On 19/01/2013 21:47, Jethro_uk wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:35:35 +0000, Alex Heney wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:43:52 +0000, Graham
>> <
isnther...@talktalk.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/01/2013 20:14, Mel Rowing wrote:
>>>> On Jan 19, 7:58 pm, Graham <
isnthereanym...@talktalk.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is eh offense - if any - when a driving instructor is over the
>>>>> alcohol limit but a sober pupil is driving?
>>>>
>>>> The supervisor of a learner driver is subject to exactly the same
>>>> rules as he would be were he driving the vehicle.
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.helpingldrivers.com/law/supervisor.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'm not so sure. There can be more than one person with a full license
>>> in the car and there is nothing to say they must be in the front seat.
>>>
>>>
>> You would have a hard job persuading the courts that the supervisor
>> wasn't the one sat in the front passenger seat, if that person had a
>> full licence.
>>
>> But you have moved the goalposts here anyhow.
>>
>> Your question wasn't about who the instructor is, but about what the
>> offence is.
>>
>> And the answer is that it is just as much an offence to supervise a
>> learner while drunk as it is to drive yourself while drunk.
>
> A supplementary question (possibly of more use) is what offence - in any
> - would the *learner* have committed. Assuming he had no reason to
> suspect his instructor were over the limit.
>
> If the leaner were to be subject to punishment - despite their lack of
> knowledge - then would it be fair to insist instructors are tested before
> beginning a lesson ?
>
I suppose you could argue that if the supervisor was unfit to
supervise, then the learner would be guilty of driving whilst
unsupervised, but you would probably be hard pressed to get that one
home in a court, unless of course, anyone knows of a stated case?