OT: Trump on LBC

[Dave Plowman (News)]

Just wondering if Trump endorsing Boris and slagging Corbyn on LBC
yesterday will have the effect Trump (and Farage) intended?

I've a feeling many in the UK would do the exact opposite of what Trump
wants. ;-)

Quite a feather in the cap for LBC, though.

Wonder if any PM has appeared on a similar phone in prog in other than the
UK?

--
*Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine*

Dave Plowman da...@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

[whisky-dave]

On Friday, 1 November 2019 11:59:12 UTC, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
> Just wondering if Trump endorsing Boris and slagging Corbyn on LBC
> yesterday will have the effect Trump (and Farage) intended?
>
> I've a feeling many in the UK would do the exact opposite of what Trump
> wants. ;-)

It's the best reason I've heard in a long time for voting for Jeremy Corbyn.

[alan_m]

On 01/11/2019 11:54, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

> Quite a feather in the cap for LBC, though.

Only because Trump was talking to our mate Nigel who was hosting the
programme.

--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

[alan_m]

On 01/11/2019 12:57, whisky-dave wrote:

>
> It's the best reason I've heard in a long time for voting for Jeremy Corbyn.
>

Except that Trump was correct on this one point!

[whisky-dave]

On Friday, 1 November 2019 15:46:46 UTC, alan_m wrote:
> On 01/11/2019 12:57, whisky-dave wrote:
>
> >
> > It's the best reason I've heard in a long time for voting for Jeremy Corbyn.
> >
>
> Except that Trump was correct on this one point!

If so then that'll be a furst for Trump.

[Brian Gaff (Bed)]

It was a set up you know.

I'm sure the British public are not that shallow. I am tempted to suggest
Trump cannot have much to do if he can spend that long talking to an ex
politician on the radio.
Brian

--
--
From the Bed of Brian Gaff -
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
Today is Yesterdays Tomorrow.
"Dave Plowman (News)" <da...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:580c14b...@davenoise.co.uk...

[Brian Gaff (Bed)]

It was obviously a set up after all the President should have more to do
with his time than to chat to an ex politician on the phone on the radio.
The question is, what is the motive here?

Personally I cannot bear to listen to more than a few sound bytes of Trump
as he is either completely ignorant or a little bit mad. Some of the things
he says beggars belief and I'm not giving any of them the oxygen of quoting
them. He has enough hot air on his own. Brian

--
--
From the Bed of Brian Gaff -
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
Today is Yesterdays Tomorrow.
"Dave Plowman (News)" <da...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:580c14b...@davenoise.co.uk...

[Andy Burns]

Dave Plowman wrote:

> Quite a feather in the cap for LBC

Eddie Mair's a bit jealous ...
"If you're the president, give me a call"

[Chang]

"Dave Plowman (News)" <da...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:580c14b...@davenoise.co.uk...

> Just wondering if Trump endorsing Boris and slagging Corbyn on LBC
> yesterday will have the effect Trump (and Farage) intended?

I doubt many in the UK give a damn about that the fool spews.

> I've a feeling many in the UK would do the exact opposite of what Trump
> wants. ;-)

I doubt many take any notice of him.

[Peeler]

On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 05:51:15 +1100, Chang, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:

> I doubt

No intelligent person should give a shit what you doubt or don't doubt,
senile Ozzietard!

--
Kerr-Mudd,John addressing senile Rot:
"Auto-contradictor Rod is back! (in the KF)"
MID: <XnsA97071CF43...@85.214.115.223>

[The Natural Philosopher]

On 01/11/2019 12:00, Jethro_uk wrote:

> On Fri, 01 Nov 2019 11:54:13 +0000, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
>
>> Just wondering if Trump endorsing Boris and slagging Corbyn on LBC
>> yesterday will have the effect Trump (and Farage) intended?
>>
>> I've a feeling many in the UK would do the exact opposite of what Trump
>> wants. ;-)
>>
>> Quite a feather in the cap for LBC, though.
>>
>> Wonder if any PM has appeared on a similar phone in prog in other than
>> the UK?
>

> I would hope a slew of complaints to the US ambassador would be the first
> order of the day.
>
What a sad sick snoflake you are....

--
"First, find out who are the people you can not criticise. They are your
oppressors."
- George Orwell

[The Natural Philosopher]

On 01/11/2019 15:44, alan_m wrote:
> On 01/11/2019 11:54, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
>
>> Quite a feather in the cap for LBC, though.
>
> Only because Trump was talking to our mate Nigel who was hosting the
> programme.
>

Ftreather in the cap for LBC for employing him, then

[Ian Jackson]

In message <h2327b...@mid.individual.net>, alan_m
<ju...@admac.myzen.co.uk> writes

>On 01/11/2019 11:54, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
>
>> Quite a feather in the cap for LBC, though.
>
>Only because Trump was talking to our mate Nigel who was hosting the
>programme.
>

Although I find Nigel Farage's phone-ins interesting, and would
recommend listening to them, I doubt if any BBC programme presenter
would be permitted to have a regular 6 hours per week of air time for
what are essentially pro-Brexit party-political broadcasts.
--
Ian

[Marland]

Chang <js...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> "Dave Plowman (News)" <da...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:580c14b...@davenoise.co.uk...
>> Just wondering if Trump endorsing Boris and slagging Corbyn on LBC
>> yesterday will have the effect Trump (and Farage) intended?
>
> I doubt many in the UK give a damn about that the fool spews.
>
>> I've a feeling many in the UK would do the exact opposite of what Trump
>> wants. ;-)
>
> I doubt many take any notice of him.
>

We get plenty of practise on doing that with your postings.


GH

[Ian Jackson]

In message <qphpig$h1j$1...@news.albasani.net>, "Brian Gaff (Bed)"
<bri...@blueyonder.co.uk> writes

>It was obviously a set up after all the President should have more to
>do with his time than to chat to an ex politician on the phone on the
>radio. The question is, what is the motive here?
>
>Personally I cannot bear to listen to more than a few sound bytes of
>Trump as he is either completely ignorant or a little bit mad. Some of
>the things he says beggars belief and I'm not giving any of them the
>oxygen of quoting them. He has enough hot air on his own. Brian
>

In his half-hour 'chat' with Nigel Farage, I was actually quite
impressed by Trump's frankness and apparent honesty regarding his
opinions. Unlike the furore that followed Obama's innocuous 'back of the
queue' so-called 'interference' in our referendum, it's unlikely that
Trump's extremely disparaging remarks about Jeremy Corbyn's suitability
for the premiership, and about Boris Johnson's transition deal, will
generate anything like as much condemnation (certainly NOT from either
wing of the Brexit camp). But at least it has exposed Nigel Farage's
election policy of wanting Johnson to join him in going for a no-deal
Brexit, in the hope it will bring the pair of them both a glorious,
overwhelming victory.
--
Ian

[The Natural Philosopher]

Of course. They have 12 hours per day of what are essentially pro remain
party political broadcasts instead.


--
Truth welcomes investigation because truth knows investigation will lead
to converts. It is deception that uses all the other techniques.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Farage has playeds a shot to nothing. If tories join him, its a sign of
weakness in the tiories. If they dont, it's a sign of arrogance. He has
thrown down the no deal challenge as well.

No, its good tactics.

Out-Cummings Cummings...

[Andy Burns]

Ian Jackson wrote:

> at least it has exposed Nigel Farage's election policy of wanting
> Johnson to join him in going for a no-deal Brexit

If you've listened to Farage on LBC, that should hardly need "exposing"

[Ian Jackson]

In message <h238kj...@mid.individual.net>, Andy Burns
<use...@andyburns.uk> writes

Yes - I liked Eddie Mair's way of following Nigel's coup. Several
'presidential' callers rose well to the occasion.
--
Ian

[michael adams]

"Ian Jackson" <ianREMOVET...@g3ohx.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Z4WquxJ+...@brattleho.plus.com...

> In message <qphpig$h1j$1...@news.albasani.net>, "Brian Gaff (Bed)"
> <bri...@blueyonder.co.uk> writes
>>It was obviously a set up after all the President should have more to do with his time
>>than to chat to an ex politician on the phone on the radio. The question is, what is
>>the motive here?
>>
>>Personally I cannot bear to listen to more than a few sound bytes of Trump as he is
>>either completely ignorant or a little bit mad. Some of the things he says beggars
>>belief and I'm not giving any of them the oxygen of quoting them. He has enough hot air
>>on his own. Brian
>>
> In his half-hour 'chat' with Nigel Farage, I was actually quite impressed by Trump's
> frankness and apparent honesty regarding his opinions.

As are many people. That's the whole point about con artists and
bullshit merchants. Unless you're actually fact checking everything
that comes out of their mouths as they're saying it, then superficially
they can sound very convincing. Not least because they actually believe
all the bullshit themselves. It was the exact same with Blair.

> Unlike the furore that followed Obama's innocuous 'back of the queue' so-called
> 'interference' in our referendum, it's unlikely that Trump's extremely disparaging
> remarks about Jeremy Corbyn's suitability for the premiership, and about Boris
> Johnson's transition deal, will generate anything like as much condemnation (certainly
> NOT from either wing of the Brexit camp).

Possibly because people took Obama rather more seriously than they ever
did Trump. Like Boris Johnson he's a turn; worth listening to not for
his wisdom but for his entertainment value.

> But at least it has exposed Nigel Farage's election policy of wanting Johnson to join
> him in going for a no-deal Brexit, in the hope it will bring the pair of them both a
> glorious, overwhelming victory.

Contesting General Elections costs money. The real question is
probably whether Farage already has, or can secure the financial
backing, to back up his threats.


michael adams

...

[Andy Burns]

Ian Jackson wrote:

> I liked Eddie Mair's way of following Nigel's coup

I quite like that various ex-BBC presenters turn up on LBC, and are
given their voice rather than being wrapped in neutrality, I can even
usually listen to James O'Brien, David Lamy often gets a <click>

[harry]

He says he already has the money and funds continue to pour in.

[Fredxx]

On 02/11/2019 07:36:05, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 01/11/2019 12:00, Jethro_uk wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Nov 2019 11:54:13 +0000, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
>>
>>> Just wondering if Trump endorsing Boris and slagging Corbyn on LBC
>>> yesterday will have the effect Trump (and Farage) intended?
>>>
>>> I've a feeling many in the UK would do the exact opposite of what Trump
>>> wants. ;-)
>>>
>>> Quite a feather in the cap for LBC, though.
>>>
>>> Wonder if any PM has appeared on a similar phone in prog in other than
>>> the UK?
>>
>> I would hope a slew of complaints to the US ambassador would be the first
>> order of the day.
>>
> What a sad sick snoflake you are....

Why, governments seem quick to criticise any involvement of Russia in an
electrion, why not the USA too?

[Roger Hayter]

harry <harry...@btinternet.com> wrote:

> On Saturday, 2 November 2019 10:18:56 UTC, michael adams wrote:

>snip

> >
> > Contesting General Elections costs money. The real question is
> > probably whether Farage already has, or can secure the financial
> > backing, to back up his threats.
>
> He says he already has the money and funds continue to pour in.

Largely in six and seven figure donations, I expect.

--

Roger Hayter

[Rod Speed]

"harry" <harry...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:ff65f97f-801e-465f...@googlegroups.com...

But it remains to be seen if there is enough of it to do
a decent campaign in every seat and even if there is
he wont get even single MP elected anyway, you watch.

His problem is that there isnt even a single constituency
where he has enough support to get that candidate elected.

[Rod Speed]

"Fredxx" <fre...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:qpmcup$k42$1...@dont-email.me...

Different type of involvement.

The USA does in fact do the same sort of involvement in an
election in some countrys, but not currently in the UK election.

Trump and Obama were just expressing their opinion.

Plenty have done that about Trumps election and policys too.

[Peeler]

On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 04:39:25 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH trollshit>

Fuck off from normally evolved humans' ngs, you abnormal senile trolling
cretin!

[Peeler]

On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 04:17:17 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

> But it remains to be seen

What we WILL see here is YOU trolling on all these group like there was no
tomorrow, you subnormal senile idiot!

--
MrTu...@down.the.farm about senile Rot Speed:
"This is like having a conversation with someone with brain damage."
MID: <ps10v9$uo2$1...@gioia.aioe.org>

[whisky-dave]

On Friday, 1 November 2019 18:51:26 UTC, Chang wrote:
> "Dave Plowman (News)" <da...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:580c14b...@davenoise.co.uk...
> > Just wondering if Trump endorsing Boris and slagging Corbyn on LBC
> > yesterday will have the effect Trump (and Farage) intended?
>
> I doubt many in the UK give a damn about that the fool spews.

and you should know that feeling all to well.