On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:36:51 +0000, Graham <m...@privacy.net.invalid>
wrote in <
7b72b851jkqn1m0q8...@4ax.com>:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:50:08 +0000 (UTC), "Ivan D. Reid"
><
Ivan...@ivan.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> Sometime last winter I noticed that my CH thermostat had changed
>>its behaviour. Instead of being on for ~10 minutes and off for ~20, it
>>would run the heating for ~40 seconds, then off for ~2 minutes. It was as
>>if it somehow lost its hysteresis. Given that it's an all-electronic
>>system (Drayton RTS1) I suppose it's possible that, e.g., an electrolytic
>>capacitor has dried out (or leaked). Is this a common problem?
> Hi Ivan.
> Despite having a thermistor for a sensor rather than a bimetal strip,
> it would appear that the electronics in these thermostats is very
> rudimentary, and they use a resistor as an accelerator heater to
> counter the hysteresis just like bimetal ones.
> Has the neutral connection gone O.C?
Hmm, interesting, I'll have to check if it's still short-changing.
The most logical place for neutral to go o/c would be where the controller
plugs into the backplate, and I broke and re-made that connection several
times this afternoon.
> On a conventional thermostat, the only purpose the neutral serves is a
> return for the anti hysteresis heater.
OTOH, the manual talks about it being double-insulated and it
needs to get a return path for the live current to power the electronics
(and activate the relay).
> I am aware you are complaining of *too little* hysteresis so I am
> probably barking up the wrong tree as usual.
It's all hypothesis until I fit a replacement.
> PDF manual here:
>
http://snipurl.com/25ovkml
Thanks; I already had that but can't find anything more detailed
as regards circuit information and mechanical details.
> Ed. note.
> Forte Agent spell checker insists hysteresis is spelled "shysters".
...as one does...