Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Mains Water Pressure. What is "typical"?

22,396 views
Skip to first unread message

Vortex5

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 2:44:27 PM12/6/09
to
Today I measured my incoming mains water pressure to be a little over 10
bar. About 145 PSI. About 100 metres "head"

Quite honestly I was surprised because instinctively I would have expected
it to be somewhat lower. What is normal though? Is 10 bar unusual?

It's never especially bothered me because I have an IMI pressure regulator
taking the in-house pressure down to about 3 bar....however the regulator
started playing up recently causing the in house static pressure to increase
a lot which could be quite alarming when filling a kettle.

The regulator is now fixed....and I am just curious.

Ron Lowe

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 2:46:59 PM12/6/09
to

That's high.

Normal is around 3-4 bar, but I've seen as high as 7. I've never seen 10.

--
Ron

Bob Minchin

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 2:54:53 PM12/6/09
to
I'd expect 2-4 bar.

Bob

Tim W

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 2:58:52 PM12/6/09
to
Ron Lowe <d...@null.com>
wibbled on Sunday 06 December 2009 19:46

Yes. 4+/- bar is quite common. Mine is 7.5bar, limited to 5 bar by
regulator. 7.5 bar is pretty crazy - couldn't imagine what 10 would be like.

Without a regulator, that would be right at the limit for a lot of
equipment.

--
Tim Watts

This space intentionally left blank...

Steve Walker

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 3:39:34 PM12/6/09
to
Vortex5 wrote:
> Today I measured my incoming mains water pressure to be a little over 10
> bar. About 145 PSI. About 100 metres "head"
>
> Quite honestly I was surprised because instinctively I would have
> expected it to be somewhat lower. What is normal though? Is 10 bar
> unusual?

Good grief, that's at the limit of my air compressor. Your plumbing must
be made of extra-thick steel pipe.... :o)


Vortex5

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 4:26:51 PM12/6/09
to

"Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message
news:hfh2ds$rhm$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Some years ago I recall measuring the pressure at about 8 bar, but have lost
the pressure gauge.

This measurement was taken with a brand new "monument tools" gauge I
purchased recently.

I originally installed the regulator after fitting a segment of Hep2O
internally and was uncomfortable about such high pressures with plastic
(incidentally Hep2O is rated to at least 12 Bar safe pressure at room temp
so I was being paranoid).

I'm going to borrow another pressure gauge just to be sure I don't have
dodgy equipment! Will also call the waterco to see what they have to say.

Phil L

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 4:53:08 PM12/6/09
to

They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the stoptap,
which is what you should have done before buying a regulator.

--
Phil L
RSRL Tipster Of The Year 2008


ephrai...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 4:59:35 PM12/6/09
to
My guess is "3-ish"

I got a bit concerned about some work I was doing, 'phoned our water
provider and asked. We'll check they said.
I awaited their call.
Meanwhile I asked No 1 son, Civil Engineer in water elsewhere in UK
answered,
"Don't be daft, most are about 3bar + or -. "
Then our Co called back... The Chief Engineer of the water Co.
where I live called back. He replied it's about 3.5-4 when it leaves
our header where you live, so based on your postcode, 3 bar would be a
good number!

Ho Hum
EP

Vortex5

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:05:46 PM12/6/09
to
>> I'm going to borrow another pressure gauge just to be sure I don't
>> have dodgy equipment! Will also call the waterco to see what they
>> have to say.
>
> They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the
> stoptap, which is what you should have done before buying a regulator.
>
> --
> Phil L
> RSRL Tipster Of The Year 2008
>

Why on earth would they say that? It won't make any difference to the
static pressure.

....or is there a pressure regulator at the exterior stop tap tap? (I find
that hard to believe)

Harry Bloomfield

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:09:46 PM12/6/09
to
Phil L formulated the question :

> They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the stoptap,
> which is what you should have done before buying a regulator.

Partially closing the stop tap, will not affect the pressure, except
when there is flow. The static pressure will remain the same as before.

--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk


Phil L

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:14:11 PM12/6/09
to
Vortex5 wrote:
>
> Why on earth would they say that? It won't make any difference to the
> static pressure.


So even when the tap's just trickling, the water's at 10 bar?

what if it's turned down so low that it's just a slow drip when fully open,
is it still at 10 bar then?

>
> ....or is there a pressure regulator at the exterior stop tap tap? (I
> find that hard to believe)

--

ephrai...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:17:56 PM12/6/09
to
Just another thought:
Turning the supply valve or tap down isn't really a solution if the
pressure is as high as you suggest.
Clamping down a valve may reduce the flow but it won't change the
pressure. When the flow stabilises, the pressure will be the same.
It's a bit like volts and amps. "Volts is pressure, Amps is flow"

Please no flames...... the OT has a pressure (volts) problem not a
flow (amps) problem so squeezing the flow won't help.

I remain curious about the pressure/head being reported in the
original post. I suspect that most providers in UK don't supply water
much above 3, 4 or 5 bar.

EP

Vortex5

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:19:43 PM12/6/09
to

"Phil L" <neverc...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:T0WSm.12693$Ym4....@text.news.virginmedia.com...

> Vortex5 wrote:
>>
>> Why on earth would they say that? It won't make any difference to the
>> static pressure.
>
>
> So even when the tap's just trickling, the water's at 10 bar?
>
> what if it's turned down so low that it's just a slow drip when fully
> open, is it still at 10 bar then?
>

When the internal tap is off, yes.

Phil L

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:27:45 PM12/6/09
to

Yes but it wouldn't stay at that pressure for more than a second or two when
using a tap, so filling a kettle, as you mentioned in your OP, wouldn't be
'alarming'

Vortex5

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:28:00 PM12/6/09
to

<ephrai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:abecb3e3-b28e-4de0...@o23g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...

What really confuses me is that there are plenty of houses around me on
higher land, none are more than about 20 metres ( - 2 bars) higher.

I could understand if pressure was (say) 5 bar, but cannot understand why I
see 10. hence the original post.

As I said previously first stop is to double-check the instrument. I'm
wondering if I can bodge up a connection to do this pneumatically at the
local garage.

js.b1

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:33:04 PM12/6/09
to
On Dec 6, 10:17 pm, "ephraim_p...@hotmail.com"

<ephraim_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Please no flames...... the OT has a pressure (volts) problem not a
> flow (amps) problem so squeezing the flow won't help.

Correct.

> I remain curious about the pressure/head being reported in the
> original post.  I suspect that most providers in UK don't supply
> water much above 3, 4 or 5 bar.

That's the typical range.

Water co's do play about with pressure, if works are undertaken they
drop it down noticeably, then ramp it back up once complete. The
problem with 10 bar is water hammer (flexible w/machine hoses) is
going to get brutal on the pipework.

Tim W

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:36:04 PM12/6/09
to
Phil L <neverc...@hotmail.co.uk>
wibbled on Sunday 06 December 2009 21:53


> They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the
> stoptap, which is what you should have done before buying a regulator.
>

Pardon?

Tim W

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:45:08 PM12/6/09
to
Phil L <neverc...@hotmail.co.uk>
wibbled on Sunday 06 December 2009 22:27

I beg to differ...

That's not a reliable method of regulating dynamic pressure, which will now
be all over the place depending on demand.

It also doesn't help any equipment that doesn't like such high pressures as
they will be seeing the static pressure regularly. It would also be a
potential disaster if the OP had mains pressure DHW and plastic.

Looking at an offcut of JG Speedfit pipe, I see the pressure ratings are:

12bar at 20C
4 bar at 82C
3 bar at 92C

The figure for 60C isn't given but I can't see JG pipe enjoying 10bar at
much over 40C if that.

IME, certain garden hoses (hello Screwfix) fail early at 7.5bar, so for
anyone with 10bar static pressure, I would rate it as a *very good* idea to
include a pressure regulator next to the stopcock. I found 7.5 bar a big
enough pain to include a regulator in my system. No real disadvantages and a
decent device does not reduce the flow (I tested this specifically). CAme in
very handy when I wanted to install a water heater that required <6bar (the
included pressure relief valve is set to 6bar).

Cheers

Tim

Harry Bloomfield

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:47:20 PM12/6/09
to
Phil L wrote :

> Vortex5 wrote:
>>
>> Why on earth would they say that? It won't make any difference to the
>> static pressure.
>
>
> So even when the tap's just trickling, the water's at 10 bar?
>
> what if it's turned down so low that it's just a slow drip when fully open,
> is it still at 10 bar then?

Note the mention of the words 'static pressure' by Vortex5. The word
static means in this case, no water flowing.

Harry Bloomfield

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:50:34 PM12/6/09
to
ephrai...@hotmail.com explained :

> Clamping down a valve may reduce the flow but it won't change the
> pressure. When the flow stabilises, the pressure will be the same.
> It's a bit like volts and amps. "Volts is pressure, Amps is flow"
>
> Please no flames...... the OT has a pressure (volts) problem not a
> flow (amps) problem so squeezing the flow won't help.

The word you are looking for is 'resistance' in the electrical sense.

A restriction to the flow of water could also be called resistance to
flow.

Phil L

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 5:55:54 PM12/6/09
to
Tim W wrote:
> Phil L <neverc...@hotmail.co.uk>
> wibbled on Sunday 06 December 2009 21:53
>
>
>> They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the
>> stoptap, which is what you should have done before buying a
>> regulator.
>>
>
> Pardon?

They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the stoptap,
which is what you should have done before buying a regulator.

HTH

Tim W

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 6:10:39 PM12/6/09
to
Phil L <neverc...@hotmail.co.uk>
wibbled on Sunday 06 December 2009 22:55

> Tim W wrote:
>> Phil L <neverc...@hotmail.co.uk>
>> wibbled on Sunday 06 December 2009 21:53
>>
>>
>>> They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the
>>> stoptap, which is what you should have done before buying a
>>> regulator.
>>>
>>
>> Pardon?
>
> They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the
> stoptap, which is what you should have done before buying a regulator.

I don;t think they will - see my other reply...

Mark

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 6:13:59 PM12/6/09
to
Phil L wrote:

so you went to the same school of plumbing as TMH?

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 7:29:36 PM12/6/09
to

"Phil L" <neverc...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8JVSm.12685$Ym4....@text.news.virginmedia.com...

> They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the
> stoptap, which is what you should have done before buying a regulator.

The static presure will burst equiment not rated to 10 bar. You NEED a PRV.

Tim W

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 7:38:03 PM12/6/09
to
Doctor Drivel <kill...@invalid.invalid>
wibbled on Monday 07 December 2009 00:29

Sometimes the man speaks sense - and this is one such occasion :)

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 7:42:32 PM12/6/09
to

"Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message
news:hfhipb$vtn$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

You are an idiot!

geoff

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 7:52:43 PM12/6/09
to
In message <hfhj2b$32b$1...@news.eternal-september.org>, Doctor Drivel
<kill...@invalid.invalid> writes

One for the archives there ...

--
geoff

Tim W

unread,
Dec 6, 2009, 9:15:10 PM12/6/09
to
Doctor Drivel <kill...@invalid.invalid>
wibbled on Monday 07 December 2009 00:42

Not a plantpot then?

Vortex5

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 1:32:56 AM12/7/09
to

>
> IME, certain garden hoses (hello Screwfix) fail early at 7.5bar, so for
> anyone with 10bar static pressure, I would rate it as a *very good* idea
> to
> include a pressure regulator next to the stopcock. I found 7.5 bar a big
> enough pain to include a regulator in my system. No real disadvantages and
> a
> decent device does not reduce the flow (I tested this specifically). CAme
> in
> very handy when I wanted to install a water heater that required <6bar
> (the
> included pressure relief valve is set to 6bar).
>
> Cheers
>
> Tim
>
> --
> Tim Watts
>
> This space intentionally left blank...
>


That's a good point on hoses.

The "spur" to my outside taps is upstream of the pressure regulator.

It's a real hassle replacing hose connectors all the time (because they get
blown off). ....and have had one "burst".


PeterC

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 4:56:38 AM12/7/09
to
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:45:08 +0000, Tim W wrote:

> It also doesn't help any equipment that doesn't like such high pressures as
> they will be seeing the static pressure regularly. It would also be a
> potential disaster if the OP had mains pressure DHW and plastic.
>
> Looking at an offcut of JG Speedfit pipe, I see the pressure ratings are:
>
> 12bar at 20C
> 4 bar at 82C
> 3 bar at 92C
>
> The figure for 60C isn't given but I can't see JG pipe enjoying 10bar at
> much over 40C if that.

Much the same for washing machine hoses, but lower pressures. In the rare
case of a machine that uses hot fill from a combi, the hose will be full of
hot water when the filling ceases and mains pressure on a hot hose...!

A few years ago I installed a Miele and that hose was much higher rated
than standard ones.
--
Peter.
The head of a pin will hold more angels if
it's been flattened with an angel-grinder.

ARWadsworth

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 5:04:40 AM12/7/09
to

"Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message
news:hfhofe$c76$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

It depends what page his Ladybird Book Of Insults is randomly opened to.

Adam

Tim W

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 5:15:48 AM12/7/09
to
ARWadsworth <adamwa...@blueyonder.co.uk>
wibbled on Monday 07 December 2009 10:04

>
> "Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message

>> Not a plantpot then?


>>
>> --
>> Tim Watts
>>
>
> It depends what page his Ladybird Book Of Insults is randomly opened to.
>
> Adam

Ah, the book with 3 pages:

Plantpot
Idiot
And something about blokes in dresses...

dennis@home

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 5:25:40 AM12/7/09
to

"Vortex5" <vortexvisio...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7o3lsqF...@mid.individual.net...

> The "spur" to my outside taps is upstream of the pressure regulator.
>
> It's a real hassle replacing hose connectors all the time (because they
> get blown off). ....and have had one "burst".

Mine blew a watering computer to bits.
Luckily I got a new one from the shop for free.
I had to fit a pressure regulator to stop the new one breaking.
Of course turning the stop tap down as suggested earlier would have resulted
in another blown up watering computer.

Jules

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 9:30:55 AM12/7/09
to
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:04:40 +0000, ARWadsworth wrote:
>>> You are an idiot!
>>
>> Not a plantpot then?
>>
>> --
>> Tim Watts
>
> It depends what page his Ladybird Book Of Insults is randomly opened to.

And which pages haven't been chewed (or otherwise soiled).

Vortex4

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 11:06:27 AM12/7/09
to

"dennis@home" <den...@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote in message
news:hfil75$o1u$1...@news.datemas.de...
Spoke to the South East Water today. "that sounds very high" they said.

An investigation is in progress.

Dave

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 11:46:56 AM12/7/09
to

Where does that rank against being called a plant pot then?

Dave

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 12:13:53 PM12/7/09
to

"Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message
news:hfhofe$c76$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

As well.

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 12:13:38 PM12/7/09
to

"geoff" <ra...@kateda.org> wrote in message
news:TFmnHodb...@demon.co.uk...

> In message <hfhj2b$32b$1...@news.eternal-september.org>, Doctor Drivel
> <kill...@invalid.invalid> writes
>>
>>"Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message

>>You are an idiot!


>
> One for the archives there ...

Fantastic to hear from you Maxie! How is the Paddy band going? You do play
to many drunken audiences? People like you make this world go round and are
a breath of fresh air. You really are. I hope you have stopped swearing at
people in the street and have a handle on the flatulence. Fantastic Maxie.
Truly fantastic.

Tim W

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 12:15:47 PM12/7/09
to
Dave <dave...@btopenworld.com>
wibbled on Monday 07 December 2009 16:46

Well, I feel aggrieved. Not special enough to get a proper name.

Have you noticed Drivel's creativity is down the pan of late. Must be the
new pills...

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 12:20:06 PM12/7/09
to

"Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message
news:hfikkk$aif$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

> ARWadsworth <adamwa...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> wibbled on Monday 07 December 2009 10:04
>
>>
>> "Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message
>
>>> Not a plantpot then?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tim Watts
>>>
>>
>> It depends what page his Ladybird Book Of Insults is randomly opened to.
>>
>> Adam
>
> Ah, the book with 3 pages:
>
> Plantpot
> Idiot
> And something about blokes in dresses...

You fill all three.

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 12:19:32 PM12/7/09
to

"ARWadsworth" <adamwa...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Yq4Tm.12793$Ym4....@text.news.virginmedia.com...

> It depends what page his Ladybird Book Of Insults is randomly opened to.

You need tagging.

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 12:18:56 PM12/7/09
to

"PeterC" <giraffe...@homecall.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ihqc28tzjyxm.26rqqy3cjfoq$.dlg@40tude.net...

> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:45:08 +0000, Tim W wrote:
>
>> It also doesn't help any equipment that doesn't like such high pressures
>> as
>> they will be seeing the static pressure regularly. It would also be a
>> potential disaster if the OP had mains pressure DHW and plastic.
>>
>> Looking at an offcut of JG Speedfit pipe, I see the pressure ratings are:
>>
>> 12bar at 20C
>> 4 bar at 82C
>> 3 bar at 92C
>>
>> The figure for 60C isn't given but I can't see JG pipe enjoying 10bar at
>> much over 40C if that.
>
> Much the same for washing machine hoses, but lower pressures. In the rare
> case of a machine that uses hot fill from a combi,

Rare??????

>the hose will be full of
> hot water when the filling ceases and mains pressure on a hot hose...!
>
> A few years ago I installed a Miele and that hose was much higher rated
> than standard ones.

With these sorts of pressures, it is best to have cold fill only. Most
washing machines are these days. Cold 30C washing liquid is very good. The
have a 1/4 turn tap under the sink at the front so the machine is turned off
after each wash, or have a remote operated water tap, available from S/fix
and the likes. Just hit he switch and the cold is off.

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 12:21:04 PM12/7/09
to

"Jules" <jules.rich...@remove.this.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.12.07...@remove.this.gmail.com...

Another pervo that needs tagging.

Grimly Curmudgeon

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 12:38:58 PM12/7/09
to
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember Ron Lowe <d...@null.com> saying
something like:

>
>That's high.
>
>Normal is around 3-4 bar, but I've seen as high as 7. I've never seen 10.

It's 10bar around here, but the main ressy is on a hillside a fair ways
up, probably 300' or more. Then there's the pumps...
Of course, the Council could put pressure regulators on the system, but
they'd rather keep their employees busy by having to repair the mains
blow-outs every few weeks. Utterly daft.

Grimly Curmudgeon

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 12:43:22 PM12/7/09
to
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "Phil L"
<neverc...@hotmail.co.uk> saying something like:

>They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the stoptap,
>which is what you should have done before buying a regulator.

Utter bollocks.

Tim W

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 1:09:25 PM12/7/09
to
Doctor Drivel <kill...@invalid.invalid>
wibbled on Monday 07 December 2009 17:20

If you've been fantacising about big blokes with hairy beards, in dresses,
you really do need help.

Or a Norwegian fisherman.

Jules

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 2:17:25 PM12/7/09
to
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:21:04 +0000, Doctor Drivel wrote:
>>> It depends what page his Ladybird Book Of Insults is randomly opened to.
>>
>> And which pages haven't been chewed (or otherwise soiled).
>
> Another pervo that needs tagging.

*cheers*


ARWadsworth

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 2:20:03 PM12/7/09
to

"Jules" <jules.rich...@remove.this.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.12.07....@remove.this.gmail.com...

Must have 4 pages in the book :-)

Adam

ARWadsworth

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 2:20:43 PM12/7/09
to

"Doctor Drivel" <kill...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:hfjdiq$7he$2...@news.eternal-september.org...


What with?

Adam

geoff

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 4:57:54 PM12/7/09
to
In message <hfikkk$aif$1...@news.eternal-september.org>, Tim W
<t...@dionic.net> writes

>ARWadsworth <adamwa...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> wibbled on Monday 07 December 2009 10:04
>
>>
>> "Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message
>
>>> Not a plantpot then?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tim Watts
>>>
>>
>> It depends what page his Ladybird Book Of Insults is randomly opened to.
>>
>> Adam
>
>Ah, the book with 3 pages:
>
>Plantpot
>Idiot
>And something about blokes in dresses...
>
Yes, the pratt can't tell the difference between a dress and a sarong

http://www.kateda.org/Kateda.org/Home.html


--
geoff

Dave

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 6:12:55 PM12/7/09
to

Adam, FFS I am trying to have a night cap here and my key board does not
like the spray. It copes, but it takes a week out of the shower to dry out.

Dave

Dave

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 6:15:00 PM12/7/09
to


Horse tranquillisers?

Dave

Jules

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 7:02:46 PM12/7/09
to
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:20:03 +0000, ARWadsworth wrote:
> Must have 4 pages in the book :-)

Ha! Doubtless a big potted Aspidistra on the front cover, too...


Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 8:04:15 PM12/7/09
to

"geoff" <ra...@kateda.org> wrote in message
news:WC4WmHLi...@demon.co.uk...

Fantastic Maxie. You are half naked resplendent in a flock! What a man!!!

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 8:02:25 PM12/7/09
to

"Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message
news:hfjgcm$hhs$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Help? So you help people get these blokes.
This one needs tagging.

Tim W

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 3:01:00 AM12/8/09
to
Doctor Drivel <kill...@invalid.invalid>
wibbled on Tuesday 08 December 2009 01:04

>
> "geoff" <ra...@kateda.org> wrote in message

>> Yes, the pratt can't tell the difference between a dress and a sarong


>>
>> http://www.kateda.org/Kateda.org/Home.html
>
> Fantastic Maxie. You are half naked resplendent in a flock! What a
> man!!!

Now run along and get some kleenex and tell nursie you need new sheets...

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 9:15:03 AM12/8/09
to

"Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message
news:hfl13s$h4j$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

> Doctor Drivel <kill...@invalid.invalid>
> wibbled on Tuesday 08 December 2009 01:04
>
>>
>> "geoff" <ra...@kateda.org> wrote in message
>
>>> Yes, the pratt can't tell the difference between a dress and a sarong
>>>
>>> http://www.kateda.org/Kateda.org/Home.html
>>
>> Fantastic Maxie. You are half naked resplendent in a frock! What a

>> man!!!
>
> Now run along and get some kleenex and tell nursie you need new sheets...

You are right, Maxie may need these things. What a man! And he plays in a
Paddy band dressed like that as well.

ARWadsworth

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 9:30:01 AM12/8/09
to

"Doctor Drivel" <kill...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:hfln1r$i3u$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

He made a song for you

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j72-_iF8F4Y&feature=PlayList&p=BC74A1405DCDB78D&index=40>

Adam

matthelliwell

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 9:46:14 AM12/8/09
to
On 6 Dec, 19:44, "Vortex5" <vortexvisionDELETET...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Today I measured my incoming mains water pressure to be a little over 10
> bar.  About 145 PSI.  About 100 metres "head"
>
> Quite honestly I was surprised because instinctively I would have expected
> it to be somewhat lower.  What is normal though?  Is 10 bar unusual?
>
> It's never especially bothered me because I have an IMI pressure regulator
> taking the in-house pressure down to about  3 bar....however the regulator
> started playing up recently causing the in house static pressure to increase
> a lot which could be quite alarming when filling a kettle.
>
> The regulator is now fixed....and I am just curious.

Well the taps I just bought are rated up to 6 bar so I'd certainly
have trouble. You include a turbine on the incoming mains to generates
a bit of electricity everytime you use the taps.

Matt

Roger Dewhurst

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 4:15:26 PM12/8/09
to
Vortex5 wrote:
> Today I measured my incoming mains water pressure to be a little over 10
> bar. About 145 PSI. About 100 metres "head"

Very high. High enough to burst a defective hot water cylinder and LD
polyethylene pipe. Is the reservoir on a hill nearby or does the
council keep the pressure high by pumping? 5 or 6 bar is much more
reasonable.


>
> Quite honestly I was surprised because instinctively I would have
> expected it to be somewhat lower. What is normal though? Is 10 bar
> unusual?
>
> It's never especially bothered me because I have an IMI pressure
> regulator taking the in-house pressure down to about 3 bar....however
> the regulator started playing up recently causing the in house static
> pressure to increase a lot which could be quite alarming when filling a
> kettle.

Is that what we call an Ajax valve?

R

Roger Dewhurst

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 4:23:30 PM12/8/09
to
Vortex5 wrote:
>
> <ephrai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:abecb3e3-b28e-4de0...@o23g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>> Just another thought:
>> Turning the supply valve or tap down isn't really a solution if the
>> pressure is as high as you suggest.
>> Clamping down a valve may reduce the flow but it won't change the
>> pressure. When the flow stabilises, the pressure will be the same.
>> It's a bit like volts and amps. "Volts is pressure, Amps is flow"
>>
>> Please no flames...... the OT has a pressure (volts) problem not a
>> flow (amps) problem so squeezing the flow won't help.
>>
>> I remain curious about the pressure/head being reported in the
>> original post. I suspect that most providers in UK don't supply water
>> much above 3, 4 or 5 bar.
>>
>> EP
>
> What really confuses me is that there are plenty of houses around me on
> higher land, none are more than about 20 metres ( - 2 bars) higher.
>
> I could understand if pressure was (say) 5 bar, but cannot understand
> why I see 10. hence the original post.
>
> As I said previously first stop is to double-check the instrument. I'm
> wondering if I can bodge up a connection to do this pneumatically at the
> local garage.

Get some hose. Fit a tyre valve at one end and connect the other to the
tap. Make sure that the hose is vertical and full of air. Turn on the
tap and measure the pressure with tyre pressure gauge.

R

Roger Dewhurst

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 4:26:02 PM12/8/09
to
js.b1 wrote:
> On Dec 6, 10:17 pm, "ephraim_p...@hotmail.com"

> <ephraim_p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Please no flames...... the OT has a pressure (volts) problem not a
>> flow (amps) problem so squeezing the flow won't help.
>
> Correct.

>
>> I remain curious about the pressure/head being reported in the
>> original post. I suspect that most providers in UK don't supply
>> water much above 3, 4 or 5 bar.
>
> That's the typical range.
>
> Water co's do play about with pressure, if works are undertaken they
> drop it down noticeably, then ramp it back up once complete. The
> problem with 10 bar is water hammer (flexible w/machine hoses) is
> going to get brutal on the pipework.

Water hammer occurs when flow is shut down suddenly. The water is not
compressible and has inertia. I believe that uPVC pipe has a safety
factor of at least 2 to protect against water hammer.

R

Doctor Drivel

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 7:07:36 PM12/8/09
to

"ARWadsworth" <adamwa...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:JptTm.13252$Ym4....@text.news.virginmedia.com...

>> You are right, Maxie may need these things. What a man! And he plays
>> in a Paddy band dressed like that as well.
>
> He made a song for you
>
> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j72-_iF8F4Y&feature=PlayList&p=BC74A1405DCDB78D&index=40>

Fantastic. I bet Maxie sings that song on the beach in the Far East up the
tree in that frock. What a man! Truly fantastic. Such a foot tapping tune
as well. Only Maxie can do that.

Geo

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 10:55:33 AM12/9/09
to
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:23:30 +1300, Roger Dewhurst <dewh...@wave.co.nz> wrote:


>Get some hose.
ok - how long (high) is required for the vertical air-filled bit?

>Fit a tyre valve at one end

Not sure how to do this?


--
Geo

Frank Erskine

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 11:21:06 AM12/9/09
to
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:55:33 GMT, Geo <hw9j...@dea.spamcon.org>
wrote:

Ingenuity...


This _is_ a diy group :-)

--
Frank Erskine

Geo

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 11:37:49 AM12/9/09
to
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:21:06 +0000, Frank Erskine <frank....@btinternet.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:55:33 GMT, Geo <hw9j...@dea.spamcon.org>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:23:30 +1300, Roger Dewhurst <dewh...@wave.co.nz> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Get some hose.
>>ok - how long (high) is required for the vertical air-filled bit?
>>
>>>Fit a tyre valve at one end
>>Not sure how to do this?
>
>Ingenuity...
>
>
>This _is_ a diy group :-)

Yebbut - I wasn't sure if the duct tape would hold...

--
Geo

becks...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 8, 2016, 9:54:56 AM7/8/16
to
Domestic mains pressure depends on where you live how many houses it has to serve and how tall the buildings are. Example on a main road in London you would expect the main pressure to be 10 bar or so, but in very remote places you should expect low pressure e.g. in the lake district where there is very little housing for miles apart. You Should expect about 3 bar pressure in some remote areas. Most domestic taps and boilers can run off 1 bar pressure, but if you had a house three stories high then this would not be enough pressure and your water will come out at a drisel or not at all on the top floor. 10 bar mains pressure is pretty standard now. Just imagine all your neighbours getting up at 7 in the morning all wanting a shower at the same time? That is a large demand on supply! You may even notice that a some parts of the day you have better pressure than other times of the day depending on the demand on the supply.

Tim+

unread,
Jul 8, 2016, 10:30:55 AM7/8/16
to
<becks...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 10 bar mains pressure is pretty standard now.

Bravo on waiting 7 years to spout bollocks.

Tim

--
Trolls and troll feeders go in my killfile

Robin

unread,
Jul 8, 2016, 1:24:01 PM7/8/16
to
On 08/07/2016 15:30, Tim+ wrote:
> <becks...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 10 bar mains pressure is pretty standard now.
>
> Bravo on waiting 7 years to spout bollocks.
>
> Tim
>

Quite. Even after they replace Victorian mains in London they don't
supply anything like 10 bar - and a good job too given there are still
very many iron/lead communication/supply pipes.

And nice pun. Pity we can't apply 10 bar to his bollocks/her tits.

--
Robin
reply-to address is (intended to be) valid

stevi...@googlemail.com

unread,
Aug 5, 2016, 4:51:28 PM8/5/16
to
On Sunday, December 6, 2009 at 9:53:08 PM UTC, Phil L wrote:
> Vortex5 wrote:
> > "Tim W" <t...@dionic.net> wrote in message
> > news:hfh2ds$rhm$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> >> Ron Lowe <d...@null.com>
> >> wibbled on Sunday 06 December 2009 19:46
> >>
> >>> Vortex5 wrote:
> >>>> Today I measured my incoming mains water pressure to be a little
> >>>> over 10 bar. About 145 PSI. About 100 metres "head"
> >>>>
> >>>> Quite honestly I was surprised because instinctively I would have
> >>>> expected it to be somewhat lower. What is normal though? Is 10
> >>>> bar unusual?
> >>>>
> >>>> It's never especially bothered me because I have an IMI pressure
> >>>> regulator taking the in-house pressure down to about 3
> >>>> bar....however the regulator started playing up recently causing
> >>>> the in house static pressure to increase a lot which could be
> >>>> quite alarming when filling a kettle.
> >>>>
> >>>> The regulator is now fixed....and I am just curious.
> >>>
> >>> That's high.
> >>>
> >>> Normal is around 3-4 bar, but I've seen as high as 7. I've never
> >>> seen 10.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes. 4+/- bar is quite common. Mine is 7.5bar, limited to 5 bar by
> >> regulator. 7.5 bar is pretty crazy - couldn't imagine what 10 would
> >> be like.
> >>
> >> Without a regulator, that would be right at the limit for a lot of
> >> equipment.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tim Watts
> >>
> >> This space intentionally left blank...
> >>
> >
> > Some years ago I recall measuring the pressure at about 8 bar, but
> > have lost the pressure gauge.
> >
> > This measurement was taken with a brand new "monument tools" gauge I
> > purchased recently.
> >
> > I originally installed the regulator after fitting a segment of Hep2O
> > internally and was uncomfortable about such high pressures with
> > plastic (incidentally Hep2O is rated to at least 12 Bar safe pressure
> > at room temp so I was being paranoid).
> >
> > I'm going to borrow another pressure gauge just to be sure I don't
> > have dodgy equipment! Will also call the waterco to see what they
> > have to say.
>
> They'll tell you to turn the pressure down by partially closing the stoptap,
> which is what you should have done before buying a regulator.
>
> --
> Phil L
> RSRL Tipster Of The Year 2008

This is a common misconception, partially closing a stopcock down has no bearing on the water pressure, all it does is slow the flow rate down, to reduce pressure you need a pressure reducing valve set at the desired pressure on the draw of side.

The Other John

unread,
Aug 5, 2016, 6:07:35 PM8/5/16
to
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:51:25 -0700, steviehtcck wrote:

> On Sunday, December 6, 2009 at 9:53:08 PM UTC, Phil L wrote:

Did you miss ^^^^^^^^ ^ ^^^^ that bit? The post is nearly 7 years old!

--
TOJ.

Brian Gaff

unread,
Aug 6, 2016, 4:30:28 AM8/6/16
to
This very old thread seems to periodically get revitalised. I suspect a lot
of people do not understand the difference between flow rate and pressure.
You can often see an initial high pressure spurt if you just close down
the tap a bit but from what I've been told pressure reducers do not have
this pressure build up issue. However thus far despite our pressure being
quite high, nothing has been damaged, though you can clearly hear the
initial spurt when the washing machine solenoid valve initially opens.
Brian

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
<stevi...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:017bae05-ef2b-4d63...@googlegroups.com...

gar...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 4, 2018, 2:00:10 PM8/4/18
to
Here in Palm Desert California our home was built with TWO water pressure regulators. One for the house supply (set at 50psi) and one for the garden sprinkler supply. I have never bothered to determine the latter pressure. Static pressure from the street is 95psi which varies but not by much.
Construction methods here involve a cast concrete slab with the water pipes set in the concrete. To me, this is BLOODY LUNACY as anyone knows concrete flexes and cracks. Slab leaks are not at all uncommon. Guess why?

newshound

unread,
Aug 4, 2018, 2:36:30 PM8/4/18
to
On 04/08/2018 19:00, gar...@gmail.com wrote:
> Here in Palm Desert California our home was built with TWO water pressure regulators. One for the house supply (set at 50psi) and one for the garden sprinkler supply. I have never bothered to determine the latter pressure. Static pressure from the street is 95psi which varies but not by much.
> Construction methods here involve a cast concrete slab with the water pipes set in the concrete. To me, this is BLOODY LUNACY as anyone knows concrete flexes and cracks. Slab leaks are not at all uncommon. Guess why?
>
This being a UK group, we are not particularly interested.

Brian Gaff

unread,
Aug 5, 2018, 3:24:18 AM8/5/18
to
Yes well thinking ahead has never been a strong point of builders anywhere
in the world when it affects their bottom line profit.
Brian

--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
<gar...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d71b4159-5ada-4d65...@googlegroups.com...

paul....@btinternet.com

unread,
Oct 5, 2018, 9:59:40 AM10/5/18
to
Turning the stop tap down does not reduce the static pressure - sure it will reduce the flow and consequentially the running pressure, but as soon as you stop demand, even with the stop cock reduced to a minute pin hole, the standing pressure is exactly the same as the main line pressure - I would have thought it to be obvious to an expert

Tim+

unread,
Oct 6, 2018, 10:27:44 AM10/6/18
to
But you don’t have to be an expert to spot that you’re responding to 9
year old post. I think the problem may well have been resolved by now.

Tim


--
Please don't feed the trolls

whi...@gmail.com

unread,
Apr 4, 2019, 1:41:21 PM4/4/19
to
On Sunday, 6 December 2009 19:44:27 UTC, Vortex5 wrote:
> Today I measured my incoming mains water pressure to be a little over 10
> bar. About 145 PSI. About 100 metres "head"
>
> Quite honestly I was surprised because instinctively I would have expected
> it to be somewhat lower. What is normal though? Is 10 bar unusual?
>
> It's never especially bothered me because I have an IMI pressure regulator
> taking the in-house pressure down to about 3 bar....however the regulator
> started playing up recently causing the in house static pressure to increase
> a lot which could be quite alarming when filling a kettle.
>
> The regulator is now fixed....and I am just curious.

The water companies have a statutory minimum pressure they have to deliver. They should also have a statutory maximum of 4 bars. 4.5 is the rated working limit for many central heating boilers etc. Above that will damage them. A fitting blew off the mains supply in my mothers flat at somewhere between 7 and 11 bars. Three flats uninhabitable for 18 months and £200k insurance bill. No liability to the water company. Partially closing the main supply valve reduces flow, (and make noise) but does nothing to reduce pressure. You need a reducer on the system if it is above 4 bars. The big step down valves on the water mains they install now are not fail safe and have a habit of failing by giving full pressure - 11 bars etc. Not good for your system. The design rating of copper pipe is 12 bars but the fittings etc are your weak point. If your system is going to see over 4 bars it needs to be properly pressure tested and certified to take max pressure + 20%. This countries standards are so bad it makes me weep, (my pipework as well).

TOJ

unread,
Apr 4, 2019, 6:03:56 PM4/4/19
to
On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:41:18 -0700, whitwp wrote:

> On Sunday, 6 December 2009 19:44:27 UTC, Vortex5 wrote

Did you miss this ^^^^^^^^^^^ ? Over 9 years ago.

--
TOJ.

Brian Gaff

unread,
Apr 5, 2019, 3:35:40 AM4/5/19
to
I wonder how many pipes have failed due to high pressure in the 10 years
since the post replied to here?
Brian

--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
<whi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6da77b2a-17e9-43e7...@googlegroups.com...

Andrew Gabriel

unread,
Apr 5, 2019, 5:09:44 AM4/5/19
to
On 04/04/2019 18:41, whi...@gmail.com wrote:

> The water companies have a statutory minimum pressure they have to deliver. They should also have a statutory maximum of 4 bars. 4.5 is the rated working limit for many central heating boilers etc. Above that will damage them. A fitting blew off the mains supply in my mothers flat at somewhere between 7 and 11 bars. Three flats uninhabitable for 18 months and £200k insurance bill. No liability to the water company. Partially closing the main supply valve reduces flow, (and make noise) but does nothing to reduce pressure. You need a reducer on the system if it is above 4 bars. The big step down valves on the water mains they install now are not fail safe and have a habit of failing by giving full pressure - 11 bars etc. Not good for your system. The design rating of copper pipe is 12 bars but the fittings etc are your weak point. If your system is going to see over 4 bars it needs to be properly pressure tested and certified to take max pressure + 20%. This countries standards are so bad it makes me weep, (my pipework as well).
>

4 bar is for the sealed system. Mains pressure can be higher than that.

A pressure regulator only really works with a flow through it. The
static pressure (when no flow) will always be higher than the set point
(although not necessarily the fill input pressure - that depends on the
volume of pipework downstream). The downstream plumbing must be able to
handle the static pressure, not just the regulators set point pressure.

--
Andrew

The Natural Philosopher

unread,
Apr 5, 2019, 6:24:42 AM4/5/19
to
On 05/04/2019 10:09, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
> On 04/04/2019 18:41, whi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> The water companies have a statutory minimum pressure they have to
>> deliver. They should also have a statutory maximum of 4 bars. 4.5 is
>> the rated working limit for many central heating boilers etc. Above
>> that will damage them. A fitting blew off the mains supply in my
>> mothers flat at somewhere between 7 and 11 bars. Three flats
>> uninhabitable for 18 months and £200k insurance bill. No liability to
>> the water company. Partially closing the main supply valve reduces
>> flow, (and make noise) but does nothing to reduce pressure. You need a
>> reducer on the system if it is above 4 bars. The big step down valves
>> on the water mains they install now are not fail safe and have a habit
>> of failing by giving full pressure - 11 bars etc. Not good for your
>> system. The design rating of copper pipe is 12 bars but the fittings
>> etc are your weak point. If your system is going to see over 4 bars it
>> needs to be properly pressure tested and certified to take max
>> pressure + 20%. This countries standards are so bad it makes me weep,
>> (my pipework as well).
>>
>
> 4 bar is for the sealed system. Mains pressure can be higher than that.
>
> A pressure regulator only really works with a flow through it.

Not so.

> The
> static pressure (when no flow) will always be higher than the set point
> (although not necessarily the fill input pressure - that depends on the
> volume of pipework downstream). The downstream plumbing must be able to
> handle the static pressure, not just the regulators set point pressure.
>
That is just plain WRONG.

For example as I found out recently my mains pressure HW cylinder has a
regulator on the input. When the pressure rises above 2.1 bar it shuts
off flow into the tank completely. There is an air bubble pressure
maintainer so that there is 'elasticity' in the system.

The valve on your loo shuts off input completely. That does not mean the
cistern is at 10 bar!

You are thinking of flow reduction as a means to achieve pressure
reduction. Then what you say applies, but that is not what a proper
pressure reducer does.

--
"Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and
higher education positively fortifies it."

- Stephen Vizinczey

Chris B

unread,
Apr 5, 2019, 9:59:07 AM4/5/19
to
On 05/04/2019 11:24, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 05/04/2019 10:09, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
>> On 04/04/2019 18:41, whi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>> A pressure regulator only really works with a flow through it.
>
> Not so.
>
>> The static pressure (when no flow) will always be higher than the set
>> point (although not necessarily the fill input pressure - that depends
>> on the volume of pipework downstream). The downstream plumbing must be
>> able to handle the static pressure, not just the regulators set point
>> pressure.
>>
> That is just plain WRONG.

That was my initial thoughts as well, but I think it depends on just how
pedantic he is being

http://www.beswick.com/basics-pressure-regulators

shows the principle of zero flow rate regulators and goes on to define

Lock Up Pressure
“Lockup pressure” is the pressure above the set-point that is required
to completely shut the regulator valve off and insure that there is no flow.

But I suspect that for domestic plumbing applications the difference
between lock up pressure and set point pressure will be lost in the noise.



>
> For example as I found out recently my mains pressure HW cylinder has a
> regulator on the input.  When the pressure rises above 2.1 bar it shuts
> off flow into the tank completely. There is an air bubble pressure
> maintainer so that there is 'elasticity' in the system.
>
> The valve on your loo shuts off input completely. That does not mean the
> cistern is at 10 bar!
>
> You are thinking of flow reduction as a means to achieve pressure
> reduction. Then what you say applies, but that  is not what a proper
> pressure reducer does.

No I think he is being very pedantic

>


--
Chris B (News)

mdria...@gmail.com

unread,
May 20, 2019, 2:13:15 PM5/20/19
to
I think 3 to 4 bar is better water pressure but it's depend our use water system

rab...@waitrose.com

unread,
Aug 5, 2020, 8:00:29 AM8/5/20
to

rab...@waitrose.com

unread,
Aug 5, 2020, 8:01:25 AM8/5/20
to
You are lucky we have only 1.2 Bar

Dave Liquorice

unread,
Aug 5, 2020, 8:58:26 AM8/5/20
to
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 05:00:23 -0700 (PDT), rab...@waitrose.com wrote:

>> Today I measured my incoming mains water pressure to be a little
over
>> 10 bar. About 145 PSI. About 100 metres "head"

Ouch, I'm surprised, are you sure of the accuracy of the measuring
device?

Most (metal) domestic plumbing bits are only rated to 10 bar. Plastic
and hot a lot lower. A little bell is ringing that says the maximum
mains pressure ought to be about 6 bar. See what the Ofwat site has
to say?

--
Cheers
Dave.



The Other John

unread,
Aug 5, 2020, 10:10:12 AM8/5/20
to
On Wed, 05 Aug 2020 05:01:22 -0700, raboni wrote:

> You are lucky we have only 1.2 Bar

I expect the OP will be glad to hear that after 10+ years! (if they're
still alive!)

--
TOJ.

Tim+

unread,
Aug 5, 2020, 10:20:04 AM8/5/20
to
As this was all discussed back in 2009 I suspect it all been resolved by

Brian Gaff (Sofa)

unread,
Aug 5, 2020, 4:04:51 PM8/5/20
to
Why did you bring back an old thread for this from 2009?
Brian

--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
<rab...@waitrose.com> wrote in message
news:00a9a60a-939e-440f...@googlegroups.com...
0 new messages