Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

New Apple mice - any experience updates?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 4:45:53 PM11/25/09
to
Flavio, Elliott, anyone else? How are you finding them?

--
bellajonez at yahoo dot co dot uk

Elliott Roper

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 5:19:49 PM11/25/09
to
In article <1j9rb3h.1hxefqq10rf93pN%m...@privacy.net>, Bella Jones
<m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Flavio, Elliott, anyone else? How are you finding them?

I love it. I loved my Mighty Mouse, but oh, you Magic!

The only niggle is that on rare occasions the scroll is a smidge too
sensitive, and I get a slight upward scrolling movement as I bring my
paw up to the mouse to move it, even before I make contact with it.
Presumably when my fingers are in Coulomb view.

The momentum stuff is quite addictive.

--
To de-mung my e-mail address:- fsnospam$elliott$$
PGP Fingerprint: 1A96 3CF7 637F 896B C810 E199 7E5C A9E4 8E59 E248

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 2:08:59 AM11/26/09
to
Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Flavio, Elliott, anyone else? How are you finding them?

Been using it for a week now, and I'm loving it.

But be warned - I have an untypically good track record with Apple mice.

It has the same 'click' charactistics as the Mighty Mouse, ie you have
to lift your finger off to right-click. If this bothers you, you won't
like it.

Jim
--
http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk http://twitter.com/GreyAreaUK
Please help save Bletchley Park - sign the petition for
Government funding at: (open to UK residents and ex.pats)
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/BletchleyPark/ Thank you.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 2:19:04 AM11/26/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> charactistics

Oh, good Lord....

Jim
--
"Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good
product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious
understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some
slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 2:28:42 AM11/26/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> It has the same 'click' charactistics as the Mighty Mouse, ie you have
> to lift your finger off to right-click. If this bothers you, you won't
> like it.

Thanks for that.

In the Apple Store, when we were playing with them, they seemed pretty
nice, but that one 'feature' would stop me buying one. This is a purely
personal preference, but it's what makes the Mighty Mouse unusable for
me, except as a one button mouse which is really not what I want.

But that's just software. I'll wait to see how they develop it.
--
Peter

Sara Merriman

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 2:44:22 AM11/26/09
to
In article <1j9s1ud.ed5ijxrzokbvN%pe...@cara.demon.co.uk>,
pe...@cara.demon.co.uk (Peter Ceresole) wrote:

Oddly, my boss has one and loves it, except that he can't find a way for
it to act as a one-button mouse. It doesn't matter how many people wax
lyrical about the benefits of >1 button, that's all he wants. Other than
that he loves it enough to buy another to use on his Mac at home.

--
Sara

Cuddler of rats, cats and husband

Woody

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 3:08:26 AM11/26/09
to
Peter Ceresole <pe...@cara.demon.co.uk> wrote:

I don't know if it isn't actually the firmware on the mouse rather than
the driver, and I doubt that is upgradable. And as that is the same
fault as the mighty mouse, I don't see that they will update it.

Having said that, maybe someone will copy the good bits?


--
Woody

www.alienrat.com

Chris Ridd

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 3:24:06 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26 07:44:22 +0000, Sara Merriman said:

> Oddly, my boss has one and loves it, except that he can't find a way

> forit to act as a one-button mouse.

Isn't that the default configuration?
--
Chris

Hans Sluiman

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 6:06:47 AM11/26/09
to

Yes. I received mine yesterday along with the 27" i5, and although I was
initially somewhat sceptical (not having seen/touched it in real life
before), it is actually the best mouse that I've ever used. I used the
default configuration for an hour or so, but then decided to activate
the right-click mode. Works great for me.

Hans

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 6:13:49 AM11/26/09
to

I _think_ it tries to match itself to what your Mighty Mouse config was. I
don't recall having to activate 2nd click.

I'd imagine that if you weren't previously using a Mighty Mouse then it
would default to a single-button configuration.

My Oasis of Calm has dried up. However, my Garden of Angry is
flourishing quite nicely.

Sara

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 7:17:23 AM11/26/09
to
In article <7n6s96F...@mid.individual.net>,
Chris Ridd <chri...@mac.com> wrote:

Sadly no, and there's no obvious way to tell it to use both sides as
"primary button".

Sara

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 7:25:08 AM11/26/09
to
In article <bjtPm.8871$Ym4....@text.news.virginmedia.com>,
Hans Sluiman <n...@this.address> wrote:

Hmmm. Wonder why that wasn't an option here?

Sara

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 7:26:23 AM11/26/09
to
In article <slrnhgson...@wotan.magrathea.local>,
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-11-26, Chris Ridd <chri...@mac.com> wrote:
> > On 2009-11-26 07:44:22 +0000, Sara Merriman said:
> >
> >> Oddly, my boss has one and loves it, except that he can't find a way
> >> forit to act as a one-button mouse.
> >
> > Isn't that the default configuration?
>
> I _think_ it tries to match itself to what your Mighty Mouse config was. I
> don't recall having to activate 2nd click.
>
> I'd imagine that if you weren't previously using a Mighty Mouse then it
> would default to a single-button configuration.
>
> Jim

Argh. Yes, his previous mouse was a two-button one. Now, how the blazes
to change it.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 7:29:44 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Oddly, my boss has one and loves it, except that he can't find a way
>> >> forit to act as a one-button mouse.
>> >
>> > Isn't that the default configuration?
>>
>> I _think_ it tries to match itself to what your Mighty Mouse config was. I
>> don't recall having to activate 2nd click.
>>
>> I'd imagine that if you weren't previously using a Mighty Mouse then it
>> would default to a single-button configuration.
>>
>> Jim
>
> Argh. Yes, his previous mouse was a two-button one. Now, how the blazes
> to change it.
>

What options are there under 'secondary click' (or whatever it's called) ?

Elliott Roper

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 8:35:21 AM11/26/09
to
In article <slrnhgst5...@wotan.magrathea.local>, Jim
<j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-11-26, Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Oddly, my boss has one and loves it, except that he can't find a way
> >> >> forit to act as a one-button mouse.
> >> >
> >> > Isn't that the default configuration?
> >>
> >> I _think_ it tries to match itself to what your Mighty Mouse config was. I
> >> don't recall having to activate 2nd click.
> >>
> >> I'd imagine that if you weren't previously using a Mighty Mouse then it
> >> would default to a single-button configuration.
> >>
> >> Jim
> >
> > Argh. Yes, his previous mouse was a two-button one. Now, how the blazes
> > to change it.
> >
>
> What options are there under 'secondary click' (or whatever it's called) ?

That's it. Untick "One finger/secondary click" and you have a one
button mouse.

I use it with my left hand. Like the mighty Mouse before it, it becomes
far better behaved for us southpaws by setting the secondary click to
the left.
That has the side benefit of confusing the b'Jasus out of anybody
playing in my account.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 8:52:20 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Elliott Roper <nos...@yrl.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> What options are there under 'secondary click' (or whatever it's called) ?
>
> That's it. Untick "One finger/secondary click" and you have a one
> button mouse.
>
> I use it with my left hand. Like the mighty Mouse before it, it becomes
> far better behaved for us southpaws by setting the secondary click to
> the left.
> That has the side benefit of confusing the b'Jasus out of anybody
> playing in my account.

SWMBO goes one further - she's right-handed, but uses her mice in a
left-handed configuration.

She cooks a *damn* fine duck though, otherwise I'd probably have to shoot
her.

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:01:51 AM11/26/09
to
Elliott Roper <nos...@yrl.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <1j9rb3h.1hxefqq10rf93pN%m...@privacy.net>, Bella Jones
> <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
> > Flavio, Elliott, anyone else? How are you finding them?
>
> I love it. I loved my Mighty Mouse, but oh, you Magic!
>
> The only niggle is that on rare occasions the scroll is a smidge too
> sensitive, and I get a slight upward scrolling movement as I bring my
> paw up to the mouse to move it, even before I make contact with it.
> Presumably when my fingers are in Coulomb view.
>
> The momentum stuff is quite addictive.

Yep, subscribe to all that.

See whether it lasts or develops quirks, as all machinery is wont to do,
but for the time being it is luverly. I mentioned elsewhere that I was
fearing not being able to easily adjust to the different holding
position required for the mouse (normally I grab the mouse with the
whole palm, rest both fingers all the time, etc), but I took to it
straight away and didn't have to think about it.

Once in a while it does interpret grabbing the mouse as a scroll; once
or twice it hasn't responded to a scrolling movement, but in general it
works beautifully and -well, what else, it's a mouse, it works as
advertised.

--
flavio matani
guitar tuition
http://www.flaviomatani.co.uk
http://fflavio.com

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:06:08 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:
>
> Once in a while it does interpret grabbing the mouse as a scroll; once
> or twice it hasn't responded to a scrolling movement, but in general it
> works beautifully and -well, what else, it's a mouse, it works as
> advertised.

Do you find that there's a tiny, *tiny* delay between moving the mouse and
the pointer moving, if the mouse has been untouched for a couple of seconds?

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:06:35 AM11/26/09
to
Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Flavio, Elliott, anyone else? How are you finding them?

I love it. Well, that might be putting it a little too strongly, it's
only a mouse, but it is luverly.

If you want I can lend it to you for a day or two so you get a better
idea whether you want one -if you have bluetooth in your iMac.

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:06:34 AM11/26/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
> > charactistics
>
> Oh, good Lord....
>

character tic ticks?

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:07:37 AM11/26/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-11-26, Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > Once in a while it does interpret grabbing the mouse as a scroll; once
> > or twice it hasn't responded to a scrolling movement, but in general it
> > works beautifully and -well, what else, it's a mouse, it works as
> > advertised.
>
> Do you find that there's a tiny, *tiny* delay between moving the mouse and
> the pointer moving, if the mouse has been untouched for a couple of seconds?
>

Not for the pointer to move but if I reach down to scroll straight away
yes, a little bit sometimes.

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:30:24 AM11/26/09
to
Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:

> Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
> > Flavio, Elliott, anyone else? How are you finding them?
>
> I love it. Well, that might be putting it a little too strongly, it's
> only a mouse, but it is luverly.
>
> If you want I can lend it to you for a day or two so you get a better
> idea whether you want one -if you have bluetooth in your iMac.

Eh? Is it bluetooth only?

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:50:09 AM11/26/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> She cooks a *damn* fine duck though, otherwise I'd probably have to shoot
> her.

Having met her I'd say that would be a criminal waste. If needs, just
pass her on...
--
Peter

Sara

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:50:54 AM11/26/09
to
In article <slrnhgst5...@wotan.magrathea.local>,
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-11-26, Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Oddly, my boss has one and loves it, except that he can't find a way
> >> >> forit to act as a one-button mouse.
> >> >
> >> > Isn't that the default configuration?
> >>
> >> I _think_ it tries to match itself to what your Mighty Mouse config was. I
> >> don't recall having to activate 2nd click.
> >>
> >> I'd imagine that if you weren't previously using a Mighty Mouse then it
> >> would default to a single-button configuration.
> >>
> >> Jim
> >
> > Argh. Yes, his previous mouse was a two-button one. Now, how the blazes
> > to change it.
> >
>
> What options are there under 'secondary click' (or whatever it's called) ?
>
> Jim

STOP PRESS!!! I went over to see what could be done (again) and he's
managed it. Apparently after downloading the magic mouse software update
jobbie, it now does what was expected.

So, basically, I lied. But I didn't mean to.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:01:56 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:
> Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>>
>> > charactistics
>>
>> Oh, good Lord....
>>
>
> character tic ticks?

The coffee _really_ doesn't kick in as early as it used to...

My Oasis of Calm has dried up. However, my Garden of Angry is
flourishing quite nicely.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:03:13 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:
> Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2009-11-26, Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Once in a while it does interpret grabbing the mouse as a scroll; once
>> > or twice it hasn't responded to a scrolling movement, but in general it
>> > works beautifully and -well, what else, it's a mouse, it works as
>> > advertised.
>>
>> Do you find that there's a tiny, *tiny* delay between moving the mouse and
>> the pointer moving, if the mouse has been untouched for a couple of seconds?
>>
>
> Not for the pointer to move but if I reach down to scroll straight away
> yes, a little bit sometimes.

Might be me just seeing something that isn't there, then. Pretty sure there
is the tiniest of delays though. Not a problem though.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:03:37 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>> I love it. Well, that might be putting it a little too strongly, it's
>> only a mouse, but it is luverly.
>>
>> If you want I can lend it to you for a day or two so you get a better
>> idea whether you want one -if you have bluetooth in your iMac.
>
> Eh? Is it bluetooth only?

'Fraid so.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:04:07 AM11/26/09
to

Then _she'd_ shoot _me_.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:04:44 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> STOP PRESS!!! I went over to see what could be done (again) and he's
> managed it. Apparently after downloading the magic mouse software update
> jobbie, it now does what was expected.
>
> So, basically, I lied. But I didn't mean to.

That's not lying. It's only lying if you know it to be false.

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:10:12 AM11/26/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-11-26, Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> I love it. Well, that might be putting it a little too strongly, it's
> >> only a mouse, but it is luverly.
> >>
> >> If you want I can lend it to you for a day or two so you get a better
> >> idea whether you want one -if you have bluetooth in your iMac.
> >
> > Eh? Is it bluetooth only?
>
> 'Fraid so.

But that's ridiculous. I'm sure the ones in the shop had wires, or where
they just for security? In that case, I don't think i can use it without
a dongle. I have an ancient one somewhere that I bought from James
Savage (RIP James) years ago.

I don't think this G4 has is automatically. My dongle is D-Link
DWB-120M.

HOw stupid. I thought no one used bluetooth any more.

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:12:11 AM11/26/09
to
Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

Yep - discontinued December 03!

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:14:16 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I love it. Well, that might be putting it a little too strongly, it's
>> >> only a mouse, but it is luverly.
>> >>
>> >> If you want I can lend it to you for a day or two so you get a better
>> >> idea whether you want one -if you have bluetooth in your iMac.
>> >
>> > Eh? Is it bluetooth only?
>>
>> 'Fraid so.
>
> But that's ridiculous. I'm sure the ones in the shop had wires, or where
> they just for security? In that case, I don't think i can use it without
> a dongle. I have an ancient one somewhere that I bought from James
> Savage (RIP James) years ago.

The Mighty Mouse (scroll pea) was available in wired and wireless versions.
So far as I can tell the Magic Mouse is wireless only. I'd have preferred a
wired version but there doesn't seem to be one.

> I don't think this G4 has is automatically. My dongle is D-Link
> DWB-120M.

I have no idea if that would work, sorry.

> HOw stupid. I thought no one used bluetooth any more.

Apple's wireless keyboards and mice use it.

Tim Streater

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:16:52 AM11/26/09
to
On 26/11/2009 15:10, Bella Jones wrote:
> Jim<j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2009-11-26, Bella Jones<m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I love it. Well, that might be putting it a little too strongly, it's
>>>> only a mouse, but it is luverly.
>>>>
>>>> If you want I can lend it to you for a day or two so you get a better
>>>> idea whether you want one -if you have bluetooth in your iMac.
>>>
>>> Eh? Is it bluetooth only?
>>
>> 'Fraid so.
>
> But that's ridiculous. I'm sure the ones in the shop had wires, or where
> they just for security?

'Fraid so, m'dear. Thass what I checked at the time.


--
Tim

"That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines
imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted"

Bill of Rights 1689

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:22:19 AM11/26/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> > So, basically, I lied. But I didn't mean to.
>
> That's not lying. It's only lying if you know it to be false.

But this is usenet, where the tiniest error is often labelled a lie. Or,
of course, an insult.

All to do with the degradation of language. Myself, I blame electrons.
--
Peter

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:25:07 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Peter Ceresole <pe...@cara.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> > So, basically, I lied. But I didn't mean to.
>>
>> That's not lying. It's only lying if you know it to be false.
>
> But this is usenet, where the tiniest error is often labelled a lie. Or,
> of course, an insult.

I think she might have been sneering as well. The minx.

> All to do with the degradation of language. Myself, I blame electrons.

I blame pear trees. They're up to something.

Elliott Roper

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:25:41 AM11/26/09
to
In article <1j9snsn.xz7ktj1o2jprxN%pe...@cara.demon.co.uk>, Peter
Ceresole <pe...@cara.demon.co.uk> wrote:

What a negative view!

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:27:09 AM11/26/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-11-26, Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Eh? Is it bluetooth only?
> >>
> >> 'Fraid so.
> >
> > But that's ridiculous. I'm sure the ones in the shop had wires, or where
> > they just for security? In that case, I don't think i can use it without
> > a dongle. I have an ancient one somewhere that I bought from James
> > Savage (RIP James) years ago.
>
> The Mighty Mouse (scroll pea) was available in wired and wireless versions.
> So far as I can tell the Magic Mouse is wireless only. I'd have preferred a
> wired version but there doesn't seem to be one.

Wanktards.



> > I don't think this G4 has is automatically. My dongle is D-Link
> > DWB-120M.
>
> I have no idea if that would work, sorry.

I was just typing it out for my own reference, and in a small rage. :-)



> > HOw stupid. I thought no one used bluetooth any more.
>
> Apple's wireless keyboards and mice use it.

Do people even use dongles any more? I mean, I could buy one but that is
what 20 quid on top of the mouse? Am now furtling.

Arseflaps of doom.

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:28:16 AM11/26/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-11-26, Peter Ceresole <pe...@cara.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > So, basically, I lied. But I didn't mean to.
> >>
> >> That's not lying. It's only lying if you know it to be false.
> >
> > But this is usenet, where the tiniest error is often labelled a lie. Or,
> > of course, an insult.
>
> I think she might have been sneering as well. The minx.
>
> > All to do with the degradation of language. Myself, I blame electrons.
>
> I blame pear trees. They're up to something.

I blame that bottle of Stain Slayer over there on the kitchen top.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:28:58 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Elliott Roper <nos...@yrl.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > > So, basically, I lied. But I didn't mean to.
>> >
>> > That's not lying. It's only lying if you know it to be false.
>>
>> But this is usenet, where the tiniest error is often labelled a lie. Or,
>> of course, an insult.
>>
>> All to do with the degradation of language. Myself, I blame electrons.
>
> What a negative view!
>

Please resist the erg to do this again or I'm going ohm.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:31:37 AM11/26/09
to

The big problem is that all Macs for the last 3-or-so years (at a guess)
have had bluetooth built in as standard.

You might well find your existing dongle works, but I can't think of a way
of testing it short of borrowing a Magic Mouse from some kind soul.

Sara

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:35:38 AM11/26/09
to
In article <slrnhgt68...@wotan.magrathea.local>,
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-11-26, Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > STOP PRESS!!! I went over to see what could be done (again) and he's
> > managed it. Apparently after downloading the magic mouse software update
> > jobbie, it now does what was expected.
> >
> > So, basically, I lied. But I didn't mean to.
>
> That's not lying. It's only lying if you know it to be false.
>
> Jim

Phew!

James Dore

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:36:46 AM11/26/09
to
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:28:58 -0000, Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-11-26, Elliott Roper <nos...@yrl.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> > > So, basically, I lied. But I didn't mean to.
>>> >
>>> > That's not lying. It's only lying if you know it to be false.
>>>
>>> But this is usenet, where the tiniest error is often labelled a lie.
>>> Or,
>>> of course, an insult.
>>>
>>> All to do with the degradation of language. Myself, I blame electrons.
>>
>> What a negative view!
>>
>
> Please resist the erg to do this again or I'm going ohm.
>
> Jim

Joule be sorry you started this, it has the potential to get rather
re-volting.

--
James Dore
New College IT Officer
james.dore@new / it-support@new

Sara

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:39:54 AM11/26/09
to
In article <1j9so3i.1kixzh81v4hso4N%m...@privacy.net>,
m...@privacy.net (Bella Jones) wrote:

Arseflaps be damned! I'll bring a BT dongle or two over too.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:40:58 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, James Dore <james...@new.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All to do with the degradation of language. Myself, I blame electrons.
>>>
>>> What a negative view!
>>
>> Please resist the erg to do this again or I'm going ohm.
>
> Joule be sorry you started this, it has the potential to get rather
> re-volting.

So I'm LED to believe, but I'll just have to solder on.

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:47:23 AM11/26/09
to
James Dore <james...@new.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> >>> All to do with the degradation of language. Myself, I blame electrons.
> >>
> >> What a negative view!
> >>
> >
> > Please resist the erg to do this again or I'm going ohm.
> >
> > Jim
>
> Joule be sorry you started this, it has the potential to get rather
> re-volting.

But only if you keep it going for coulomb.
--
Peter

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:47:23 AM11/26/09
to
Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> > > All to do with the degradation of language. Myself, I blame electrons.
> >
> > I blame pear trees. They're up to something.
>
> I blame that bottle of Stain Slayer over there on the kitchen top.

Nope. It's electrons. They have their own agenda, you know.
--
Peter

Chris Ridd

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:48:09 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26 15:03:13 +0000, Jim said:

> On 2009-11-26, Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:
>> Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2009-11-26, Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Once in a while it does interpret grabbing the mouse as a scroll; once
>>>> or twice it hasn't responded to a scrolling movement, but in general it
>>>> works beautifully and -well, what else, it's a mouse, it works as
>>>> advertised.
>>>
>>> Do you find that there's a tiny, *tiny* delay between moving the mouse and
>>> the pointer moving, if the mouse has been untouched for a couple of seconds?
>>>
>>
>> Not for the pointer to move but if I reach down to scroll straight away
>> yes, a little bit sometimes.
>
> Might be me just seeing something that isn't there, then. Pretty sure there
> is the tiniest of delays though. Not a problem though.

Sounds like a bit of Bluetooth latency, like the mouse is reconnecting
or something?
--
Chris

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:48:56 AM11/26/09
to
Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <1j9so3i.1kixzh81v4hso4N%m...@privacy.net>,
> m...@privacy.net (Bella Jones) wrote:

[...]


> >
> > Wanktards.
> >
> > > > I don't think this G4 has is automatically. My dongle is D-Link
> > > > DWB-120M.
> > >
> > > I have no idea if that would work, sorry.
> >
> > I was just typing it out for my own reference, and in a small rage. :-)
> >
> > > > HOw stupid. I thought no one used bluetooth any more.
> > >
> > > Apple's wireless keyboards and mice use it.
> >
> > Do people even use dongles any more? I mean, I could buy one but that is
> > what 20 quid on top of the mouse? Am now furtling.
> >
> > Arseflaps of doom.
>
> Arseflaps be damned! I'll bring a BT dongle or two over too.

Oh you are a honeybun! *kiss*

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:53:13 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Peter Ceresole <pe...@cara.demon.co.uk> wrote:

Oh, well played sir.

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:54:06 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Chris Ridd <chri...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not for the pointer to move but if I reach down to scroll straight away
>>> yes, a little bit sometimes.
>>
>> Might be me just seeing something that isn't there, then. Pretty sure there
>> is the tiniest of delays though. Not a problem though.
>
> Sounds like a bit of Bluetooth latency, like the mouse is reconnecting
> or something?

I think it's the mouse waking up. I think it sleeps very, very quickly.

Jaimie Vandenbergh

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:55:19 AM11/26/09
to
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:03:13 +0000, Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com>
wrote:

>On 2009-11-26, Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:
>> Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2009-11-26, Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Once in a while it does interpret grabbing the mouse as a scroll; once
>>> > or twice it hasn't responded to a scrolling movement, but in general it
>>> > works beautifully and -well, what else, it's a mouse, it works as
>>> > advertised.
>>>
>>> Do you find that there's a tiny, *tiny* delay between moving the mouse and
>>> the pointer moving, if the mouse has been untouched for a couple of seconds?
>>>
>>
>> Not for the pointer to move but if I reach down to scroll straight away
>> yes, a little bit sometimes.
>
>Might be me just seeing something that isn't there, then. Pretty sure there
>is the tiniest of delays though. Not a problem though.

I'm sure it will exist - it's the bluetooth waking up, and it's
working-as-designed. Otherwise the battery goes flat.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
"Please stop telling us what you feel. Please stop telling us what your
intuition is. Your intuitive feelings are of no interest whatsoever,
and nor are mine. I don't give a bugger what you feel, or what I feel.
I want to know what the evidence shows." -- Richard Dawkins

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:59:26 AM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26, Jaimie Vandenbergh <jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>>
>>Might be me just seeing something that isn't there, then. Pretty sure there
>>is the tiniest of delays though. Not a problem though.
>
> I'm sure it will exist - it's the bluetooth waking up, and it's
> working-as-designed. Otherwise the battery goes flat.

My thoughts as well. I only saw it because it took a _wee_ bit longer than
normal, once, and I started looking for it.

I repeat though, not a problem.

Sara

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 11:49:32 AM11/26/09
to
In article <1j9sp7u.1sx6mvma94a4N%m...@privacy.net>,
m...@privacy.net (Bella Jones) wrote:

> Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > In article <1j9so3i.1kixzh81v4hso4N%m...@privacy.net>,
> > m...@privacy.net (Bella Jones) wrote:
> [...]
> > >
> > > Wanktards.
> > >
> > > > > I don't think this G4 has is automatically. My dongle is D-Link
> > > > > DWB-120M.
> > > >
> > > > I have no idea if that would work, sorry.
> > >
> > > I was just typing it out for my own reference, and in a small rage. :-)
> > >
> > > > > HOw stupid. I thought no one used bluetooth any more.
> > > >
> > > > Apple's wireless keyboards and mice use it.
> > >
> > > Do people even use dongles any more? I mean, I could buy one but that is
> > > what 20 quid on top of the mouse? Am now furtling.
> > >
> > > Arseflaps of doom.
> >
> > Arseflaps be damned! I'll bring a BT dongle or two over too.
>
> Oh you are a honeybun! *kiss*

**simper**

Pd

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 11:51:16 AM11/26/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> It's only lying if you know it to be false.

My first wife used to win at Scrabble with words that didn't exist. She
maintained you could use a word if you genuinely believed it to be a
real word.

I think she single-handedly keeps Tinkerbell and the Tooth Fairy alive.

--
Pd

Jim

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 11:59:01 AM11/26/09
to

heh.

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 2:09:39 PM11/26/09
to
Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <1j9sp7u.1sx6mvma94a4N%m...@privacy.net>,
> m...@privacy.net (Bella Jones) wrote:
>
> > Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <1j9so3i.1kixzh81v4hso4N%m...@privacy.net>,
> > > m...@privacy.net (Bella Jones) wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Wanktards.
> > > >
> > > > > > I don't think this G4 has is automatically. My dongle is D-Link
> > > > > > DWB-120M.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have no idea if that would work, sorry.
> > > >
> > > > I was just typing it out for my own reference, and in a small rage. :-)
> > > >
> > > > > > HOw stupid. I thought no one used bluetooth any more.
> > > > >
> > > > > Apple's wireless keyboards and mice use it.
> > > >
> > > > Do people even use dongles any more? I mean, I could buy one but that is
> > > > what 20 quid on top of the mouse? Am now furtling.
> > > >
> > > > Arseflaps of doom.
> > >
> > > Arseflaps be damned! I'll bring a BT dongle or two over too.
> >
> > Oh you are a honeybun! *kiss*
>
> **simper**

I will repeat the offer justin case now that the scope of the enquiry
has widened: Do you want to try out the magicke moose with that dongle
and see whether d) it works with your machine and dongle and b) whether
you could get to like it or hate it?

--
flavio matani
guitar tuition
http://www.flaviomatani.co.uk
http://fflavio.com

zoara

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 2:28:17 PM11/26/09
to

That's *not* a good alternative to booze, Bella.

Actually, Stain Slayer sounds like a strong (as in taste, not alcohol
level) locally brewed stout. Yum yum yum.

-zoara-

--
email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm

Pd

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 3:09:08 PM11/26/09
to
zoara <me...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Actually, Stain Slayer sounds like a strong (as in taste, not alcohol
> level) locally brewed stout. Yum yum yum.

I had one in your neck of the woods called Hung, Drawn & Portered.

--
Pd

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 3:21:40 PM11/26/09
to
Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:

> Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Arseflaps of doom.
> > > >
> > > > Arseflaps be damned! I'll bring a BT dongle or two over too.
> > >
> > > Oh you are a honeybun! *kiss*
> >
> > **simper**
>
> I will repeat the offer justin case now that the scope of the enquiry
> has widened: Do you want to try out the magicke moose with that dongle
> and see whether d) it works with your machine and dongle and b) whether
> you could get to like it or hate it?

oh good point i was thinking more of a lend. but actually as i haven't
decided what to do about the mouse yet - and it's 55 quid = i might hold
off. but thanks....

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 3:22:34 PM11/26/09
to
Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:

> Sara <sarame...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > > > > Arseflaps of doom.
> > > >
> > > > Arseflaps be damned! I'll bring a BT dongle or two over too.
> > >
> > > Oh you are a honeybun! *kiss*
> >
> > **simper**
>
> I will repeat the offer justin case now that the scope of the enquiry
> has widened: Do you want to try out the magicke moose with that dongle
> and see whether d) it works with your machine and dongle and b) whether
> you could get to like it or hate it?

sorry i thought i was repling to sara! actually don't worry - i really
shouldn't be spending that now anyway

Chris Ridd

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 3:23:21 PM11/26/09
to
On 2009-11-26 20:21:40 +0000, Bella Jones said:

> oh good point i was thinking more of a lend. but actually as i haven't
> decided what to do about the mouse yet - and it's 55 quid = i might hold
> off. but thanks....

It'll be a bit cheaper tomorrow.
--
Chris

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 3:41:10 PM11/26/09
to
Chris Ridd <chri...@mac.com> wrote:

i didn't get the wonderousness of 'apple special shopping day' - i saw
no discounts on the email i got. was i being a tard?

zoara

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 3:53:28 PM11/26/09
to

Heh. A friend of mine sometimes brews his own beer, and always names
them. One of them was called "Follow Through".

Actually, if you're in the Cotswolds again, I highly recommend seeking
out beers from Uley Brewery, particularly Pig's Ear, which is a right
tasty pint:

http://www.uleybrewery.com/ales_pigs_ear.htm

Chris Ridd

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 5:05:41 PM11/26/09
to

No, just early. The special prices are from midnight tonight.
--
Chris

Pd

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 5:35:19 PM11/26/09
to
zoara <me...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Heh. A friend of mine sometimes brews his own beer, and always names
> them. One of them was called "Follow Through".

Um, ew. That reminds me of the Joel Veitch song "Anal Leakage".


> Actually, if you're in the Cotswolds again, I highly recommend seeking
> out beers from Uley Brewery, particularly Pig's Ear, which is a right
> tasty pint:

I shall. And I shall also impose upon you for a nice cup of tea and a
sit down.

--
Pd

Chris Ridd

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 1:23:34 AM11/27/09
to

But sadly, the Magic Mouse is still £55 today. Mophies (for you iPhone
chaps) are reduced.

<http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/campaigns/holiday/giftguide/black_friday>
--
Chris

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 4:27:20 AM11/27/09
to
Chris Ridd <chri...@mac.com> wrote:

> On 2009-11-26 22:05:41 +0000, Chris Ridd said:
>
> > On 2009-11-26 20:41:10 +0000, Bella Jones said:
> >
> >> Chris Ridd <chri...@mac.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2009-11-26 20:21:40 +0000, Bella Jones said:
> >>>
> >>>> oh good point i was thinking more of a lend. but actually as i haven't
> >>>> decided what to do about the mouse yet - and it's 55 quid = i might hold
> >>>> off. but thanks....
> >>>
> >>> It'll be a bit cheaper tomorrow.
> >>
> >> i didn't get the wonderousness of 'apple special shopping day' - i saw
> >> no discounts on the email i got. was i being a tard?
> >
> > No, just early. The special prices are from midnight tonight.
>
> But sadly, the Magic Mouse is still �55 today. Mophies (for you iPhone
> chaps) are reduced.
>
> <http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/campaigns/holiday/giftguide/black_friday>

I say again Wanktards!

Woody

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 4:41:18 AM11/27/09
to
"Chris Ridd" <chri...@mac.com> wrote in message
news:7n8cdlF...@mid.individual.net...

And on the grand scheme of special, they err.. weren't very!

--
Woody

zoara

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 1:16:33 PM11/27/09
to
Pd <peter...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> zoara <me...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
> > Heh. A friend of mine sometimes brews his own beer, and always names
> > them. One of them was called "Follow Through".
>
> Um, ew. That reminds me of the Joel Veitch song "Anal Leakage".

We all had the same reaction when he told us. None of us got the chance
to try the beer in question - not sure I would have wanted to...


> > Actually, if you're in the Cotswolds again, I highly recommend
> > seeking
> > out beers from Uley Brewery, particularly Pig's Ear, which is a
> > right
> > tasty pint:
>
> I shall. And I shall also impose upon you for a nice cup of tea and a
> sit down.

You're welcome. So is anyone else, if they find themselves in or near
Stroud...

0 new messages