MI5 Persecution: Leicester Square 9/2/98 (13923)
MI5V...@mi5.gov.uk
Leicester Square - 9/Feb/1998
In February 1998 I spent some time in Leicester Square, in the West End
of London. This is a very busy area of London, and one which can be relied
on to produce "contacts". Capital Radio's offices and their cafe are
located here, the Trocadero is nearby, and the place is full of cinemas
and entertainment venues.
Certainty level: 100%
A young girl is heard to say, "Alright I'm going to talk to myself" to her
friends, followed by all of them laughing together, as I passed by.
Believe me, I do not look mad in real life, these young people would not
have directed their comments and laughter at me unless they had already
been told by others that I was ill. I am absolutely certain that their
behaviour was directed at me, and this audio file is particularly clear.
Certainty level: 60%
This one was recorded in a cafe in Green Park. Two women are talking to
each other, one of them says to the other, "something wrong with him",
with an emphasis on the "wrong".
The words "something wrong with him" have been repeated at me dozens of
times, at my former workplace in Canada, in England, etc. The words are
quite deliberately chosen to have two meanings; they obviously imply that
I am ill, without forcing the abusers to demean themselves by using
more pejorative terms, although they have shown that they have no
compunction in that area; and secondly, the words "wrong ... him" make
me at fault, and place the guilt for the abusers' wrongdoing on my
shoulders.
Certainty level: 30%
Recorded on a Victoria line tube train leaving Green Park station.
If you listen carefully you can pick up the word "hunchback". The speaker
had emitted a swear word immediately before this excerpt; both the swear
word, and the "hunchback", were (I believe) directed at me.
13923
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
Chris
> Leicester Square - 9/Feb/1998
>
> In February 1998 I spent some time in Leicester Square, in the West End of
> London
>.....the Trocadero is nearby, and the place is full of cinemas and
>entertainment venues
>.....Green Park
>.....Canada [Water]
>....Victoria line tube train leaving Green Park station....
I can't find any record of this game, which is a pity as I was trying to
work out which rule set was being played. The obvious would, of course, be
McFadden's Subterfuge, were it not for the seemingly impossible double-cross
at Green Park. Can anyone shed some light on this? What was the result?
Pies
Actually, the reason you cannot find a record of this game is that it
was a postal variant, played before Usenet became commonplace. In fact,
due to the general decline in standards of the Royal Mail, it is still
ongoing, and I am pondering my next move. If you're interested, mine was
the second Green Park, which has thus left me in spoon, however I plan
to use Bacon's Reverse to play
Baker Street.
Chris
news:GKJZi.4276$pg....@newsfe6-win.ntli.net...
The reference to the Trocadero now becomes explicable - thank you. Using
Bacon's Reverse has always seemed rasher than the alternatives to me, but in
this case Baker Street should serve well enough, given the proximity of the
Planetarium. Fingers crossed for no more postal strikes as I'm looking
forward to MI5's next play.
Pies
Sadly, I think you may find that he is temporarily indisposed... if
you'd like to take over his play, perhaps?
I should warn you that due to his being absent, Paddington Green and
associated diagonals (under Bateman's 1998) are wild.
Chris
Waterloo Bridge (something of a stab in the dark, but I believe this is
allowed under the umbrella dispensation of the Litvinenko Protocol, even
when diagonals are wild.)
Pies
Damn you to hell.
You leave me no choice, but to play Anderson's Reverse:
Southwark
Chris
Bond Street
Chris
> yourself (as per Boscombe '90) to
>
> Dollis Hill
Ealing Br...
Hanger La...
Boston Ma...
Uxbr...
Amersh...
...
...
Dollis Hill (it's no laughing matter)
Pies
You do realise that by laughing before that play, you've condemned
Pies
solar penguin
> Chris wrote:
> > "Pies" <p...@nospam.cantab.net> wrote in message
Dollis H-h-h-h-h-h-Hill...
Pies
GIVE ME A D! D!
GIVE ME AN O! O!
GIVE ME AN L! L!
GIVE ME AN L! L!
GIVE ME AN I! I!
GIVE ME AN S! S!
Hill...
Aidan Karley
actually a spoof of Mornington Crescent which doesn't actually have any rules.
The author hides it well (sometimes I think he's actually using a code of some
sort, but I only have a suspicion about that).
If you think back to Chapters 7 through 12 of Humph's masterly
12-volume introduction to McFadden's, you'd notice that while Canada [Water]
appears a good move, it leaves one open to going off in Huff 4 moves down the
line.
BUT, if you were to move to Canada by AIR, your shorter transit time
via Keflavik would give you the extra move needed to execute a fine fork
entrapment.
And your poor opponent would see it coming with the ponderous
inevitability of a new Harry Potter book.
I suspect that Humph didn't cover this variant in the McFadden's
introduction because he likes playing it himself so much, and you can't expect
him to actually teach you how to play in a player's guide, and you?
--
Aidan Karley,
Aberdeen, Scotland
Written at Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:20 GMT, but posted later.
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Chris
news:VA.000014b...@email.provider.invalid...
> In article <oLidnYbdLO9J0ara...@pipex.net>, Chris wrote:
>> [Irrelevant ramblings and inconsequential detail snipped]
>>
>> > Leicester Square - 9/Feb/1998
>> >
>> > In February 1998 I spent some time in Leicester Square, in the West End
>> > of
>> > London
>> >.....the Trocadero is nearby, and the place is full of cinemas and
>> >entertainment venues
>> >.....Green Park
>> >.....Canada [Water]
>> >....Victoria line tube train leaving Green Park station....
>>
>> I can't find any record of this game, which is a pity as I was trying to
>> work out which rule set was being played. The obvious would, of course,
>> be
>> McFadden's Subterfuge, were it not for the seemingly impossible
>> double-cross
>> at Green Park. Can anyone shed some light on this? What was the result?
>>
> Sorry, Chris, but you've swallowed it, hook, line and sinker. This
> is
> actually a spoof of Mornington Crescent which doesn't actually have any
> rules.
> The author hides it well (sometimes I think he's actually using a code of
> some
> sort, but I only have a suspicion about that).
I feel such a fool. Suddenly hundreds of other posts here take on a new and
rational light. Thank you.
Chris
PS: Who is Harry Potter and what books has he written?