unconfirmed: Wii Zelda: TP runs @ 60FPS (?) Cube ver runs @ 30FPS
AirRa...@gmail.com
from what I've been reading, *apparently* the Wii version of Zelda:
Twilight Princess will run at 60 frames per second and with a
widescreen mode. the Gamecube version, even though the graphics are
apparently identical, will run at the 30 frames per second that we have
been seeing from the game ever since it was revealed at E3 2004.
during E3 2006 or just slightly before, I noticed that in a video of
the Wii version, the framerate seemed to be *significantly* smoother
than previous videos of the Gamecube version.
if true, it would be awesome.
60fps is a huge difference from 30fps to me, and many other games.
For me, it's like the difference between having 60 bucks in your pocket
and having only 30 bucks in your pocket. (or quid if you're in the UK,
hehe)
it would make me very pleased if true.
I remember the only major flaw (IMO) of Zelda: The Ocarina of Time on
the Nintendo 64 (and even the Gamecube port) was its low framerate;
only ~20 FPS. while very much playable, it was definitally not even
fairly smooth, like Mario 64 was.
so I am drooling at the *possibility* that the Wii version of Zelda
OoT's successor, Zelda: TP, *might* run at at triple the framerate,
and double the framerate of Zelda TP on Gamecube.
yet, I also realize that there's a DAMN good chance this isn't
happening. It would almost be too good to be true.
Chris F
>please take this as completely unconfirmed for now.
so why fucking post it?
--
gamertag: Chrisflynnuk
http://live.xbox.com/member/Chrisflynnuk
Phil Da Lick!
> On 28 Jun 2006 01:28:17 -0700, AirRa...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>>please take this as completely unconfirmed for now.
>
>
> so why fucking post it?
lol
erics
"Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:44a26234$0$22133$ed26...@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net...
can someone confirm that you laughed out loud, or is that also unconfirmed?
Christoph Kögler
> 60fps is a huge difference from 30fps to me, and many other games.
The framerate of your eyes is below 25 frames right? So whats the
Difference?
Chris
AirRaid
that's clearly nonsense, since, at least most good game developers try
to aim for 30fps in their games, if not 60fps.
of course there's a perceivable difference between 30fps and 60fps to
most gamers, even if the average joe / casual gamer doesn't notice it.
no idea where you got "the framerate of your eyes is below 25 frames",
Satanica
WCZ
"Satanica" <sata...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:wpidnU0vivJ...@bt.com...
Clearly never seen the terrible judder on pans in the cinema then.
bob_builder
Try setting your monitor refresh rate to 30Hz and see if you notice the
difference!
![[ste parker]'s profile photo](http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a-/ALV-UjUTp5GxrXR4waacmP-E3V3EuaWvbCnYVnlp4CwjlJpvM_Yy=s40-c)
[ste parker]
Is this some sort of irrelevant comparison competition?
--
"Global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural
disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking numbers of
Pirates since the 1800s"
Sir Chewbury Gubbins
> please take this as completely unconfirmed for now.
So why do you insist on posting this drivel then? I mean, for heaven's
sake man - how much time each day do you spend digging up this stuff
which NO ONE WILL READ? Why don't you spend it on yourself instead?
Choobs
--
Sir Chewbury Gubbins
Knight of the Wholly Gnarly Widget
Gaming Diary and Rants: http://www.nelefa.org
Sir Chewbury Gubbins
> On 28 Jun 2006 01:28:17 -0700, AirRa...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> please take this as completely unconfirmed for now.
>
> so why fucking post it?
Ah feck, I might have known you'd get there first :)
Please take this as completely unconfirmed for now, but rumour has it
that the Wii will bring about unity and harmony among all mankind, allow
the lion to lay down with the lamb, and turn Barry Manilow into a
household name once again.
Mantorok
"Christoph Kögler" <cro...@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:e7ukbd$aot$01$1...@news.t-online.com...
Well if that ain't the biggest bollocks that's ever been spoken I don't know
what is.....
Kev
Zachary
zach
"Sir Chewbury Gubbins" <chewbury...@nelefa.org> wrote in message
news:4ghvj4F...@individual.net...
Chris F
<zachary...@wowway.com> wrote:
>hahahahahahahaha! next rumor is the ps3 will sell $20! hahahahahahahaha!
>
well if it's selling them for $10 i'll buy a few.
Phil Da Lick!
confirmed and ratified by the appropriate competent authorities
Sir Chewbury Gubbins
President Bush is a benevolent old Gentleman who is selflessly putting
the needs of the world over his own country's financial well being.
Chris F
<chewbury...@nelefa.org> wrote:
>Mantorok wrote:
>> "Christoph Kögler" <cro...@gmx.de> wrote in message
>> news:e7ukbd$aot$01$1...@news.t-online.com...
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>> 60fps is a huge difference from 30fps to me, and many other games.
>>> The framerate of your eyes is below 25 frames right? So whats the
>>> Difference?
>>
>> Well if that ain't the biggest bollocks that's ever been spoken I don't know
>> what is.....
>
>President Bush is a benevolent old Gentleman who is selflessly putting
>the needs of the world over his own country's financial well being.
>
replace country with "campaign funders" and you're closer ;)
The Magic Engineer @ comcastic!>
news:44A3C818...@nelefa.org...
> AirRa...@gmail.com wrote:
>> please take this as completely unconfirmed for now.
>
> So why do you insist on posting this drivel then? I mean, for heaven's
> sake man - how much time each day do you spend digging up this stuff
> which NO ONE WILL READ? Why don't you spend it on yourself instead?
>
> Choobs
I like to read the posts that usually follow his.. quite entertaining.
TME
--
"Disintegration is a 'slight bummer'?"
-Raj, "Camp Lazlo"
Miles Bader
> sake man - how much time each day do you spend digging up this stuff
> which NO ONE WILL READ? Why don't you spend it on yourself instead?
Er, well possibly because people _do_ read it.
-miles
--
`Suppose Korea goes to the World Cup final against Japan and wins,' Moon said.
`All the past could be forgiven.' [NYT]
Sir Chewbury Gubbins
> "Sir Chewbury Gubbins" <chewbury...@nelefa.org> wrote in message
> news:44A3C818...@nelefa.org...
>> AirRa...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> please take this as completely unconfirmed for now.
>> So why do you insist on posting this drivel then? I mean, for heaven's
>> sake man - how much time each day do you spend digging up this stuff
>> which NO ONE WILL READ? Why don't you spend it on yourself instead?
>>
>> Choobs
>
> I like to read the posts that usually follow his.. quite entertaining.
Annoyingly, I can't really argue with that :)
AirRaid
Sir Chewbury Gubbins wrote:
> AirRa...@gmail.com wrote:
> > please take this as completely unconfirmed for now.
>
> So why do you insist on posting this drivel then? I mean, for heaven's
> sake man - how much time each day do you spend digging up this stuff
> which NO ONE WILL READ? Why don't you spend it on yourself instead?
>
> Choobs
>
very, very little time.
the time i spend "digging stuff up" pales in comparison to the
collective amount of time people spend reading it, and/or coming up
with a reply.
glad you found the post interesting enough to reply yourself.
Chris F
well it took you 4 days to get round to replying, so thats a lot of
trawling sites for non-news to copy and paste before getting round to
reading threads you already started.
Tim Miller
> Sir Chewbury Gubbins <chewbury...@nelefa.org> writes:
>> sake man - how much time each day do you spend digging up this stuff
>> which NO ONE WILL READ? Why don't you spend it on yourself instead?
>
> Er, well possibly because people _do_ read it.
>
On the original sites from which he's stolen it.
Tim (tm)
--
tim (at) economic-truth.co.uk
http://www.ugvm.org.uk - the uk.games.video.misc magazine
Fear us, for we are the Wii Ouendan!
Chris F
<ne...@economic-truth.co.uk> wrote:
>Miles Bader wrote:
>> Sir Chewbury Gubbins <chewbury...@nelefa.org> writes:
>>> sake man - how much time each day do you spend digging up this stuff
>>> which NO ONE WILL READ? Why don't you spend it on yourself instead?
>>
>> Er, well possibly because people _do_ read it.
>>
>Indeed.
>
>On the original sites from which he's stolen it.
>
>Tim (tm)
to be fair, he didn't steal this one.
he just completely made it up.