On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:10:38 +0100, Chris Hogg wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:36:54 +0100, john west
> <mail.in...@mail.invalid> wrote:
>
> IME pointing the aerial directly at the transmitter doesn't necessarily
> give you the best signal. There is a significant hill between us and the
> transmitter that obstructs line-of-sight reception,
> and nearly all the aerials on this side of the hill point to one side of
> the hill. I presume some sort of diffraction takes place. Also, aerials
> are never so sensitive that they need precise alignment. A degree or two
> either side makes not a lot of difference. The best way to align the
> aerial is to use a signal strength meter, but unfortunately good ones
> are only afforded by professionals. The alternative is to check the
> strength/quality values using the TV itself, moving the aerial a little
> and re-checking, until you get the best result.
On the subject of signal strength meters.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fringe-Electronics-Pro-Satellite-Finder/dp/
B00LGWN87S
Just over £20 on Amazon - may be cheaper elsewhere.
I have one (IIRC a certain Bill Wright mentioned it) and it worked very
well for aligning an external TV aerial. I have a "swinging needle" meter
for aligning the satellite dish, so I don't remember trying this (although
it was a while back).
We now use it in the camper for aligning the TV aerial at each new site -
and it is quick and effective.
It should be sensitive enough to align your aerial.
Cheers
Dave R
--
Windows 8.1 on PCSpecialist box