Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Volume of air through a hole - how to calc.

1,357 views
Skip to first unread message

Harry Bloomfield

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 10:02:52 AM9/25/13
to
How do you calculate the volume of air passing through a hole, given
the hole size and the pressure please?

Lets say 0.3mm diameter, with a pressure of 30PSI.

--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk


GB

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 10:20:30 AM9/25/13
to
On 25/09/2013 15:02, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
> How do you calculate the volume of air passing through a hole, given the
> hole size and the pressure please?
>
> Lets say 0.3mm diameter, with a pressure of 30PSI.
>
Google comes up with *many* references. This one seems useful:

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=288922

Onetap

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 10:52:20 AM9/25/13
to
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:02:52 PM UTC+1, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
> How do you calculate the volume of air passing through a hole, given
>
> the hole size and the pressure please?
>
>
>
> Lets say 0.3mm diameter, with a pressure of 30PSI.

Volume of what? Air, water, treacle, bricks?

Clive George

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 10:57:03 AM9/25/13
to
Um, you've quoted the answer to your question.


Onetap

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 11:04:04 AM9/25/13
to
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:02:52 PM UTC+1, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
> How do you calculate the volume of air passing through a hole, given
>
> the hole size and the pressure please?

I don't recall the formulae off-hand, but a couple of brain cells eventually connected and I remembered that it's covered by these;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orifice_plate

You should find all the details in there or other sites dealing with orifice meters. They're the commonest main flow measuring device in building services (heating, chilled water, some air) so there's lots of literature.

There is a large pressure loss immediately downstream due to local turbulence; some of the fluid static pressure is converted into velocity. The pressure increases downstream (10D) as the turbulence dies away.

Onetap

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 11:05:32 AM9/25/13
to
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:57:03 PM UTC+1, Clive George wrote:

> Um, you've quoted the answer to your question.

Bummer. Senior moment there, apologies offered to all inconvenienced

Harry Bloomfield

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 12:03:17 PM9/25/13
to
Onetap explained :
What I'm trying to work out is very roughly, supposing I had a
compressor which store 4cf of air at 100PSI, followed by a pressure
reducer dropping it down to 30PSI which then fed a hole which was 0.3mm
diameter, with atmosphere at the other side - how long would it last,
before the 100 PSI in the tank fell to 30PSI.

I found this, but I'm confused as to how to feed the information in -

http://www.tlv.com/global/TI/calculator/air-flow-rate-through-orifice.html

ARW

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 12:57:53 PM9/25/13
to
:-). And when I said to the site manager today that the cooker extracter
hoods had been fitted too low he asked me "which room is this in?".

There is no inconvenience, just the reassurance that it is not just me who
can sometimes miss the blinding obvious and that we are all human. I am not
telling you what I did wrong.


--
Adam


newshound

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 1:16:38 PM9/25/13
to
Well to a reasonable approximation the mass flow rate will be about 0.6
x Area of hole x square root of (density of air x pressure difference).
You need to use consistent units. I'm about to go out, but will try to
plug some numbers into MathCAD some time tomorrow.

Harry Bloomfield

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 2:25:51 PM9/25/13
to
on 25/09/2013, newshound supposed :
Thanks, absolutely no rush.

John Rumm

unread,
Sep 25, 2013, 11:03:36 PM9/25/13
to
On 25/09/2013 17:57, ARW wrote:
> Onetap wrote:
>> On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:57:03 PM UTC+1, Clive George wrote:
>>
>>> Um, you've quoted the answer to your question.
>>
>> Bummer. Senior moment there, apologies offered to all inconvenienced
>
> :-). And when I said to the site manager today that the cooker extracter
> hoods had been fitted too low he asked me "which room is this in?".

I remember one engineer coming up to me with spec document clutched in
hand... "It says that to select this function you set the command word
to 1... It that a 1 in hex or a 1 in binary?"


--
Cheers,

John.

/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/

Matty F

unread,
Sep 26, 2013, 12:31:10 AM9/26/13
to
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:02:52 AM UTC+12, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
> How do you calculate the volume of air passing through a hole, given
>
> the hole size and the pressure please?
>
>
>
> Lets say 0.3mm diameter, with a pressure of 30PSI.

I'd do some experiments with different size holes.
I don't trust those engineers and their formulae!
Some engineer got the formula wrong with the Manapouri power tunnel and made it 10% too small. There was more friction than they allowed for. They had to dig a new tunnel in rock for 20 kilometres at a cost of $220 million.

Onetap

unread,
Sep 26, 2013, 6:39:33 AM9/26/13
to
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 5:31:10 AM UTC+1, Matty F wrote:
> On Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:02:52 AM UTC+12, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
>
> > How do you calculate the volume of air passing through a hole, given

Charts for calibrated orifices here;

http://www.okcc.com/PDF/Threaded_insert_metric_inch.pdf

Lots of other information on the theory on that site, or Google for micro orifice plate.


> I'd do some experiments with different size holes.
>
> I don't trust those engineers and their formulae!

They're surprisingly accurate because they're used so much and have been tested and refined by experimenters over many decades.

I mostly used charts to estimate pump sizes and you never heard how accurate the estimate was, unless something went wrong. Everyone tended to add in random factors of 10% since it's easier to reduce flow than it is to upgrade pipes &?or pumps.

I only once calculated the resistance of an existing installation (with CIBSE charts), that I had measured and my 'estimate' was within 1% of the measured resistance; the orifice plate was only accurate to +/- 5%. A commissioning technician had falsified test data.


> Some engineer got the formula wrong with the Manapouri power tunnel and made it 10% too small. There was more friction than they allowed for. They had to dig a new tunnel in rock for 20 kilometres at a cost of $220 million.

Rubbish in, rubbish out.

newshound

unread,
Sep 26, 2013, 4:42:25 PM9/26/13
to
Hmmm. My first calc gives about 9 hours. That seems a bit large to me
(but I can't spot any obvious fault).

I tried that calculator link first, but it did not work at all for me.

Harry Bloomfield

unread,
Sep 27, 2013, 6:08:58 AM9/27/13
to
newshound laid this down on his screen :
9 hours is much longer than I expected, but if it is in hours that is
good enough for my purpose - I thinking to carry out some experiments
with Babington type burners.

Harry Bloomfield

unread,
Sep 27, 2013, 6:09:42 AM9/27/13
to
Harry Bloomfield brought next idea :
Sorry, ommited to say - thanks very much.

Dave Baker

unread,
Sep 27, 2013, 7:50:50 AM9/27/13
to

"Harry Bloomfield" <harry...@NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:mn.cbff7dd94e...@NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk...
> What I'm trying to work out is very roughly, supposing I had a compressor
> which store 4cf of air at 100PSI, followed by a pressure reducer dropping
> it down to 30PSI which then fed a hole which was 0.3mm diameter, with
> atmosphere at the other side - how long would it last, before the 100 PSI
> in the tank fell to 30PSI.

Discharge coefficient of a non radiused hole that small in normal thickness
sheet metal will be somewhat higher than the 0.6 of a conventional thin
plate orifice - call it 0.7.

Flow rate at a pressure difference of 30 psi absolute is therefore about 0.7
litres/min.

Tank capacity at approx 28 litres per cubic foot is 112 litres. At 70 psi
over regulator pressure that equates to about 70 / 14.7 x 112 = 533 litres
at atmospheric.

Discharge time = 533 / 0.7 = 762 minutes = 12.7 hours.
--
Dave Baker

Harry Bloomfield

unread,
Sep 27, 2013, 9:38:53 AM9/27/13
to
Dave Baker formulated on Friday :
Not that far from Newshaounds result of 9 hours...
0 new messages