In article <
qam5c71tug38pg175...@4ax.com>,
MM <
kyli...@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:57:28 +0000 (UTC),
and...@cucumber.demon.co.uk
> (Andrew Gabriel) wrote:
>
>>In article <j9tupr$bs4$
1...@dont-email.me>,
>> Hugh - Was Invisible <invi...@invalid.invalid> writes:
>>> On 15/11/2011 14:55, The Other Mike wrote:
>>>> You might possibly have a flow switch on the boiler in lieu of of a
>>>> room thermostat in which case it is compliant.
>>>>
>>> Looks like it has TRVs. Do these make it compliant?
>>
>>No, there has to be an interlock which stops the boiler
>>firing and keeping the primary circuit hot when no rooms
>>require heat.
>
> What does an interlock look like?
Most commonly, a room thermostat.
But you can use any scheme that cuts the call for heat signal to
the boiler when no heat is required. As someone mentioned, a flow
switch in the radiator circuit would work, although you'd need to
keep the pump on, or you wouldn't notice when a TRV opened. A
flow switch working the opposite way around in the bypass loop
would also work if the loop has a pressure differential bypass
valve fitted.
I believe there are some intelligent pumps which might have some
way to do this, but I've never looked at them.
> All I have is the rads with the Honeywell TRVs and the Drayton program
> controller. The boiler (Wallstar 55 in the garage) has a knob on it to
> set the desired temperature, and two warning lights. There is nothing
> else.
>
> House was built in 2004, along with 39 other similar properties.
There are probably loads of installations which don't comply.
Heating installers are not all very good at keeping up with
technology and regs, and there will be no BCO inspection as it
will all be self-certified.