Yes. Although cheaper petrol machines don't have them.
>
> And how true is it that the machines at lower RPM last a lot longer?
>
Hmmm! Bit of a marketing thing :-)
In the early days HPC's used plunger pumps like the legendary CAT or the
Hawk, Speck etc
>
http://www.catpumps.com/products/pumps-positive-displacement-triplex-piston.asp
These were designed to be belt driven at a fairly slow rpm. They had a
relatively long piston stroke. Great for flow rate, great on suction &
priming.
This were in tut days of a proper balance between pressure & volume.
Nowadays pressure is king.
Typical commercial machine when I were a lad was 70 bar @ 12 to 15
litres/min Cleaned better than 150 bar @ 9 litres/min.
Most HPC's these days use direct drive axial swash plate pumps which
have a very short piston stroke - good for pressure, not so good for
flow rate. They can be run much faster - but their main attraction is
that they are very cheap to make.
I suppose a slower running machine would last longer, but most of it is
marketing.