It runs two small underfloor heating circuits which together need about
20,000 btu and domestic hot water both of which work fine. The problem
is that we can't get the oven temparature above about 350š F, which just
isn't hot enough to cook on. And this takes full blast on the oil
control for four or five hours. At one point we had it up to 400š but
now we're struggling to get anywhere near that.
In the past we've had solid-fuel Rayburns which have worked perfectly
well, and on those you can get them up to heat within half an hour by
adjusting the damper and air control and giving it some more fuel. We've
lived with an oil fired Aga for a while and that seemed to work fine.
Are we asking too much of the Rayburn? Any ideas about what we can do to
improve things? (We've already got the damper all the way in, adjusted
the baffle over the burner and blanked off some of the boiler pipes, by
the way.)
Thanks in advance.
Have you spoken with the firm that did the conversion in terms of what the
burner should deliver?
Is it a manufacturer approved conversion and burner?
The heating and HW requirements should hardly be taxing.
I'd get the installer back, as it should be doing much better than that.
.andy
Hmm. When my Aga was installed, the cahppie spend a *lot* of time with a
burette, measuring oil flow levels. It expects the float chabmre to be a
certain height above the burner, to get peak oil flow high enough to
keep the thing hot...
Now I don't know the rayburn, but its the same manufacturere these days
I believe, and so my guess is that this might be applicable....have you
got the oil control valve bit high enough above the burner? And is there
adequate flow from the tank? If the answer is yes to both, thne your new
burner is inefficient.
The other thig I noticed about the (new) oil fired aga, vis a vis the
solid fuel converted aga that my other halfs mum has, is that a lot more
effort is made (e.g. fins on teh underside of teh plate) to extract the
heat from the gases of combustion. Oil burners are simply not as hot as
coal.
I would talk to rayburn, and the people who converted it..I have assumed
from what you said that it was an old coal burner converted...or is it a
revamped oil burner? In which case the revampers may have cattled it..
Best of luck
Noel
Good point. Oil fired raeburns also have fins on the plate and of
course is also gravity fed.As mentioned I think you've got to ensure
that the cooker has efficient oil feed.