Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DOES THE BIBLE SAY THAT IT'S OK TO SHAVE PUBIC HAIR??

2,768 views
Skip to first unread message

Ron Ingelevics

unread,
Apr 22, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/22/96
to
an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote:
>ea...@system3.demon.co.uk (bald eagle) wrote:
>>In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>,
>>an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> ...Christian...pubes...Sodom...Gomorrah...hellfire...blah...blah...
>>> Mary
>>
>>Well why not ask a priest?
>>Oh yeah, I forgot - this is where they all hang out anyway.
>>
>As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
>found the role the catholic church has to play in saving people like you
>an important one.

Hmmm... "catholic" without an upper-case "C" only mean "universal".

And since there is no "universal" church, your offense is totally
misplaced.

Try again under your real name. If you find posting in gay groups
embarassing then DON'T DO IT! "Save" yourself.

--
Ron Ingelevics What's more important than love?
Toronto, Ontario
love...@io.org


Ground Pounder

unread,
Apr 22, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/22/96
to
On 19 Apr 1996 17:37:40 GMT, an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote:

>ea...@system3.demon.co.uk (bald eagle) wrote:
>>In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>,
>>an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> ...Christian...pubes...Sodom...Gomorrah...hellfire...blah...blah...
>>> Mary
>>>
>>
>>Well why not ask a priest?
>>Oh yeah, I forgot - this is where they all hang out anyway.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
>found the role the catholic church has to play in saving people like you
>an important one.
>

Why don't people like you grow up.

THERE IS NO GOD,

HE DOESN'T EXSIST,

ITS ALL A BLOODY FAIRY STORY.

Take a look at this world around you, do a bit of travelling (And I'm
not just talking about the developed world) Take a look at how the
majority of the people on this planet live, look at the disease,
poverty, famine and wars that are suffered by those people.Then ask
your self "if you were a loving, just, all powerful God wouldn't you
do something about it ? Right. So why hasn't the real God ?

I'll tell you why, Its because there isn't one.

The whole concept of God was invented by primitive societies in order
to explain away natural phenomena, later the concept was used to
impose order on small nomadic communities. If you wanted to control
someone/ other members of your tribe, you couldn't do so by using the
fear of death, that would be counter productive, you'd end up killing
off what small amount of tribal members you did have. So instead you
make out that some invisible all knowing all powerful deity will get
mad at the wrong doers and will end up punishing them in some after
life.

Once you get people falling for this one you can start making up your
own rules as you go along, just as long as you don't forget to tell
the people that these rules were handed to you by God.

The people back then were pretty Stupid and gullible, however it's now
the late 20th Century and you've got no excuse for you childishness.

If I were to take you back in time say 500 years and show you peoples
fear of Fairies, Vampires and Werewolves you'd laugh at their
stupidity because you know that those things don't exist (Shut up
Nyar) Yeah well hate to brake it to you like this but neither goes
God.....And guess what I'm laughing at you lot


8).

Keplar


_,.-*~'^'~*-.,_,.-*~'^'~*MAD COW DISEASE._,.-*~'^'~*-.,_,.-*~'^'~*

Frederick

unread,
Apr 22, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/22/96
to

an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:


> Hi,
>
> I am a committed Christian who shaves her pubic hair on a regular basis.
> I am concerned that this may have sexual conitations as far as the Bible
> is concerned and would like to know if this is so?
> I would hate to stop shaving but if Jesus says so I will.

> Thanks,
>
> Mary

Which Jesus? The Catholic one? The Methodist one? The etc etc one?
Perhaps you had better stop washing yourself around the area as well,
cos that may have 'sexual conitations' too!

But it's a joke right?

Fred really hopes so!

Lonnie Lopez

unread,
Apr 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/23/96
to Kep...@fink.demon.co.uk
My Dear,
A bitter queen, aren't we? God will punish you by turning you into a
mad cow.

Lonnie

Matthew Marks

unread,
Apr 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/23/96
to
Ground Pounder (Kep...@fink.demon.co.uk) wrote:
: The whole concept of God was invented by primitive societies in order

: to explain away natural phenomena, later the concept was used to
: impose order on small nomadic communities.

Well said. My personal theory is that as humans evolved and became self-aware,
they started to think about death, and that totally f***s up the brain - just
you think about not existing for a moment! So something was invented to fill
the gap - somewhere to go after death. Of course, it was soon taken over by
people like the Catholic heirarcy for power and financial gain.

There might well be a Heaven - nobody knows. But what's bloody certain is that
it will have no place for bigots like the sad anonymous "catholic" contributor
to this thread.

Matthew mat...@rd.bbc.co.uk My opinions, not Auntie's.

Richard Lewis

unread,
Apr 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/23/96
to
I'm a bit bemused by the direction of this thread. I'm not religious
myself, although brought up a Catholic, and agree with most of what
has been said about the Catholic church.

But there are certainly Christian gays out there, and presumably
there are also practising gay Catholics? Or am I wrong?

Richard

John*G*

unread,
Apr 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/23/96
to
In article <817114...@neige.demon.co.uk>,
Martin Reilly <mar...@neige.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In article: <4l98ll$o...@mars.efn.org> a...@efn.org (YAA (Yet Another Al))
writes:
>
>> Now that you mention it, how about shaving your arm-pits? Waxing
>> your legs? Plucking your eyebrows? Is the entire female
>> population if the western world damned to hell?!!!
>
>And more than a few drag queens!!!

No, I only think it accounts to women.

-John*G*

E-mail = ecl...@leeds.ac.uk
===============================================
Bouncy Blue-eyed Brunette Bitch-Boy-Babe -Get it.
===============================================
Devil/Angel. Fallen from grace & bathing in flames

The attached material has been sent without the knowledge of Leeds
University.The statements contained in my material are entirely my
opinions and I personally accept all responsibility for any liability
that may arise from my material.

an52...@anon.penet.fi

unread,
Apr 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/23/96
to a...@efn.org
a...@efn.org (YAA (Yet Another Al)) wrote:
>an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote:
>
>>ea...@system3.demon.co.uk (bald eagle) wrote:
>>>In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>,
>>>an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> ...Christian...pubes...Sodom...Gomorrah...hellfire...blah...blah...
>>>> Mary
>>>>
>>>
>>>Well why not ask a priest?
>>>Oh yeah, I forgot - this is where they all hang out anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
>>found the role the catholic church has to play in shaving people like you
>>an important one.
>
>That's why you good catholics spend your time lurking on the gay
>and lesbian NGs, using anonymous remailers, being offended and
>doing Important Things!
>
>Yeah.
>
>I'm sure.

I am very sorry to see a posting attacting a good catholic. I think you
may not have read the posting correctly.

Thanks for noticing.

Mary.


YAA (Yet Another Al)

unread,
Apr 24, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/24/96
to
an52...@anon.penet.fi wrote:

>Thanks for noticing.

>Mary.


Mary lambasted ME for this message, however there is not one word
of mine left in it!! My name is at the top, so at one time I
wrote something. Then someone else responded to it, probably
editing it. Then someone else responded to that, editing again,
and so forth. What is left is my name, but not so much as a single
wrod of my original post.

Lesson: only respond to original posts! Once someone else edits
it, I am no longer responsible. If you don't like what is said,
respond to the poster of THAT article!


IMHO,
YAA (Yet Another Al)


Peanuts

unread,
Apr 25, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/25/96
to
In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>, an52...@anon.penet.fi.?
writes

>
> Hi,
>
> I am a committed Christian who shaves her pubic hair on a regular basis.
>
> I am concerned that this may have sexual conitations as far as the Bible
>
> is concerned and would like to know if this is so?
>
> I would hate to stop shaving but if Jesus says so I will.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mary
>
>

Well, strictly in the context of your Subject line, no I don't recall in
any of my religious learning seeing or being told by my Sunday school
teacher that Jesus said "If you wanna shave your pubic hair, it's
cool". BUT neither do I recall seeing "If you wanna shave your pubic
hair, it aint cool".

So I guess that means it's OK, except it is probably a deadly sin listed
under Vanity.

BTW what would they have used to do it in biblical times anyway?

Jon

-----------------------------------
Peanuts
A hard man is good to find.

John*G*

unread,
Apr 25, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/25/96
to
In article <B8V$BBBiS0...@peanuts.demon.co.uk>,

A razor perhaps?

Sean A Corfield

unread,
Apr 25, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/25/96
to

|> In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>, an52...@anon.penet.fi.?
|> writes

|> > I am concerned that this may have sexual conitations as far as the


Bible
|> > is concerned and would like to know if this is so?
|> > I would hate to stop shaving but if Jesus says so I will.

|> So I guess that means it's OK, except it is probably a deadly sin listed
|> under Vanity.

Well, the bible's fairly specific about what is not allowed. It
specifically forbids:
- a man to lie down with another man
- a man to lie down with an animal
- a man to lie down with various close female relatives (sister, mother,
etc)

It does *not* forbid:
- lesbianism
- BDSM
- ...

So, shaving's just fine.

--
One hand is tied, one step gets behind, in one breath we're dying - KC
http://www.ocsltd.com/sean


Peanuts

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

In article <4loj4o$ghk...@leeds.ac.uk>, John*G* <ECL...@leeds.ac.uk>
writes

>>
>>BTW what would they have used to do it in biblical times anyway?
>
>A razor perhaps?

<stunned> You mean they had Bic razors then? Every photo I've seen of
Jesus he had a long beard.

Richard Lewis

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

In article: <ADA5B239...@corf.demon.co.uk> se...@corf.demon.co.uk
(Sean A Corfield) writes:
>
> Well, the bible's fairly specific about what is not allowed. It
> specifically forbids:
> - a man to lie down with another man
> - a man to lie down with an animal
> - a man to lie down with various close female relatives (sister, mother,
> etc)
>
> It does *not* forbid:
> - lesbianism
> - BDSM
> - ...
>
> So, shaving's just fine.

And so is sand-up sex! Which is good cos I like doing it upright.


Richard
(on re-reading, that should have been stand-up sex. But I'll leave it as
it is for Sean's benefit. [Rich remembering the leetle uk.glb discussion
on some of the more unusual uses for sandpaper])

John*G*

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

In article <ADA5B239...@corf.demon.co.uk>,

se...@corf.demon.co.uk (Sean A Corfield) wrote:
>In article <B8V$BBBiS0...@peanuts.demon.co.uk>,
>Peanuts <j...@peanuts.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>|> In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>, an52...@anon.penet.fi.?
>|> writes
>
>|> > I am concerned that this may have sexual conitations as far as the
>Bible
>|> > is concerned and would like to know if this is so?
>|> > I would hate to stop shaving but if Jesus says so I will.
>
>|> So I guess that means it's OK, except it is probably a deadly sin listed
>|> under Vanity.
>
>Well, the bible's fairly specific about what is not allowed. It
>specifically forbids:
>- a man to lie down with another man
>- a man to lie down with an animal
>- a man to lie down with various close female relatives (sister, mother,
>etc)
>
>It does *not* forbid:
>- lesbianism
>- BDSM
>- ...
>
>So, shaving's just fine.

Yeah, but so's rape.

John*G*

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

In article <h$RHBACNC...@peanuts.demon.co.uk>,

Peanuts <j...@peanuts.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <4loj4o$ghk...@leeds.ac.uk>, John*G* <ECL...@leeds.ac.uk>
>writes
>>>
>>>BTW what would they have used to do it in biblical times anyway?
>>
>>A razor perhaps?
>
><stunned> You mean they had Bic razors then? Every photo I've seen of
>Jesus he had a long beard.

No Jon, Bic did not invent the razor. Disposable razors are not the only kind
you know....*hint* Cut-throat...

Eduardo Tobar Delgado

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

If I may ask, Do you go electric or classical?


Kevin M.

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

In article <h$RHBACNC...@peanuts.demon.co.uk>, Peanuts
<j...@peanuts.demon.co.uk> writes

>In article <4loj4o$ghk...@leeds.ac.uk>, John*G* <ECL...@leeds.ac.uk>
>writes
>>>
>>>BTW what would they have used to do it in biblical times anyway?
>>
>>A razor perhaps?
>
><stunned> You mean they had Bic razors then? Every photo I've seen of
>Jesus he had a long beard.

Its little known, but is claimed that Jesus shaved his pubes daily with
a Bic razor but couldnt be bothered to do his face.

--
Kevin M.

Peek

unread,
Apr 27, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/27/96
to

Peanuts wrote:
>
> In article <4loj4o$ghk...@leeds.ac.uk>, John*G* <ECL...@leeds.ac.uk>
> writes
> >>
> >>BTW what would they have used to do it in biblical times anyway?
> >
> >A razor perhaps?
>
> <stunned> You mean they had Bic razors then? Every photo I've seen of
> Jesus he had a long beard.
>
> Jon

You mean every painting ? Or every image ? I don't think they had Kodak
cameras at that time.

Peek
(-:

Peek

unread,
Apr 27, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/27/96
to

an52...@anon.penet.fi wrote:
>
> a...@efn.org (YAA (Yet Another Al)) wrote:
> >an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote:
> >
> >>ea...@system3.demon.co.uk (bald eagle) wrote:
> >>>In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>,
> >>>an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:

> >>As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
> >>found the role the catholic church has to play in shaving people like you
> >>an important one.
> >
> >That's why you good catholics spend your time lurking on the gay
> >and lesbian NGs, using anonymous remailers, being offended and
> >doing Important Things!
> >
> >Yeah.
> >
> >I'm sure.
>
> I am very sorry to see a posting attacting a good catholic. I think you
> may not have read the posting correctly.
>
> Thanks for noticing.
>
> Mary.


It galls me to see jokes or criticism about the Catholic Church too, but
they are rarely gratuitous; after all, it's the church which insists to
say that we are sinners and we're going to hell if we don't repent and become
celibate; they may use soft words to express it but this doesn't mean
it isn't offensive at all. And not satisfied with this, radical Christians
(not only Catholics) also use to complain when gays, lesbians and bisexuals fight
for equal rights in a society which is theirs (ours) as well.

Now about that posting, the idea I got from the expression "saving people
like you" is that he/she also considers us as sinners; and I think the others got
the same idea.So the reason for the
attack wasn't that he/she is a good catholic, but that although in a
camouflaged way he/she was condemning us by being gay/lesbian/bi.
And why we have to stay quiet and act like sheep to the slaughter ?

Peek

Peanuts

unread,
Apr 27, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/27/96
to

In article <31820155...@leeds.ac.uk>, Peek <che...@leeds.ac.uk>
writes

Gerraway! No Bic? No Kodak? You'll be telling me next there was no
McDonalds :-)

Jon

-----------------------------------
Peanuts
Strangely strange (but oddly normal)

Sean A Corfield

unread,
Apr 27, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/27/96
to

In article <446010...@coopinf.demon.co.uk>,
Richard Lewis <Rich...@coopinf.demon.co.uk> wrote:

|> (on re-reading, that should have been stand-up sex. But I'll leave it as

|> it is for Sean's benefit. [Rich remembering the leetle uk.glb discussion

|> on some of the more unusual uses for sandpaper])

Shame on you! I would like to categorically state that I have never, at any
time, used sandpaper for sexual purposes...

Other things yes, but *not* sandpaper...

Really...

Mind you, now you mention it, I think I *do* have some sandpaper
somewhere...

--
Toll the bell, pay the private eye, all's well, 20th century dies - Bowie
http://www.ocsltd.com/sean


Sean A Corfield

unread,
Apr 27, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/27/96
to

In article <gbNVIrA9...@peanuts.demon.co.uk>,
Peanuts <j...@peanuts.demon.co.uk> wrote:

|> Gerraway! No Bic? No Kodak? You'll be telling me next there was no
|> McDonalds :-)

Nah, I'm sure that was MacDonalds. There's *always* been McDonalds... I can
just imagine the last supper... "12 Big Macs and 12 Thick Strawberry shakes
to go" Er, wasn't there something about fish or was that another bit of the
"good book"... I dunno, never found it had much of a plot anyway...

Peanuts

unread,
Apr 28, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/28/96
to

In article <ADA8141C...@corf.demon.co.uk>, Sean A Corfield
<se...@ocsltd.com> writes

>In article <446010...@coopinf.demon.co.uk>,
>Richard Lewis <Rich...@coopinf.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>|> (on re-reading, that should have been stand-up sex. But I'll leave it as
>
>|> it is for Sean's benefit. [Rich remembering the leetle uk.glb discussion
>
>|> on some of the more unusual uses for sandpaper])
>
>Shame on you! I would like to categorically state that I have never, at any
>time, used sandpaper for sexual purposes...
>
>Other things yes, but *not* sandpaper...
>
>Really...
>
>Mind you, now you mention it, I think I *do* have some sandpaper
>somewhere...
>

"Sand-up sex" That's a weekend in Brighton isn't it?

Peanuts

unread,
Apr 28, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/28/96
to

In article <ADA8141F...@corf.demon.co.uk>, Sean A Corfield
<se...@ocsltd.com> writes

>In article <gbNVIrA9...@peanuts.demon.co.uk>,
>Peanuts <j...@peanuts.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>|> Gerraway! No Bic? No Kodak? You'll be telling me next there was no
>|> McDonalds :-)
>
>Nah, I'm sure that was MacDonalds.

Spelling Qweeen <g>

>There's *always* been McDonalds... I can
>just imagine the last supper... "12 Big Macs and 12 Thick Strawberry shakes
>to go" Er, wasn't there something about fish

I think that was when they invented portion control by feeding 5000 with
3 fishes and 3 loaves.

Richard Lewis

unread,
Apr 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/29/96
to

In article: <ADA8141C...@corf.demon.co.uk> se...@ocsltd.com (Sean A
Corfield) writes:
>
> In article <446010...@coopinf.demon.co.uk>,
> Richard Lewis <Rich...@coopinf.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> |> (on re-reading, that should have been stand-up sex. But I'll leave
> |> it as it is for Sean's benefit. [Rich remembering the leetle uk.glb
> |> discussion on some of the more unusual uses for sandpaper])
>
> Shame on you! I would like to categorically state that I have never,
> at any time, used sandpaper for sexual purposes...
>
> Other things yes, but *not* sandpaper...

Cheesegrater?


Richard

Matt Thornfield

unread,
Apr 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/29/96
to

In article <B8V$BBBiS0...@peanuts.demon.co.uk>, Peanuts
<j...@peanuts.demon.co.uk> writes

>
>Well, strictly in the context of your Subject line, no I don't recall in
>any of my religious learning seeing or being told by my Sunday school
>teacher that Jesus said "If you wanna shave your pubic hair, it's
>cool". BUT neither do I recall seeing "If you wanna shave your pubic
>hair, it aint cool".
>

Well as I understand it, Catholocism is loosely based on Judaism, and
Judaism has a very definite attitude to shaving pubic hair. Now since
Jesus was a Jew, he would have followed this attitude. Whether modern
day Catholics do also, I have no idea.

Anyway here is the ruling (which is the very traditional attitude, and
is not normally followed by non-fanatics today):

(1) For men:

You must not harm yourself, nor do anything that may risk harming
yourself. With any type of shaving there is the risk of cutting
yourself, therefore you must not shave your pubic hair.

(2) For women:

You should not expose any part of your hair - keep it covered, along
with your elbows and knees. Thus you should either shave your pubic
hair, or keep it covered.

>BTW what would they have used to do it in biblical times anyway?

Well they managed circumcision, so shaving should be a doddle!


--
Matti - he's back!

To anyone who has mailed me before Monday 22nd April & not received a reply: My
hard disk blew up & I've lost your email! Please re-email me if you want a
reply!

Sean A Corfield

unread,
Apr 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/29/96
to

In article <100398...@coopinf.demon.co.uk>,
Richard Lewis <Rich...@coopinf.demon.co.uk> wrote:

Omigod!! I remember seeing that programme on telly about S&M prostitutes
and that woman going at that old guy's cock with a cheesegrater...
nonononononono!!!

Sean A Corfield

unread,
Apr 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/29/96
to

In article <SbjdqoAE...@peanuts.demon.co.uk>,
Peanuts <j...@peanuts.demon.co.uk> wrote:

|> In article <ADA8141F...@corf.demon.co.uk>, Sean A Corfield
|> <se...@ocsltd.com> writes

|> >Nah, I'm sure that was MacDonalds.
|>
|> Spelling Qweeen <g>

Ooops!! That should have said "Nah, I'm sure there was MacDonalds"...

Besides...

|> >There's *always* been McDonalds... I can

...I go on to misspell it in the very next sentence!

|> I think that was when they invented portion control by feeding 5000 with
|> 3 fishes and 3 loaves.

Certainly on a par with the amount of real food you find in any MacD
product...

bald eagle

unread,
Apr 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/30/96
to

In article <GzIWhBAq...@meeker.demon.co.uk>,
Matt Thornfield <ma...@meeker.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Well they managed c*irc*mc*s**n, so shaving should be a doddle!
>

Purrlease do not mention such barbaric practices as the mutilation of
babies' genitals without anaesthetic. Can we keep to more humane subjects
such as fisting, piercing, nipple clamps, Gaffa tape, and nailing of
scrotums to kitchen tables?


Maxwell's Aardvark

unread,
Apr 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/30/96
to

ea...@system3.demon.co.uk "bald eagle" writes:
> Matt Thornfield <ma...@meeker.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >Well they managed c*irc*mc*s**n, so shaving should be a doddle!
> Purrlease do not mention such barbaric practices as the mutilation of
> babies' genitals without anaesthetic. Can we keep to more humane subjects
> such as fisting, piercing, nipple clamps, Gaffa tape, and nailing of
> scrotums to kitchen tables?

All hail the mighty gaffa tape! Great stuff for making safe weapons for LRP,
putting up posters, sticking up washing lines in halls, fixing broken
tea pots, and binding up a friend and sticking them in a lift.

I actually used some to stick down some wire once as well.

Bouncing away, who has black, silver and white here...

Nyar
----
"I'm a duck! I'm a duck! I'm a duck!...
*SPLASH*
...I'm a pigeon! I'm a pigeon! I'm a pigeon!" - an anonymous fowl in Brum

Peanuts

unread,
Apr 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/30/96
to

In article <ADAAFC149...@corf.demon.co.uk>, Sean A Corfield
<se...@ocsltd.com> writes

>In article <100398...@coopinf.demon.co.uk>,
>Richard Lewis <Rich...@coopinf.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>|> In article: <ADA8141C...@corf.demon.co.uk> se...@ocsltd.com (Sean
>A
>|> Corfield) writes:
>
>|> > Shame on you! I would like to categorically state that I have never,
>|> > at any time, used sandpaper for sexual purposes...
>|> >
>|> > Other things yes, but *not* sandpaper...
>|>
>|> Cheesegrater?
>
>Omigod!! I remember seeing that programme on telly about S&M prostitutes
>and that woman going at that old guy's cock with a cheesegrater...
>nonononononono!!!
>

A bit desperate when you have to have your cock cheese removed with a
grater doncha think.

Parmessan anyone.......?

Peanuts

unread,
Apr 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/30/96
to

In article <ADAB16BB...@system3.demon.co.uk>, bald eagle
<ea...@system3.demon.co.uk> writes
>In article <GzIWhBAq...@meeker.demon.co.uk>,

>Matt Thornfield <ma...@meeker.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Well they managed c*irc*mc*s**n, so shaving should be a doddle!
>>
>
>Purrlease do not mention such barbaric practices as the mutilation of
>babies' genitals without anaesthetic. Can we keep to more humane subjects
>such as fisting, piercing

OK..... here's a clue :-p

>....... and nailing of scrotums to kitchen tables?

I'm working up to that :-)

John*G*

unread,
Apr 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/30/96
to

In article <8...@ah.win-uk.net>, adr...@ah.win-uk.net (Adrian) wrote:
>Eduardo Tobar Delgado (eto...@lander.es) writes:
>
>!Hola! (just pretend it's upside down, OK?) Edwardo dude,

>
>> If I may ask, Do you go electric or classical?
>
>I know I've just read thru (or - I admit it - "junked") about 600
>posts, but one minute we're talking about the bible and now we're
>talking about guitars?

Umm...Where does he mention guitars Adrian?

dion...@infinet.com

unread,
May 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/1/96
to

Sean A Corfield (se...@corf.demon.co.uk) said:

}So, shaving's just fine.

Um, yes *and* no. Observe:

Shaving of beards is not allowed (Judges 8:5, Leviticus 19:28)

Long hair is shameful (I Corinthians 6:14)


--
<a href="http://www.infinet.com/~dionisio">Finger</a> for PGP public key

And the Thought of the Moment (tm) is...

"Here at OSU, you're not just a number - you're three numbers, a dash, two
more numbers, another dash, and then four more numbers, all stored on
magnetic tape for your convenience! Now go away."


Donnie Lee Waters

unread,
May 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/1/96
to

>>
>>> If I may ask, Do you go electric or classical?
>>
>>I know I've just read thru (or - I admit it - "junked") about 600
>>posts, but one minute we're talking about the bible and now we're
>>talking about guitars?
>
>Umm...Where does he mention guitars Adrian?
>
Electric (guitars) or classical (guitars). It seems pretty obvious to me...
DLW

John*G*

unread,
May 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/1/96
to

In article <1777A42D3S...@ulkyvm.louisville.edu>,

Umm...Read the header....Maybe it's electric shavers or classical razors...?

Hmmm...sweddie?

Maxwell's Aardvark

unread,
May 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/1/96
to

In article <8...@ah.win-uk.net>, adr...@ah.win-uk.net (Adrian) wrote:
> Eduardo Tobar Delgado (eto...@lander.es) writes:
> > If I may ask, Do you go electric or classical?
> I know I've just read thru (or - I admit it - "junked") about 600
> posts, but one minute we're talking about the bible and now we're
> talking about guitars?

"I am the Electric Messiah!
The AC/DC God" (My Life with the Thrill Kill Kult)

Bouncing away, playing da guitar?

Donnie Lee Waters

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to

In article <4m889s$ec0...@leeds.ac.uk>

ECL...@leeds.ac.uk (John*G*) writes:

>In article <1777A42D3S...@ulkyvm.louisville.edu>,
> DLWA...@ulkyvm.louisville.edu (Donnie Lee Waters) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If I may ask, Do you go electric or classical?
>>>>
>>>>I know I've just read thru (or - I admit it - "junked") about 600
>>>>posts, but one minute we're talking about the bible and now we're
>>>>talking about guitars?
>>>
>>>Umm...Where does he mention guitars Adrian?
>>>
>>Electric (guitars) or classical (guitars). It seems pretty obvious to me...
>>DLW
>
>Umm...Read the header....Maybe it's electric shavers or classical razors...?
>
I read the header, silly. He was talking about razors, then someone came in
and either made a mistake thinking he was talking about guitars or really
thought he was talking aabout guitars, then someone came and wondered what
guitars had to do with anything, and I pointed out the pun (or mistake)
whatever the case may be.
DLW

Sean A Corfield

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to

In article <4m71su$n...@news1.infinet.com>,
dion...@infinet.com () wrote:

|> Um, yes *and* no. Observe:
|>
|> Shaving of beards is not allowed (Judges 8:5, Leviticus 19:28)
|>
|> Long hair is shameful (I Corinthians 6:14)

Oh, that's what I *love* about the bible... it is *so* self-contradictory!
The question is: is pubic hair a "beard"?

And, um, why does Jesus always have long hair in all the paintings and
other representations of him?


--
Vincent: I'm curious, why would you get a stud in your tongue?
Jody: It's a sex thing. It helps fellatio. -- Pulp Fiction
http://www.ocsltd.com/sean


Frederick

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to

che...@leeds.ac.uk (Peek) writes:

>Peanuts wrote:
>>
>> In article <4loj4o$ghk...@leeds.ac.uk>, John*G* <ECL...@leeds.ac.uk>
>> writes
>> >>

>> >>BTW what would they have used to do it in biblical times anyway?
>> >

>> >A razor perhaps?
>>
>> <stunned> You mean they had Bic razors then? Every photo I've seen of
>> Jesus he had a long beard.
>>
>> Jon

> You mean every painting ? Or every image ? I don't think they had Kodak
>cameras at that time.

> Peek
> (-:

*ROTFL*!!!!!

Uncontrollably.....................

Fred

YAA (Yet Another Al)

unread,
May 3, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/3/96
to

DLWA...@ulkyvm.louisville.edu (Donnie Lee Waters) wrote:

>In article <4m889s$ec0...@leeds.ac.uk>
>ECL...@leeds.ac.uk (John*G*) writes:
>
>>In article <1777A42D3S...@ulkyvm.louisville.edu>,
>> DLWA...@ulkyvm.louisville.edu (Donnie Lee Waters) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If I may ask, Do you go electric or classical?
>>>>>
>>>>>I know I've just read thru (or - I admit it - "junked") about 600
>>>>>posts, but one minute we're talking about the bible and now we're
>>>>>talking about guitars?
>>>>
>>>>Umm...Where does he mention guitars Adrian?
>>>>
>>>Electric (guitars) or classical (guitars). It seems pretty obvious to me...
>>>DLW
>>
>>Umm...Read the header....Maybe it's electric shavers or classical razors...?
>>
>I read the header, silly. He was talking about razors, then someone came in
>and either made a mistake thinking he was talking about guitars or really
>thought he was talking aabout guitars, then someone came and wondered what
>guitars had to do with anything, and I pointed out the pun (or mistake)
>whatever the case may be.
>DLW


This thread has done the nearly-impossible: it started silly and
has become sillier!


"If you get near a point, make it!" Ivanova - Babalon-5.


Frederick

unread,
May 3, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/3/96
to

ea...@system3.demon.co.uk (bald eagle) writes:

>In article <GzIWhBAq...@meeker.demon.co.uk>,
>Matt Thornfield <ma...@meeker.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>>Well they managed c*irc*mc*s**n, so shaving should be a doddle!
>>

>Purrlease do not mention such barbaric practices as the mutilation of
>babies' genitals without anaesthetic. Can we keep to more humane subjects

>such as fisting, piercing, nipple clamps, Gaffa tape, and nailing of
>scrotums to kitchen tables?

Ok ok ok... what is Gaffa tape?

Is it excruuuuuuxiiaaaaaatiiiinnngggg?

Fred


Frederick

unread,
May 3, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/3/96
to

se...@ocsltd.com (Sean A Corfield) writes:
>|> Cheesegrater?

>Omigod!! I remember seeing that programme on telly about S&M prostitutes
>and that woman going at that old guy's cock with a cheesegrater...
>nonononononono!!!

The Red Light Zone?

Fred


Frederick

unread,
May 3, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/3/96
to

Matt Thornfield <ma...@meeker.demon.co.uk> writes:


>(1) For men:

>You must not harm yourself, nor do anything that may risk harming
>yourself. With any type of shaving there is the risk of cutting
>yourself, therefore you must not shave your pubic hair.

Doesn't this mean that circumcision is wrong too cos it harms the guy?
And ahhhhh if I musn't harm myself, can I get someone else to
shave _my_ pubic hair? *pant pant*


>(2) For women:

>You should not expose any part of your hair - keep it covered, along
>with your elbows and knees. Thus you should either shave your pubic
>hair, or keep it covered.

Of course it doesn't matter to me if you Don't shave your pubic
hair and don't keep it covered... or for that matter shave your
public hair and don't keep it covered... Cos I'm not interested
womin init?


Fred
Who is stressed becoz of exams ... aaarrrgggghhhh!

I don't think this is Six Flags Over Flushing!

unread,
May 4, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/4/96
to

In article <ADAEF6FF9...@corf.demon.co.uk>,

se...@ocsltd.com (Sean A Corfield) wrote:

>And, um, why does Jesus always have long hair in all the paintings and
>other representations of him?

He doesn't. In medeival paintings he was usually pictured with short hair,
dressed as a king. I don't know when the long-haired style became the
norm, but it wasn't until relatively recently.


ObUKglb: Err...Some of these paintings may be found in England...<stumble>


alpha

Hey! Watcha doin' mister? Are you gonna suck her blood, empty her tank, and turn her into one of your legion of zombie vampires who only live to do your evil bidding? Or are you just gonna make out and play kissy-face and hope your dad doesn't butt in and ground ya? Huh? How about it, mister?

I don't think this is Six Flags Over Flushing!

unread,
May 4, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/4/96
to

In article <830950...@blibble.demon.co.uk>,

Maxwell's Aardvark <Ny...@blibble.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Bouncing away, playing da guitar?

It didn't look like a guitar last *I* looked...

>"I'm a duck! I'm a duck! I'm a duck!...
>*SPLASH*
>...I'm a pigeon! I'm a pigeon! I'm a pigeon!" - an anonymous fowl in Brum

Ah, yes--Birmingham, UK, home of deluded pigeons.


alpha
...and mad-pigeon disease...

Futon Aardvark

unread,
May 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/7/96
to

uct...@ucl.ac.uk "Frederick" writes:

> ea...@system3.demon.co.uk (bald eagle) writes:
> >Purrlease do not mention such barbaric practices as the mutilation of
> >babies' genitals without anaesthetic. Can we keep to more humane subjects
> >such as fisting, piercing, nipple clamps, Gaffa tape, and nailing of
> >scrotums to kitchen tables?
> Ok ok ok... what is Gaffa tape?

Gaffa tape is like the force - it's dark on one side, light on the other,
and holds the universe together.

(It's a very strong tape used in theatre for taping cables, lights etc. When
it gets into your life, you start using it for *everything*. Very
addictive stuff.)

Bouncing away, gaffa addict.

Nyar
----
The Bouncing Chaos and Master of Madness. For maximum enjoyment cool for
at least two hours. Alternatively, leave for a few seconds, then enjoy
straight from the can. Made in Birmingham, England. Recyclable.

Ground Pounder

unread,
May 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/7/96
to

On Tue, 07 May 96 06:30:31 GMT, Futon Aardvark
<Ny...@blibble.demon.co.uk> wrote:


>(It's a very strong tape used in theatre for taping cables, lights etc. When
>it gets into your life, you start using it for *everything*. Very
>addictive stuff.)
>

And you can use it to hold "Matti's" captive in your celler.
Matt

Not Matti....Who incidentally wears his Mothers knickers to work

Bam Bam.

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

Matt Thornfield <ma...@meeker.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In article <83150657...@fink.demon.co.uk>, Ground Pounder
><Kep...@fink.demon.co.uk> writes


>>On Tue, 07 May 96 06:30:31 GMT, Futon Aardvark
>><Ny...@blibble.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Matti. Not a happy chappy, feeling victimised by the horribe GP.

don't worry about him. He's just a tub of Lard !!!!!!!!!


--
I NEED A BLOODY GOOD.........?
In my opinion, my opinion is the only opinion that counts.
Live long and prosper

Ground Pounder

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

On Wed, 8 May 1996 21:14:57 +0100, Matt Thornfield
<ma...@meeker.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>And when you peel it off a wooden floor, it takes the varnish off with
>it, which leaves a horrible mark, rather like the scar that could
>shortly be appearing on Ground Pounder's face.

No thank you I've enough of those already

>Matti. Not a happy chappy, feeling victimised by the horribe GP.

Ahh Poor Matti, Come here and give me a big kiss *Smooch* and now a
big hug just to prove I was only mucking around.

I never *Really* locked Matti in my cellar and he doesn't really wear
his mothers Knickers to work........That's Bam Bam


Keplar

YAA (Yet Another Al)

unread,
Apr 19, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/19/96
to
an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:


> Hi,
>
> I am a committed Christian who shaves her pubic hair on a regular basis.
> I am concerned that this may have sexual conitations as far as the Bible
> is concerned and would like to know if this is so?
> I would hate to stop shaving but if Jesus says so I will.

> Thanks,
>
> Mary

Now that you mention it, how about shaving your arm-pits? Waxing
your legs? Plucking your eyebrows? Is the entire female
population if the western world damned to hell?!!!

These are Deep Thoughts!

Fairy Prince

unread,
Apr 19, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/19/96
to
On 19 Apr 1996 an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote:

> ea...@system3.demon.co.uk (bald eagle) wrote:
> >In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>,
> >an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> ...Christian...pubes...Sodom...Gomorrah...hellfire...blah...blah...
> >> Mary
> >>
> >
> >Well why not ask a priest?
> >Oh yeah, I forgot - this is where they all hang out anyway.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
> found the role the catholic church has to play in saving people like you
> an important one.
>
>
>
I think you are very funny

bald eagle

unread,
Apr 19, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/19/96
to

an52...@anon.penet.fi

unread,
Apr 19, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/19/96
to

Matthew Marks

unread,
Apr 19, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/19/96
to
an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:
:
: Hi,

I can't help thinking that this is a troll, but seeing as the bible says that
you can't trim the hair on your temples, eat seafood, hybridise crops or wear
clothes of mixed weave (polycotton shirts etc), I should think that you've
committed yourself to rotting in Hell for all eternity anyway.

So why not take your head out of your arse and enjoy yourself?


Matthew mat...@rd.bbc.co.uk My opinions, not Auntie's.
:
:
:

an57...@anon.penet.fi

unread,
Apr 19, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/19/96
to

King of Hearts

unread,
Apr 19, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/19/96
to
On 19 Apr 1996 an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote:

Oh take a good read of the bible, a good look at the ethos of
Christianity, and find the glaringly obvious inconsistencies, please!

Alternatively, moderate your own brain and use religion as a guide and
not a rule.

George.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
____ ____ http://www.uea.ac.uk/~u9216634/HomePage.html
\ / George Forth \ / Beast @ Paradox - vassun.vassar.edu 4040
\/ School of Law \/ CuteBeast on irc
University of East Anglia Head of News @ Livewire 945 : 01603 250020
Norwich Mobile : 0831 818364
__ __
\/ (c)1996 KOH Enterprises \/
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Peek

unread,
Apr 19, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/19/96
to

Actually, if her interpretation of the bible is really so narrow-minded, a more
coherent attitude would be to flaggelate herself; but she would have to do it
on her own, because if someone else whipped her this could be interpreted as
a sexual fantasy and she would be sinning again. (-:

Peek

Lyn David Thomas

unread,
Apr 19, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/19/96
to
In article: <4l8j14$2...@news.ox.ac.uk> an57...@anon.penet.fi writes:
>
> ea...@system3.demon.co.uk (bald eagle) wrote:
> >In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>,
> >an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> ...Christian...pubes...Sodom...Gomorrah...hellfire...blah...blah...
> >> Mary
> >>
> >
> >Well why not ask a priest?
> >Oh yeah, I forgot - this is where they all hang out anyway.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
> found the role the catholic church has to play in saving people like you
> an important one.

None of us need saving - so I'd be grateful if you would not post
homophobic comments here, it is unwelcome and contravenes this
groups charter (posted every Monday).
--
__
*Lyn David Thomas* \/ *Only 403 days, at most, before the*
*next general election*
New Web page at http://www.netlink.co.uk/users/matthews/lyn/

bald eagle

unread,
Apr 20, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/20/96
to
In article <4l8j14$2...@news.ox.ac.uk>,
an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote:

>As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
>found the role the catholic church has to play in saving people like you
>an important one.
>

Sorely offended? - Faith a bit shaky is it?

People like me? ...Saving? ...From what?

Religious Zealots maybe?

As an ex-catholic myself, I am continuously offended by patronising,
sanctimonious bigots ramming their ill-considered papist preachings down
the throats of an audience who they evidently believe to be gullible,
insecure, emotionally immature, and intellectually crippled. (See story
below). Society is now a little more sophisticated and enlightened than it
was when Galileo was emprisoned by the catholic hierarchy for heresy in
suggesting that the Earth orbitted the Sun.

How DARE you suggest that 'people like me' require saving by the so-called
catholic (an ironic title if ever there was one) church. What is this
important role you write of? The Spanish Inquisition?

I have received better considered correspondence from red necked homophobes
and KKK members.

The young and not so young readers of these newsgroups who are attempting
to come to terms with their sexuality require saving from outpourings of
mumbo jumbo from the Vatican. I have plenty of Email from the unfortunate
victims who have suffered a lifetime of indoctrination in this dogma..

I have nothing but admiration for the vast amount of good work done by
members of the catholic church in helping to improve society. Who could
possibly not admire Mother Theresa. I know a few priests (at least two in
the biblical sense) who are great guys. But please, spare me the cant and
hypocrisy of career clerics who are nothing but frustrated polititians.

Kirk out.

>
>From an Associated Press wire story:
>
> Vatican City -- The Vatican has appealed to voters not to
>support politicians who endorse same-sex marriages.
> Theologian Gino Concetti wrote on March 27th in
>L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican's official newspaper, that gay
>and lesbian marriages would "undermine the foundation of the
>family model upon which human civilization was built."
> He recalled that Pope John Paul II denounced in 1994 a
>European Parliament resolution that declared that homosexual
>couples should be allowed to marry and adopt children. The pope
>said at the time that such a development would legitimize "moral
>disorder."
> Also open for "moral censure" is "the action of that
>citizen, who, with his choice, favors the election of the
>candidate who has formally promised to translate into law the
>homosexual demand," Concetti wrote.
>
>Posted by Adam Starchild
> The Offshore Entrepreneur at http://www.au.com/offshore
> Travel Free! at http://www.gaytravel.com/starchild.htm
>
>

Kevin M.

unread,
Apr 20, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/20/96
to
>members of the catholic church in helping to improve society. Who could
>possibly not admire Mother Theresa. I know a few priests (at least two in
>the biblical sense) who are great guys. But please, spare me the cant and
>hypocrisy of career clerics who are nothing but frustrated polititians.

I for one. There was a very well balanced programme on the TV a year or
so ago exposing Mother Theresa for just what she is, a self seeking
agent of the current pope.

Kevin. (also once a catholic)
--
Kevin M.

Kevin M.

unread,
Apr 20, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/20/96
to
In article <Pine.OSF.3.91.960419...@cpca5.uea.ac.uk>,
King of Hearts <u921...@cpca5.uea.ac.uk> writes

>On 19 Apr 1996 an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote:
>
>> ea...@system3.demon.co.uk (bald eagle) wrote:
>> >In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>,
>> >an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >> ...Christian...pubes...Sodom...Gomorrah...hellfire...blah...blah...
>> >> Mary
>> >>
>> >
>> >Well why not ask a priest?
>> >Oh yeah, I forgot - this is where they all hang out anyway.
>> >
>> As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
>> found the role the catholic church has to play in saving people like you
>> an important one.
>
>Oh take a good read of the bible, a good look at the ethos of
>Christianity, and find the glaringly obvious inconsistencies, please!

I think it makes much more sense in the 20th century to be a member of
the Flat Earth Society than the christian church. And as for telling
people in poor countries not to use contraception, that is morally
irresponsible and without any justification at all. I look forward to
the day the catholic church finds itself in court and has its arse sued
off for this advice

Kevin.
--
Kevin M.

Mr R Chew

unread,
Apr 20, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/20/96
to
On Fri, 19 Apr 1996 13:15:11 +0100 (BST), che...@leeds.ac.uk (Peek)
wrote:

These bible bashers make me want to turn hetrosexual .

STUPID BITCH

YAA (Yet Another Al)

unread,
Apr 20, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/20/96
to
an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote:

>ea...@system3.demon.co.uk (bald eagle) wrote:
>>In article <4l6m97$9...@netra2.HomeNet.ie>,
>>an52...@anon.penet.fi. wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> ...Christian...pubes...Sodom...Gomorrah...hellfire...blah...blah...
>>> Mary
>>>
>>
>>Well why not ask a priest?
>>Oh yeah, I forgot - this is where they all hang out anyway.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
>found the role the catholic church has to play in saving people like you
>an important one.

That's why you good catholics spend your time lurking on the gay
and lesbian NGs, using anonymous remailers, being offended and
doing Important Things!

Yeah.

I'm sure.


Mr R Chew

unread,
Apr 21, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/21/96
to
On Sun, 21 Apr 1996 17:18:15 GMT, phi...@filo.demon.co.uk (Bingo
Bongo) wrote:

>e-z all....
>on 19 Apr 1996 17:37:40 GMT, the dude an57...@anon.penet.fi lays 19
>lines of stuff about Re: DOES THE BIBLE SAY THAT IT'S OK TO SHAVE
>PUBIC HAIR?? on me/yezzal uk.gay-lesbian-bi posse!!


>
>>As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
>>found the role the catholic church has to play in saving people like you
>>an important one.
>>
>

>hahahaha ahhahah a ah ah.............
>
>--
>
>Fil.
>
>
>PLUR! #:-)
>eone
>avis
>cetp
>e ye
> c
> t http://137.222.84.160/pa/phil.htm
All the catholic church thinks about is how much money it can get out
of people . I wonder just how much money is stached away in the
vatican vaults this is the only religious sect that has it's own
bank!.

Bingo Bongo

unread,
Apr 21, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/21/96
to

Martin Reilly

unread,
Apr 21, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/21/96
to
In article: <4l98ll$o...@mars.efn.org> a...@efn.org (YAA (Yet Another Al)) writes:

> Now that you mention it, how about shaving your arm-pits? Waxing
> your legs? Plucking your eyebrows? Is the entire female
> population if the western world damned to hell?!!!

And more than a few drag queens!!!

--

Martin Reilly
mar...@neige.demon.co.uk

Iain

unread,
Apr 21, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/21/96
to
On 19 April 1996, an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote...

> As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
> found the role the catholic church has to play in saving people like you

> an important one.

That's cool, I find the role the catholic church plays in fucking up the
lives of people, ESP. us poor LBG's an important one too :)
But seriously - as far as I know it's not put down specifically, but if it
counts as a sexual fantasy for u then... <shrug>.

Iain

unread,
Apr 21, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/21/96
to
On 20 April 1996, "Kevin M." wrote...

> I think it makes much more sense in the 20th century to be a member of
> the Flat Earth Society than the christian church. And as for telling
> people in poor countries not to use contraception, that is morally
> irresponsible and without any justification at all. I look forward to
> the day the catholic church finds itself in court and has its arse sued
> off for this advice

Well said, my thoughts exactly.
The catholic church may have been a great thing some time ago when it
managed to impose some order on chaos, but that's no excuse for the
suffering that's come with it - crusades... no contraceptives... their
opinions on aids etc etc..

Iain


Dave McKeen

unread,
Apr 22, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/22/96
to
an57...@anon.penet.fi wrote:

>As a catholic myself, I was sorely offended by your remarks. I have
>found the role the catholic church has to play in saving people like you
>an important one.
>

Simmilar to the one they had with the natives and some Orphan boys????


0 new messages