Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
OTish He might use 1st class without paying but he has no class :-)
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Mike.. . . .
Apr 5, 2013, 5:51:35 AM4/5/13
to
"http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/george-osborne-parks-disabled-bay-1812379"
Witnesses told how Mr Osborne and his entourage went for a McDonald’s
as his driver sat inside the official car before popping out for a
crafty cig.
--
Mike... . . . .
Witnesses told how Mr Osborne and his entourage went for a McDonald’s
as his driver sat inside the official car before popping out for a
crafty cig.
--
Mike... . . . .
Joe Fazakerley
Apr 5, 2013, 9:01:21 AM4/5/13
to
"Mike.. . . ." wrote in message
news:sh7tl8tgmgioeeqvj...@4ax.com...
>"http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/george-osborne-parks-disabled-bay-1812379"
>Witnesses told how Mr Osborne and his entourage went for a McDonald’s
>as his driver sat inside the official car before popping out for a
>crafty cig.
Mike.. . . .
Apr 5, 2013, 9:17:00 AM4/5/13
to
Following a post by Joe Fazakerley
>went for a McDonald’s
>>as his driver sat inside the official car before popping out for a
>>crafty cig.
>
>I blame Thatcher!!
LOL, for the burger? These are "Thatchers children" yes, but did Eton
teach him a Big Mac was the perfect lunch? Or is he just pandering to
the masses? I don't think John Majors curry and chips was for
publicity?
BTW Give credit where due, he didn't park on a disabled *person*, he's
only running them into the ground fugitively :-)
>went for a McDonald’s
>>as his driver sat inside the official car before popping out for a
>>crafty cig.
>
>I blame Thatcher!!
teach him a Big Mac was the perfect lunch? Or is he just pandering to
the masses? I don't think John Majors curry and chips was for
publicity?
BTW Give credit where due, he didn't park on a disabled *person*, he's
only running them into the ground fugitively :-)
Mike.. . . .
Apr 5, 2013, 9:26:44 AM4/5/13
to
Following a post by Mike.. . . .
> fugitively
"figuratively" must actually *look* at spellcheck
> fugitively
"figuratively" must actually *look* at spellcheck
vi...@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk
Apr 5, 2013, 9:35:00 AM4/5/13
to
Joe Fazakerley <spamell...@nospam.net> wrote:
>>Witnesses told how Mr Osborne and his entourage went for a McDonald?s
"I blame Thatcher!!"
(not that I have a problem with that, I hasten to add)
>>Witnesses told how Mr Osborne and his entourage went for a McDonald?s
>>as his driver sat inside the official car before popping out for a
>>crafty cig.
>
> I blame Thatcher!!
Just on general principle? "Terrible weather we're having today"
>>crafty cig.
>
> I blame Thatcher!!
"I blame Thatcher!!"
(not that I have a problem with that, I hasten to add)
Mike.. . . .
Apr 5, 2013, 9:48:53 AM4/5/13
to
Following a post by <vi...@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
" my postillions been struck by lightning"
"me culpa maggie thatcher" in "Argie" (TM Sun) accent.
"me culpa maggie thatcher" in "Argie" (TM Sun) accent.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
sf
Apr 5, 2013, 11:24:51 AM4/5/13
to
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:51:35 +0100, Mike.. . . .
<junkfo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/george-osborne-parks-disabled-bay-1812379"
> Witnesses told how Mr Osborne and his entourage went for a McDonald’s
> as his driver sat inside the official car before popping out for a
> crafty cig.
Sounds very much like their fellow hypocrites on this side of the
<junkfo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/george-osborne-parks-disabled-bay-1812379"
> Witnesses told how Mr Osborne and his entourage went for a McDonald’s
> as his driver sat inside the official car before popping out for a
> crafty cig.
Pond.
--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.
Mike.. . . .
Apr 5, 2013, 1:33:13 PM4/5/13
to
Following a post by Martin
>I blame his education and his friends.
there seems to be a bit of Eton instilled arrogance?
>I blame his education and his friends.
there seems to be a bit of Eton instilled arrogance?
Mike.. . . .
Apr 5, 2013, 1:42:44 PM4/5/13
to
Following a post by sf
>> Witnesses told how Mr Osborne and his entourage went for a McDonald’s
>> as his driver sat inside the official car before popping out for a
>> crafty cig.
>
>Sounds very much like their fellow hypocrites on this side of the
>Pond.
On policy they are not hypocrites, they hate the poor and keep bashing
them, they say the poor are scroungers and lazy, all quite consistent.
We have just had an appalling case of a man who have masses of
children to get more benefits and then killed them all in a bizarre
fire he arranged in order to put it out and seem a hero and get a
bigger (public sector) house. The most awful person you could imagine.
While there is a strong case for doing something about such people,
the govts mouthpiece, the daily mail is representing the killings as
being the product of having a benefits system and him as typical of
the poor. The reporting has been quite disgusting even for the daily
mail.
But my point was really his choice of lunch, (I regard him parking in
a disabled bay as par for the course).
>> Witnesses told how Mr Osborne and his entourage went for a McDonald’s
>> as his driver sat inside the official car before popping out for a
>> crafty cig.
>
>Sounds very much like their fellow hypocrites on this side of the
>Pond.
them, they say the poor are scroungers and lazy, all quite consistent.
We have just had an appalling case of a man who have masses of
children to get more benefits and then killed them all in a bizarre
fire he arranged in order to put it out and seem a hero and get a
bigger (public sector) house. The most awful person you could imagine.
While there is a strong case for doing something about such people,
the govts mouthpiece, the daily mail is representing the killings as
being the product of having a benefits system and him as typical of
the poor. The reporting has been quite disgusting even for the daily
mail.
But my point was really his choice of lunch, (I regard him parking in
a disabled bay as par for the course).
sf
Apr 5, 2013, 2:39:16 PM4/5/13
to
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:42:44 +0100, Mike.. . . .
<junkfo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But my point was really his choice of lunch, (I regard him parking in
> a disabled bay as par for the course).
Yes, society has rules (aka: laws) but they are for the less
<junkfo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But my point was really his choice of lunch, (I regard him parking in
> a disabled bay as par for the course).
privileged. Remember, there are two distinct classes: "the Makers and
the Takers". People with power and/or money think they can ignore the
rules and go unpunished. Unfortunately, that is often the case or
else we'd have prosecuted those criminals on Wall Street a long time
ago.
Joe Fazakerley
Apr 5, 2013, 6:12:36 PM4/5/13
to
wrote in message news:as8284...@mid.individual.net...
for Thatcher. Mike was employed by the LCC, whose leader was Ken Livingstone
(nice man). When Thatcher (nasty person) and Ken fell out, she scrapped the
London County Council and put Mike and others out of work. There is a happy
ending, the nice Mr Livingstone does after dinner talks at £10K a pop.
And the subject of these speeches? why it's Mrs T of course!! One subject it
won't be, is the number of people killed in NHS hospitals during 2005 - 2009
due to Govt incompetence and lack of hospital hygiene -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-20924654
Oops I digress - back to Osborne. Last month it was traveling on a 2nd class
ticket, this week it's parking in a disabled bay. What'll it be next week,
drinking soup with a fork!!!
Bring back Socialism, before standards drop even further.
Mike.. . . .
Apr 6, 2013, 3:09:40 AM4/6/13
to
Following a post by Joe Fazakerley
>whose leader was Ken Livingstone
>(nice man).
part of the problem IMHO
>(nice man).
Mike.. . . .
Apr 6, 2013, 3:27:26 AM4/6/13
to
Following a post by Joe Fazakerley
>and put Mike and others out of work.
a touching enthusiasm to misremember my personal history, what an odd
person you must be, as long suspected. For the record Thatcherism has
(personally) served me very well, its unplanned stupidities keeping me
in lucrative work!
Mike.. . . .
Apr 6, 2013, 4:59:43 AM4/6/13
to
Following a post by sf
>Yes, society has rules (aka: laws) but they are for the less
>privileged. Remember, there are two distinct classes: "the Makers and
>the Takers". People with power and/or money think they can ignore the
>rules and go unpunished. Unfortunately, that is often the case or
>else we'd have prosecuted those criminals on Wall Street a long time
>ago.
We have no law that says nobody can reward themselves an immense
>privileged. Remember, there are two distinct classes: "the Makers and
>the Takers". People with power and/or money think they can ignore the
>rules and go unpunished. Unfortunately, that is often the case or
>else we'd have prosecuted those criminals on Wall Street a long time
>ago.
paycheck (even after relative failure). We need a mechanism that
brings boardroom and banking pay in line with reality. The
shareholders meeting does not seem to be doing it. The govt is not
interested in biting the hand that feeds it and will try to resist
Europe driven reform.
Mike.. . . .
Apr 6, 2013, 5:33:11 AM4/6/13
to
Following a post by Martin
>I blame his education and his friends.
he should try the BBC class test, there's nothing about eating burgers
>I blame his education and his friends.
in the carpark though
"http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22000973"
Message has been deleted
Mike.. . . .
Apr 8, 2013, 4:29:50 AM4/8/13
to
Following a post by John Smith
>Here's the likely scenario.... (I'm not within a million miles of being a
>supporter of this man or his work colleagues!)
>The driver decides he'll give the care occupants the least amount of
>distance to walk to get into Mac's (less chance of anything happening in a
>'public place') and spots the disabled bay, drives into it, either covering
>up the word disabled under the car, or if the word is written *behind* the
>car on the ground and not seen by the occupants leaving the rear of the care
>forwards...a fairly normal way to exit your car... There is every chance the
>occupants, other than the driver, had no idea which bay they were parked
>in.
especially in a Disco where you cannot see much of the immediate
ground unless it has the ground cameras. No idea what he knew or
didn't know but he is getting away with appalling things otherwise, so
let him take the blame. Somebody paraphrased all his speeches to "I'm
right, you're wrong, shut up". They are presiding over a stagnating
economy which they make worse by cutting public spending as never
before, they take benefits from the poor, freeze the pay of many
ordinary people and give tax cuts to the rich while doing nothing
about executive pay which is now out of control with rises of 50% or
more to already gargantuan pay in companies where profits are falling.
But worst of all, he eats bigmacs!
>Here's the likely scenario.... (I'm not within a million miles of being a
>supporter of this man or his work colleagues!)
>The driver decides he'll give the care occupants the least amount of
>distance to walk to get into Mac's (less chance of anything happening in a
>'public place') and spots the disabled bay, drives into it, either covering
>up the word disabled under the car, or if the word is written *behind* the
>car on the ground and not seen by the occupants leaving the rear of the care
>forwards...a fairly normal way to exit your car... There is every chance the
>occupants, other than the driver, had no idea which bay they were parked
>in.
especially in a Disco where you cannot see much of the immediate
ground unless it has the ground cameras. No idea what he knew or
didn't know but he is getting away with appalling things otherwise, so
let him take the blame. Somebody paraphrased all his speeches to "I'm
right, you're wrong, shut up". They are presiding over a stagnating
economy which they make worse by cutting public spending as never
before, they take benefits from the poor, freeze the pay of many
ordinary people and give tax cuts to the rich while doing nothing
about executive pay which is now out of control with rises of 50% or
more to already gargantuan pay in companies where profits are falling.
But worst of all, he eats bigmacs!
Luke Understory
Apr 8, 2013, 9:56:37 AM4/8/13
to
"Mike.. . . ." wrote in message
coil, I think they broke the mould. We're left with self-seekers and
scumbags.
I've no objection to large pay-outs or bonuses, as long as it's open, above
board and uk income tax is paid. Most of these high earners work in finance
and global multi-nationals. If the Taxman got tough, it would be a simple
matter for them to get paid off-shore - for from the clutches of HM.
So how does a future Labour Gov. put the squeeze on the rich, yet stop the
salaries, perks, bungs, commissions etc, being transferred to tax havens?
They need someone with integrity, a true patriot and masses of street cred.
Preferably some who doesn't read the Torygrapgh, park in disabled bays,
orders the wine last or eat bigmacs. Can such a person exist -
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/tony-blair/8999890/Tony-Blair-and-the-8million-tax-mystery.html
Mike.. . . .
Apr 8, 2013, 10:22:17 AM4/8/13
to
Following a post by Luke Understory
>I've no objection to large pay-outs or bonuses, as long as it's open, above
>board and uk income tax is paid. Most of these high earners work in finance
>and global multi-nationals. If the Taxman got tough, it would be a simple
>matter for them to get paid off-shore - for from the clutches of HM.
the shareholders need to get tough.
Why keep changing your name?
>I've no objection to large pay-outs or bonuses, as long as it's open, above
>board and uk income tax is paid. Most of these high earners work in finance
>and global multi-nationals. If the Taxman got tough, it would be a simple
>matter for them to get paid off-shore - for from the clutches of HM.
Why keep changing your name?
0 new messages