Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

2 gang pull cord

385 views
Skip to first unread message

Mark

unread,
May 19, 2008, 5:45:01 AM5/19/08
to
In my bathroom I currently have 1 pull cord which operates both the
light and the extractor fan. I want to separate the 2 functions, but
without a whole extra switch.

So what I want to know is, can you get a pull cord switch with 2 cords
coming out, which can operate different things?

George

unread,
May 19, 2008, 5:48:17 AM5/19/08
to

"Mark" <markwi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ccf1605c-969e-4233...@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

And then you have to remember what cord operates what.

What a silly post.


d...@gglz.com

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:05:14 AM5/19/08
to
You may find building regs require the fan to operate with the light
switch.

I've never heard of any type of pull cord switch other than the
standard item.

However ISTR the new 17th Ed wiring regulations permits conventional
wall switches in bathrooms, provided they're rcd protected - assuming
separate switching meet the BR on ventilation.

Another alternative is a moisture sensitive extraction fan.

George

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:16:07 AM5/19/08
to

<d...@gglz.com> wrote in message
news:eaa2274f-744f-4022...@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

Best solution for the fan is a ceiling mounted passive infared and just a
single pull switch for the light.


David Hansen

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:18:47 AM5/19/08
to
On Mon, 19 May 2008 03:05:14 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be
"d...@gglz.com" <d...@gglz.com> wrote this:-

>However ISTR the new 17th Ed wiring regulations permits conventional
>wall switches in bathrooms,

The 16th and earlier editions also permitted wall switches, provided
they were out of reach of someone using a bath or shower (which
generally means a big bathroom).

>Another alternative is a moisture sensitive extraction fan.

Useful if the aim is to extract moisture. Personally I think the are
an excellent idea in such circumstances, provided people are willing
to open the window when necessary as well.


--
David Hansen, Edinburgh
I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

David Hansen

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:31:23 AM5/19/08
to
On Mon, 19 May 2008 10:16:07 GMT someone who may be "George"
<20X...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote this:-

>Best solution for the fan is a ceiling mounted passive infared and just a
>single pull switch for the light.

For a toilet perhaps, but then (at least in this country) there is
no requirement for a fan in a toilet if it has an opening window.

In a room with a bath or shower people are likely to not work out
how an automatic fan works, leave the window closed when they vacate
the room and thus cause mould. A humidity sensor deals with this
problem.

George

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:47:18 AM5/19/08
to

"David Hansen" <SENDdavi...@spidacom.co.uk> wrote in message
news:uek2345rro1p4uerh...@4ax.com...

What are you on about humidity sensor? when you have a crap the place stinks
hence the fan coming into action when you park your bottom on the
toilet...whats the use of the fan not operating when the room is not humid
enough to operate when you're having a crap?


Dave Plowman (News)

unread,
May 19, 2008, 7:57:17 AM5/19/08
to
In article <uek2345rro1p4uerh...@4ax.com>,

David Hansen <SENDdavi...@spidacom.co.uk> wrote:
> The 16th and earlier editions also permitted wall switches, provided
> they were out of reach of someone using a bath or shower (which
> generally means a big bathroom).

I'd say it would be a very small bathroom if you could reach such a switch
from the bath or shower. Even with my original - which was just big enough
for a bath and basin - no bog - you wouldn't have been able to.

--
*He who dies with the most toys is, nonetheless, dead.

Dave Plowman da...@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

jkn

unread,
May 19, 2008, 10:39:37 AM5/19/08
to
On May 19, 10:48 am, "George" <20X...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> "Mark" <markwillia...@gmail.com> wrote in message

You make one cord say 6 inches shorter than the other, so it's trivial
to tell the difference...

> What a silly post.

the reply was for sure.

J^n


David Hansen

unread,
May 19, 2008, 11:49:28 AM5/19/08
to
On Mon, 19 May 2008 12:57:17 +0100 someone who may be "Dave Plowman
(News)" <da...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote this:-

>> The 16th and earlier editions also permitted wall switches, provided
>> they were out of reach of someone using a bath or shower (which
>> generally means a big bathroom).
>
>I'd say it would be a very small bathroom if you could reach such a switch
>from the bath or shower. Even with my original - which was just big enough
>for a bath and basin - no bog - you wouldn't have been able to.

Depends on the layout. In particular the relationship between the
bath/shower and the door (where the switch is likely to be).

George

unread,
May 19, 2008, 1:23:43 PM5/19/08
to

"jkn" <jkn...@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
news:e6e4fd6e-105f-46fb...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...

And what about when relatives,friends come to stay...do they take up bell
ringing.lol

No the reply was valid.


Lobster

unread,
May 19, 2008, 1:43:06 PM5/19/08
to
George wrote:
> "David Hansen" <SENDdavi...@spidacom.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:uek2345rro1p4uerh...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 03:05:14 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be
>> "d...@gglz.com" <d...@gglz.com> wrote this:-
>>
>>> However ISTR the new 17th Ed wiring regulations permits conventional
>>> wall switches in bathrooms,
>> The 16th and earlier editions also permitted wall switches, provided
>> they were out of reach of someone using a bath or shower (which
>> generally means a big bathroom).
>>
>>> Another alternative is a moisture sensitive extraction fan.
>> Useful if the aim is to extract moisture. Personally I think the are
>> an excellent idea in such circumstances, provided people are willing
>> to open the window when necessary as well.
>>
>
> What are you on about humidity sensor? when you have a crap the place stinks
> hence the fan coming into action when you park your bottom on the
> toilet...whats the use of the fan not operating when the room is not humid
> enough to operate when you're having a crap?

My parents have a motion sensor attached to their extractor fan, which
makes a noise like a Lancaster bomber taking off. When visiting, before
I even remove my trousers, my first task is to bung a bit of bogpaper
over the sensor so that 2 mins later I can read the Sunday Times in peace.

David


Lobster

unread,
May 19, 2008, 1:45:03 PM5/19/08
to
David Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 03:05:14 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be
> "d...@gglz.com" <d...@gglz.com> wrote this:-
>
>> However ISTR the new 17th Ed wiring regulations permits conventional
>> wall switches in bathrooms,
>
> The 16th and earlier editions also permitted wall switches, provided
> they were out of reach of someone using a bath or shower (which
> generally means a big bathroom).

Particularly if the bathroom wall is of a stud partition construction,
it's usually a doddle to mount the switch in the same position on the
*outside* wall of the bathroom.

David

George

unread,
May 19, 2008, 1:48:30 PM5/19/08
to

"Lobster" <davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:w_iYj.44234$4B6....@newsfe14.ams2...

What if its a spicey curry moment?

Maybe your dad used an old air raid siren thinking it was an extractor fan.
;-)


David Hansen

unread,
May 19, 2008, 2:09:28 PM5/19/08
to
On Mon, 19 May 2008 10:47:18 GMT someone who may be "George"
<20X...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote this:-

>> >Another alternative is a moisture sensitive extraction fan.


>>
>> Useful if the aim is to extract moisture. Personally I think the are
>> an excellent idea in such circumstances, provided people are willing
>> to open the window when necessary as well.
>

>What are you on about humidity sensor?

A little comprehension should indicate what.

>when you have a crap the place stinks

That is when opening the window is necessary.

ARWadworth

unread,
May 19, 2008, 2:45:00 PM5/19/08
to

"Lobster" <davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:w_iYj.44234$4B6....@newsfe14.ams2...
> George wrote:
>> "David Hansen" <SENDdavi...@spidacom.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:uek2345rro1p4uerh...@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 03:05:14 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be
>>> "d...@gglz.com" <d...@gglz.com> wrote this:-
>>>
>>>> However ISTR the new 17th Ed wiring regulations permits conventional
>>>> wall switches in bathrooms,
>>> The 16th and earlier editions also permitted wall switches, provided
>>> they were out of reach of someone using a bath or shower (which
>>> generally means a big bathroom).
>>>
>>>> Another alternative is a moisture sensitive extraction fan.
>>> Useful if the aim is to extract moisture. Personally I think the are
>>> an excellent idea in such circumstances, provided people are willing
>>> to open the window when necessary as well.
>>>
>>
>> What are you on about humidity sensor? when you have a crap the place
>> stinks
>> hence the fan coming into action when you park your bottom on the
>> toilet...whats the use of the fan not operating when the room is not
>> humid
>> enough to operate when you're having a crap?
>
> My parents have a motion sensor attached to their extractor fan, which
> makes a noise like a Lancaster bomber taking off.

Did you go and watch the Lancaster over the Derwent on Friday? A Stitfire
and Hurricane as extras.

Adam

Dave Plowman (News)

unread,
May 19, 2008, 2:40:59 PM5/19/08
to
In article <w_iYj.44234$4B6....@newsfe14.ams2>,

Lobster <davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> When visiting, before I even remove my trousers, my first task is to
> bung a bit of bogpaper over the sensor so that 2 mins later I can read
> the Sunday Times in peace.

Too much information.

--
*Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder...

Andy Champ

unread,
May 19, 2008, 5:37:21 PM5/19/08
to
Lobster wrote:
>
> Particularly if the bathroom wall is of a stud partition construction,
> it's usually a doddle to mount the switch in the same position on the
> *outside* wall of the bathroom.
>
> David

... whereupon your children decide it's a great joke to turn off the
light when you're in the bath.

All this auto stuff is all very well except for the pee in the night
case. Sometimes you do NOT want it coming on, because of the noise.

Andy

Ian_m

unread,
May 20, 2008, 10:13:52 AM5/20/08
to
"George" <20X...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:WUcYj.5938$DZ6....@text.news.virginmedia.com...

In my last house with the humidity controlled fan I ftted a pull switch that
was momentary action to start the fan (made by removing the latching bit
from standard pull switch). Thus if you accidentally dropped a stinker you
just momentarily pulled the cord to start the fan to clear the air.

If you get a humidity contolled fan get a temperature compensated one (about
£100 or more) or else you will find it will just turn itself on in winter
when it gets cold or it will not turn on in the summer when it gets hot.
Went through numerous humidty controlled fans (could alter humidity trip
point, but there was not a setting suitable for both summer and winter)
before twigging that you need a temperature compensated one.

Message has been deleted

Lobster

unread,
May 20, 2008, 1:32:56 PM5/20/08
to

I wish... would have probably done so if I'd known about it before it
had happened! (and yes, that was why the Lancaster was in my mind)

David

ARWadworth

unread,
May 20, 2008, 3:31:47 PM5/20/08
to

"Lobster" <davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9XDYj.47910$4B6....@newsfe14.ams2...

Call me lucky but I was in Sheffield that morning. I went to watch it. Three
fly overs from the Lancaster.

Adam

PeterMcC

unread,
May 20, 2008, 4:17:47 PM5/20/08
to
ARWadworth wrote in
<DGFYj.6811$DZ6...@text.news.virginmedia.com>

> "Lobster" <davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:9XDYj.47910$4B6....@newsfe14.ams2...
>> ARWadworth wrote:
>>>
>>> "Lobster" <davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:w_iYj.44234$4B6....@newsfe14.ams2...

<snip>

>>> Did you go and watch the Lancaster over the Derwent on Friday? A
>>> Stitfire and Hurricane as extras.
>>
>> I wish... would have probably done so if I'd known about it before
>> it had happened! (and yes, that was why the Lancaster was in my mind)
>>
>
> Call me lucky but I was in Sheffield that morning. I went to watch
> it. Three fly overs from the Lancaster.
>

Here's one on the ground - 582 Pathfinder Squadron.

I'm just tidying up a few folds, rips and water stains on the original pic
which is about 100cm wide.

http://www.mccourt.org.uk/lanc/lancaster3.jpg

--
PeterMcC
If you feel that any of the above is incorrect,
inappropriate or offensive in any way,
please ignore it and accept my apologies.

ARWadworth

unread,
May 20, 2008, 4:33:24 PM5/20/08
to

"PeterMcC" <pe...@mccourt.org.uk> wrote in message
news:g0vbkn$2c9j$1...@energise.enta.net...

> ARWadworth wrote in
> <DGFYj.6811$DZ6...@text.news.virginmedia.com>
>
>> "Lobster" <davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:9XDYj.47910$4B6....@newsfe14.ams2...
>>> ARWadworth wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Lobster" <davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:w_iYj.44234$4B6....@newsfe14.ams2...
> <snip>
>
>>>> Did you go and watch the Lancaster over the Derwent on Friday? A
>>>> Stitfire and Hurricane as extras.
>>>
>>> I wish... would have probably done so if I'd known about it before
>>> it had happened! (and yes, that was why the Lancaster was in my mind)
>>>
>>
>> Call me lucky but I was in Sheffield that morning. I went to watch
>> it. Three fly overs from the Lancaster.
>>
>
> Here's one on the ground - 582 Pathfinder Squadron.
>
> I'm just tidying up a few folds, rips and water stains on the original pic
> which is about 100cm wide.
>
> http://www.mccourt.org.uk/lanc/lancaster3.jpg
>
> --
> PeterMcC

One of those men must be a relative of yours. What a brilliant photo.

Adam

Bob Eager

unread,
May 20, 2008, 4:48:40 PM5/20/08
to
On Tue, 20 May 2008 19:31:47 UTC, "ARWadworth"
<adamwa...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> >> Did you go and watch the Lancaster over the Derwent on Friday? A Stitfire
> >> and Hurricane as extras.
> >
> > I wish... would have probably done so if I'd known about it before it had
> > happened! (and yes, that was why the Lancaster was in my mind)
> >
>
> Call me lucky but I was in Sheffield that morning. I went to watch it. Three
> fly overs from the Lancaster.

We had a fly past (twice) from a Lancaster three or four years ago; I
forget the occasion. But it flew past very low, along the coast, and we
were on the high part of the seafront. It was *really* close!

(Herne Bay in Kent; many will know why that's significant).

Incidentally, there was a double page picture of a Lancaster cockpit in
the Mail on Sunday this week. My son would like a poster of this sort of
picture; anyone ever seen any?

--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
http://www.diybanter.com

geoff

unread,
May 20, 2008, 5:22:33 PM5/20/08
to
In message <g0vbkn$2c9j$1...@energise.enta.net>, PeterMcC
<pe...@mccourt.org.uk> writes

>ARWadworth wrote in
><DGFYj.6811$DZ6...@text.news.virginmedia.com>
>
>> "Lobster" <davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:9XDYj.47910$4B6....@newsfe14.ams2...
>>> ARWadworth wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Lobster" <davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:w_iYj.44234$4B6....@newsfe14.ams2...
><snip>
>
>>>> Did you go and watch the Lancaster over the Derwent on Friday? A
>>>> Stitfire and Hurricane as extras.
>>>
>>> I wish... would have probably done so if I'd known about it before
>>> it had happened! (and yes, that was why the Lancaster was in my mind)
>>>
>>
>> Call me lucky but I was in Sheffield that morning. I went to watch
>> it. Three fly overs from the Lancaster.
>>
>
>Here's one on the ground - 582 Pathfinder Squadron.
>
>I'm just tidying up a few folds, rips and water stains on the original pic
>which is about 100cm wide.
>
>http://www.mccourt.org.uk/lanc/lancaster3.jpg
>
That's one hell of a crew for just one aeroplane


--
geoff

ARWadworth

unread,
May 20, 2008, 5:34:49 PM5/20/08
to

"geoff" <ra...@kateda.org> wrote in message
news:tiOw8XTZ...@ntlworld.com...

It is one hell of an aeroplane.

Adam

geoff

unread,
May 20, 2008, 6:39:25 PM5/20/08
to
In message <ZtHYj.6900$DZ6....@text.news.virginmedia.com>, ARWadworth
<adamwa...@blueyonder.co.uk> writes
I know that

maybe I should have invested in a smiley or something there

--
geoff

Owain

unread,
May 21, 2008, 3:49:24 AM5/21/08
to
Bob Eager wrote:
> Incidentally, there was a double page picture of a Lancaster cockpit in
> the Mail on Sunday this week. My son would like a poster of this sort of
> picture; anyone ever seen any?

No Lancasters AFAICS, but http://www.transair.co.uk/ and click on
"posters" on the left hand menu.

Owain


Bob Eager

unread,
May 21, 2008, 12:59:32 PM5/21/08
to
On Wed, 21 May 2008 07:49:24 UTC, Owain <owain...@stirlingcity.coo.uk>
wrote:

Thanks - interesting site!

robgraham

unread,
May 22, 2008, 4:23:42 AM5/22/08
to

I'm slightly surprised that none of you have found the ideal
combination (IMO) - the humidity sensed fan with its own momentary
pull cord. I got such a thing off Ebay some 5 years ago for something
like £30 and it works excellently. It's got a label 'RDL' on it.

This does of course require your fan to be near the pan such that the
cord hangs nearby and you are reminded therefore to use it!

Rob

Susan

unread,
Mar 7, 2020, 11:44:04 PM3/7/20
to
replying to Mark, Susan wrote:
Hi... In my bedroom I currently have a pull cord light switch. I’m thinking
of having a long cord pendant light by the side of my bed... My question
is.... Is it possible to buy a PULL CORD light switch that would operate each
light fitting individually at separate times.... Kind regards.

--
for full context, visit https://www.homeownershub.com/uk-diy/2-gang-pull-cord-479901-.htm


tabb...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 8, 2020, 7:14:09 AM3/8/20
to
On Sunday, 8 March 2020 04:44:04 UTC, Susan wrote:
> replying to Mark, Susan wrote:
> Hi... In my bedroom I currently have a pull cord light switch. I’m thinking
> of having a long cord pendant light by the side of my bed... My question
> is.... Is it possible to buy a PULL CORD light switch that would operate each
> light fitting individually at separate times.... Kind regards.

No. Such things existed long ago and it's doable to make them. Each pull of the cord turns a wheel 1/4 or 1/6th of a turn. Every other position is both off. Sticky out bits on the wheel press on microswitches - 6 way adds a 'both on' position. Or it could be done with a little digital logic & 2 relays.


NT

Jeff Layman

unread,
Mar 8, 2020, 8:28:01 AM3/8/20
to
"Mark's" original post for this was on Homeowners Hub in 2008...

Probably the easiest (but certainly not the cheapest) way to do this
today would be with a Quinetic 2-gang switch on the bedside table and
individual receivers for each light.

--

Jeff

tabb...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 8, 2020, 12:09:55 PM3/8/20
to
On Sunday, 8 March 2020 12:28:01 UTC, Jeff Layman wrote:
2 pullcords is as easy as it gets. Colour one to avoid confusion. I daresay it could also be done with relay logic! Another option is to use a semirigid drop rod to rotate a cam with microswitches. Or just drop the wires - eg 3 or 4 core - and fit 2 switches.

Susan's question was from today fwiw.


NT

Jeff Layman

unread,
Mar 8, 2020, 12:47:25 PM3/8/20
to
On 08/03/20 16:09, tabb...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 March 2020 12:28:01 UTC, Jeff Layman wrote:
>> On 08/03/20 11:14, tabbypurr wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 8 March 2020 04:44:04 UTC, Susan wrote:
>>>> replying to Mark, Susan wrote:
>
>>>> Hi... In my bedroom I currently have a pull cord light switch. I’m thinking
>>>> of having a long cord pendant light by the side of my bed... My question
>>>> is.... Is it possible to buy a PULL CORD light switch that would operate each
>>>> light fitting individually at separate times.... Kind regards.
>>>
>>> No. Such things existed long ago and it's doable to make them. Each pull of the cord turns a wheel 1/4 or 1/6th of a turn. Every other position is both off. Sticky out bits on the wheel press on microswitches - 6 way adds a 'both on' position. Or it could be done with a little digital logic & 2 relays.
>>
>> "Mark's" original post for this was on Homeowners Hub in 2008...
>>
>> Probably the easiest (but certainly not the cheapest) way to do this
>> today would be with a Quinetic 2-gang switch on the bedside table and
>> individual receivers for each light.
>
> 2 pullcords is as easy as it gets.

Where do you get that idea?
Quinetic receivers: find power cable to light fitting. Cut. Connect
receiver. Repeat for other light fitting. Ensure transmitter and
receivers talk to each other.
Pullcords: find power cable to light. Cut. connect cut ends to Wago or
other connector. Run cable to where pullcord switch will be placed.
Drill hole in ceiling. Screw switch to ceiling. Pull cable through and
connect. Connect to Wago. Repeat for other light fitting.

Of course, I could be wrong. Why not ask Adam which he thinks would take
longer?

Colour one to avoid confusion. I daresay it could also be done with
relay logic! Another option is to use a semirigid drop rod to rotate a
cam with microswitches. Or just drop the wires - eg 3 or 4 core - and
fit 2 switches.
>
> Susan's question was from today fwiw.

I know; that's why I made the suggestion. I wouldn't have bothered if it
was from 2008.

--

Jeff

charles

unread,
Mar 8, 2020, 12:52:42 PM3/8/20
to
In article <bbb4cace-0a0f-4500...@googlegroups.com>,
<tabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 March 2020 12:28:01 UTC, Jeff Layman wrote:
> > On 08/03/20 11:14, tabbypurr wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 8 March 2020 04:44:04 UTC, Susan wrote:
> > >> replying to Mark, Susan wrote:

> > >> Hi... In my bedroom I currently have a pull cord light switch. I僧
> > >> thinking of having a long cord pendant light by the side of my
> > >> bed... My question is.... Is it possible to buy a PULL CORD light
> > >> switch that would operate each light fitting individually at
> > >> separate times.... Kind regards.
> > >
> > > No. Such things existed long ago and it's doable to make them. Each
> > > pull of the cord turns a wheel 1/4 or 1/6th of a turn. Every other
> > > position is both off. Sticky out bits on the wheel press on
> > > microswitches - 6 way adds a 'both on' position. Or it could be done
> > > with a little digital logic & 2 relays.
> >
> > "Mark's" original post for this was on Homeowners Hub in 2008...
> >
> > Probably the easiest (but certainly not the cheapest) way to do this
> > today would be with a Quinetic 2-gang switch on the bedside table and
> > individual receivers for each light.

> 2 pullcords is as easy as it gets. Colour one to avoid confusion.

You don't need to colour thencords, just use different ends.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

Andrew

unread,
Mar 8, 2020, 3:24:39 PM3/8/20
to
ALEXA !!!!, turn the lights off.

tabb...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 8, 2020, 3:47:15 PM3/8/20
to
On Sunday, 8 March 2020 16:47:25 UTC, Jeff Layman wrote:
> On 08/03/20 16:09, tabbypurr wrote:
> > On Sunday, 8 March 2020 12:28:01 UTC, Jeff Layman wrote:
> >> On 08/03/20 11:14, tabbypurr wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, 8 March 2020 04:44:04 UTC, Susan wrote:
> >>>> replying to Mark, Susan wrote:
> >
> >>>> Hi... In my bedroom I currently have a pull cord light switch. I’m thinking
> >>>> of having a long cord pendant light by the side of my bed... My question
> >>>> is.... Is it possible to buy a PULL CORD light switch that would operate each
> >>>> light fitting individually at separate times.... Kind regards.
> >>>
> >>> No. Such things existed long ago and it's doable to make them. Each pull of the cord turns a wheel 1/4 or 1/6th of a turn. Every other position is both off. Sticky out bits on the wheel press on microswitches - 6 way adds a 'both on' position. Or it could be done with a little digital logic & 2 relays.
> >>
> >> "Mark's" original post for this was on Homeowners Hub in 2008...
> >>
> >> Probably the easiest (but certainly not the cheapest) way to do this
> >> today would be with a Quinetic 2-gang switch on the bedside table and
> >> individual receivers for each light.
> >
> > 2 pullcords is as easy as it gets.
>
> Where do you get that idea?
> Quinetic receivers: find power cable to light fitting. Cut. Connect
> receiver. Repeat for other light fitting. Ensure transmitter and
> receivers talk to each other.
> Pullcords: find power cable to light. Cut. connect cut ends to Wago or
> other connector. Run cable to where pullcord switch will be placed.
> Drill hole in ceiling. Screw switch to ceiling. Pull cable through and
> connect. Connect to Wago. Repeat for other light fitting.

we don't know which is easier because we don't know where the current switching points are. I'm sure the OP can decide on that for themselves.

And you left out the unreliability / short-livedness of consumer electronics. I prefer to fit something that should still be good in 30 years +.


NT
0 new messages