On 29/10/2019 15:36, Martin Brown wrote:
> No. NS&I were very particular and refused to accept a copy that had been
> done by the junior dogsbody using the practice stamp rather than a named
> individual solicitor using their own personal stamp. I still don't know
> whether they were right or wrong in this matter. No other bank noticed.
I think they were wrong, and I think I can prove it! :)
This is all covered by S.3 of the Powers of Attorney Act, which reads as
follows:
"Proof of instruments creating powers of attorney.
(1)The contents of an instrument creating a power of attorney may be
proved by means of a copy which—
(a)is a reproduction of the original made with a photographic or other
device for reproducing documents in facsimile; and
(b)contains the following certificate or certificates signed by the
donor of the power or by a solicitor, authorised person or stockbroker,
that is to say—
(i)a certificate at the end to the effect that the copy is a true and
complete copy of the original; and
(ii)if the original consists of two or more pages, a certificate at the
end of each page of the copy to the effect that it is a true and
complete copy of the corresponding page of the original."
So, the certificates need to be signed by the donor or a solicitor,
authorised person, or stockbroker, but there's nothing in there about
the precise wording of the certificate or the need for a particular stamp.
It seems clear that the OPG's wording is far more verbose than
necessary, and there's clearly no need for the certificate to be
hand-written.