On 01/05/15 11:40, fred wrote:
> In article <mhvf7h$8tv$
1...@news.albasani.net>, The Natural Philosopher
> <t...@invalid.invalid> writes
>> On 01/05/15 09:23, fred wrote:
>>> In article <mhu8dm$ah8$
1...@dont-email.me>, Andrew Gabriel
>>> <
use...@cucumber.me.uk> writes
>>>> In article <mhu20k$j1h$
1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>> "michael adams" <mjad...@ukonline.co.k> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> Panels in panelled doors are supposed to be a loose fit - they fit
>>>>> into grooves to allow for shrinkage and expansion. So that when the
>>>>> wood shrinks the only problem should be a strip of unstained or
>>>>> unpainted
>>>>> wood which may appear at the side.
>>>>
>>>> ... is the right answer.
>>>
>>>> They expand and contract every time humidity and temperature changes
>>>> the moisture content in the timber. Paint or varnish at the panel
>>>> edges will stop the panels working as they were intended to.
>>>>
>>> How would that work with an external door subject to driving rain? I
>>> don't think it would.
>>
>> It does.
>>
> The recommendation was for a loose fit which clearly would not.
length and width and the wind velocity. If these are in fact beyond some
Secondly a sliding fit is not a loose fit. Its just not tight enough to