In article <
aesu3l...@mid.individual.net>,
<snip>
>
>The whole thing has now become very public and quite alarming. Do we now
>have a situation where reviewers are accepting personal freebies from
>companies and silencing anyone who objects to it?
This has been a problem in other review-oriented media for a while now.
Journalists actually have quite a bit more influence than even they
realise, and many don't understand that it's ethically problematic for
them to be wined and dined and buttered up.
The independent game site I write for actually had quite an internal
blow-up about the subject. We debated for a week or two on whether or not
the requirement of full disclosure applies to where our review games come
from. The majority argued strongly that we had to indicate in our reviews
whether we bought our games or if they were provided by the developers,
and as it turns out US law requires that we do exactly that.
The counter-argument is mercenary and discouraging. In a time when all
individual writers are trying to establish their own nebulous "brand",
freebies and bribes are considered part of one's compensation and aren't
an ethical problem at all. The reasoning is, writers are paid so little
that they need to make up the shortfall any way they can. Now that large
media institutions are no longer authoritative or credible, there's very
little motivation for a journalist to consider their own ethics.
-KKC, who needs a burger and some onion rings.
--
-- "Everybody secretly wants to be serenaded. |
Unless it's in a Greek restaurant, then | kendrick @
it's really annoying." - James May |
io-nyc.com