Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Chrome - Intel only!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Bella Jones

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 2:28:59 PM12/13/09
to
Sod that.

--
bellajonez at yahoo dot co dot uk

Woody

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 3:21:54 PM12/13/09
to
Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Sod that.

It is quite nice though!

--
Woody

www.alienrat.com

J.J. O'Shea

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 3:44:30 PM12/13/09
to
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:21:54 -0500, Woody wrote
(in article <1jaoj1h.1f30zld1pblb8pN%use...@alienrat.co.uk>):

> Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> Sod that.
>
> It is quite nice though!
>
>

It is fairly nice. However, for those who don't have Little Snitch (and why
don't you?) you should know that Chrome installs a little bundle which calls
home to the Chocolate Factory every ever so often. It's inside
~/Library/Google/GoogleSoftwareUpdate. It calls home, or at least tries to and
would have succeeded if I hadn't had Little Snitch installed, whether or not
you have prefs set for autoupdate and if you delete it, the next time you run
Chrome it's re-installed.

--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.

Chris Ridd

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 4:15:01 PM12/13/09
to

If it is like the Google Earth phoner-home, you can fool it by leaving
the launchd job installed, but disabled. Lingon can disable them.
--
Chris

Pd

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 4:40:39 PM12/13/09
to
Chris Ridd <chri...@mac.com> wrote:

> If it is like the Google Earth phoner-home, you can fool it by leaving
> the launchd job installed, but disabled. Lingon can disable them.

It sucks that Google say you must run their updater in the background to
continue using Google Earth. Why not just run the updater when you run
the program? Why does it have to be constantly running in the
background?

--
Pd

J.J. O'Shea

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 5:11:56 PM12/13/09
to
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:40:39 -0500, Pd wrote
(in article <1jaomru.opvn7o6owbvgN%peter...@gmail.invalid>):

I donno. I just removed Google Earth and that was the end of that.

Flavio Matani

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 4:31:51 AM12/14/09
to
Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Sod that.


It's that 27" iMac calling, whispering your name, singing from beyond
the waves...


--
flavio matani
guitar tuition
http://www.flaviomatani.co.uk
http://fflavio.com

Woody

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 4:33:49 AM12/14/09
to
Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:

> Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
> > Sod that.
>
>
> It's that 27" iMac calling, whispering your name, singing from beyond
> the waves...

What waves? Camden Lock?

--
Woody

Jim

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 4:37:35 AM12/14/09
to
On 2009-12-14, Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > Sod that.
>>
>>
>> It's that 27" iMac calling, whispering your name, singing from beyond
>> the waves...
>
> What waves? Camden Lock?

That can get quite choppy in a stiff breeze.

Jim
--
http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk http://twitter.com/GreyAreaUK
"A Microsoft spokesman said: "We spent five years and $350million
developing a system that would make it really easy for us not to
give you your money back." The Daily Mash

Bella Jones

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 6:07:09 AM12/14/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-12-14, Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Sod that.
> >>
> >>
> >> It's that 27" iMac calling, whispering your name, singing from beyond
> >> the waves...
> >
> > What waves? Camden Lock?
>
> That can get quite choppy in a stiff breeze.

A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
which would be cheaper.

Jim

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 6:11:29 AM12/14/09
to
On 2009-12-14, Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
> A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
> which would be cheaper.

Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor whenever you
wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.

I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine. Only bad
thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch DVDs. Apart
from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.

Jim

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 6:12:28 AM12/14/09
to
On 2009-12-14, Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
> On 2009-12-14, Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>> A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
>> which would be cheaper.
>
> Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor whenever you
> wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.
>
> I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine. Only bad
> thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch DVDs. Apart
> from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.

I should point out that the machine itself is whisper quiet. It's only the
optical drive that's a bit "whooooosh"-y.

Woody

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 6:35:02 AM12/14/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-12-14, Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
> > On 2009-12-14, Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
> >> which would be cheaper.
> >
> > Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor whenever you
> > wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.
> >
> > I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine.
> > Only bad thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch
> > DVDs. Apart from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.
>
> I should point out that the machine itself is whisper quiet. It's only the
> optical drive that's a bit "whooooosh"-y.

Quiet is good, if you can put up with the space. I have a new PC which
is a i7 860, so appears as an 8 core and was amazed at how quiet it was.

I still do have my G4/dp1.25 which is the same volume level as sitting
in heavy traffic!

--
Woody

Jim

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 6:40:19 AM12/14/09
to
On 2009-12-14, Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
>> >> which would be cheaper.
>> >
>> > Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor whenever you
>> > wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.
>> >
>> > I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine.
>> > Only bad thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch
>> > DVDs. Apart from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.
>>
>> I should point out that the machine itself is whisper quiet. It's only the
>> optical drive that's a bit "whooooosh"-y.
>
> Quiet is good, if you can put up with the space. I have a new PC which
> is a i7 860, so appears as an 8 core and was amazed at how quiet it was.
>
> I still do have my G4/dp1.25 which is the same volume level as sitting
> in heavy traffic!

Quite a lot of that noise is probably coming from the big fan at the back. I
replaced mine with one from Dorothy Bradbury and the noise level halved at
least.

If you do the same then be sure to point out it's for a Mac - the polarity
needs reversing. How ironic is that?

Bella Jones

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 6:40:50 AM12/14/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-12-14, Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> >
> > A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
> > which would be cheaper.
>
> Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor whenever you
> wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.
>
> I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine. Only bad
> thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch DVDs. Apart
> from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.

Hmm, maybe I should look at this...

Jim

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 6:42:50 AM12/14/09
to
On 2009-12-14, Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
>> > which would be cheaper.
>>
>> Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor whenever you
>> wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.
>>
>> I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine. Only bad
>> thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch DVDs. Apart
>> from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.
>
> Hmm, maybe I should look at this...

Installing extra hard drives is a doddle as well.

Woody

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 6:46:28 AM12/14/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-12-14, Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
> >> >> which would be cheaper.
> >> >
> >> > Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor
> >> > whenever you wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.
> >> >
> >> > I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine.
> >> > Only bad thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch
> >> > DVDs. Apart from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.
> >>
> >> I should point out that the machine itself is whisper quiet. It's only the
> >> optical drive that's a bit "whooooosh"-y.
> >
> > Quiet is good, if you can put up with the space. I have a new PC which
> > is a i7 860, so appears as an 8 core and was amazed at how quiet it was.
> >
> > I still do have my G4/dp1.25 which is the same volume level as sitting
> > in heavy traffic!
>
> Quite a lot of that noise is probably coming from the big fan at the back. I
> replaced mine with one from Dorothy Bradbury and the noise level halved at
> least.
>
> If you do the same then be sure to point out it's for a Mac - the polarity
> needs reversing. How ironic is that?

Its an old machine that I dont use anymore, and really should just stick
it on ebay for a few beans, so probably not worth the effort.

--
Woody

Jim

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 6:47:52 AM12/14/09
to
On 2009-12-14, Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Its an old machine that I dont use anymore, and really should just stick
> it on ebay for a few beans, so probably not worth the effort.
>

How much do they fetch nowadays?

Woody

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 6:57:26 AM12/14/09
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2009-12-14, Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Its an old machine that I dont use anymore, and really should just stick
> > it on ebay for a few beans, so probably not worth the effort.
> >
>
> How much do they fetch nowadays?

I haven't looked but I can't imagine it would be much.


--
Woody

Jim

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 7:00:00 AM12/14/09
to
On 2009-12-14, Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
> Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2009-12-14, Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > Its an old machine that I dont use anymore, and really should just stick
>> > it on ebay for a few beans, so probably not worth the effort.
>> >
>>
>> How much do they fetch nowadays?
>
> I haven't looked but I can't imagine it would be much.

A quick furtle on eBay seems to suggest just that, although I didn't find a
1.25GHz machine in my admittedly brief furtle.

Chris Ridd

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 8:20:07 AM12/14/09
to
On 2009-12-14 11:11:29 +0000, Jim said:

> On 2009-12-14, Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>> A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
>> which would be cheaper.
>
> Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor whenever you
> wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.
>
> I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine. Only bad
> thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch DVDs. Apart
> from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.

What's the power consumption of the MacPros like, compared to an iMac?

--
Chris

Jim

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 8:29:17 AM12/14/09
to
On 2009-12-14, Chris Ridd <chri...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
>>> which would be cheaper.
>>
>> Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor whenever you
>> wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.
>>
>> I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine. Only bad
>> thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch DVDs. Apart
>> from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.
>
> What's the power consumption of the MacPros like, compared to an iMac?
>

I've no way of knowing, sorry.

Chris Ridd

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 8:50:11 AM12/14/09
to
On 2009-12-14 13:29:17 +0000, Jim said:

> On 2009-12-14, Chris Ridd <chri...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
>>>> which would be cheaper.
>>>
>>> Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor whenever you
>>> wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.
>>>
>>> I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine. Only bad
>>> thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch DVDs. Apart
>>> from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.
>>
>> What's the power consumption of the MacPros like, compared to an iMac?
>>
>
> I've no way of knowing, sorry.

There are two out of data KB articles:

<http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2836> and <http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3559>

The MacPro figures don't seem to include a monitor.

--
Chris

Flavio Matani

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 10:32:24 AM12/14/09
to
Chris Ridd <chri...@mac.com> wrote:

I was going to ask that, as I've seen people (here or elsewhere, can't
remember now) saying that they did use up a lot of power. Interesting,
though. It does look like you could use it to heat up the flat ...

Flavio Matani

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 10:32:48 AM12/14/09
to
Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:

Certainly not Google Waves...

Woody

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 10:50:56 AM12/14/09
to
Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:

> Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sod that.
> > >
> > >
> > > It's that 27" iMac calling, whispering your name, singing from beyond
> > > the waves...
> >
> > What waves? Camden Lock?
>
> Certainly not Google Waves...

Clearly not. If a google wave started whispering your name, it would
take a long time until it reached the end, and then you wouldn't be able
to find out where to edit it

--
Woody

Bruce Horrocks

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 12:10:41 PM12/14/09
to
Flavio Matani wrote:
> Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> Sod that.
>
>
> It's that 27" iMac calling, whispering your name, singing from beyond
> the waves...

Flavio, you're a very naughty man.

--
Bruce Horrocks
Surrey
England
(bruce at scorecrow dot com)

Message has been deleted

Flavio Matani

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 5:45:49 PM12/14/09
to
Fred Bambrough <fred@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:

> In message <hg3or...@news2.newsguy.com>

> Here's the fix;
>
> http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20090424045847496

Funnily (or is it 'funnest'?) the version (rather an old one I think) of
Google Earth that I have hasn't got those two files..

Rob

unread,
Dec 15, 2009, 7:53:07 AM12/15/09
to
On 14/12/2009 11:35, Woody wrote:
> Jim<j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2009-12-14, Jim<j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>>> On 2009-12-14, Bella Jones<m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A friend is suggesting I get a refurb tower-type thing and monitor,
>>>> which would be cheaper.
>>>
>>> Not a bad idea, actually. You'd be able to upgrade the monitor whenever you
>>> wanted without having to buy a whole new machine.
>>>
>>> I've got one of the towers (early 8-core) and it's a lovely machine.
>>> Only bad thing is the optical drive - it's too loud to use it to watch
>>> DVDs. Apart from that it runs 24/7 most of the time.
>>
>> I should point out that the machine itself is whisper quiet. It's only the
>> optical drive that's a bit "whooooosh"-y.
>
> Quiet is good, if you can put up with the space. I have a new PC which
> is a i7 860, so appears as an 8 core and was amazed at how quiet it was.
>

What brand PC pls?

Woody

unread,
Dec 15, 2009, 8:22:24 AM12/15/09
to

It was a mesh. Took them quite a while to deliver it, but it is a nice
machine, i7 860 (which is what I was looking for), 8gb ram, 2 x 1TB
disks, extra FireWire and graphics card upgrade, just under £900.
if you put it on your 'thinking about' list, they phone to offer you a
discount!


--
Woody

Martin S Taylor

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 6:45:33 AM12/16/09
to
Jim wrote

> Installing extra hard drives is a doddle as well.

I read that as "extra-hard drives".

MST

Jim

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 6:53:56 AM12/16/09
to

You need to get out more, mate :-)

Rob

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 7:06:04 AM12/16/09
to

Thanks - worth knowing!

Bella Jones

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 8:48:36 AM12/16/09
to
Martin S Taylor <m...@hRyEpMnOoVtEiTsHm.cIo.uSk> wrote:

*giggle*

whisky-dave

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 8:58:45 AM12/16/09
to

"Bella Jones" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:1jatl0k.1ge1aetc359bkN%m...@privacy.net...

> Martin S Taylor <m...@hRyEpMnOoVtEiTsHm.cIo.uSk> wrote:
>
>> Jim wrote
>> > Installing extra hard drives is a doddle as well.
>>
>> I read that as "extra-hard drives".
>
> *giggle*
>

It's all the viagra spam that causes that.


Jon B

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 6:28:59 AM12/17/09
to
Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Sod that.

And now Flash is going to become Intel only too...
--
Jon B
Above email address IS valid.
<http://www.bramley-computers.co.uk/> Apple Laptop Repairs.

0 new messages