On 19/02/2024 10:33, Paul wrote:
> On 2/19/2024 4:36 AM, Scott wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 21:07:14 +0000, alan_m <
ju...@admac.myzen.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 18/02/2024 18:24, Tim+ wrote:
>>>> Scott <
newsg...@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Once upon a time, Duracell used to guarantee to replace any equipment
>>>>> damaged by leakage from a Duracell battery. Now I find that leakage is
>>>>> commonplace if the battery is left for a long time. Does the guarantee
>>>>> still apply? That said, I have not recently known anything to be
>>>>> damaged as the deposit seems to be a white powder easily removed using
>>>>> a screwdriver.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Used to be my impression that Duracell was a “quality” brand but they do
>>>> seem to leak a lot these days. Hard to tell as it’s possible that it’s
>>>> just the brand that I’ve bought most of but I’ve come across some really
>>>> old non-Duracell batteries that haven’t leaked.
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>> Duracell batteries, especially AA and AAA, are guaranteed to leak. I
>>> stopped using them a long time ago because of this problem.
>>
>> Has the composition changed?
>>
>
> The behavior of Duracell products, has been consistent for a long long time.
>
"Duracell Inc. is an American manufacturer of alkaline batteries,
specialty cells, and rechargeables; it is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Berkshire Hathaway."
The behaviour of Berkshire Hathaway is also consistent. Ask how Moodys
came to rate subprime mortgages and icelandic banks as AAA.
> It boggles the mind, why they don't do something about it.
>
> What is hard to determine, is whether we are seeing the work of the
> original company or not.
Triggers broom. Corporately and legally it is still the same company.
> Duracell offered its name, for branding bodges
> (the Duracell USB sticks, which are not made by Duracell), and you
> have to wonder what kind of company is behind the manufacture of the
> cells.
>
> If other companies can make cells that don't leak and are 10 years
> past their best-before date, then Duracell can do that too.
>
But why bother making good sells when spending money on wanking rabbits
that never come to orgasm is cheaper.
> Most companies would have a "continuous improvement" policy,
> examining field results and attempting to improve on them.
>
Bless!
Most companies today have a manufacturing cost reduction budget with
the saving spent on marketing an inferior product.
> I've done a couple sweeps of the house, and I think I've collected
> all the Duracell I could find.
>
Dustbin of history.
They work OK for me in my mice and keyboards.
I don't think I have much that goes flat and stays flat for years
anyway, which is usually the killer
> Paul
--
“But what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an
hypothesis!”
Mary Wollstonecraft