On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 08:30:10 +0100, polygonum <
rmoud...@vrod.co.uk>
wrote:
<snip>
>>
>When I was really quite young, I could disassemble and re-assemble our
>old Hoover steam iron in very little time. I think it was because my
>mother always let the mains flex twist and end up "bobbling" - so it
>needed all too frequent replacement.
>
>They don't make them like that any more... :-)
And that's the bottom line isn't it. I've stripped lots of 'older
stuff' and it actually looks like it was 'designed' to be taken to
pieces and serviced and even if it wasn't, one wasn't actually
prevented from doing so by hidden screws, one-way clips or even
security screws.
I think along with energy ratings, equipment should also have a
serviceability rating ... but how many people (outside of here) would
take any notice of that? ;-(
Even something as big and expensive are bought because they 'look
good', with no regard to *any* other factor. But then, how often do
you see people with a sofa on the roof-rack, or anything 'substantial'
for that matter?
I've even had bikers question why I would tow a camping trailer behind
my motorbike ... because *their* use / understanding of motorbikes are
simply for speed and performance. Because I've never been interested
in speed or (sports) performance and the trailers we use are
specifically designed to be towed behind motorbikes and therefore you
aren't actually restricted by much as it's slightly narrower than my
touring luggage so I can still filter and my bike has more than enough
power that the (functional) performance isn't really affected either.
'Vehicles' for me (us) have always / only been about getting us and
our stuff from A to B and looking after them was part of that. Not
sure that is the case in general these days.
Cheers, T i m