On 21 May 2022, T wrote
(in article <t6bq3c$6sn$
3...@dont-email.me>):
Either he’s legit, in which case he doesn’t need to prove anything to
John Public (just to MS) or he’s not, in which case MS will get upset and
the keys will be revoked. And, if he’s not legit, it’s trivial to
generate a nice official-looking document. Do you know what kind of
documentation MS requires for those who sell on excess license keys? I do...
and it’s trivial to set up exact copies in Publish (easier in a _real_
desktop publishing app, of course, like Quark or InDesign) and such copies
would be nearly impossible to detect... until MS revokes the license.
Basically, you can either believe he’s legit or not. If he is, you get
cheap MS software. If he isn’t, you get cheap MS software for a while,
until MS revokes the key. Depending on what software it is, MS may never
bother revoking the key; older copies of Office and Windows, for example, are
no longer supported, which means that the license key servers are turned off
at MS. I have some perfectly legit Vista keys, purchased from MS over a
decade ago, by the guy who had my job before I got it. They can’t be used
directly, as the Vista key servers are turned off. I can and have contacted
MS and used a few as Win 10 keys. Or, rather, MS gave me new keys that worked
with Win 10, the Vista servers are off and will stay off. Several older
machines have been upgraded to the extent that the old key breaks; a call to
MS fixes that. (I made it quite clear that I wasn’t paying even one penny
more, and that it was a choice of them updating the key so it worked or my
putting Ubuntu on the old box, either way MS wasn’t getting any more money.
They updated the key. The fact that the company has a _lot_ of licenses for
Windows and Office had something to do with that; we’re a _large_ customer.
John Public at home might have had a bit more trouble, though.)