On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 19:45:48 +0200, Laszlo Lebrun
<
lazlo_...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>On 19.07.2014 18:02, Molly Mockford wrote:
>
>> I was taught at school that the default for a g was the hard
>> pronunciation, but an e or an i after the g softened it. If it was
>> necessary to have a hard g with an otherwise-softening vowel following,
>> a u would be inserted, as in guide or guess.
>>
>+1
>> I have always pronounced longitude with a soft g, but I have frequently
>> heard it pronounced with a hard one. But then, I've also heard
>> longevity pronounced with a hard instead of a soft g, which I am sure is
>> incorrect.
>+1
>> I wonder whether there is any correlation with those who say
>> "sing-ger" rather than "sing-er"?
>
>Singer with a soft "g" is incorrect. Sing-ger too.
"Singer" with a soft-g is correct if the word refers to a person or
something who "singes": burns superficially.
I assume that Molly is using "sing-ger" to represent the pronunciation
in which a hard-g is used in the same way as in "finger". That
pronunciation is used in parts of England.
http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?t=2823655&s=2ff68334f9b19557cb343a1fd64b2269&p=14270323#post14270323
"Singer" is pronounced /'s??g?/ in a zone that runs from Lancashire
via Cheshire and Staffordshire to the Black Country and Birmingham
(UK). This is not a "substandard" pronunciation (linguistics doesn't
use the word "substandard", since no sound is intrinsically inferior
to any other) but a redoubt of a pronunciation that once extended
over a wider area. In fact, Peter Trudgill, in "The Dialects of
England", says: This is the original English pronunciation.