Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Are Metposts any good for round timber posts?

325 views
Skip to first unread message

r.l...@tesco.net

unread,
Sep 6, 2000, 3:25:18 PM9/6/00
to
Are Metposts any good for round timber posts?

Just to hold up a short lenght of decorative screening. Poles are
about 4 or 5 inch diameter.

Metposts just look quick and ideal - if they'll hold round poles!!

Malcolm Race

unread,
Sep 6, 2000, 4:40:51 PM9/6/00
to
In article <39b699a8...@news.clara.net>, <URL:mailto:r.l...@tesco.net>
wrote:
If you can square off the post to fit into the 3inch square socket!

Wickes do a similar thing, without the brand name but, IIRC, cheaper

Malcolm
--
Is Microsoft another name for world domination?
A tree is known by its fruits, not by its roots.

Ed Sirett

unread,
Sep 6, 2000, 4:57:17 PM9/6/00
to
I have found a number of shortcomings with metposts.

1) Extremely difficuly to get the post driven in plumb _and_ orientated (but
that's not a problem if you are using round posts.
2) Even the long metposts tend to lean over after a relatively short while.

However, given that you want to try using them I'd use 3" met posts and
simply square off the round posts.

HTH

Ed Sirett
Property Maintainer - North London.


r.l...@tesco.net wrote in message <39b699a8...@news.clara.net>...

cormaic

unread,
Sep 6, 2000, 7:14:15 PM9/6/00
to
'Twas Wed, 06 Sep 2000 19:25:18 GMT, when r.l...@tesco.net enriched
all our lives with these words:

>Are Metposts any good for round timber posts?

Form a sentence from the following words.....

Plague Avoid Like The. ;~)

--
cormaic - paving pages at http://www.tmac.clara.co.uk/paving/
Culcheth - Last Updated on Jul 25th 2000

cormaic CAN BE FOUND AT tmac DOT clara DOT co DOT uk

leo

unread,
Sep 6, 2000, 6:11:15 PM9/6/00
to
In article <39b699a8...@news.clara.net>, r.l...@tesco.net writes

Why not square off the bottom 6 inches of the poles? 5 minutes with an
axe.


--
leo

Tony Williams

unread,
Sep 7, 2000, 4:15:57 AM9/7/00
to
In article <7dcdrs058jmcp6jki...@4ax.com>,

cormaic <cor...@NOSPAMTODAYTHANKStmac.clara.net> wrote:
> 'Twas Wed, 06 Sep 2000 19:25:18 GMT, when r.l...@tesco.net enriched
> all our lives with these words:

> >Are Metposts any good for round timber posts?

> Form a sentence from the following words.....

> Plague Avoid Like The. ;~)

Butbutbut..... Don't they have something like a
Design Council Award? I mean, come on now, if
they have a DCA....... :-)

--
Tony Williams.

Jon Beaumont

unread,
Sep 7, 2000, 5:19:57 AM9/7/00
to
In article <1egk86u.14ilukw1s6x5d0N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>, Steve Firth
<%steve%@malloc.co.uk> writes
>So maybe this isn't of much interest to you. BTW, I used metposts
>because I wanted to bolt the posts onto a concrete platform. I didn't
>have the option of doing the sensibel thing which is... Dig post holes,
>and use Post Fix to fix the poles upright. It's quick, easy and cheaper
>than Metposts. Simply dig the hole slightly larger than the post. Get an
>accomplice to hold the post upright, dump in a bag of Post Fix, then
>water it gently and leave it for a few minutes to set.
>
>I think it's Post Fix, it may be Post Set... available from Wickes,
>works well.
>
I'd agree, Metpost are more trouble than they're worth. Post fix (or
whatever its called) is much easier, cheaper and works better in my
experience.
--
Jon Beaumont

leo

unread,
Sep 7, 2000, 6:28:47 PM9/7/00
to
In article <44tfrsglvsgqvg4ao...@4ax.com>, Andy Dingley
<din...@codesmiths.com> writes

>
>>Why not square off the bottom 6 inches of the poles?
>
>Even though they're pressure treated, round posts aren't rotproof all
>the way through. Taking the sides off is going to encourage early
>rot.

Dip bare wood in creosote - works for me

>>5 minutes with an axe.
>

>Maybe 5 minutes with a properly sharpened side axe, in the hands of
>someone who can use an axe. One of B&Q's finest blunt woodchoppers
>though, and you're just making firewood.

I'm assuming a reasonable axe or hatchet, properly sharpened. I've
trimmed and pointed several hundred posts with a hatchet and it's not
difficult.


--
leo

Malcolm Race

unread,
Sep 8, 2000, 4:54:15 PM9/8/00
to
In article <44tfrsglvsgqvg4ao...@4ax.com>, Andy Dingley
<URL:mailto:din...@codesmiths.com> wrote:

>
> Metposts are OK (IMHE), provided you use the long ones (not the
> "repair" version) and you have a soil that doesn't shrink when dry.
>
>
I used some on clay under 100 yr old oak trees and they were still where
I put them 7 yrs later

Malcolm
--
Is Microsoft another name for world domination?

Love doesn't make the world go around, love is what makes the ride worthwhile.

Simon Avery

unread,
Sep 8, 2000, 6:26:01 PM9/8/00
to
leo <l...@lgab.demon.co.uk> wrote:

Hello leo

>> Even though they're pressure treated, round posts aren't
>> rotproof all the way through. Taking the sides off is
>> going to encourage early rot.

l> Dip bare wood in creosote - works for me

It won't penetrate more than a mm or so unless it's soaked, or
preferably soaked and heated.

That was the pre-tanalising trick, soak a pole in a tub of tar or oil
and heat it for 48 or so hours.

l> I'm assuming a reasonable axe or hatchet, properly
l> sharpened. I've trimmed and pointed several hundred posts
l> with a hatchet and it's not difficult.

Cutting to a square is trickier though. I've pointed 2,000 round fence
posts in a day using a PTO sawbench, which has got to be one of the
most boring jobs around.

--
Simon Avery, Devon, UK

0 new messages