> Was this some sort of swab to test for drugs or explosives?
Yes, and quite worthless, because it merely indicates that SOMEONE has
had contact with a chemical capable of creating a positive result has
touched the door handle at some point. About as legitimate as finding
drugs in a previous Attorney General's car as I recall - their
existence is the only evidence there is.
It is merely used to permit deeper search without warrant, and
routinely faked to achieve just that. A colleague who was hired to
investigate management fraud at BAe was harassed continually. When
arrested over "commercial material" on a hard drive he asked for the
seized laptop to be presented to the judge and promptly demonstrated
the hard drive bay was filled with epoxy - it was a thin-client
laptop. At least had the pleasure of calling the judge a twat to his
face.
That is how dense chemists in UK forensic labs earn a living far
beyond their level of incompetence and rapid promotion for fiddling
stuff, from falsifying evidence like the above to medical records to
police evidence with intentionally atrocious process control. Runcorn
East Forensic Lab is stuffed with chemist polycrap who could not get
jobs except via ex former ICI staff. They do the most appallingly
crude lash ups, for example quite literally biro over liquid paper on
every single page of medical records and make the mistake of sending
the wrong one to the wrong lawyer and then boast at what they did
openly. Unsurprisingly the lab is being sued by most UK police forces
who used it, both Cheshire & Merseyside police will not co-operate
with other police forces so with a bit of luck they turn up in person
and we get to see the police shoot the police. This is the police that
has spent under FOI disclosure £490,000 on helicopter flight hours
over a single 22 line of houses (11 semi) to try and find the one with
drugs grown in it. Walk around with a washing line clip on your nose
and it is pretty bloody obvious such that even the shops nearby tell
the police to uck off they are so sick of it.
Copies of police evidence against a "new" university (Edgehill) faking
IT qualifications in return for money was found in a local private
school bin, two staff at the school own a recruitment agency handling
IT staff and many of the former students of the school were found to
have IT qualifications becoming instant supervisors but could not
answer the most basic question by other ex students who were in fact
qualified. Likewise the "supervisors" had received benefits whilst at
university from Mossley Hill benefits agencies, but had no assets to
recover money from so no action taken incredibly whilst an overpaid
wheelchair bound individual had to repay £350. Same forensic lab
involved in rewriting qualification certificates, I know because my
final year project was submitted 6 times across Liverpool when I sent
a copy to the examining board.
Evidence is that which a political agenda or quota seeks, one reason
why judicial process is about investigating that which we have already
engineered. You fiddle the data before it gets to court or before it
gets to other experts so the conclusion is automatically ensured. Same
with MP expenses when the civil service eventually released paperwork
with all evidence blacked out after the ex SAS man had exposed the
real data first - and put several who would not be prison in there. I
guess the SAS got fed up with crap intelligence or seizing Kuwait land
rights documents... :-)
So yes, it is about appearances. Olympics should get the USA rather
hot n bothered...