On 11/07/2012 08:53, MM wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:25:28 +0100, "dennis@home"
> <
den...@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "MM" <
kyli...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:u2uov7lrb039ovo1c...@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:22:54 +0100, Andy Burns
>>> <
usenet....@adslpipe.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mike Tomlinson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dave <
n...@telling.com> escribi�:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYLLoYnHK8s
>>>>>
>>>>> They made a beautiful job of cleaning up the chip and reinstating the
>>>>> solder balls prior to reflowing.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed, but all that to fix an XBOX? Buy a replacement on fleabay!
>>>
>>> No, if it can be repaired cost effectively, then it should. I loathe
>>> the throwaway society.
>>
>> At minimum wage its cheaper to chuck it, do you expect skilled people to
>> work for nothing?
>
> It's cheaper, sure, but not better. Equipment is *designed* to fail
> nowadays. It should be made illegal. My late mum's mangle was a cast
There is a subtle difference between designed to fail, and not designed
to last.
If I build a PVR and specify PSU capacitors with a 2000 hour life, which
is that? If I spec 15K hour caps, and as a result everyone buys the
cheaper unit from a competitor that uses the cheaper components, is that
better?
> iron jobbie with massive wooden rollers. It was already old when mum
> acquired it. My original LaserJet III lasted THIRTEEN years with only
> a new toner cartridge every now and then. That was anno 1993. Today,
> quality is abysmal. Throw a perfectly good printer away (my P2015 is
> only four years old) that has had VERY little wear (home use only)
> simply because one or two solder balls have dry joints? This is so
> utterly idiotic a policy, the conservation movement must really mount
> some sort of a campaign to re-educated manufacturers and designers. HP
The irony is that its the green movement that have caused many of these
problems. I would guess that more kit gets trashed as a result of the
use of lead free solder than any other single reason!
> should have their arses sued off in a mass class action or something.
> It's not like just one or two of these printers have been affected,
> but thousands. Possibly tens of thousands. In one case alone, a
> company reported having a 100 of the things.
Yup, when there is evidence that loads have failed, perhaps. Even then
tough it gets more complicated... The laserjets that lasted forever,
were premium quality bits of kit with prices to match. The modern ones
that only last a few years are in many cases less than a 20th of the
price in real terms. Its is perhaps unrealistic to expect the same
longevity.