Forensic recording of webpages
Is it possible to record a webpage in such a way as to be able
to prove that it is a genuine record of the webpage (on a particular
date)?
It is possible to take a screenshot / screengrab of a webpage, but,
as I understand it, a screenshot is just a digital image, recording the
pixels that were on the screen at the time. So it could be argued that
such a screenshot could be edited, or even entirely forged, in a
programme such as Photoshop, and therefore a screenshot couldn't
be considered proof of anything. (Unless perhaps there is some hidden
code in the screenshot image file.)
I am thinking of the sort of situation whereby a company might advertise
a product on their website, and state that it had certain capabilities. But
if turned out that the product didn't actually have the advertised capabilities,
and if a disappointed purchaser wished to make a claim against the
company, the company could surreptitiously amend their webpage to
remove the questionable description of the product's capabilities, and so
the disappointed purchaser would not be able to use a screenshot as
evidence that the company had made any such description of the product's
capabilities.
Equally, a company could surreptitiously alter their terms & conditions, as
published on their website. Or a news source could remove a potentially
libelous statement from their website.
I had a look at the Wayback Machine / The Internet Archive
-------------------
https://archive.org/legal
'Information Requests
'The Internet Archive's Policy for Responding to Information Requests
'The following sets forth the Internet Archive's policy with regard to requests
for documents or other records for use in legal proceedings. [goes on to
specify payments required].'
-------------------
However, Wikipedia says:
-------------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayback_Machine#Legal_status
'In Europe, the Wayback Machine could be interpreted as violating
copyright laws. Only the content creator can decide where their content
is published or duplicated, so the Archive would have to delete pages
from its system upon request of the creator.[84] The exclusion policies
for the Wayback Machine may be found in the FAQ section of the site.[85]
[I haven't actually been able to find the exclusion policies so far.]
'Some cases have been brought against the Internet Archive specifically
for its Wayback Machine archiving efforts.'
-------------------
So I am thinking that a record of a webpage from the Internet Archive,
might not be useable proof that it is a genuine record of the webpage,
at least not in the UK.
So I am wondering if anyone has any insight about how to establish a
provable record of a webpage?