On 08/08/17 11:44, bm wrote:
> "Chris Bartram" <
ne...@delete-me.piglet-net.net> wrote in message
> news:ombqq8$ebd$2...@dont-email.me...
>> On 08/08/2017 08:55, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Chris Bartram" <
ne...@delete-me.piglet-net.net> wrote in message
>>> news:ombp0p$9jc$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sadly it's called progress aka a terrific way to make money.
>>>>
>>>> No, it's a better way to connect electrics than scotchlocking into
>>>> existing circuits.
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am sure you are right. The car should recognise the tow bar
>>>>>> electrics and adapt itself accordingly.
>>>>>
>>>>> It likely does if you use the VW one.
>>>
>>>> It doesn't. CAN is not plug and play.
>>>
>>> It certainly can be if its designed in in the
>>> first place for the trailer to be optional and
>>> automatically recognised when its added.
>> Yes, but it isn't designed that way and never was. What part of "CAN is
>> not plug and play" was hard to understand? It's a very simple protocol.
>
> A 'simple' money spinner.
> Try paying for an intermittent cpu problem.
> We've changed this, we've changed that, we're waiting for a part etc.
> Grease monkeys, computer diags and canbus? Yea, right.
>
>