Roger Mills <
watt....@gmail.com> writes:
>On 17/07/2014 15:21,
no_...@thanks.com wrote:
>> A small kitchen has a large door opening into it and the door always
>> seems to be in the way. The options seem to be to convert it to a
>> bi-fold or put it on a sliding rail ... sliding looks like the better
>> option as there's a convenient recess that the door can slide into and
>> be completely out of the way.
>>
>> Can anyone recommend sliding door or bi-fold conversions that don't need
>> a floor track?
>>
>> I don't want to remove the skirting in the area that the door will slide
>> into so plan to leave the architrave as well and just extend the door
>> lining to be close to the door ... is there a better way of doing this?
>Bi-fold is easier to the extent that the two halves together will be the
>same width as the existing door, so will fit into the rebates without
>having to fill them or remove the architrave. But if you cut an ordinary
>internal door in half, you'll just have cardboard honeycomb in the
>middle - so you'll have to construct two new vertical frame members, and
>glue them in place.
Which is a huge hassle. Wouldn't have started if I'd known enough to
realise that I'd have to cut out the honeycomb with a multi-tool, buy a
small table saw to cut timber from 38mm down to 27mm (was amazed to
discover that nowadays B&Q and the like won't cut small timber for
you), glue in place with expanding glue, then samd the result to the
precise width required.
>Actually, your woes won't stop there!
They didn't! The doors were remade very accurately (I was nervous), but
the 100 year old tenement building had an entire end wall rebuilt from
the ground up some years ago, and as a result evrything is slightly
lopsided. Not even trapezoid.
And bifold requires accurate positioning.
So more planing and sanding.
OTOH it doesn't block the opening as some sliding door arrangements
would do, and there's now room for a bedside table.
>Whether
>sliding or bi-fold, you'll have to reduce the height of the door -
>either at the top or bottom, or both - resulting in more frame
>re-construction.
>If you go for a sliding door, the door needs to be slightly wider than
>the aperture so - if using the existing door - you'll need to fill the
>rebates in the door frame.[1] You'll get a far better job if you remove
>the architrave and skirting, but you'll then have to beautify the wall
>from which it's removed - although it may not be urgent in the recess if
>if doesn't show. If you leave them on, the door will stand out a long
>way from the wall and you'll need a very odd section of timber to fill
>the rebates and come out flush with the architrave.
>[1] I've just measured the sliding door in the room I use as an office,
>and that is a 30" door in a 28" frame - so, if you wanted to achieve a
>similar overlap, you'd need to do more than just filling the rebates.
>--
>Cheers,
>Roger
>____________
>Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom
>checked.
--
Windmill, Til...@NoneHome.com Use t m i l l
J.R.R. Tolkien:- @ S c o t s h o m e . c o m
All that is gold does not glister / Not all who wander are lost