Are they selling the low self discharge types?
A few years ago, just after I'd bought a Canon PS A720 IS from
Jessops mail order with a 25 quid off coupon, I paid their shop a
visit and noticed that all the AA rechargables they had on the shelves
were just the ordinary high self discharge rate types (and over priced
at that!).
I was rather surprised at this seeming total lack of awareness of the
Sanyo Eneloop batteries which had been on the market for several years
by then. I thought that if anyone would be stocking the Eneloops, it
would be a photographic shop since it's such a 'no-brainer' match to
the digital P&S camera usage pattern. I'm not surprised that Jessops
went out of business not long after with such a lack of interest in
their customers' needs.
In the end, I landed up buying the Uniross Hybrio LSD cells from my
local Wilkinsons store (the only brand of LSD NiMH AA cells readily
available in the UK at that time). They cost £6.49 for a pack of four
which was considerably cheaper than the Argos price point of £9.99.
I think I paid £4.49 for four AA Tronic 'ready to use' 2300mAH cells
in Aldi a few years ago and about the same more recently for the Activ
branded versions that came on sale in Aldi about a year back.
I've now got a more than ample stock of rechargable AAs for that A720
IS camera . The Superzoom bridge camera, a Canon SX40 HS, uses a
proprietry 7.4v 920mAH (2 cell) Li-ion battery which precludes the
need to add any more AA cells to my stockpile.
I simply bought a cheap compatable Li-ion battery for a tenner from
play.com to use as a spare battery to cover a day's worth of heavy
'tourist' usage and this worked out just fine (I averaged 485 photos a
day(plus some movie footage) on a 14 day cruise to Norway nearly 2
years ago with one day's shooting total peaking at 1578!).
The battery charger supplied with the SX40 HS only takes about 2
hours to fully recharge each of these batteries ready for another
day's "Shoot" so owning just that one additional battery fulfils my
needs quite nicely.
Ignoring the issue of 'contact resistance', a pair of 2100mAH LSD
NiMH cells stores about 5WH, the smaller in volume (and lighter in
weight) Li-ion battery stores just under 7WH. Although a replacement
set of AAs is far cheaper than the Li-ion battery (even at the bargain
price of £9.99 - I've seen the 'genuine Canon article' priced at £23
and even higher), the much better battery contact quality(gold plated
contacts) provides a more consistent result which, at the 10 quid
mark, justifies the higher price (especially so when I only need to
carry a single additional spare in the bag and the low battery warning
actually _does_ mean 'low battery' as opposed to low voltage because
it's either low battery _or_ high contact resistance in the case of AA
cell powered kit).
I suspect the two cameras have about the same power consumption so
the 3 fold battery voltage increase of the Li-ion battery over the 2
cell NiMH battery reduces the current to one third and the contacts to
two versus four which considerably reduces contact resistance problems
greatly assisted by the use of gold plated contacts (where the higher
price of the Li-ion battery can more easily absorb the extra cost of
such a 'luxury feature').
I'm no fan of 'proprietry' battery formats but, in this case, it
would seem to be a justified practice. However, even better would be
kit designed to run off a single 3.7v Li-ion cell such as the type
used in laptop battery packs (18650C4B 2000mAH) since they could be
mass produced for such use and you'd only be throwing a battery away
for the sake of just the one and only cell failure at end of life
instead of a set of 2 or 3 or even 4 out of which only one of the
cells has to suffer premature failure to render the other cell or
three unusable.
The other advantage of single cell 'batteries' is that you can pack
that bit more WH energy capacity into a given battery volume compared
to a multi-celled battery and no need for individual cell health
monitoring and control circuitry to be integrated into the battery
itself. The monitoring can be done by the battery management circuitry
in the portable 'gadget' itself (as must be the case for most mobile
phones) which reduces 'battery' manufacturing costs to a minimum.
Taking a quick look at the wiki article on Li-ion battery technology
suggests it'll be quite a few years yet before the classic AA NiMH
cell is consigned to the pages of history so the situation in regard
to reliable and effective AA Battery Chargers seems set to remain
pertinent for the foreseeable future.
IME, the issue of contact resistance is a significant factor that
afflicts AA chargers and the AA powered kit alike. Care has to be
taken to maintain these contacts in a clean state to get the best out
these batteries in regard to their charging and use. Even a high
quality charger will suffer degraded performance from bad contact
syndrome.
All I can tell you about AA chargers is that there is a very wide
range available starting from 'cheap and cheerful' all the way up to
very expensive units that can not only charge each of from 4 to 8
cells individually but also log the AH both into and out of each cell.
These expensive chargers are useful if you're in charge of a sizeable
herd of AA cells and you're trying to keep track of the performance of
each individual cell, usually with an eye to making sure to use them
in matched pairs, triplets or quads as well as deciding when they're
past their best and in need of being culled from the herd.
I suspect the OP's needs lie somewhere between 'cheap and cheerful'
and 'Bloody damn expensive' so I can only recommend that he googles
for more info on the subject of AA chargers before choosing one.