On 24/01/2013 18:52, Roger Mills wrote:
> On 23/01/2013 23:19, Colin Stamp wrote:
>> On 23/01/2013 22:32, Roger Mills wrote:
>
>>> Not sure that length is an issue - within reason. The limit is usually
>>> based on keeping the water velocity below the level where it starts to
>>> get noisy.
>>
>> With an @11C drop and 1.95kW, they quote the velocity as 1.2m/sec. Not
>> sure how noisy that would make it, but I'm still more concerned about
>> the length. They give the pressure drop as .283 m/m, so my 5m pump will
>> run out of steam at about 17m of 10mm pipe. Presumably the flow reduces
>> pro-rata.
>>
> The JG figure will assume that you're using a pump with sufficient grunt
> to supply the required pressure and flow - which may or may not be the
> case in reality!
Indeed. I guess that's why they don't need to reference the pipe length.
They just give the pressure drop per metre an I can work out a sensible
length depending on how much pump I've got.
>
> If you look at the spec of your 5m pump, that's probably 5m at zero
> flow, with a curve going down to a high flow rate at zero pressure.
> Ideally, you want to be running it somewhere in the middle of that
> curve. So you need to look at total circuit resistance and total flow in
> order to see whether it can cope. Remember that all your radiators are
> in parallel - so their pressure drops are not additive, even though
> their flows are.
Yep. Guessing a bit at pressure drops for elbows and stuff, I reckon the
worst-case radiator will need about 3 metres, which sounds a bit on the
high side for a 5 metre pump to me. I'll need to wind down all the other
rads a fair bit to get the pressure up to 3m, then the flow might be
getting a bit marginal. Plus, I want to heat the water using the boiler,
not the pump ;o).
I'm leaning towards 10mm copper for the radiator drops now. If my last
system was anything to go by, that will easily be enough.
Cheers,
Colin.