Von Hogflume" <time...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:50982245$0$2087$7120d902@karibu...
>

> 'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court for
> importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get sexual
> favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet was being

> watched by police. Blair was fined £500, and walked away with nobody

> knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover who he was.
> Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court got him off with
> a fine, because he is one of them.'
>
> http://tinyurl.com/c4z68ne

[Fredxx]

On 05/11/2012 21:32, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
>

[Janitor of Lunacy]

"Fredxx" <fre...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:k79es2$ahq$1...@dont-email.me...

[RH]

On Nov 5, 8:32 pm, Jacob Von Hogflume <timefl...@btinternet.com>
wrote:

> 'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court
> for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
> sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet was

> being watched by police. Blair was fined 500, and walked away with

> nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover
> who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court
> got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.'
>
> http://tinyurl.com/c4z68ne

Ah yes, Charles Lynton...nudge...wink...wink...wink.... RH

[totallyconfused]

> Turk182- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

This is a rumour that has been going around for years but there is
actually no evidence (that I can find)
TC

[Ophelia]

"Janitor of Lunacy" <zo...@zonk.com> wrote in message
news:dEXls.162210$YJ1....@fx09.am4...

Hopefully!

--
--

http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

[Ophelia]

"totallyconfused" <lisab...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:569c85a4-ecf3-4821...@q4g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...

Pity the children had to be the means for them doing so ...
--
--

http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

[abelard]

On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:32:07 +0000, Jacob Von Hogflume
<time...@btinternet.com> wrote:

>
>'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court
>for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
>sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet was

>being watched by police. Blair was fined �500, and walked away with

>nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover
>who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court
>got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.'
>
>http://tinyurl.com/c4z68ne

don't be so rude..it's obvious he's a real manly sort of guy with
a lovely wife...he'd have no motive and neither would those
seeking alternative forms of entertainment
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2778529

[Roger Dewhurst]

On Nov 6, 9:32 am, Jacob Von Hogflume <timefl...@btinternet.com>
wrote:

> 'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court
> for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
> sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet was

> being watched by police. Blair was fined 500, and walked away with

> nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover
> who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court
> got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.'
>
> http://tinyurl.com/c4z68ne

When is this supposed to have happened? Surely it must have been
before he was instantly recogniseable by everyone in the courtroom?

R

[Roger Dewhurst]

On Nov 7, 6:40 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:32:07 +0000, Jacob Von Hogflume
>

>     seeking alternative forms of entertainmenthttp://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&...


"Due to an unusually high level of traffic we are currently
experiencing, the forums are temporarily closed to unregistered users.
Click here to login to DU2. Or visit the new DU3, which is still open
for everyone."

DU3 appears to be all American. What is in this DU2 forum?

R

[abelard]

here is a smaller version that appears to be functional at this time
http://www.leblogluxe.com/files/2012/06/tony_et_cherry_blair.jpg

[abelard]

On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:45:59 -0800 (PST), Roger Dewhurst
<dewhurs...@gmail.com> wrote:

this will possibly get you it in full size glorious technicolor
http://tiny.cc/pmcdnw

[Roger Dewhurst]

What an utterly revolting sight.

[Gr...@glanceback.demon.co.uk]

On Monday, November 5, 2012 8:32:06 PM UTC, Jacob Von Hogflume wrote:
> 'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court
>
> for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
>
> sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet was
>

> being watched by police. Blair was fined �500, and walked away with

>
> nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover
>
> who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court
>
> got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.'
>
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/c4z68ne

Hi, don't want to seem a pedant but the fine was £50 which was quite normal for the offence. The aim was NOT to destroy someone but to teach them propriety!

The individual importuned was a close protection officer who had him under surveilance I am given to understand.

He did not appear in Court and was allowed to use a KNOWN pseudonym, often a style in such cases, at the time.

The record is no longer in the books as I have checked in some detail!

He did NOT receive special treatment at the time as he was very junior.

I gather his conviction was never reported to the bar which was in fact a mandatory point of honour - who would expect honour from Charles Lynton!

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

[mkhend...@gmail.com]

[mkhend...@gmail.com]

Who cares whether he did or he didn't? I'm still seething about his ill-judged relationship with Bush and the terrible consequences of their illegal actions after 9/11. How could men in such positions of power be so ignorant about the countries they invaded?

[Vidcapper]

Not *this* nonsense again.

--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

[iandh...@gmail.com]

If he did not give his proper name, surely he could even now be charged with perjury... "Are you Charles Lynton" "Yes"... the "Yes" is a lie, as he is supposed to tell the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth.....

[Graham T]

You can use whatever name you like so long as it is not for illegal
purposes.

[royhol...@gmail.com]

[juli...@gmail.com]

Of course the evidence cannot be found it's gone to the same place that the peado files in government have gone!

[markbla...@gmail.com]

Youtube; 'saville and the ninth circle'...Our Country is run by pedophile politicians. I know this because i was rightly sentenced to 6 months imprisonment (first offence) for football violence back in 1981-82, but wrongly sent to a little known Detention Centre named medomsley in the North-East of England. It is now the UK's largest ever case of sexual,physical and mental abuse in British legal history, yet the powers that be somehow managed to keep it all hush hush and out of the Public's eye for over 4 decades of when that hellhole of a concentration camp's depraved sadistic gate's first opened. The then thatcher Government's employees disguised in the form of 'prison officers' were actually made up of mainly freemason's of whom operated a pedophile ring that centered on us young adults being taken out of the prison to a local pedophiles house,ligatured around the neck and wrists and brutally gang raped day after day after day until being released back into a society who,at the time believed that 'children should be seen and not heard' so it was therefore conveniently brushed under the carpet and leaving us former inmates (survivors) going through our entire adult life carrying around these twisted vile demons on our broad shoulders-with no one to talk to cos no one would of believed us-and all along being expected to lead normal law-abiding lives. WTF ? 5 of the former 'prison officers' were recently found guilty of crimes ranging from misconduct in a Public office (beating us to a pulp on a daily bases) to buggery and multiple rapes on us young 16-21 years of age adolescent boys/men and were sentenced to prison terms between 3 to 8 years. An absolute disgrace given the very real lifetime of psychological damage that those sick sadistic Government employees ingrained into our souls. We're demanding a Full Independent Public Inquiry into that hell-on-earth Government experiment that went horribly wrong and destroyed thousands of lives in the process. Then when we all think we are finally being heard..along comes bellend boris with his 'historical sexual/physical/mental abuse cases being a waste of Government money' and 'all this mularky' is costing a huge amount of Police time and Government resources with the money that he so very sensitively referred to as 'spaffing it up the wall' live on national radio LBC 13/3/2019. FFS ? What right minded man/woman would wanna vote for such a pompous bigoted piece of S?$T who clearly has no morals & principles or regard for the thousands upon thousands of victims of abuse or as importantly our families. Google medomsley detention centre and all will be revealed.

[mister...@gmail.com]

On Monday, 5 November 2012 20:50:57 UTC, Tired wrote:
> Jacob Von Hogflume wrote:
> :: 'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court

> :: for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
> :: sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet

> :: was being watched by police. Blair was fined �500, and walked away

> :: with nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to
> :: cover who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends
> :: in court got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.'
> ::
> :: http://tinyurl.com/c4z68ne
>

> but its not true, is it?

Do you have proof that it is not true? or is this just your opinion

[mister...@gmail.com]

[ianb...@hotmail.com]

its his middle name

[kylese...@yahoo.co.uk]

On Monday, 5 November 2012 20:32:07 UTC, Jacob Von Hogflume wrote:
> 'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court
> for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
> sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet was
> being watched by police. Blair was fined Ł500, and walked away with
> nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover
> who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court
> got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.'
>
> http://tinyurl.com/c4z68ne

I seem to remember this occurred close to the time he was being backed to get to the top of Labour and fight an election, so this scandal had to be hushed up immediately. I do note that references to this seem to have been removed delibrerately from the internet today. Funny how some people can get stuff removed.

[Chris Holland]

It is, of course, a beautiful story and as a lifelong Tory I'd dearly love for it to be true. Unfortunately pesky facts get in the way away that would clearly impugn upon the veracity of the tale. At the time of the alleged offence/court appearance, Blair was actually in the Young Conservatives and hadn't yet come up with his clever plan to infiltrate the Labour Party. He wasn't even a member of the Labour Party at the time and wasn't standing for election as an MP, and so was unlikely to have been standing in the dock in front of the Bow Street beaks.

[Connie Drummond]

My God, how horrendous. To be isolated in a hell-hole like this is truly horrific. Your strength of spirit and resolve is an inspiration in itself.

[Arlene Threfall]

On Friday, 2 April 2021 at 14:10:06 UTC+1, Chris Holland wrote:
> It is, of course, a beautiful story and as a lifelong Tory I'd dearly love for it to be true. Unfortunately pesky facts get in the way away that would clearly impugn upon the veracity of the tale. At the time of the alleged offence/court appearance, Blair was actually in the Young Conservatives and hadn't yet come up with his clever plan to infiltrate the Labour Party. He wasn't even a member of the Labour Party at the time and wasn't standing for election as an MP, and so was unlikely to have been standing in the dock in front of the Bow Street beaks.

whilst doubting this "cottoning Blair ", narrative myself one thing I do know is that Blair joined the Labour Party in 1975

[Sysadmin]

I read this article: 'He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street

Magistrates Court for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He
tried to get sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the

toilet was being watched by police. Blair was fined £500, and walked away

[Noel Eye]

On Friday, April 2, 2021 at 3:10:06 PM UTC+2, Chris Holland wrote:
> It is, of course, a beautiful story and as a lifelong Tory I'd dearly love for it to be true. Unfortunately pesky facts get in the way away that would clearly impugn upon the veracity of the tale. At the time of the alleged offence/court appearance, Blair was actually in the Young Conservatives and hadn't yet come up with his clever plan to infiltrate the Labour Party. He wasn't even a member of the Labour Party at the time and wasn't standing for election as an MP, and so was unlikely to have been standing in the dock in front of the Bow Street beaks.

I don't see the relevance of what his political views were at the time. Why do you think that 'the Bow Street Beaks' are only interested in prosecuting people who are standing for election? I'd suggest that your muddled thinking fits perfectly with your political views.

[Noel Eye]

On Friday, April 2, 2021 at 3:10:06 PM UTC+2, Chris Holland wrote:

> It is, of course, a beautiful story and as a lifelong Tory I'd dearly love for it to be true. Unfortunately pesky facts get in the way away that would clearly impugn upon the veracity of the tale. At the time of the alleged offence/court appearance, Blair was actually in the Young Conservatives and hadn't yet come up with his clever plan to infiltrate the Labour Party. He wasn't even a member of the Labour Party at the time and wasn't standing for election as an MP, and so was unlikely to have been standing in the dock in front of the Bow Street beaks.

Is it obligatory for people arrested for indecent behaviour to be standing for election before the courts will deal with them?

[VinniethePanda]

Cottaging.